66www.unsystem.org/scnSCN TF-AME calls for contributions to its inventory of nutrition indicatorsThe Task Force on Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation (TF-AME) of the SCN Steering Committee has askedJudith Appleton, a social nutritionist with 25 years' field and HQ experience in projects, programmes, policy andadvocacy in a variety of organisations, to inventorise and comment on nutrition indicators currently in use.The purpose is for the TF-AME to make an inventory of these indicators and assess their usefulness according torobustness (relevance, timeliness, specificity, accuracy) and user-friendliness (measurability) in various contextsas well as to provide the basis for advancing an SCN discussion of key nutrition indicators in decision-making,planning and evaluating various kinds of impact and outcome, in different sectoral, geographical, socio-economicand cultural contexts.The overall categories these will slot into in this piece of work are:- food/food security/food chain- health/ill-health- care, of each family memberIn our comments we will also highlight linkages between indicators and natural clusters of indicators.It would be very helpful if you would send Judith (judith.appleton@zen.co.uk) your current guidelines for the identificationand development of indicators and their use in your organisation. Web addresses where she can findrelevant documents would be helpful. You may wish to add your own views of the usefulness of the main indicatorsin use in your organisation, as well as further papers on, examples of, or documentation on indicator use,both in your organisation and in any collaboration and partnership work you have been involved in with other organisations.Please send:1. current guidelines on indicators used in your organisation2. your own views of the usefulness of these and other indicators for your organisation and elsewhere3. references of key papers, or your thoughts, relating to nutrition indicators - If there is a website where thesedocuments can be found, kindly provide the address4. your experience of nutrition-related indicators developed for use in any sectorThe TF-AME is also trying to pin down experience with assessing nutritional outcomes not only in activities labellednutritional, but in many sectors—non-nutritional health, in humanitarian and non-humanitarian food securityoperations, in education, in agriculture, in forestry, in fisheries, in rural development, in urban development,as well as related to trade, transport and finance. If you have experience of nutritional aspects of work in any ofthese areas, perhaps through collaboration, please let me know how any nutritional impacts and outcomes inthese areas have been assessed, according to which indicators, and how those indicators have been developed.Any papers with views on indicators that you find particularly useful, and/or thoughts you may have had on nutritionindicators yourself, will also be of interest to the endeavour.The Task Force is preparing a paper for discussion by SCN in Hanoi early March, we therefore ask you to sendJudith examples of your ideas as soon as possible. Please do not hesitate to call her to discuss any or all of theabove, to see TF-AME’s note on its Areas of Work, or to see Judith’s TOR. Judith will get straight back to you onany queries and points you raise.Many thanks from TF-AME and Judith for your time and help.Please address all correspondence about the inventory toJudith Appleton MBEFood, Nutrition and Livelihoods Specialist - working for SCN's TF-AME on nutrition indicators4 Causeway Fold, Blackshaw HeadHebden BridgeWest Yorkshire HX7 7JF U.K.Tel 00 44 1422 846677 [01422-846677 in UK]Cell: 00 44 7769556169EMail: judith.appleton@zen.co.ukSCN NEWS # 35 back to contents
www.unsystem.org/scn 67Speaker’s CornerThe Speaker’s Corner of this edition of SCN News focus on food labels and human rights responsibilities of the corporatefood sector vis-à-vis consumers. Boyd Swinburn, who has taken over as the leader of Task Force on Human RightsResponsibilities of the Corporate Food Sector the SCN Working Group on Nutrition, Ethics and Human Rights after theformer Task Force leader Kate Baillie left IASO earlier this year, argues that whereas the massive interest of the sectorto provide and market healthy food and drink is much welcome by nutritionist, there is an urgent need for a global foodprofiling system which is not confusing for the consumer. Jup van’t Veld is Secretary of the Choices International Foundatin.The Foundation was set up in 207 by Campina, Friesland Food and Unilever to coordinate the global implementationof the Choices Programme and safeguard its integrity and credibility. He describes the background and main featuresof the programme and progress in implementation. We hope that the two articles by Swinburn and van’t Veld willstimulate debate among the SCN News readership.The front-of-pack battleground for nutrient logosBoyd Swinburn, WHO Collaborating Centre for Obesity Prevention, Deakin University, Melbourne and Leader of the Task Force onHuman Rights Responsibilities of the corporate food sector“There are no healthy or unhealthy foods, only healthy or unhealthy diets.” Thank goodness we can nowofficially bury this old mantra that has been long-repeated by the food industry and many nutritionists. Aplethora of logos, many of them recently created by food companies, are now jockeying for position on thefront of food packaging to pronounce on the healthiness of the product inside. However, there is anunderstandable scepticism about why the food companies have now embraced systems that brand foods asthe healthy or (far less frequently) unhealthy choices. The potential for increasing consumer confusion isenormous because the messages will inevitably conflict and the general mistrust of industry promotion ofnutrition marketing messages may rub off on more independent sources of information. Thus, there is anurgent need to apply some basic human rights and public health principles to achieving consistency andcredibility of nutrient profiling systems and their applications.Nutrient profiling, which is the science of classifying foods according to their nutritional composition, has beenwith us for some time, but in the last few years the number of classification systems has increasedenormously (Rayner et al 2001, Grunert and Wills 2007). Originally, government regulations allowed foodnutrient claims such as ‘low salt’ or ‘reduced fat’ and ‘nutrition signpost’ systems such as the Australian andNew Zealand Heart Foundations’ Pick the Tick or the Swedish Keyhole allowed foods to carry a logo from anindependent organization to signal a healthy choice. More recently, supermarket chains in the UK haveintroduced traffic light logos on their own-brand products and large food companies such as Kellogg, Kraft,Pepsi, and Unilever have also developed their own classification systems. In Australia, the Food and GroceryCouncil is currently recruiting food manufacturers to place a percent daily intake logo on the font of pack. Addto this the specialised logos such glycemic index or gluten-free and consumers are now facing an explosionof front-of-pack signals about the health value of the foods they are about to buy.Each system does have the potential benefits of providing short-hand signals to the busy consumers aboutthe nutrient composition of food products and setting the nutrient standards for manufacturers to aim for inthe formulation of foods (Noakes and Crawford 1991, Young and Swinburn 2002). However, the risks,especially of consumer confusion and scepticism, are now increasing significantly as each large foodcompany launches its own system of criteria, names and logos. The distortion of messages and informationby large food companies is a major contributor to the public confusion about nutrition (Nestle 2007), and trulyindependent systems and messages are needed which have no connection with food companies.Food is a global commodity and a fundamental human right. Therefore, the solutions will need to be globaland UN agencies have already made important progress in operationalising these human rights. Strategies toensure ‘adequate food’ will need to incorporate all aspects of the food system (including marketing andnutrition education/information) (UNCESCR 1999) and ‘the highest attainable standards of health’ has beeninterpreted by the United Nations System Standing Committee on Nutrition to include the ‘human right ofchildren and adolescents to be free from obesity and related diseases’ (SCN 2006). Also, the UN agenciesand the United Nations University have made significant progress in identifying international harmonisationapproaches for nutrient-based dietary standards (King and Garza 2007).back to contents SCN NEWS # 35