SRP Energy Efficiency Demand Response ... - Salt River Project
SRP Energy Efficiency Demand Response ... - Salt River Project
SRP Energy Efficiency Demand Response ... - Salt River Project
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>SRP</strong> <strong>Energy</strong>‐<strong>Efficiency</strong>, <strong>Efficiency</strong> <strong>Demand</strong> <strong>Response</strong> & Pricing ProgramsDebbie KimberlyManager ‐ <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Efficiency</strong> & Policy Analysis<strong>Salt</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Project</strong>2011 <strong>SRP</strong> Sustainable Portfolio Review WorkshopMarch 3, 2011www.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/20111
Agenda‣ Overview of Program Results‣ Fiscal Year 2011 Highlights‣ New Fiscal Year 2012 Program Offerings‣ Future Commitment to Cost Effective <strong>Energy</strong><strong>Efficiency</strong> Programswww.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/20112
History of <strong>SRP</strong> <strong>Energy</strong>‐<strong>Efficiency</strong> Program InvestmentHistoryPlanned<strong>Energy</strong> Policy ActIndustry RestructuringWestern <strong>Energy</strong> CrisisFiscal yearwww.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/20113
<strong>Energy</strong> Savings Per Dollar Spent<strong>SRP</strong> FY11 <strong>SRP</strong> FY11 BudgetBaltimore Gas & ElectricFortis BCAPS 2010 Budget (w/o Perf. Incentive)MidAmerican <strong>Energy</strong>Detroit EdisonBC HydroCommonwealth EdisonXcel <strong>Energy</strong> MinnesotaLincoln Electric SystemFort Collins UtilitiesAvista UtilitiesXcel <strong>Energy</strong> ColoradoNV <strong>Energy</strong>Puget Sound <strong>Energy</strong>Seattle City LightIdaho PowerSan Diego Gas & ElectricSouthern California EdisonConsolidated EdisonNational GridPacific Gas and Electric1.733.413.152.742.73261 2.612.422.302.215.245.204.894.704.684.494.384.056.107.007.007.248.020.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00E-Source: July, 2010www.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/2011kWh Saved Per $ Spent4
Program Cost EffectivenessHighly cost‐effective EE portfolio• Cost‐effectivenessimproving year overyearProgram MarketSegmentTotal ResourceCost (TRC)*Residential 2.95• Programs generating Commercial 3.29significant netbenefits ‐nearly $77TotalPortfolio 312 3.12million NPVFar exceeds 1.0* Values reflect FY11 program years ‐ Total Resource Costabove 1.0 indicates that programs are cost effective.www.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/20115
Growth of <strong>SRP</strong> <strong>Energy</strong>‐<strong>Efficiency</strong> ProgramsNumber of Programs IntroducedMore than25 energy-efficiencyprograms wereintroducedsince 2008www.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/20116
FP 2012 SUSTAINABLE PORTFOLIOIncreased Contribution from <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Efficiency</strong>20%*Renewable and energy efficiencyresources in excess of requirement willbe banked for future useDISTRIBUTEDGENERATIONPercent of Retail Requ uirements15%10%5%HYDRORESOURCES<strong>SRP</strong> SPPREQUIREMENTRENEWABLE RESOURCESENERGY EFFICIENCY0%www.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/20117
New FY11 Residential <strong>Energy</strong>‐<strong>Efficiency</strong> ProgramsHome Performance with ENERGY STAR®LaunchedNov. 2010<strong>Project</strong>ed HPwES Participation• Whole‐house approachto efficiency• Cross‐sell other <strong>SRP</strong> programsNote: All reported figures are preliminary and subject to changewww.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/20118
EZ‐3 Price Plan StudySummer month hourly comparison7%6%August Weekdaysy UsagePercenta age of Total Dail5%4%3%2%1%EZ‐23: EZ‐3 "Test" customers who were on E‐23E‐23: E‐23 "Control" customers for comparison with EZ‐3EZ‐26: EZ‐3 "Test" customers who were on E‐26E‐26: E‐26 "Control" customers for comparison with EZ‐30%Hour EndingEZ‐23 E‐23 EZ‐26 E‐26www.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/201110
