established, and the test dose has not proved to alter thetherapeutic plan. In Europe, the test dose and black boxwarn<strong>in</strong>g with low-molecular-weight iron dextran have beenabandoned. With this dosage, serious adverse events areextremely rare, and any adverse event that has occurredwith iron dextran has not been related to the dose or<strong>in</strong>fusion rate. 4Regard<strong>in</strong>g iron salts, when the total dose adm<strong>in</strong>istered isless than 200 mg ferric gluconate or 300 mg iron sucrose,acute, <strong>in</strong>fusion-related reactions are uncommon. No testdoses are required with these salts.IV IRON AND THE EFFICACY OF ESA THERAPYThe Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)has recommended that the use of erythropoiesis–stimulat<strong>in</strong>g agents (ESAs) beg<strong>in</strong> at a hemoglob<strong>in</strong> level of
oncologistics IV iron support throughout chemotherapypatients and to predict erythropoietic responseimprovement to <strong>in</strong>travenous iron <strong>in</strong> the cancer sett<strong>in</strong>g.If <strong>in</strong>travenous iron is thought to improve the effi cacyof ESAs, can the same be said for orally adm<strong>in</strong>isterediron? Two randomized trials have compared the effi cacyof oral and <strong>in</strong>travenous iron <strong>in</strong> anemic patients withcancer who are receiv<strong>in</strong>g recomb<strong>in</strong>ant erythropoiet<strong>in</strong>.In both studies, oral iron with recomb<strong>in</strong>anterythropoiet<strong>in</strong> was not signifi cantly better thanrecomb<strong>in</strong>ant erythropoiet<strong>in</strong> alone, but <strong>in</strong>travenousiron with recomb<strong>in</strong>ant erythropoiet<strong>in</strong> resulted <strong>in</strong> asignifi cantly better erythropoietic response. 14-15 Inorder to avoid the CMS recommendations that willeffectively remove ESA therapy from the oncologyarmamentarium, IV iron should be <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>tothe treatment paradigm to maximize effi cacy.CONCLUS<strong>ION</strong>The role of <strong>in</strong>travenous iron <strong>in</strong> oncology is poorlyunderstood and is currently a vastly underusedtherapy <strong>in</strong> the treatment of a host of disordersassociated with absolute or functional iron defi ciencyand anemia. The reliance upon outdated <strong>in</strong>formation<strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g high-molecule-weight iron dextran is partlyresponsible for the underuse of IV iron <strong>in</strong> the cl<strong>in</strong>icalsett<strong>in</strong>g today. By demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g advantageous effectswhen used <strong>in</strong> conjunction with ESA therapy, and byserv<strong>in</strong>g as an option with little to no serious adverseevents, the cont<strong>in</strong>ued and <strong>in</strong>creased use of IV ironas ma<strong>in</strong>tenance therapy for chemotherapy patientsshould be considered. ❚Michael Auerbach, M.D., is <strong>in</strong> private practice <strong>in</strong>Baltimore, MD, and is a cl<strong>in</strong>ical professor of medic<strong>in</strong>eat Georgetown University. Dr. Auerbach has publishedextensively on the use of IV iron alone and asadjunctive therapy with ESAs. His study <strong>in</strong> the Journalof Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Oncology<strong>in</strong> 2004 was the fi rst paperdemonstrat<strong>in</strong>g the synergy of IV iron <strong>in</strong> optimiz<strong>in</strong>gESA responsiveness <strong>in</strong> oncology patients.References:1. Moniem KA, Bhandari S. Tolerability and effi cacy of