of spores a year, and the risk of<strong>in</strong>fection is present right from thestart of the grow<strong>in</strong>g period (“greentips” stage) through to the end ofthe season. It should thereforecome as no surprise to learn that <strong>in</strong>the year 2000, around US$150 millionwas spent worldwide on fungicidesfor use <strong>in</strong> spray<strong>in</strong>g programmesto <strong>control</strong> scab.Growers already have a choice ofseveral fungicides to combat scab<strong>disease</strong>s. But Fl<strong>in</strong>t, Bayer's <strong>new</strong>high-performance fungicide, sets<strong>new</strong> standards. Several comparativefield trials, some of which were conductedby <strong>in</strong>dependent researchers,found that Fl<strong>in</strong>t was clearly worthyof its lead<strong>in</strong>g position. Initial experience<strong>in</strong> practice has emphaticallyconfirmed this. Producers of highqualityfruit, especially <strong>in</strong> areasvulnerable to scab, will therefore bedelighted to have access to this <strong>new</strong>fungicide.Fl<strong>in</strong>t normally <strong>in</strong>hibits the earlystages of <strong>fungal</strong> pathogen development,particularly spore germ<strong>in</strong>ationand germ-tube growth. For thisreason, it is best applied early as aprophylactic treatment. However,apple scab is slightly different <strong>in</strong>that the powerful <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic action ofFl<strong>in</strong>t enables it to <strong>control</strong> laterstages of the fungus (such as thegrowth of the subcuticular stroma)as well. This offers added flexibility<strong>in</strong> spray<strong>in</strong>g programmes designed toFl<strong>in</strong>t – Spectrum of Efficacy●●●● = excellent ●●● = good ●● = moderate ● = poorcombat this <strong>disease</strong>.In view of its excellent potentialefficacy, Fl<strong>in</strong>t is normally <strong>in</strong>cluded<strong>in</strong> anti-scab spray<strong>in</strong>g programmeswhen weather conditions arefavourable to <strong>fungal</strong> reproductionand the <strong>in</strong>fection pressure isstrongest. This can occur dur<strong>in</strong>g thepre-blossom stage, but <strong>in</strong> mostyears, the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal <strong>in</strong>fection periodco<strong>in</strong>cides with the time when pomefruit trees are <strong>in</strong> bloom. Mistakes <strong>in</strong>scab <strong>control</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g this phase cannotbe subsequently corrected. Thisis why the fungicidal treatment used<strong>in</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g is so important to successful<strong>disease</strong> <strong>control</strong>.Fl<strong>in</strong>t is most effective aga<strong>in</strong>st scabwhen used preventively. Applicationrate recommendations varyfrom country to country, depend<strong>in</strong>gon the local conditions, and rangefrom 7.5–15 g product/100 l 1 . The<strong>in</strong>terval between applicationsshould not exceed 10 days whenspray<strong>in</strong>g Fl<strong>in</strong>t dur<strong>in</strong>g the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal<strong>in</strong>fection period or <strong>in</strong> orchards withstrong shoot growth. Intervals maybe extended to 10–12 days when theproduct is used later, or <strong>in</strong> generalwhen the risk of <strong>in</strong>fection is lower.Multi-talented and versatileOne of the greatest strengths ofFl<strong>in</strong>t is that it <strong>control</strong>s or at leastsuppresses many other important<strong>disease</strong>s of pome fruit alongsidescab; the level of success dependson the application volume used.For example, the application ratesPathosystem / DisorderActivitypreventive curativeVenturia spp. (scap on apple and pear) ●●●● ●●●●Podosphaera leucotricha (powdery mildew) ●●● ●Schizothyrium pomi (flyspeck)●●●●Gloeodes pomigena (sooty bloth)●●●●Gymnosporangium juniperi-virg<strong>in</strong>ianae (cedar apple rust)●●●Alternaria mali (alternaria leaf spot)●●●Stemphylium spp. (leaf spot <strong>in</strong> pear)●●●Botryosphaeria dothidea (white rot on apple)●●Glomerella c<strong>in</strong>gulata (leaf spot and bitter rot)●●Gloeosporium spp. (leaf spot and bitter rot)●●●Jonathan spotno <strong>in</strong>creaseLenticel red spotno <strong>in</strong>creaseFruit