12.07.2015 Views

an innovative algorithm for key frame extraction in video ...

an innovative algorithm for key frame extraction in video ...

an innovative algorithm for key frame extraction in video ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 7. Shot Reconstruction Degree (SRD) measure results computed us<strong>in</strong>g the histogram (HST),<strong>an</strong>d the HWD descriptors. The m<strong>in</strong>imum (mi) <strong>an</strong>d st<strong>an</strong>dard deviation (sd) of the SRD measurescomputed on each shot are also reported.eeopen SRD HST SRD HST (mi) SRD HST (sd) SRD HWD SRD HWD (mi) SRD HWD (sd)CP 4.882 2.214 1.211 7.591 3.814 1.700FR 4.868 2.077 1.239 7.577 3.741 1.723ATS 4.660 2.072 1.246 7.259 3.729 1.757SRDI 4.693 1.984 1.189 7.314 3.416 1.684PME 4.949 1.752 1.501 7.550 3.308 2.065MP 4.846 1.842 1.283 7.563 3.682 1.749nw<strong>an</strong>w1 SRD HST SRD HST (mi) SRD HST (sd) SRD HWD SRD HWD (mi) SRD HWD (sd)CP 3.887 1.474 1.162 6.648 2.928 1.634FR 3.887 1.369 1.212 6.632 2.696 1.690ATS 3.849 1.527 1.199 6.588 2.984 1.664SRDI 3.587 0.636 1.295 6.104 1.402 1.959PME 3.581 1.280 1.255 6.067 2.668 1.839MP 3.642 0.897 1.306 6.311 1.858 1.919news SRD HST SRD HST (mi) SRD HST (sd) SRD HWD SRD HWD (mi) SRD HWD (sd)CP 3.520 2.167 1.372 6.186 4.355 2.064FR 3.534 2.122 1.374 6.238 4.296 2.048ATS 3.515 2.006 1.350 6.188 4.317 2.033SRDI 3.209 1.415 1.504 5.663 2.974 2.273PME 3.084 1.714 1.189 5.527 3.279 1.993MP 3.147 1.513 1.537 5.651 3.218 2.357football SRD HST SRD HST (mi) SRD HST (sd) SRD HWD SRD HWD (mi) SRD HWD (sd)CP 3.335 2.294 0.766 5.856 4.270 1.076FR 3.361 2.294 0.727 5.902 4.270 1.008ATS 3.276 1.847 0.844 5.684 3.522 1.196SRDI 3.067 1.817 0.834 5.327 3.319 1.230PME 2.846 1.634 0.816 5.049 3.026 1.248MP 2.814 1.467 0.802 5.121 2.809 1.334bugsbunny SRD HST SRD HST (mi) SRD HST (sd) SRD HWDSRD HWD (mi) SRD HWD (sd)CP 3.442 1.176 1.091 6.476 2.898 1.479FR 3.444 1.176 1.095 6.483 2.898 1.488ATS 3.339 1.201 1.070 6.275 2.769 1.464SRDI 3.268 0.865 1.137 6.134 1.243 1.656PME 3.597 1.170 1.151 6.521 2.324 1.586MP 3.388 1.176 1.128 6.410 2.898 1.533basketball2 SRD HST SRD HST (mi) SRD HST (sd) SRD HWDSRD HWD (mi) SRD HWD (sd)CP 2.269 2.269 0.000 4.137 4.137 0.000FR 2.079 2.079 0.000 4.044 4.044 0.000ATS 1.980 1.980 0.000 3.786 3.786 0.000SRDI 2.356 2.356 0.000 4.120 4.120 0.000PME 1.658 1.658 0.000 3.336 3.336 0.000MP 0.693 0.693 0.000 2.027 2.027 0.000Table 8. The relative improvement (∆Q) measured on the Fidelity <strong>an</strong>d SRD results of the proposed<strong>algorithm</strong> with respect to each of the other <strong>algorithm</strong>s tested. The results are <strong>in</strong> percentages.24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!