new models <strong>of</strong> high performancework systems46 >outcomes. Any public policy or companystrategy that seeks to develop competitivenessin Irish industry through improvedproductivity, improved innovation orimproved quality <strong>of</strong> working life mustrecognise the importance <strong>of</strong> organisationalfactors including management policies andpractices.p There is a strong imperative to developa better capacity within Irish companiesfor high performance work systemsthat include strategic human resourcemanagement, partnership, diversity andequality systems, and flexible working.p The advocacy case for best practiceapproaches to workplace partnership,diversity and equality, and flexible workinghas a strong economic argument as well ashaving a legislative and humanitarian basis.The economic argument puts forward clearbusiness performance benefits for bothemployers and employees.p In view <strong>of</strong> the synergistic effects onbusiness performance <strong>of</strong> Strategic HRM,partnership and Diversity and <strong>Equality</strong><strong>Systems</strong>, we propose that the currentresearch agenda on high performance worksystems and workplace factors underpinningcompetitiveness should be expandedto take a more comprehensive perspectiveon the issues that require examination.
this is the section namePart 6ReferencesAppelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., &Kalleberg, A. (2000). Manufacturingadvantage: Why high-performancework systems pay <strong>of</strong>f. Ithaca, London:ILR Press.Cascio, W. F. 2006. Managing humanresources (7th Ed.). NY: McGraw-Hill.CIPD (2006). Achieving Best Practice inYour Business: <strong>High</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Work</strong>Practices: Linking Strategy and Skills to<strong>Performance</strong> Outcomes, London: CIPDDatta, D.K., Guthrie, J.P. & Wright, P.M.(2005). HRM and labor productivity:Does industry matter? Academy <strong>of</strong>Management Journal, 48(1): 135-145.Dex, S. and Smith, C. (2002) The Natureand Pattern <strong>of</strong> Family-friendly Policies inBritain. Oxford: The Policy Press.Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and InternetSurveys (2nd ed.). <strong>New</strong> York: JohnWiley & Sons, Inc.Flood, P., Guthrie, J., Liu, W., andMacCurtain, S. (2005). <strong>High</strong><strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Work</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> in Ireland:The Economic Case. National Centrefor Partnership and <strong>Performance</strong>.Guthrie, J. P. (2001). “<strong>High</strong> Involvement<strong>Work</strong> Practices, Turnover andProductivity: Evidence from <strong>New</strong>Zealand.” Academy <strong>of</strong> ManagementJournal, Vol. 44, pp. 180-190.Guthrie, J.P., Spell, C. & Nyamori, R.(2002). Correlates and consequences<strong>of</strong> high involvement management:The role <strong>of</strong> competitive strategy.The International Journal <strong>of</strong> HumanResource Management, 13(1):183-197.Huselid, M. A. (1995). The Impact<strong>of</strong> Human Resource ManagementPractices on Turnover, Productivity,and Corporate Financial <strong>Performance</strong>.Academy <strong>of</strong> Management Journal,Vol. 38, pp. 635-672.International Labour Office (2006),<strong>High</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Work</strong> ResearchProject Case Studies. Available onlinehttp://www.ilo.org/public/english/employment/skills/workplace/case/case_toc.htmLambert, S. J. (2000). Added benefits:the link between work-life benefitsand organisational citizenshipbehavior. Academy <strong>of</strong> ManagementJournal, 43(5), 801-815.MacDuffie, J. P. (1995). HumanResource Bundles and Manufacturing<strong>Performance</strong>: Organisational Logicand Flexible Production <strong>Systems</strong> inthe World Auto Industry. Industrialand Labor Relations Review, Vol. 48,pp.197-221.Monks, K. (2007). The BusinessImpact <strong>of</strong> <strong>Equality</strong> and Diversity– The International Evidence.National Centre for Partnership and<strong>Performance</strong> / <strong>Equality</strong> <strong>Authority</strong>O’Connell, L. (2003). Achieving highperformance: Partnership works – Theinternational evidence. Forum on the<strong>Work</strong>place <strong>of</strong> the Future, NationalCentre for Partnership <strong>Performance</strong>.O’Connell, P and Russell, H. (2005).<strong>Equality</strong> at <strong>Work</strong>? - <strong>Work</strong>place<strong>Equality</strong> Policies, Flexible <strong>Work</strong>ingArrangements and the Quality <strong>of</strong><strong>Work</strong>. Dublin: The <strong>Equality</strong> <strong>Authority</strong>.http://www.equality.ie/index.asp?locID=105&docID=269Osterman, P. (1995). <strong>Work</strong>/familyprograms and the employmentrelationship. Administrative ScienceQuarterly, 40, 681-700.Sheppard, E., Clifton, T. and Kruse,D (1996) Flexible <strong>Work</strong> Hours andProductivity: Some Evidence from thePharmaceutical Industry. IndustrialRelations, Vol. 35, No. 1.Siegel, P. A., Post, C., Garden, C.,Brockner, J., & Fishman, A. (2005). Themoderating influence <strong>of</strong> proceduralfairness on the relationship betweenwork-life conflict and organisationalcommitment. Journal <strong>of</strong> AppliedPsychology, 90(1), 13-24.Yasbek, P. (2004). The business case forfirm-level work-life balance policies: areview <strong>of</strong> the literature. (Labour MarketPolicy Group, Department <strong>of</strong> Labour.)Wellington, NZ. Retrieved March 3,2006 from http://www.dol.govt.nz/publication-iew.asp?ID=191.< 47