russet<strong>in</strong>gno <strong>in</strong>creaseBitter pitpositive effectmentioned above for scab also<strong>control</strong> powdery mildew. The sameis true of typical summer <strong>disease</strong>s ofapples such as flyspeck (Schizothyriumpomi) and sooty blotch(Gloeodes pomigena), as well as leafspots <strong>in</strong> pears (Stemphylium spp.).Fl<strong>in</strong>t is also effective aga<strong>in</strong>st storage<strong>disease</strong>s of pome fruit, a differentcategory of <strong>disease</strong> problem. It isvery difficult to choose the righttime to adm<strong>in</strong>ister fungicides to<strong>control</strong> these <strong>disease</strong>s. F<strong>in</strong>alpre-harvest applications are often asuccessful way of drastically reduc<strong>in</strong>gthe severity of these types of<strong>in</strong>fection. The most common parasiticstorage <strong>disease</strong>s of apples arethe gloeosporium rots (Gloeosporiumspp.). Field trials with Fl<strong>in</strong>t onthese and other <strong>disease</strong>s showedthat the <strong>in</strong>cidence of rot <strong>in</strong> storagecan be greatly reduced and that theresults are at least as good as thoseobta<strong>in</strong>ed from contact fungicides.These results have s<strong>in</strong>ce beenconfirmed <strong>in</strong> practice.Responsible resistancemanagementThe build-up of resistance tofungicides <strong>in</strong> populations of <strong>fungal</strong>pathogens is a quite normal evolutionaryprocess. Just one change <strong>in</strong>the genetic make-up of a pathogenpopulation, <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g a spontaneously-occurr<strong>in</strong>gmutation, can setthis <strong>in</strong> tra<strong>in</strong>. The most widelyacceptedand well-founded theoryassumes that mutant genes <strong>control</strong>l<strong>in</strong>ga specific resistance mechanismare already present <strong>in</strong> a naturalpopulation before a <strong>new</strong> fungicidecomes <strong>in</strong>to common use. However,<strong>in</strong>dividual pathogens carry<strong>in</strong>g thismutation do not necessarily benefitfrom it, but often lose out, <strong>in</strong> termsof growth and development <strong>in</strong> theabsence of the fungicide. That iswhy they would probably be quiterare <strong>in</strong> the population at first. Butfrequent use of the fungicide would1As Asian countries are also severely affectedby other pome fruit <strong>disease</strong>s which requirehigher application rates, anti-scab spray<strong>in</strong>gprogrammes <strong>in</strong> these countries sometimes useup to 25 g product/100 l.14Courier 1/2002
Preventive <strong>control</strong> of apple scap% efficacy10080usually lead to targeted selection ofpathogens carry<strong>in</strong>g resistance to it.Resistance development is quite acommon phenomenon amongmodern fungicides. However, it has<strong>in</strong> all cases proved possible toma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the efficacy of these fungicides<strong>in</strong> many segments and uses bytak<strong>in</strong>g responsible, appropriatecounter-measures at the right time.This br<strong>in</strong>gs us back to the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gof the story of strobilur<strong>in</strong>s and scab<strong>control</strong>.The first signs of resistance tostrobilur<strong>in</strong>s were noticed <strong>in</strong> somecrops after several years of widespreaduse had started. Some stra<strong>in</strong>sof scab that are resistant to strobilur<strong>in</strong>shave been found. However,these stra<strong>in</strong>s have as yet beenobserved only <strong>in</strong> a small number ofregions with <strong>in</strong>tensive pome fruitgrow<strong>in</strong>g or on trial sites where thepr<strong>in</strong>ciples of preventive resistancemanagement have been deliberatelyviolated. In contrast to strobilur<strong>in</strong>resistance <strong>in</strong> powdery mildew <strong>in</strong>wheat (Erysiphe gram<strong>in</strong>is sp. tritici),which is traceable to a po<strong>in</strong>tmutation, four different resistancemechanisms have already beendescribed for apple scab. We mustbe aware of this dist<strong>in</strong>ction, andrealise that the situation with applescab will not necessarily become asdramatic as that with powderymildew <strong>in</strong> wheat. Nevertheless, it isimportant