12.07.2015 Views

Best of Greyhawk VII - Le Monde de Greyhawk

Best of Greyhawk VII - Le Monde de Greyhawk

Best of Greyhawk VII - Le Monde de Greyhawk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

over the collected states <strong>of</strong> the Baklunish, or is the Caliphate <strong>of</strong> Ekbir something new in the Baklunish experience?Certainly, to a large extent Ekbir will mirror the Theocracy <strong>of</strong> the Pale, more religiously tolerant perhaps, but with a<strong>de</strong>finite sense <strong>of</strong> a state religion and state power. Is the god <strong>of</strong> the people <strong>of</strong> Ekbir someone like Kor? Or might thegod <strong>of</strong> ultimate law, merciful and compassionate, be another version <strong>of</strong> Pholtus?And what <strong>of</strong> the Caliph's interests in the other states <strong>of</strong> the broken empire? To what extent has the religion<strong>of</strong> Ekbir been institutionalized in places like Zeif, Tusmit, or Ket? What is the relationship <strong>of</strong> this religion to thevarious tribal gods it attempts to displace? Might the Baklunish believe in a sort <strong>of</strong> overgod, and is the Caliphate <strong>of</strong>Ekbir the first appearance <strong>of</strong> the overgod on Oerth? What would be his relationship to an ol<strong>de</strong>r <strong>de</strong>ity like Istus?My guess is that the god <strong>of</strong> Ekbir is originally a tough, lawful <strong>de</strong>sert god, transported to the corrupt citiesby virtuous <strong>de</strong>rvishes and nomads. Perhaps, as far the nomads were concerned, it was the lawless worship <strong>of</strong> theother gods that brought down the Empire in the first place. Now, the worship <strong>of</strong> this god has spread throughout theBaklunish world (the god is almost certainly the same who helped create the Cup and Talisman <strong>of</strong> Al'Akbar in theol<strong>de</strong>r days). I see this god, then, as up-and-coming, replacing some <strong>of</strong> the ol<strong>de</strong>r gods <strong>of</strong> the past (and these wouldinclu<strong>de</strong> animistic gods like Geshtai as well as divinatory gods like Istus). There is some evi<strong>de</strong>nce that the followers <strong>of</strong>this god at one time sought to expand their worship into the Flanaess (along with the bor<strong>de</strong>rs <strong>of</strong> the Baklunishworld). Why else would there be an or<strong>de</strong>r <strong>of</strong> Knights <strong>de</strong>dicated to keeping them at bay? But it may be that the timeis right for another holy war to mobilize the forces <strong>of</strong> the Baklunish. According to the original DMG (the only sourceI ever use on such matters), the Cup and Talisman <strong>of</strong> Al'Akbar was lost in the Bandit Kingdoms. Might the time notbe proper to recover it? And what <strong>of</strong> the Jacinth <strong>of</strong> Inestimable Beauty once possessed by the Sultan Jehef Pereen?That passed first into Ket and then down into Keoland--no doubt it is now somewhere in the area <strong>of</strong> the Hold <strong>of</strong> theSea Princes. The Baklunish would surely want their treasures returned.I would suggest that DMs putting some <strong>of</strong> these plots into motion consi<strong>de</strong>r the religious and political state<strong>of</strong> the Baklunish at present. I see a very powerful Caliphate which technically is the center <strong>of</strong> Empire and a bunch <strong>of</strong>squabbling rulers who are vassals or satraps <strong>of</strong> various sorts. This would involve a slight reorganization <strong>of</strong> theBaklunish states along medieval lines, but would result in some interesting cloak and dagger stuff, especially forplayers who are encouraged at first to see the Baklunish as a single, undifferentiated mass.Subj: Re: Baklunish politicsQSamanthaI see the ancient Baklunish Empire as very much in the Persian mo<strong>de</strong>l, with a church trying to get theEmperor to accept Caliph status, much as the Pope wanted to crown Charlemagne in an attempt to exert some controlover him. Unlike Charlemagne, the Baklunish Emperor didn't need the religious trappings.When the Empire was <strong>de</strong>stroyed, the aptly <strong>de</strong>scribed shattered remains had to fend for themselves. Thechurch set up Ekbir. Zeif claimed <strong>de</strong>scent from the Peacock Throne. Tusmit is just happy to be free from both. Now,if they can just keep the Paynims at bay.I see all three states squabbling mightily, unifying only in the face <strong>of</strong> danger (The Paynims) or when acharismatic lea<strong>de</strong>r appears to <strong>de</strong>clare Jihad on the Eastern Flaneass.Subj: Re: Baklunish GodsQSamanthaI don't see Ekbir as <strong>de</strong>voted to one god but the same pantheon as Zief and Tusmit. Similarly, I see Ekbir asvery tolerant religiously. The only exception to this is theocracy. Ekbir believes fervently in theocracy and this iswhat it would export. Once theocratic control is established, the mullahs are more than willing to tolerate behaviorand beliefs not their own. They will just tax you in accordance with how far from their norm you are. Only when areligious fervor seizes the people, usually resulting in a Jihad, does this easy going manner change.*End <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Best</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Greyhawk</strong> 7*

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!