parenteral irontherapy <strong>in</strong> haemodialysis patients, a comparison of preparations.Trans Alt Trans Med2007; 1-7.2. Critchley J, Dundar Y. Adverse events associated with <strong>in</strong>travenousiron <strong>in</strong>fusion (low-molecular-weight iron dextran and iron sucrose):a systematic review. Trans Alt Trans Med2007; 8-36.3. Sav T, Tokgoz B, Sipahioglu MH. Is there a difference betweenallergic potencies of the iron sucrose and low molecular weightiron dextran? Renal Failure 2007; 29: 423-426.4. Auerbach M, Witt D, Toler W, Fierste<strong>in</strong> M, Lerner RG, Ballard H,Cl<strong>in</strong>ical use of the total dose <strong>in</strong>travenous <strong>in</strong>fusion of iron dextran.J Lab Cl<strong>in</strong> Med1988; 111: 566-70.5. Barton JC, Barton EH, Bertoli LF, et al. Intravenous iron dextrantherapy <strong>in</strong> patients with iron defi ciency and normal renalfunction who failed to respond to or did not tolerate oral ironsupplementation. Am J Med2000; 109: 27-32.6. Auerbach M, Chaudhry M, Goldman H, Ballard H. Value ofmethylprednisolone <strong>in</strong> prevention of the arthralgia-myalgiasyndrome associated with the total dose <strong>in</strong>fusion of iron dextran:a double bl<strong>in</strong>d randomized trial. J Lab Cl<strong>in</strong> Med1998; 131:257-260.7. MacDougall IC, Roche A. Adm<strong>in</strong>istration of <strong>in</strong>travenous ironsucrose as a 2-m<strong>in</strong>ute push to CKD patients: a prospectiveevaluation of 2297 <strong>in</strong>jections. Am J Kidney Dis 2005; 46: 283-89.8. Fishbane Sm Frei GL, Maesaka J. Reduction <strong>in</strong> recomb<strong>in</strong>anthuman erythropoiet<strong>in</strong> doses by the use of chronic <strong>in</strong>travenous ironsupplementation. Am J Kidney Dis 1995; 26: 41-46.9. Fishbane S, Ungureanu VD, Maesaka JK, Kaupke CJ, Lim V, WishJ. The safety of <strong>in</strong>travenous iron dextran <strong>in</strong> hemodialysis patients.AM J Kidney Dis 1996; 28: 529-34.10. Fishbane S, Mittal SK, Maesaka JK. Benefi cial effects of irontherapy <strong>in</strong> renal failure patients on hemodialysis. Kidney Int1999;55: 567-70.11. Adamson JW, Eshbach JW. Erythropoiet<strong>in</strong> for end-stage renaldisease. N Engl J Med1998; 339: 625-27.12. Ganz T. Hepcid<strong>in</strong>, a key regulator of iron metabolism andmediator of anemia of <strong>in</strong>fl ammation. Blood 2003; 102: 783-88.13. Andrews NC. Anemia of <strong>in</strong>fl ammation: the cytok<strong>in</strong>e-hepcid<strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>k.J Cl<strong>in</strong> Invest2004; 113: 1251-53.14. Auerbach M, Ballard H, Trout JR, et al. Intravenous iron optimizesthe response to recomb<strong>in</strong>ant human erythropoiet<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> cancerpatients with chemotherapy-related anemia: a multicenter, openlabel, randomized trial. J Cl<strong>in</strong> Oncol2004; 22: 1301-07.15. Henry DH, Dahl NV, Auerbach M, Tchekmedyian S, Laufman LR.Intravenous ferric gluconate signifi cantly improves response toepoet<strong>in</strong> alfa versus oral iron or no iron <strong>in</strong> anemic patients withcancer receiv<strong>in</strong>g chemotherapy. Oncologist2007; 12: 231-42.16. Hedenus M, Birgegard G, Nasman P, et al. Addition of<strong>in</strong>travenous iron to epoet<strong>in</strong> beta <strong>in</strong>creases hemoglob<strong>in</strong> responseand decreases epoet<strong>in</strong> dose requirement <strong>in</strong> anemic patientswith lymphoproliferative malignancies: a randomized multicenterstudy. Leukemia 2007; published onl<strong>in</strong>e Jan 25. DOI:10.1038/sj.leu.2404562.oncologistics 23