African Traditional Herbal Research ClinicVolume 6, Issue 1 NEWSLETTER <strong>January</strong> <strong>2011</strong>FEATURED ARTICLESZimbabwe: 'African 'Tradition' and Women'sOppressionBy Tafataona P. MahosoThe Herald, December 8, 2010US Embassy, Harare.One of these is the classified cable of July 2007 byformer US ambassador to Zimbabwe Christopher Dell,which WikiLeaks released as part of a slew of USgovernment cables covering 274 countries.The second is former US ambassador James McGee'sFiscal 2010 Strategic Plan for the same US Embassywhich has also been leaked from another source in amanner similar to WikiLeaks.THERE is a problem with the way the oppression ofwomen and girls is explained which, if not challenged,will mean that gender will be<strong>com</strong>e a racket, anindustry, without even reducing, let alone stopping, thedegradation of the majority of women.For those who believe that clear thinking, accurate andscientific explanation and research are important stepsin the pursuit of freedom, this problem is the use of socalled"African tradition" or "African culture" as acatch-all explanation for the suffering of women.Debate is needed because it appears that now, as in thecolonial past when white settlers invented the myth ofthe African <strong>com</strong>munity as permanently "traditional"and white settler <strong>com</strong>munity as forever modernizingand progressive, the idea that African "culture" isresponsible for women's suffering and oppression hasbe<strong>com</strong>e the easiest expression of one's impliedapproval of existing so-called "modern" social andpolitical arrangements.Despite the worsening brutalisation of women andchildren through existing contemporary powerstructures and institutions, the idea is that the presentdonor-dominated and NGO-congested system is allright. The problem is in the "tradition" of the Africanmale in particular.The December 5 2010 issue of The Sunday Mailcarried stories on two documents originating from theThe first cable demonstrates that what the USgovernment does and says in public may be the exactopposite of what it says and does secretly or privately;and that the purpose of a policy stated in public may bethe opposite of the real purpose.US officials will praise certain groups and even arrangefor honours, prizes and awards to be showered onpersons, parties and organisations they despise or lookdown upon, as long as they believe that suchinducements and pretences will enable the USgovernment to secure selfish US interests.The second document itemises the means which USofficials employ to achieve their objectives andpurposes in other countries. For instance, in Zimbabwethey "created" 29 new NGOs in 2007, 32 in 2008 and35 in 2010; they exerted pressure against theGovernment of Zimbabwe while assisting certainforces, including parties, who oppose the sameGovernment; and they offered relief to some of thepeople who suffered as a result of the pressure exertedagainst Government, pressure which includes illegaleconomic sanctions.In simple language this means US officials presumingthat the people who make up the Government ofZimbabwe are not the same as the people of Zimbabweand that hurting the Government will not hurt thepeople. Continued on page 5-4- Traditional African Clinic – <strong>January</strong> <strong>2011</strong>
Continued from page 4 – Zimbabwe: African Tradition…However, just in case that presumption is wrong andthe people really get hurt together with theirgovernment, the US Embassy's strategic plan includesa huge relief programme of nyaradzo and chema forthe "suffering people," a programme also meant "touse the fight against HIV/Aids to create a good imageamong the suffering people of Zimbabwe . . ."In plain language this means that the US and its alliesemploy illegal sanctions and other "pressures" in orderto destroy or diminish the capacity of the Governmentto assist and protect its people. Then, through Usaidand the proliferating NGOs, the US government and itsallies offer relief to the same people, which is to saythey try to offer themselves as a better alternative to ora better replacement of the elected Government.All these diabolic tricks together seek to achieve whatthe McGee document calls "transformationaldiplomacy goals".Transformational diplomacy goals is a polite phrasereferring to the fact that the culture and values of thepeople of Zimbabwe remain an obstacle in the path offoreign-sponsored regime change.The culture and values which united African men andwomen against white settlerism and imperialism, theculture and values of the people which motivated themto overthrow apartheid and UDI, the culture and valueswhich inspired the people to reclaim and repossesstheir white-stolen land after one hundred years, theculture and values which caused the people to refuse tobe taxed for the purpose of paying back the landthieves -- that culture, those values, have to be"transformed", wiped out, before illegal regime changecan succeed and produce a "fresh start".The US and its allies know that, for the last 100 yearsof settlerism, that culture, those values, have beennurtured and protected by African women. So thesewomen are a critical factor in the creativity andresilience of the African social and political orderwhich the US and its allies call "the regime".The legacy of Queen Nzinga, the legacy of MbuyaNehanda, the legacy of Joice Teurai Ropa Mujuru, thelegacy of Winnie Madikizela-Mandela, the legacy ofChimbwido, refers to a real living history.In the eyes of the US government and its sponsoredNGOs, these real African heroines have to be replacedby NGO-groomed nannies who are willing to beawarded meaningless prizes for collaborating withimperialism. These are the likes of Beatrice Mtetwa,Jestina Mukoko, Jenny Williams, Ellen SirleafJohnson and Betty Makoni. That is what "change" or a"fresh start" would mean.What all the leaked cables together create is a picture of USforeign policy as dictatorial, destructive, intolerant,totalitarian and narcissistic. Even the tragedy of HIV/Aidshas to be exploited for the selfish ends of the US empire.There is clear evidence, for instance, that structuraladjustment since 1990 and sanctions since 2000 worsenedthe brutalisation of the majority of women and childrentogether with men and that there is nothing African or"traditional" about this programme or the sanctions. Yet thesymptomatic appearances and effects of this brutalisation insociety are still being explained as consequences of Africantradition.It is time we pointed out that the men and women who socasually claim that women and girls are oppressed becauseof African "tradition" are, in fact, saying they like thecurrent social system (with its structural adjustment,corporate cannibalism, illegal sanctions and land inequity)so much that they believe it would lead to a perfect societyif it was not for the backward "African traditional values"which keep intruding upon this otherwise happy existenceon the edges the neoliberal global "market economy".African "culture" has be<strong>com</strong>e for the women's freedommovement what the myth of the <strong>com</strong>munist "evil empire"was for the Western rightwing during the Cold War.When the former Soviet Union collapsed, two paradoxesemerged starkly and they still haunt rightwingpropagandists: First, this <strong>com</strong>munist evil empire, whichmost Western leaders always said was about to take overthe entire world and impose its tyranny, could not in facthold on even to its Second World War borders.Second, the evils for which this empire was being blamedaround the world have, in fact, be<strong>com</strong>e much moreprevalent and overwhelming: genocide, wars, terrorism,hunger, mass poverty, tyranny and capitalist anarchy.Just look at Haiti, Afghanistan, Gaza, Sierra Leone andIraq. In fact, there may be a link between the embarrassingdisappearance of the demon of the <strong>com</strong>munist evil empireas the main cause of the world's suffering and the need nowto find a new and equally irrational explanation of women'soppression in the form of African tradition.In the Muslim world the demon has been identified by thesame Western-funded forces as "Islamic fundamentalism".Yet Muslim women who fled to modern France findthemselves vilified and excluded by the liberated Frenchwomen.-5- Traditional African Clinic – <strong>January</strong> <strong>2011</strong>My first appeal to the open-minded journalist therefore is toadopt the attitude expressed in the African proverb: "Onedoes not go begging for palm oil with a gourd without anopening." Continued on page 10