Expanded & New FY11 Commercial <strong>Energy</strong>‐<strong>Efficiency</strong>ProgramsFY11 Standard Business Solutions$MillionsBudgeted*As of February 25, 2011Additional fundingReservationsSmall Business Solutions• Free walk‐throughlighting i audit• Rebates cover upto 75% of cost onqualified lf energysavingprojectsLaunchedMay 2011Note: All reported figures are preliminary and subject to auditwww.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/201111
PowerPartner <strong>Demand</strong> <strong>Response</strong> Program<strong>SRP</strong>’s Commercial direct load‐control programOver 40customers and100 facilitiesparticipating• Program controls select lighting,HVAC and process equipment• <strong>SRP</strong> currently in year two ofthree‐year contract• Plan growth to 50 MW ofcapacitywww.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/201112
Industry‐Specific Web ToolsLaunch of savewithsrpbiz.comwww.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/201113
FY11 <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Efficiency</strong> Portfolio SummaryYTD Through January, 2011Actual(000s)AnnualBudget(000s)% toGoalAggregate NetSavings (MWh) 656.49 618.39 106%Incremental NetSavings (MWh)** 294.29 316.93 93%StatusProgram Expenditures $23,563 $35,025 67%** Incremental is defined as the impact resulting only from new participants.Results are unauditedwww.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/201114
FY11 Residential Incremental Impact by ProgramYTD Through January, 2011MWh5045403530252015105‐104983765243121‐0CFLApl RcylSun Scr PWH CC AC QI Rtl Apl DTR HPwES LI Wx Air Seal InsulActual Net YTD <strong>Energy</strong> Savings (MWh) Budgeted Annual <strong>Energy</strong> Savings (MWh)Results are unauditeddIncremental MWh Savings – All Residential Programs(excl. M‐Power)Actual Annual Budgeted % to Goal66,055 63,639 104%www.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/201115
FY11 Commercial Incremental Impact by ProgramYTD Through January, 201180670605MWh504043302021010Standard BizCustom Biz0Comp Air Spatia Large Retrofit Retro‐Comm New Construction Small BizNet YTD <strong>Energy</strong> Savings (MWh)Budgeted Annual <strong>Energy</strong> Savings (MWh)www.savewithsrp.comResults are unauditedIncremental MWh Savings – AllCommercial ProgramsActual Annual Budgeted % to Goal85,953 73,342 117%D. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/201116
FY11 Pricing & DR Participation & Impact by Program200,000115,00040,000120195,000190,000110,000105,00035,00030,00025,00010080Participa ants185,000180,000175,000100,00095,00020,00015,00010,0005,000604020170,000TOU90,000Mpower0EZ30DRYTD ParticipantsResults are unauditedBudgeted Participantswww.savewithsrp.comAggregateSavings TOU EZ3 M-Power DRMW 93.9 42.6 44.3 31.4MWh N/A N/A 142,241 N/AD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/201117
FY12 <strong>Energy</strong>‐<strong>Efficiency</strong> ObjectivesStrong focus on cost‐effective programs• Retail CFL Programs• Appliance Recycling• Standard & Custom Business Solutions• Technical Assistance ProgramsFY12 Incremental Goal403,000 MWh52%20%28%Residential Commercial M‐Powerwww.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/201118
<strong>SRP</strong> Cost of Conserved <strong>Energy</strong> ($/MWh)Financial Plan 2010 vs. 2012$40$35Megawatt Ho our (MWh)Cost per$30$25$20$15$10$37$28$5$‐Plan/Fiscal Yearwww.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/201119
New FY12 Residential <strong>Energy</strong>‐<strong>Efficiency</strong> ProgramsPool pump & timer program• Pool pumps cost more than manyappliances• Rebates for variable‐speed poolpumps and seasonal timers• Point‐of‐purchase discountsthrough retailers and suppliersEvaluating third party loan programLaunchingFY12www.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/201120
