Special Issue on Procedural Fairness - American Judges Association

More documents

Recommendations

Info

APPEARANCE OUTCOMEStipulation*Stipulation with finaljudgment*Order to show cause grantedOrder to show cause deniedAdjourned***DiscontinuedSet for trialUnsureTABLE 3: APPEARANCE OUTCOMEHARLEM49%26%7%1%8%8%2%0%V. PERCEPTION OF THE JUDGE AND COURTTenant perceptions of the judge were overwhelmingly favorablein both the Harlem and downtown housing courts,although on most measures those in Harlem tended to view thejudge somewhat more favorably than those downtown (Table6). Specifically, Harlem tenants were more likely to “stronglyagree” or “agree” that the judge:• treated them with respect (99% vs. 87% downtown);• carefully considered their input in making a decision(92% vs. 72% downtown);• listened to them (99% vs. 83% downtown);• treated them fairly (98% vs. 85% downtown); and• understood the facts of the case (99% vs. 81% down-DOWN-TOWN36%17%12%2%24%4%1%2%TOTAL43%22%9%2%15%6%2%1%AGREED TO PAY MONEY TOLANDLORD*** 69% 46% 59%*p
TABLE 5: TENANT PREPAREDNESS FOR ANDUNDERSTANDING OF THE COURT EXPERIENCEtown).HARLEMDOWN-TOWNTOTALFELT PREPARED FOR COURTAPPEARANCE*** 90% 73% 83%UNDERSTOOD WHATHAPPENED IN COURT*** 99% 90% 95%RECEIVED MATERIALS ABOUTTHE HOUSING COURTPROCESS43% 47% 45%+ Percentages refer to the percent “strongly agree” and “agree.” Otherchoices given were “neither agree not disagree,” “disagree,” and “stronglydisagree.”*** p
Page 1 and 2:
Court ReviewVolume 44, Issu
Page 3 and 4:
Court ReviewT H E J O U R N A L O F
Page 5 and 6: A WHITE PAPER OF THE AMERICAN JUDGE
Page 7: nomenon exists. 6 Thus, procedural
Page 10 and 11: THE PUBLIC EXPANDS THEIR KNOWLEDGE
Page 12 and 13: ception of the courts as long as pe
Page 14 and 15: or also because they are more famil
Page 16 and 17: PERCEPTIONS OF PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS
Page 18 and 19: up to the courtroom, but also the w
Page 20 and 21: 3. Judicial education must include
Page 22 and 23: Society Faculty Working Papers, Pap
Page 24 and 25: ABOUT THE AMERICAN JUDGES ASSOCIATI
Page 26 and 27: from outcomes and toward the proced
Page 28 and 29: courts are based heavily upon evalu
Page 30 and 31: Providing people with information a
Page 32 and 33: compared to traditional court proce
Page 34 and 35: judges, if procedural fairness is e
Page 36 and 37: Commission on Children in Foster Ca
Page 38 and 39: Several of the court attenders expr
Page 40 and 41: prior experience with the legal sys
Page 42 and 43: Vicky Weisz is a Research Professor
Page 44 and 45: emerged as the strongest predictor
Page 46 and 47: CONFERENCE OF STATECOURT ADMINSTRAT
Page 48 and 49: The resourceguide... willcontain ef
Page 50 and 51: [T]he AOC willbe better able toiden
Page 52 and 53: Impacts of the ACTION program:• O
Page 54 and 55: The Perceptions ofSelf-Represented
Page 58 and 59: TABLE 8: SATISFACTION WITH COURT EX
Page 60 and 61: Decision Makers andDecision Recipie
Page 62 and 63: [Judges']proceduralfairness andoutc
Page 64 and 65: Study 3 isimportant becauseit demon
Page 66 and 67: [O]ur questions toparticipantsinclu
Page 68 and 69: addition, Fairness Heuristic Theory
Page 70 and 71: dural justice can obscure the equal
Page 72 and 73: economic loss based on a variety of
Page 74 and 75: doubt that aspirations for, and sat
Page 76 and 77: proposed conditions, in the judge c
Page 78 and 79: ole optimally, procedural fairness
show all

Special Issue on Procedural Fairness - American Judges Association

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?