12.07.2015 Views

Solar electrification by the concession approach in rural Limpopo ...

Solar electrification by the concession approach in rural Limpopo ...

Solar electrification by the concession approach in rural Limpopo ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Solar</strong> <strong>electrification</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>concession</strong> <strong>approach</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>rural</strong> <strong>Limpopo</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>ce 27Table 8.5: Fuels used less s<strong>in</strong>ce obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g solar or grid electricityFuel% of respondents mention<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> fuelSHS-usersGrid-usersCandles 61% 49%Paraff<strong>in</strong> 31% 40%Wood 0% 2%Dry cell batteries 1% 2%Generator 1% 0%n/a 6% 7%Reduction <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> use of candles was seen as <strong>the</strong> greatest impact on o<strong>the</strong>r fuels <strong>by</strong> 61% of SHSs users,with paraff<strong>in</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> only o<strong>the</strong>r significant fuel said to have been affected <strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong> acquisition ofSHSs (31%). S<strong>in</strong>ce SHSs cannot cook or be used for o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>rmal applications, this impact is whatmight be expected.Grid users stated that candles and paraff<strong>in</strong> were <strong>the</strong> fuels whose use had been reduced <strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir be<strong>in</strong>gconnected to <strong>the</strong> grid. Wood is also mentioned, albeit <strong>by</strong> only 2% of grid connected respondents.Grid electricity can displace wood for cook<strong>in</strong>g and o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>rmal applications, but is relativelyexpensive, which is why its impact on <strong>the</strong> use of wood is found to be limited. The fact that <strong>the</strong>majority of households us<strong>in</strong>g wood collect it free is a major factor here.Table 8.6: Changes <strong>in</strong> expenditure on fuels s<strong>in</strong>ce obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g solar or grid electricityTrend SHS-users Grid-usersSpend<strong>in</strong>g more money 22% 2%Spend<strong>in</strong>g less money 52% 93%Same 11% 2%Miss<strong>in</strong>g or n/a 15% 2%The question on <strong>the</strong> effect of <strong>electrification</strong> on expenditure on fuels produced a fairly unequivocalresponse (93%) from grid-users who <strong>in</strong>dicated that <strong>the</strong>y were spend<strong>in</strong>g less money than before<strong>electrification</strong>. SHS-users were less certa<strong>in</strong>, with about half say<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>y were spend<strong>in</strong>g less money,11% say<strong>in</strong>g no change had occurred, and 22% say<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>y were spend<strong>in</strong>g more money. In view of<strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> mean expenditure on grid electricity is a little over half of that on SHSs, <strong>the</strong>sentiment among SHS-users can be understood.ENERGY RESEARCH CENTRE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!