that the recommendationsfor strobilur<strong>in</strong> use set out below arealways considered as part of aresponsible, preventive resistancemanagement programme if thishighly effective substance class is torema<strong>in</strong> available for use <strong>in</strong> pomefruit grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the long term:Fl<strong>in</strong>t or other fungicides conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gstrobilur<strong>in</strong>s should never be usedmore than 3 or 4 times a season to<strong>control</strong> pome fruit <strong>disease</strong>s. Ofcourse, this also applies when Fl<strong>in</strong>tis be<strong>in</strong>g used to <strong>control</strong> storage <strong>disease</strong>s.In this case, it is advisable tomake the last treatment <strong>in</strong> the programmewith a contact fungicidesuch as Euparen ® M (tolylfluanid)rather than with Fl<strong>in</strong>t. Another6040200Foliar scapFruit scapField trials <strong>in</strong> Europe, under very heavy <strong>disease</strong> pressurePreventive <strong>control</strong> of powdery mildew on apple leaves% efficacy100806040200Infected leaves* Infected branches**Field trials <strong>in</strong> Europe, 1998* No. of <strong>in</strong>fected leaves (untreated): 42%** No. of <strong>in</strong>fected branches (untreated): 47%aspect of preventive resistance managementis that the recommended<strong>in</strong>tervals between applications arerespected and that ideally thetreatment programme should notcomprise more than two strobilur<strong>in</strong>applications <strong>in</strong> succession. It hasproven beneficial to apply Fl<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> atank-mix, together with other specificscab fungicides or broad-act<strong>in</strong>gcontact agents, particularly <strong>in</strong> casesof severe <strong>in</strong>festation. Possiblepartners <strong>in</strong> the mix are Euparen Mand Folicur ® (tebuconazole).Detailed national recommendationssuggest<strong>in</strong>g tank-mixes with othercrop protection products can beobta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Bayer recommendationbrochures or from advisors <strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>dividual countries. If you are<strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> this topic, you can alsosee the latest recommendations onthe use of strobilur<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> pome fruitconta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the guidel<strong>in</strong>es issuedby the FRAC (Fungicide ResistanceAction Committee; homepage:www.gcpf.org/frac).For pome fruit throughoutthe worldMany users who have <strong>in</strong>corporatedFl<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>to their spray<strong>in</strong>g programmeto <strong>control</strong> scab and other pome fruit<strong>disease</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the past grow<strong>in</strong>g seasonTrifloxystrob<strong>in</strong>7.5 g/100 lKresoxim-methyl10 g/100 lCaptan150 g/100 lTrifloxystrob<strong>in</strong>5 g/100 lTrifloxystrob<strong>in</strong>7.5 g/100 lKresoxim-methyl10 g/100 lPenconazole2.5 g/100 lare already conv<strong>in</strong>ced of the manybenefits offered by this fungicide.As it becomes registered for use <strong>in</strong>further areas of the world, theproduct will go on sale <strong>in</strong> otherimportant pome-fruit-produc<strong>in</strong>gcountries <strong>in</strong> 2002: Italy, France,Chile, Japan and Korea are just afew. From 2003, Fl<strong>in</strong>t will be available<strong>in</strong> all countries that producesignificant quantities of pome fruit.Two other important po<strong>in</strong>ts:• In some Asian countries, Fl<strong>in</strong>t willbe sold not as an extrusion granulatebut <strong>in</strong> liquid form as a 250 SC(suspension concentrate). Othercountries have opted for the tradenames Zato ® or Aepul ® rather thanFl<strong>in</strong>t.• Anyone who would like to f<strong>in</strong>dout more about Fl<strong>in</strong>t can visit thehome page of Bayer CropScience atwww.bayercropscience.com. Thisconta<strong>in</strong>s a range of <strong>in</strong>formation,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a video with other <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>gfacts that you can downloadfree of charge. ■Courier 1/200215