12.07.2015 Views

The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect - Vinartus

The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect - Vinartus

The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect - Vinartus

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1. GENERAL SIMILARITIES 25<strong>in</strong> (19a) and the sentential subject of (19b), it was necessary to derivethem both from the same simplex sentence, viz., Nero destroyed Rome.<strong>The</strong> relevant part of the <strong>in</strong>terpretation of simplex sentences is represented<strong>in</strong> the current theory by -grids by assum<strong>in</strong>g destroy and destruction havethe same -grid, we can dispense with the transformational account of (19).Sentences and noun phrases are also similar with respect to processeslike control and b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>The</strong> basic b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g facts are the same <strong>in</strong> sentenceand noun phrase:(20) John i portrayed himself iJohn i 's protrayal of himself i*himself i portrayed John i /him i*his own i portrayal of John i /him iJohn recommended for [himself i to portray himself i ]John recommended [his own i portrayal of himself i ]*John recommended for [himself i to portray him i ]*John recommended [his own i portrayal of him i ]Control facts are also similar <strong>in</strong> noun phrase and sentence.clauses can only be controlled by the subject, not the object:Adjunct(21) a. John criticized Bill j after his j talk.b. John's criticism of Bill j after his j talk.c. *John criticized Bill j after PRO j talk<strong>in</strong>g.d. *John's criticism of Bill j after PRO j talk<strong>in</strong>g.(Both (c) and (d) are ne where John controls PRO.)When Chomsky <strong>in</strong>troduced a non-transformational account of the thematicsimilarities between sentence and noun phrase (Chomsky 1970), healso considered the fact that a structural subject-object dist<strong>in</strong>ction wasnecessary <strong>in</strong> the noun phrase as well as sentence, and <strong>in</strong>troduced the nodeN|and X-theory|precisely for this reason. If we dene c-command as follows: c-commands if neither dom<strong>in</strong>ates the other, and the rst (branch<strong>in</strong>g)node dom<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g dom<strong>in</strong>ates then with the <strong>in</strong>troduction of N-bar,the noun phrase and sentence are similar enough <strong>in</strong> structure to accountfor the facts of (20) and (21). <strong>The</strong> \subjects" of both noun phrase andsentence assymetrically c-command the objects, allow<strong>in</strong>g us to capture theassymetry <strong>in</strong> b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g and control facts.A po<strong>in</strong>t onwhichsentence and noun phrase rema<strong>in</strong> dissimilar, underChomsky's account|which has become the standard account |is Case-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!