148 PARALLEL SESSION HALL H III | ANTRHOPOGENIC INFLUENCESPARALLEL SESSION HALL H III | ANTHROPOGENIC INFLUENCES149Session: Anthropogenic influencesThursday, 24 February, 12:30, Hall H IVSession: Anthropogenic influencesThursday, 24 February, 12:45, Hall H IVBIRD DIVERSITY AND FEEDING GUILD COMPOSITION ALONG ATROPICAL FOREST-FARMLAND GRADIENT IN WESTERN KENYARonald Mulwa 1 , Katrin Böhning-Gaese 1 , Matthias Schleuning 11BiK-F Senckenberg, Frankfurt, DE, Ronald.Mulwa@senckenberg.deIMPACT OF ANTHROPOGENIC PRESSURE ON THE POPULATIONSTRUCTURE OF ANOGEISSUS LEIOCARPA WITHIN WARI-MAROFOREST RESERVE IN BENIN (WEST AFRICA)Achille Ephrem Assogbadjo 1THURSDAY 12:30 Hall H IVIn many tropical regions, <strong>for</strong>ests have been replaced by secondary <strong>for</strong>ests andfarmland habitats that often occur adjacent to remnants of near natural <strong>for</strong>est.Whereas numerous studies have investigated the effects of human disturbancein <strong>for</strong>est habitats, little is known about bird communities in tropical farmlands.We surveyed bird communities in Kakamega Forest and adjacent farmlands inwestern Kenya to assess variations in bird abundance, diversity and feedingguild composition across a habitat gradient during different seasons. Intwo types of <strong>for</strong>est (near natural vs. secondary <strong>for</strong>est) and farmland habitats(mixed and sugarcane farmland), we conducted point counts to record birdsand their key resources (i.e., fruits, flowers and invertebrates) over an entireyear. Bird abundances and resource availability fluctuated over the course ofthe year. Surprisingly, overall bird abundances were higher in farmland thanin <strong>for</strong>est habitats. Accordingly, flower, fruit and invertebrate availability werein higher farmland than in <strong>for</strong>est habitats, whereas the structural vegetationdiversity was higher in <strong>for</strong>est than in farmland habitats. However, feeding guildsof birds responded differently to differences between <strong>for</strong>est and farmlandhabitats. Frugivorous birds tended to be more numerous in farmland than in<strong>for</strong>est habitats, whereas insectivorous birds showed the opposite pattern. Thehigher frugivore richness in the farmland was directly related to the higherfruit availability in farmland than in <strong>for</strong>est habitats. Within <strong>for</strong>est and farmlandhabitats, bird species richness and abundance were higher in near naturalthan in secondary <strong>for</strong>est types and in mixed than in sugarcane farmland types,respectively. These differences might be due to the higher structural diversityin near natural <strong>for</strong>ests and mixed farmlands, indicating that structurally diversehabitats support larger and more species-rich bird communities in both <strong>for</strong>estand farmland habitats. The differential response of different bird feeding guildsto tropical <strong>for</strong>est-farmland gradients indicates that conservation research oftropical bird communities should not rely on measures of overall bird diversity.1LEA-FSA-UAC, Cotonou, BJ, assogbadjo@yahoo.frThe present study focused on the analysis of the structure of the A. leiocarpadominated natural stands in the Wari-Maro <strong>for</strong>est reserve which are under highand minimal anthropogenic pressures. These stands were considered <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>estinventory after carrying out a random sampling scheme of 40 sample units of30 m x 50 m. In each level pressure stand, the dbh and tree-height of identifiedtree-species were measured in each plot. Data analyses were based on thecomputation of structural parameters, establishment of the stem diameter andheight distributions and the floristic composition of the two types of stands.Results obtained showed higher values <strong>for</strong> the overall basal area, mean heightand diameter <strong>for</strong> A. leiocarpa presented in low-pressure stands. In the highpressurestands, the frequency of trees in the successive diameter classesdropped rapidly and the value of the logarithmic slope of the height-diameterrelationship was lower indicating a lanky shape. Results from the present studysuggest that effective conservation is needed <strong>for</strong> A. leiocarpa stands under highpressure by developing appropriate strategy <strong>for</strong> restoration purposes.THURSDAY 12:45 Hall H IVgtö<strong>Society</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Tropical</strong> <strong>Ecology</strong> | Gesellschaft für Tropenökologie e.V. Status and future of tropical biodiversity | Frankfurt, 21 - 24 February 2011gtö