<strong>SRP</strong> Annual Account Summary Letter & <strong>Energy</strong> ScorecardResidential letter introduces Compare Your HomePhases<strong>Energy</strong>Scorecardpilot programbegins summer2012• Include neighborcomparison in AAS letterfor winter 2011 mailing• Launch a two‐year pilotprogram in summer 2012• Full implementationsummer 2014www.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/201121
Summary of Program ResultsProgramYear*ForecastedIncrementalSavings (MWh)ActualSavings (MWh)Annual Budget(Mill)% of RetailRequirementsFY09 197,500 207,000 $20.8 0.76%FY10 257,000 284,000 $28.7 1.05%FY11 315,000 ‐ $39.3 1.14%FY 12 403,000 ‐ $51.5 1.48%* <strong>SRP</strong>’s program year runs May 1 st through April 30 th .Positive trendwww.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/201122
<strong>SRP</strong> FP12 <strong>Energy</strong>‐<strong>Efficiency</strong> Program Savings (MWh)2,000,0001,800,000Incremental488,0001,600,000Aggregate from Prior Years Lighting Standards 1245000475,000awatt Hours (MWh)1,400,0001,200,0001,000,000800,000403,000433,000463,000866,000461,0001,034,0001,245,0001,416,000Meg600,000668,000400,000479,000200,000‐Fiscal Yearwww.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/201123
Cost Effective Solutions –A Collaborative ApproachCodes and StandardsEst. over• Arizona one of seven states900,000* 000* MWhswith no statewide energycodeof energy savingsin <strong>SRP</strong>’s serviceterritory alone* Cumulative savings by FY20• Home Rule State – codeadoption at local level• 66% of state jurisdictionshave no energy code• Appliance standards, systemefficiencies, etc. can alsoreduce emissions• Want to collaborate, effectgradual changewww.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/201124
Annual Incremental Savings ‐ Percent of Retail RequirementsNo Credit for Codes and Standards1.75%Lighting Standards1.64%1.61%1.63%1.65%Percentage1.50%1.48%1.56%1.25%Fiscal Yearwww.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/201125
SummaryMeeting customer needs, cost‐effectively• Experience with new,growing programs ‐ adjustas needed• Cost‐effectiveness• Robust benefit/costratios• Sensitive to priceincreases• Explore ALL cost‐effectiveoptions• Partnership essentialwww.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/201126
Questions?Debbie KimberlyManager ‐ <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Efficiency</strong> & Policy Analysis<strong>Salt</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Project</strong>(602) 236‐2711Debbie.Kimberly@srpnet.comwww.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/201127
Back‐Up Slideswww.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/201128
Fridge‐A‐Thon Ad AwarenessGeneral and Hispanic markets7 out of 10customers saidthecommunications made themfeel betterabout <strong>SRP</strong>Do you remember seeing anyelectric utility advertising ?UnaidedRecallGeneral market 59%BLD SLDHispanic market 47% 49%NationalUtilityAverage32%Sources: Brand Keys – Residential Fridge‐A‐Thon Tracking Study (July 2010)Brand Keys –BLD and SLD Hispanic Fridge‐A‐Thon Tracking Study (May 2010)www.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/201129
Home Comfort Campaign Tracking Results<strong>SRP</strong> customers found these communicationsinteresting, relevant and took actionShadeScreenTVHEMOnlineCoolCashRadioInterest 62% 69% 65%Relevance 65% 79% 65%Took action 45% 71% 52%Source: Brand Keys ‐ Ad Tracking Studies<strong>SRP</strong>’s ratings forproviding energyefficiency advice andrebates increasedsignificantly during theresidential campaign.www.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/201130
