Human Rights, Serious Crime and Criminal Procedure - College of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

IndexPublic interest—cont.fundamental rights and 70-71balancing 127resolving conflicts between74-77presumption of innocence and42private interests, conflict with70release pending trial and 30-32seriousness of crime, groundedin 52-53, 70Strasbourg court and 56-61,62-64, 69strength of 69-80victims' rights and 77-80Public participationvalue of 9-10Public safetySee also Public interestArticle 6, and 56-61prominence by government 38Regulation of InvestigatoryPowers Act 2000compatibility with ECHR 5,108, 115-116,128Release pending trial. See BailRetrospective criminallaws/penaltiesnon-derogable right prohibiting75Rights based approachconflicting goals of criminaljustice policy 38, 43^4generally 13, 42public interest considerations42-43Royal Commissionsilenceopposition to adverseinferences on 24Safetyinterpretation 39Self-defenceevidential burden 17Self-incriminationprivilege against 13, 18-23, 42anti-pooling rationale 21balancing approach 65-67British courts and 64-67exclusions 19-23, 67implied 58-60, 64rationales 20-21support for 20-21terrorist cases 60-61Sentencingharsher 1, 43mandatory minimum 1, 43Serious crimebalance, finding the right126-132definitions, expanding 107-108drug trafficking 102-104And see Drug traffickingexceptions based on,developing 93, 94, 108-118justification for 111-112international battle against96-108organised crime 97-102And see Organised crimeproper approach to tackling111safeguards to accompanyspecial procedures108-109, 114-116serious fraud 104-105And see Serious fraudspecial proceduresCanada, in 105child witnesses, as to 106defendants rights and105-107England, in 106E.U., in the 105France, in 106Germany, in 105Italy, in 106-107safeguards required toaccompany 108-109,114-116Scandinavia, in 105-106trial process, during the106-107144
Serious crime—cont.special procedures—cont.witness anonymity 106-107struggle against 1tackling, proper approach 111Serious fraudfocus of concern 104-105Serious Fraud Office 104-105Silenceright to 13, 18, 23-26, 42, 128adverse inference drawn onexercise of 23, 24, 27, 64balancing approach 65-67curtailment 44fair trial, part of right to25-26implied 25, 58-60, 64police questioning/prosecution casedistinguished 23-24presumption of innocencelinked 24pre-trial investigation 23restrictions on 1, 26terrorist cases 60-61Standard of proofbeyond reasonable doubt 14,15-16Statisticsrecorded crime 39^11Summary offencesevidential burden 17IndexTerrorismcurtailment of Articles 5 and 6where 55definition 30, 95, 107detention in context of 29-30,53-54Terrorism Act 2000compatibility with ECHR 5effect of 30, 95Torture/inhuman/degradingtreatmentevidence obtained by 35-36non-derogable right prohibiting75145Tribunalsfallibilities 7-8UN Convention against IllicitTraffic in Narcotic Drugsand PsychotropicSubstances 1988powers under 99, 103UN Convention againstTransnational OrganisedCrimedraft objectives 97-98Valuesaccurate adjudication 6-9communication 10conflicting 12-13criminal process 41^12public interest considerations42^3rights based approach 41-^2defendant's basic protection,upholding 11-12, 113-114legitimacy 9-13public participation 9-10victim's rights, upholding10-11, 113-114Victim's rightspublic interest, and 77-80value of upholding 10-11, 42Witnessesanonymity of 34, 79-80,106-107child 106right to confront 13, 33-35, 42,77-78public interest considerations43violations 56-58Youth Justice and CriminalEvidence Act 1999powers under 106
Page 1:
THEKAMLYNHuman Rights, Serious Crim
Page 11:
TABLE OF CONTENTSAcknowledgementsCo
Page 14 and 15:
The Hamlyn Lectures1961 British Jus
Page 16 and 17:
The Hamlyn Lectures1989 Protection
Page 18 and 19:
The Hamlyn TrustProfessor N. Dawson
Page 20 and 21:
Table of CasesBrown (Margaret) v. S
Page 22 and 23:
Table of CasesLooseley [2001] UKHL
Page 24 and 25:
Table of CasesVan Mechelen v. Nethe
Page 26 and 27:
Why bother with Rights when Public
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Why bother with Rights ivhen Public
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73:
Page 76 and 77:
Evaluating the Strasbourg and Briti
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119: Taking a "Balanced" View of the Pub
Page 164 and 165: IndexCriminal Justice and Police Ac
Page 166 and 167: IndexFair trial rights—cont.curta
Page 175 and 176: Does the United Kingdom StillHave a
show all

Human Rights, Serious Crime and Criminal Procedure - College of ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?