12.07.2015 Views

intermittent and continuous ATP 101119 - irse.nl

intermittent and continuous ATP 101119 - irse.nl

intermittent and continuous ATP 101119 - irse.nl

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• Level 2 is also based on conventional lineside signalling equipment, but is operated without linesidesignals. Instead an additional subsystem, called the Radio Block Centre (RBC) determines themovement authorities for the trains under its control <strong>and</strong> transmits these to the train where they areshown on the DMI. The system is based on <strong>continuous</strong> transmission using the GSM-R radio link.Balises are required o<strong>nl</strong>y to provide position references <strong>and</strong> fixed information such as line geometry.This level is suited for main <strong>and</strong> high-speed lines.ETCS level 2• Level 3 systems of ERTMS/ETCS are intended to operate without lineside signals. Track basedtrain detection systems are made redundant by active reporting of the train position to the RBC. Thetrain reports its present position back to the RBC, which calculates the train end position by takingthe train length into account. As in level 2, the separation between trains is the task allocated to theATC centre called Radio Block Centre (RBC) but where in level 2 the resolution of thedetermination of the train’s position is equal to the length of the sections used in the train detectionsystem (e.g. track circuits or axle counters), in level 3 the resolution is mai<strong>nl</strong>y dependent on theaccuracy of the train’s odometry. Therefore level 3 systems can operate in fixed or moving blockmode. The absence of conventional train detection systems in level 3 requires trains to <strong>continuous</strong>lymonitor <strong>and</strong> report on their integrity, i.e. the fact that the train is still intact <strong>and</strong> therefore no cars arestill occupying sections of track about to be included in a following train’s movement authority. Untilnow however unfortunately no proven technical solutions for train integrity monitoring exist,especially for locomotive hauled freight trains <strong>and</strong> this, combined with the complexity of arriving atharmonised specifications for a level 3 system, have led Eurosig to postpone the development work onLevel 3.40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!