12.07.2015 Views

Monday, September 27, 2010 2:00 PM - American Society for ...

Monday, September 27, 2010 2:00 PM - American Society for ...

Monday, September 27, 2010 2:00 PM - American Society for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conclusions: These results demonstrate that, despite markedly improved sensitivity, the use of solid phasemethods to identify HLA-specific antibodies may provide apparently aberrant results that require carefulclinical and laboratory investigation.53-PTHE IMPACT OF ALLOSENSITIZATION ON TIME TO TRANSPLANTATION ANDMORTALITY IN A COHORT OF PATIENTS AWAITING LUNG TRANSPLANTATION.Joseph T. Weber 1 , Bryan F. Meyers 2 , Alexander Patterson 2 , Elbert P. Trulock 1 , ThalachallourMohanakumar 3 , Ramsey Hachem 1 . 1 Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, WashingtonUniversity School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA; 2 Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, WashingtonUniversity School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA; 3 Department of Surgery, Washington UniversitySchool of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.Aim: To determine if allosensitization has an impact on the rate of transplantation, waiting time, or wait listmortality in those awaiting lung transplantation.Methods: We per<strong>for</strong>med a retrospective cohort study of 64 consecutive candidates who were active on thewaiting list at our program between 01/2<strong>00</strong>6 and 07/2<strong>00</strong>7. Patients were prospectively screened <strong>for</strong>pre<strong>for</strong>med anti-HLA antibodies using the LABScreen Single Antigen assay at the time of listing. Acalculated Panel Reactive Antibody (cPRA) was obtained using the UNOS calculator <strong>for</strong> each candidate.We analyzed time to event using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods.Results: Of the 64 candidates, 22 (34%) were sensitized and 17 (26%) had a cPRA>50%. Sensitizedcandidates were significantly less likely to undergo transplantation using the virtual crossmatch approach(log rank p=0.<strong>00</strong>06).[figure1]In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, cPRA>50% was a significantnegative predictor of transplantation (OR=0.28; 95%CI: 0.1-0.6, p=0.<strong>00</strong>1). Additionally, 4 of the 42 (10%)non-sensitized patients died while on the waiting list compared to 5 of the 22 (23%) sensitized patients (p =0.<strong>00</strong>4). All 5 sensitized patients who died on the waiting list had a cPRA>50% while none of the sensitizedpatients with a cPRA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!