30.11.2012 Views

RESOURCING THE CHURCH FOR ECUMENICAL MINISTRy A ...

RESOURCING THE CHURCH FOR ECUMENICAL MINISTRy A ...

RESOURCING THE CHURCH FOR ECUMENICAL MINISTRy A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a pluralistic context, Christians who seek to express<br />

the universality of God’s love may try to do so by<br />

suppressing those parts of the gospel that make<br />

Christ and Christianity unique. However, Everett<br />

Ferguson emphasizes the need for a spoken word<br />

conveying the core Christian narrative at a moment<br />

like this, “Even with the elaborate efforts to get Peter<br />

and Cornelius together, it was necessary that words<br />

be spoken ‘by which you will be saved’ (11:4). Peter’s<br />

sermon told the story of Jesus from the baptism<br />

which John preached until his resurrection<br />

appearances (10:36-42).” This story pinpoints the<br />

centrality of our core narrative proclamation in the<br />

midst of a boundary crossing experience. It is the<br />

core narrative that must come to the surface in those<br />

significant moments of cross-boundary contact<br />

because to share those narratives is to share what<br />

most animates our existence and therefore is to truly<br />

share.<br />

Imagine how disappointed you’d feel if<br />

you asked a Muslim about their practice<br />

of praying five times a day and they said,<br />

“Oh, it’s no big deal really, it’s just<br />

something we do.”<br />

As an aside to where this speaks to me in the present<br />

context, I recently had a conversation with another<br />

Dad. We both have teenage daughters. We were<br />

searching for what to tell our teenagers about how<br />

they engage a pluralistic, interreligious culture.<br />

Their definition of hospitable seems to be that they<br />

shuttle off the distinctive content of the Christian<br />

faith when confronted with difference. Boundary<br />

crossing moments are for them times to downplay<br />

what makes Christianity unique. Clearly, they—like<br />

their parents—have seen evangelism-as-bluntforce-trauma<br />

where would-be evangelists cross<br />

boundaries into other people’s holy ground wearing<br />

combat boots—it might be better to say they have<br />

seen evangelism that transgresses boundaries rather<br />

than crosses boundaries. Wanting to avoid such<br />

cultural insensitivity, our kids seem to proclaim a<br />

vacuum—I recognize that they are often mimicking<br />

the behavior of us their parents.<br />

The example of Peter and the early church seems to<br />

be that when there is someone on the other side of a<br />

boundary willing to invite you in and demonstrates<br />

hospitality, you should be prepared to give an answer<br />

43<br />

for why you have hope in Jesus Christ. My friend<br />

and I determined that if the opportunity to address<br />

the subject developed again, we would present it this<br />

way. Imagine how disappointed you’d feel if you<br />

asked a Muslim about their practice of praying five<br />

times a day and they said, “Oh, it’s no big deal really,<br />

it’s just something we do.” OR if you were to<br />

encounter an Orthodox Jew and asked about the<br />

significance of keeping Kosher only to hear them<br />

say, “Oh, well, it’s nothing really. We just do it<br />

because we want to.” You’d feel almost cheated in a<br />

way. How would you feel if you were ready to listen<br />

and understand another person’s faith story and<br />

they soft pedaled their faith? I suspect the same<br />

thing happens when you are silent about the content<br />

of Christian faith in the presence of hospitable<br />

others willing to listen to you. Crossing boundaries<br />

should cause us to re-examine our Christian faith<br />

and practice, but it should never be the excuse for<br />

us to suppress the content of our faith.<br />

Additionally, this study primarily identifies with<br />

Peter as the agent of the church. However, within a<br />

discussion of the ecumenical ministry of the<br />

Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) it may be<br />

equally instructive to identify with Cornelius. We<br />

are in a position of receiving those who wish to cross<br />

boundaries for the sake of the church’s unity who<br />

nonetheless find aspects of our faith and practice<br />

unacceptable. The story of Cornelius’ conversion<br />

suggests that such boundary crossing moments are<br />

frequently contingent on the hospitality of those on<br />

the other side of the boundary. That said, the task<br />

of twenty-first-century ecumenism for the<br />

Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) might not<br />

simply be one of navigating the boundary crossings<br />

but also providing welcome to those who cross<br />

boundaries to reach us.<br />

Conversion of the Church<br />

In baptizing Cornelius, Peter was crossing a<br />

boundary that the church had never witnessed Jesus<br />

cross. This was indeed a new thing. This story takes<br />

place in Caesarea (note the name CAESARea).<br />

Cornelius—gentile, God-fearing, and good—was<br />

instructed in a dream to invite Peter to come and<br />

proclaim the gospel among the Gentiles in<br />

Caesarea. Acts 10:28 points to the radical nature of<br />

the boundary crossing. Balch writes, “We do not<br />

usually realize how radical it is when the ‘believers<br />

in Joppa’ (Acts 10:28) hear Peter characterize<br />

Cornelius as an allophyle and then baptize him.”<br />

Mangum • Boundary Crossing, Conversion and Resurrection

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!