30.11.2012 Views

2010 and 2011 - Census Bureau

2010 and 2011 - Census Bureau

2010 and 2011 - Census Bureau

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 6.<br />

Productivity Varies Widely Across Regions: Ratio of Actual to Expected<br />

Completions for Regional <strong>Census</strong> Centers<br />

Atlanta<br />

Boston<br />

Charlotte<br />

Chicago<br />

Dallas<br />

Denver<br />

Detroit<br />

Kansas City<br />

Los Angeles<br />

New York<br />

Philadelphia<br />

Seattle<br />

<strong>and</strong> Dallas performed considerably<br />

worse.<br />

Our analysis also examined<br />

how the data collected during<br />

nonresponse follow-up affected<br />

differences in final response<br />

rates across groups of concern.<br />

Figure 7 shows rates of response<br />

through mailout/mailback <strong>and</strong><br />

through enumeration (NRFU)<br />

by the share of minorities in a<br />

tract’s population. Information<br />

about April 1st inhabitants of<br />

a housing unit provided by<br />

people not living there on April<br />

1st—known as proxy response<br />

—is treated as nonresponse<br />

here. Figure 7 shows that mail<br />

response rates strongly negatively<br />

correlate with percent<br />

minority. Tracts with populations<br />

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4<br />

Actual/forecast<br />

that are less than 25 percent<br />

minority had about eleven<br />

percentage points higher average<br />

response rates than tracts<br />

with populations that are more<br />

than 75 percent minority. The<br />

correlation is much weaker in<br />

nonresponse follow-up, where<br />

75 percent minority tracts had<br />

approximately three percentage<br />

points lower interview rates.<br />

Nonresponse follow-up thus<br />

reduced the differential undercount<br />

of minorities relative to<br />

the count at the end of the mailback<br />

period.<br />

Figure 8 shows the odds ratios<br />

of selected variables in tractlevel<br />

grouped logistic regressions<br />

of response rates separately<br />

for mailout/mailback<br />

(in blue) <strong>and</strong> nonresponse<br />

follow-up (in red). The results<br />

provide further support for the<br />

story suggested by Figure 7.<br />

Even after controlling for other<br />

factors, minority race/ethnicity<br />

groups have well-below-average<br />

mailout/mailback response<br />

rates, but their nonresponse<br />

follow-up response rates are not<br />

nearly so low. Unemployment<br />

has a positive association with<br />

response rates, but the magnitude<br />

of the effect is very<br />

small. Richer neighborhoods<br />

have slightly higher mailout/<br />

mailback response rates <strong>and</strong><br />

slightly lower nonresponse<br />

follow-up response rates. Areas<br />

with a high concentration of<br />

retirement-aged persons have<br />

very high mailout/mailback<br />

U.S. <strong>Census</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> Research at the Center for Economic Studies <strong>and</strong> the Research Data Centers: <strong>2010</strong>–<strong>2011</strong> 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!