12.07.2015 Views

Question and Questionnaire Design - Stanford University

Question and Questionnaire Design - Stanford University

Question and Questionnaire Design - Stanford University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

308 Jon A. Krosnick <strong>and</strong> Stanley PresserMartin, E. (1980). The effects of item contiguity <strong>and</strong> probing on measures of anomia. SocialPsychology Quarterly, 43, 116–120.Martin, E. (2004). Vignettes <strong>and</strong> respondent debriefing for questionnaire design <strong>and</strong>evaluation. In: S. Presser, J. M. Rothgeb, M. P. Couper, J. L. Lessler, E. Martin,J. Martin & E. Singer (Eds), Methods for testing <strong>and</strong> evaluating survey questionnaires(pp. 149–172). New York: Wiley.Martin, W. S. (1973). The effects of scaling on the correlation coefficient: A test of validity.Journal of Marketing Research, 10, 316–318.Martin, W. S. (1978). Effects of scaling on the correlation coefficient: Additionalconsiderations. Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 304–308.Masters, J. R. (1974). The relationship between number of response categories <strong>and</strong> reliabilityof Likert-type questionnaires. Journal of Educational Measurement, 11, 49–53.Matell, M. S., & Jacoby, J. (1971). Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert scaleitems? Study I: Reliability <strong>and</strong> validity. Educational <strong>and</strong> Psychological Measurement, 31,657–674.Matell, M. S., & Jacoby, J. (1972). Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likertscaleitems? Effects of testing time <strong>and</strong> scale properties. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56,506–509.Mathews, C. O. (1927). The effect of position of printed response words upon children’sanswers to questions in two-response types of tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 18,445–457.McClendon, M. J. (1986). Response-order effects for dichotomous questions. Social ScienceQuarterly, 67, 205–211.McClendon, M. J. (1991). Acquiescence <strong>and</strong> recency response–order effects in interviewsurveys. Sociological Methods <strong>and</strong> Research, 20, 60–103.McClendon, M. J., & Alwin, D. F. (1993). No-opinion filters <strong>and</strong> attitude measurementreliability. Sociological Methods <strong>and</strong> Research, 21, 438–464.McKelvie, S. J. (1978). Graphic rating scales – how many categories? British Journal ofPsychology, 69, 185–202.Means, B., Swan, G. E., Jobe, J. B., & Esposito, J. L. (1991). An alternative approachto obtaining personal history data. In: P. P. Biemer, R. M. Groves, L. E. Lyberg,N. A. Mathiowetz & S. Sudman (Eds), Measurement errors in surveys (pp. 127–144). NewYork: Wiley.Messick, S., & Frederiksen, N. (1958). Ability, acquiescence, <strong>and</strong> ‘authoritarianism’.Psychological Reports, 4, 687–697.Metzner, H., & Mann, F. (1953). Effects of grouping related questions in questionnaires.Public Opinion Quarterly, 17, 136–141.Miller, N., & Campbell, D. T. (1959). Recency <strong>and</strong> primacy in persuasion as a functionof the timing of speeches <strong>and</strong> measurement. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology,59, 1–9.Miller, W. E. (1982). American National Election Study, 1980: Pre <strong>and</strong> post election surveys.Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-<strong>University</strong> Consortium for Political <strong>and</strong> Social Research.Mingay, D. J., & Greenwell, M. T. (1989). Memory bias <strong>and</strong> response-order effects. Journalof Official Statistics, 5, 253–263.Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (1991). Eliminating defense <strong>and</strong> agreement bias from measuresof the sense of control: A 2 2 index. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 127–145.Mondak, J. J. (2001). Developing valid knowledge scales. American Journal of PoliticalScience, 45, 224–238.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!