Question and Questionnaire Design - Stanford University

310 Jon A. Krosnick and Stanley PresserPresser, S., & Blair, J. (1994). Survey pretesting: Do different methods produce differentresults? In: P. V. Marsden (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 73–104). Cambridge, MA:Blackwell.Presser, S., Rothgeb, J. M., Couper, M. P., Lessler, J. T., Martin, E., Martin, J., & Singer, E.(Eds). (2004). Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires. New York: Wiley.Presser, S., Traugott, M. W., & Traugott, S. (1990). Vote ‘‘over’’ reporting in surveys: Therecords or the respondents? Presented at the International Conference on MeasurementErrors, Tucson, AZ.Quinn, S. B., & Belson, W. A. (1969). The effects of reversing the order of presentation of verbalrating scales in survey interviews. London: Survey Research Center.Ramsay, J. O. (1973). The effect of number categories in rating scales on precision ofestimation of scale values. Psychometrika, 38, 513–532.Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1999). Measures of political attitudes. SanDiego, CA: Academic Press.Roese, N. J., & Jamieson, D. W. (1993). Twenty years of bogus pipeline research: A criticalview and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 363–375.Rosenberg, N., Izard, C. E., & Hollander, E. P. (1955). Middle category response: reliabilityand relationship to personality and intelligence variables. Educational and PsychologicalMeasurement, 15, 281–290.Rosenstone, S. J., Hansen, J. M., & Kinder, D. R. (1986). Measuring change in personaleconomic well-being. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 176–192.Rothenberg, B. B. (1969). Conservation of number among four- and five-year-old children:Some methodological considerations. Child Development, 40, 383–406.Rothgeb, J., Willis, G., & Forsyth, B. H. (2001). Questionnaire pretesting methods: Dodifferent techniques and different organizations produce similar results? Paper presented atthe annual meeting of the American Statistical Association.Rubin, H. K. (1940). A constant error in the seashore test of pitch discrimination. Unpublishedmaster’s thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.Ruch, G. M., & DeGraff, M. H. (1926). Corrections for chance and ‘guess’ vs. ‘do not guess’instructions in multiple-response tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 17, 368–375.Rundquist, E. A., & Sletto, R. F. (1936). Personality in the Depression. Minneapolis, MI:University of Minnesota Press.Saris, W. E., & Gallhofer, I. N. (2007). Design evaluation and analysis of questionnaires forsurvey research. New York: Wiley.Saris, W. E., & Krosnick, J. A. (2000), The damaging effect of acquiescence response bias onanswers to agree/disagree questions. Paper presented at the American Association for PublicOpinion Research annual meeting. Portland, OR.Schaeffer, N. C. (1991). Hardly ever or constantly? Group comparisons and vague quantifiers.Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 395–423.Schaeffer, N. C., & Bradburn, N. M. (1989). Respondent behavior in magnitude estimation.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 402–413.Schaeffer, N. C., & Dykema, J. (2004). A multiple-method approach to improving the clarity ofclosely related concepts: Distinguishing legal and physical custody of children. In: S. Presser,J. M. Rothgeb, M. P. Couper, J. T. Lessler, E. Martin, J. Martin & E. Singer (Eds), Methodsfor testing and evaluating survey questionnaires (pp. 475–502). New York: Wiley.Scherpenzeel, A. (1995). Meta-analysis of a European comparative study. In: W. E. Saris &A. Munnich (Eds), The multitrait-multimethod approach to evaluate measurement instruments(pp. 225–242). Budapest, Hungary: Eotvos University Press.