12.07.2015 Views

Improving Security of Payment Building and Construction Industry

Improving Security of Payment Building and Construction Industry

Improving Security of Payment Building and Construction Industry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9. Mutual Fund Insurance Page 107National Public Works Council Inc<strong>Improving</strong> <strong>Security</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Payment</strong> in the <strong>Building</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Construction</strong> <strong>Industry</strong>9.1 Recommendations• As with Insurance, this Consultancy recommends that further research be undertakento obtain empirical data to quantify the number <strong>and</strong> overall impact <strong>of</strong> Head Contractorinsolvencies on Subcontractors in the <strong>Building</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Construction</strong> <strong>Industry</strong>. The results<strong>of</strong> the research are needed before the concept <strong>of</strong> Mutual Funds providing security forSubcontractor payments is able to be fully considered.• However, it is the recommendation <strong>of</strong> this Consultancy that if the concept <strong>of</strong> MutualFunds is adopted, then the Mutual Fund should be used only for the purpose <strong>of</strong>reimbursing Subcontractors on the default <strong>of</strong> Head Contractors due to insolvency.• As with Insurance, if Mutual Funds are to be used to protect all Subcontractors thenthere must exist a universal approach. Universality can only be achieved throughlegislation. However, in the interim, before such a legislative approach is adopted, allst<strong>and</strong>ard form building contracts should make provision for all Head Contractors tocommit to a Mutual Fund to cover against its default in payment to Subcontractorsdue to insolvency.• The <strong>Building</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Construction</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> participants rely on the receipt <strong>of</strong> progresspayments throughout the duration <strong>of</strong> the contract. Given our earlier recommendationthat pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> payment mechanisms should exist in all st<strong>and</strong>ard building contracts, wewould contend that at any one time there would be only one payment outst<strong>and</strong>ing tothe Subcontractors. Further, with amendment to Section 556 <strong>of</strong> the CorporationsLaw, the Subcontractors would receive a priority for their unsecured claims to$10,000 with the balance <strong>of</strong> the claim ranking as unsecured. Accordingly, theappropriate level <strong>of</strong> fund cover would need to be determined after taking into accountthat at the time <strong>of</strong> the default (ie insolvency) <strong>of</strong> a Head Contractor the maximumexposure to any Insurer would be one payment (either progress or final) less thepriority afforded to Subcontractors.9.2 BackgroundMutual Funds are similar in concept to insurance in that they provide security to theSubcontractors in the event <strong>of</strong> the insolvency <strong>of</strong> the Head Contractor. The key difference toinsurance is the way in which the monies to cover the "Insured" party are obtained <strong>and</strong>subsequently retained.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!