150 PLENARY KEYNOTE THURSDAY HALL IIIPARALLEL SESSION HALL H III | ANDEAN BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOT II151Session: KeynoteThursday, 24 February, 14:25, Hall H IIIChair: Heribert HoferGENETIC DIVERSITY AND TROPICAL BIODIVERSITYCONSERVATION: NEGLECTED COMPONENT OR NEEDLESSDISTRACTION?Thursday, 24 February, 15:15 | Hall H III | Second part of the session:THE ANDEAN BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOT AND ITS FUTURE: BIODIVERSITY,ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING & ECOSYSTEM SERVICES UNDERENVIRONMENTAL CHANGEChairs: Jörg Bendix, Erwin BeckMichael Bru<strong>for</strong>d, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK, bru<strong>for</strong>dmw@cf.ac.ukTHURSDAY 14:25 Hall H IIIGiven the numerous calls on conservation funding and the alarming rate atwhich tropical biodiversity is currently being lost, prioritisation of conservationaction and research is a necessity. Genetic diversity is considered by many tobe a relatively low priority in conservation of biodiversity. A commitment toconserve genetic diversity is absent from many national and internationalagreements and from the scientific underpinning of the CBD which, whileconcentrating on species diversity (Global Taxonomy Initiative) and ecosystemstability (Ecosystems Approach), neglects genetic diversity almost completely.No targets <strong>for</strong> the conservation of genetic diversity were set <strong>for</strong> 2010 within theEU. Yet genetic diversity is one of the three important components of biologicaldiversity and provides the raw material <strong>for</strong> natural selection and adaptation toenvironmental change which will certainly be needed in the future. I will usethis presentation to first ask why genetics is ignored in this way, and what cangeneticists do to change attitudes within the biodiversity community. Researchon genetic diversity of species in tropical ecosystems has yielded knowledge ofconservation relevance which was previously unsuspected and in the secondpart of my talk I will summarise what new knowledge has come from researchon tropical ecosystem genetics. Finally, evidence that genetic data may impactdirectly on management of tropical biodiversity and alter priorities <strong>for</strong> fundingand action may be considered equivocal, yet such examples are beginning tocome into the literature and in the third part of my talk I will use one exampleto illustrate how genetic data can alter the ’bottom line’ in tropical biodiversityconservation.FUNCTIONAL SOIL-LANDSCAPE MODELLING - ESTIMATING SLOPESTABILITY IN A STEEP ANDEAN MOUNTAIN FOREST REGIONMareike Liess 11Bayreuth University, Bayreuth, DE, mareike.liess@uni-bayreuth.deLandslides are a common phenomenon within the Ecuadorian Andes and havean impact on soil-landscape <strong>for</strong>mation. Within the research area, landslidesare mainly composed of soil and mud slides, while rock slides occur to a muchlesser extent.Landslide susceptibility was determined in a steep mountain <strong>for</strong>est region inSouthern Ecuador. Soil mechanical and hydrological properties in addition toterrain steepness were hypothesized to be the major factors in causing soilslides. Hence, the factor of safety (FS) was calculated as the soil shear ratio thatis necessary to maintain the critical state equilibrium on a potential slidingsurface. Regression tree (RT) and Random Forest (RF) models were comparedin their predictive <strong>for</strong>ce to regionalise the depth of the failure plane and soilbulk density based on terrain parameters. The depth of the failure planewas assumed at the lower boundary of the stagnic soil layer or soil depthrespectively, depending on soils being stagnic or non-stagnic.Bulk density and the depth of the failure plane were regionalised with RFper<strong>for</strong>ming better than RT. The FS was determined in dependence of soilwetness referring to 0.001, 0.01, 0.1 and 3 mm/h net rainfall rate. Sites with a FS≥ 1 at 3 mm/h (complete saturation) as unconditionally stable, sites with a FS