12.07.2015 Views

118/119 Biodiversity and Tropical Forest Assessment for Angola

118/119 Biodiversity and Tropical Forest Assessment for Angola

118/119 Biodiversity and Tropical Forest Assessment for Angola

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The proportional representation of major potential vegetation types, according to IDF(2004), is given in Exhibit 6. These numbers do not apply to the current vegetationcover, but rather to the potential cover in the absence of major anthropogenicdisturbance. IDF (2004) estimates that although more than 45 percent of <strong>Angola</strong> wouldlikely support miombo woodl<strong>and</strong> (Exhibit 6), but the actual coverage is lower, as muchmiombo has been cleared <strong>for</strong> agriculture, urban construction, charcoal production, <strong>and</strong>the like. Based on these estimates, it appears that 60-70 percent of <strong>Angola</strong> has thecapacity to support tree-dominated l<strong>and</strong>scapes (i.e., in the absence of major hum<strong>and</strong>isturbance); or 80-90 percent if savannah systems are included. IDF’s estimates appearto be based on the 1970 Carta Fitogegráfica de <strong>Angola</strong> (Barbosa 1970), which dividespotential vegetation into 32 types, many of which are mosaics of different life <strong>for</strong>ms.Exhibit 6. Estimates of cover <strong>for</strong> broad vegetation categories (source: IDF 2004)Potential vegetation type% of total areaOpen tropical <strong>for</strong>est (Miombo) 45.4Dry tropical woodl<strong>and</strong> (savannah) 24.2Miombo-savanna mosaic (transition) 19.8Grassl<strong>and</strong>/meadow 5.2Steppe 3.1<strong>Tropical</strong> rain<strong>for</strong>est (Maiombe) 2.0Desert 0.3Miombo, such as this one inCang<strong>and</strong>ala National Park, is thepredominant vegetation type in<strong>Angola</strong>.Exhibit 7 is a generalized map of the broad potential vegetation types, derived fromBarbosa’s (1970) detailed map <strong>and</strong> extracted from MINUA (2006a). Miombo is clearlythe dominant ecoregion, while <strong>Angola</strong>n afro-montane <strong>for</strong>ests (much “patchier” thanExhibit 6 indicates) are the rarest.In terms of species diversity, endemism, <strong>and</strong> de<strong>for</strong>estation threat, the afro-montane<strong>for</strong>ests are of particular note. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, there are no conservation units within thisecoregion.<strong>118</strong>/<strong>119</strong> BIODIVERSITY AND TROPICAL FOREST ASSESSMENT FOR ANGOLA 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!