12.07.2015 Views

The Thrill of Victory - Structure Tone Inc.

The Thrill of Victory - Structure Tone Inc.

The Thrill of Victory - Structure Tone Inc.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10©John Baer/PDM PicturesMission Accomplishedby Terence Deneny A key issue while constructing the data center was managing the integration <strong>of</strong> power, coolingand technology componentsBusiness continuity is a paramount issuetoday affecting companies large andsmall across a broad brush <strong>of</strong> marketsectors. Financial services, higher education,healthcare, energy, insurance, media, technology,telecommunications—no industry is immunefrom the need to protect, and ensure accessto, data and the uninterrupted flow <strong>of</strong>daily business that revolves around it. <strong>The</strong>re areany number <strong>of</strong> steps an organization can taketo ensure business continuity, one <strong>of</strong> the primaryamong them, particularly for larger businesses,being the development <strong>of</strong> data centersand disaster recovery facilities.Just as two widely disparate structures suchas a beach bungalow and Hollywood Hillsmansion can be called homes, so too cangrossly different facilities be considered datacenters. However, industry standards havebeen developed that, when used to describethe data center, help us better understandthe magnitude <strong>of</strong> the facility.One <strong>of</strong> the most common among those is aTier Rating, as created and defined by the UptimeInstitute. Currently, data centers can berated as Tier 1 through IV. Tier ratings refer tothe reliability <strong>of</strong> the center’s infrastructuresystems and power supply. Tier ratings encompassalmost 50 discrete elements <strong>of</strong> electrical,mechanical, architectural and structuralsystems, as well criteria for redundant components,power delivery paths, raised floorratio and height, allowable downtime and siteselection, among other concerns. Tier IV arethe most complex data centers. This data center’s cooling infrastructure,like all data centers’ today, had to keep pacewith the ever increasing density <strong>of</strong> computerprocessing equipment©John Baer/PDM Pictures©John Baer/PDM PicturesIn 2008, <strong>Structure</strong> <strong>Tone</strong> will put in place over$550M in data center construction, mostlyTier III and IV, including completing construction<strong>of</strong> a 476,000sf enterprise data centerand disaster recovery facility in centralNJ (see side bar facts). <strong>The</strong> project entailedadaptive reuse <strong>of</strong> a 236,000sf single-storywarehouse and construction <strong>of</strong> a new,240,000sf, two-story addition to create afully integrated facility.<strong>The</strong> project was the culmination <strong>of</strong> an approximately24-month endeavor that beganwith due diligence and site selection assistance.Our staff worked closely with theowner, developer (Tishman Speyer), broker(CBRE), architect (Gensler) and MEP engineer(Jaros Baum & Bolles) during this phaseto select the eventual project site. “Weworked closely with all parties throughoutthe project,” said project manager KevinMulvey. “<strong>The</strong> due diligence stage, in particular,was a very collaborative effort withTishman Speyer, CBRE and the owner.”During the site selection phase, our focuswas on assessing the pros and cons <strong>of</strong> a siteand their respective impacts on the owner.<strong>The</strong> final result was the selection <strong>of</strong> a sitethat <strong>of</strong>fered opportunities for cost savingswhile providing better logistics, enabling theowner to achieve more with the budget andschedule allocated for the project. Issuessuch as cost to bring power to the site, continuity<strong>of</strong> data center operations (i.e. a constrainedsite that had to go multi-storyvertical vs. a more horizontal space on oneor two levels), site environmental considerationsand a host <strong>of</strong> other issues were examined.We prepared budgets and costcomparisons for the sites and the issues particularto each so that our client could makethe most informed decision with regard tocost and risk and reward.Once the final site was selected, we interfacedclosely with Gensler, ThorntonTomasetti and Jaros Baum & Bolles performingvalue engineering, to the great benefit<strong>of</strong> the owner. Together, we scrutinizedevery facet <strong>of</strong> the existing building to determinewhat could be salvaged and renovated.This saved both budget and schedule versussimply tearing it down.V O L U M E I V | Q III | 2 0 0 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!