View PowerPoint Presentation - Vision Research Coordinating Center

More documents

Recommendations

Info

OHTS Resource CentersStudy Chairman’s Office&Coordinating CenterWashington UniversitySt. Louis, MOOptic Disc Reading CenterBascom Palmer Eye InstituteUniversity of MiamiMiami, FLVisual Field Reading CenterUniversity of California, DavisSacramento, CAJune, 2002
OHTS Clinical CentersBascom Palmer Eye InstituteEye Consultants of AtlantaEye Physicians and SurgeonsCullen Eye InstituteDevers Eye InstituteEmory Eye InstituteHenry Ford HospitalsJohns Hopkins UniversityKrieger Eye InstituteHoward UniversityUniversity of MarylandUniversity of California, LosAngelesCharles Drew UniversityKellogg Eye CenterKresge Eye InstituteJune, 2002Great Lakes Eye InstituteUniversity of LouisvilleMayo ClinicNew York Eye & Ear InfirmaryOhio State UniversityOphthalmic Surgeons & ConsultantsPennsylvania College of OptometryMCP/Hahnemann UniversityScheie Eye InstituteUniversity of California, DavisUniversity of California, San DiegoUniversity of California, SanFranciscoUniversity Suburban Health CenterUniversity of OphthalmicConsultantsWashington Eye Physicians &SurgeonsEye Associates of Washington, DCWashington University, St. Louis
Page 1 and 2: The Ocular HypertensionTreatment St
Page 3 and 4: Why did we do this study?Don’t we
Page 5 and 6: Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study
Page 7 and 8: Patient found eligible for OHTS•
Page 9 and 10: Baseline Characteristics by Randomi
Page 15 and 16: IOP By RaceMedicationObservationAfr
Page 17 and 18: Progress and Outcome of Study Parti
Page 19 and 20: Proportion POAG1 st Visual Field PO
Page 21 and 22: First POAG Endpoint per Participant
Page 23 and 24: Treatment perhaps less protectivein
Page 25 and 26: Percent Reporting Changes inIris, L
Page 27 and 28: Borderline Safety DifferencesBetwee
Page 29 and 30: Significant Baseline Predictive Fac
Page 31 and 32: Significant Baseline Predictive Fac
Page 33 and 34: POAG Endpoints by Central Corneal T
Page 35 and 36: 60-year-old WF IOP 24 / 24 C/D rati
Page 37 and 38: 60-year-old WF IOP 28 / 28 C/D rati
Page 39 and 40: 72-year-old BM IOP 25 / 25 C/D rati
Page 41 and 42: Weaknesses1. Convenience sample rat
Page 43: Possible Misinterpretations of OHTS

View PowerPoint Presentation - Vision Research Coordinating Center

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?