Time‐of‐Day Participants10,317 net new YTD through November230,000 FY11 Goal225,000220,000215,000210,000205,000200,000195,000190,000185,000FY11 FY10 FY09May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar AprRPP Campaign-DM, Print, Radio, TV, Cinema,Online, ContactRPP Campaignwww.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/201131
FY11 <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Efficiency</strong> Portfolio Summaryby SectorIncremental MWhSavings* (000s)Total Program Expenditures($000s)ActualAnnualBudget% toGoalActualAnnualBudget% toBudgetStatusResidential (noM-Power) 66.05 63.64 104% $8,486 $12,049 70%Commercial 85.95 73.34 117% $12,870 $19,593 66%Pricing(M-Power)** 142.28 179.95 79% $2,207 $3,383 65%TOTAL 294.29 316.93 93% $23,563 $35,025 67%** Includes Commercial M-Power* Incremental is defined as the impact resulting only from new participants.www.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/20112/20/2011 January MVE Dashboard (All numbers preliminary and subject to audit)32
FY11 ResidentialSavings and Participation by ProgramResidentialMWH(000s)AnnualBudgeted % of goal ActualParticipants/Units*(000s)AnnualBudgeted % of goal ActualProgram Expenditures (000s)AnnualBudgeted % of goalActualStatusNotesAppliance Recycling 675 6.75 937 9.37 72% 802 8.02 11.44 70% $1,321 $2,078 64%Program closed, Evaluated NTGRetail Appliance 0.47 0.70 67% 5.87 5.78 102% $491 $593 83%lower than planCool Cash HVACexpenditures slightly exceededupgrade 2.32 2.44 95% 1.94 2 97% $1,106 $983 113%budgetlower than anticipated savingsSun Screen 1.363 3.62 38% 2.80 6 47% $652 $722 90%per participantpHPwES 0.33 0.63 52% 0.51 0.25 204% $379 $385 99%program launched in November,investigating invoice issues,deemed savings adjusted atprogram launchPowerWise Homes 2.08 2.24 93% 2.18 2 109% $1,759 $2,067 85%LI Weatherization 0.15 0.57 27% 0.106 0.18 61% $544 $850 64% data lagDuct Test & Repair 3.28 0.68 486% 2.04 0.4 510% $791 $383 207%Ahead of goal, pgm budgetadjustedCFL 49.02 41.35 119% 1364.81 1,693 81% $1,413 $2,115 67%Qual Install 0.15 1.93 8% 0.31 4 8% $21 $325 7% low program participationAir seal 0.01 0.08 16% 0.08 0.05 164% $0 $120 0%program launched in November,investigating invoice issuesInsulation 0.11 0.03 377% 0.15 0.05 294% $4 $95 5% program launched in NovemberHome characterization 0.00 0.00 0% 0.00 1.333 0% $3 $1,334 0% program has not launched yetTOTAL 66.05 63.64 104% $8,486 $12,049 70%* - Participation Units differ by program** - Appliance Recycling, CFL, and Sun Screens include a portion of Hispanic market targeted costswww.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/20112/20/2011 January MVE Dashboard (All numbers preliminary and subject to audit)33
FY11 CommercialSavings and Participation by ProgramMWHProgram ExpenditureCommercial(000s)Participants(000s)ActualAnnualBudgeted % of goal ActualAnnualBudgeted % of goal ActualAnnualBudgeted % of goalStatusNotesStandard Biz 70.23 40.53 173% 1990 523 380% $7,566 $5,879 129% Ahead of goalCustom Biz 11.16 16.16 69% 75 330 23% $1,234 $3,118 40%fewer participants p but producinglarger savings per participantComp Air 1.40 2.67 53% 2 24 8% $338 $750 45% low participationLarge Retrofit 1.23 4.72 26% 4 12 33% $567 $1,463 39% low participationNew Constr 0 0.8 0% 0 2 0% $122 $579 21%slow building due to economicconditionsRetrocommissioning 0 3.74 0% 0 10 0% $373 $725 51% participation below forecastSmall Bus Direct Install 1.16 1.20 97% 182 343 53% $730 $1,064 69%SPATIA 0.77 3.53 22% 36 144 25% $128 $110 116%program costs exceed budgetdue to high labor costs<strong>Demand</strong> <strong>Response</strong> 0.00 0 100% 105 50 210% $1,813 $3,405 53% event called 2/2, waiting for data<strong>Energy</strong> for Edu (on-billfin) 0.00 0 0% 0 0 0% $0 $2,500 0% budget adjusted to 1.5 millionTOTAL 85.95 73.3434 117% $12,870 $19,593 66%- Participation Units differ by programwww.savewithsrp.comD. Kimberly; 2011 SPP Review Workshop; 3/3/20112/20/2011 January MVE Dashboard (All numbers preliminary and subject to audit)34
Change language