12.07.2015 Views

The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect - Vinartus

The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect - Vinartus

The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect - Vinartus

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. THE DP-ANALYSIS 51Though the idea that the Determ<strong>in</strong>er is the head of the noun phraseseems rather odd at rst, the conceptual considerations I havejustsketchedmake it seem a very natural, even necessary development of current viewsof phrase structure. I will discuss the Det-as-head analysis <strong>in</strong> more detail<strong>in</strong> Chapter Four. I have <strong>in</strong>troduced it here because I will occasionally makereference to it <strong>in</strong> the rema<strong>in</strong>der of this chapter, and <strong>in</strong> the next.As a bibliographic note, I would also like topo<strong>in</strong>t out that the Detas-headanalysis, and the analysis <strong>in</strong> which there is an Inectional (i.e.,functional) head of the noun phrase, are also not so odd that others havenot thought of it before me. When I rst began explor<strong>in</strong>g the possibility,I thought it quite novel, but I have s<strong>in</strong>ce discovered comparable proposals<strong>in</strong> Brame 1981, 1982, Hale 1980, Hellan 1986, Horrocks & Stavrou 1985,Hudson 1984, Kornlt 1984, Kuroda 1986, Reuland 1985, Szabolcsi 1981,1984. For the most part, these authors appear to be unaware of each other'swork.<strong>The</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>er as head of the noun phrase is also, of course, a very wellestablishedtenet <strong>in</strong> the Montagovian semantic tradition (Montague 1974),and receives particular attention <strong>in</strong> the Generalized Quantier proposal ofBarwise & Cooper 1981, cf. Higg<strong>in</strong>botham & May 1980.3.5 <strong>The</strong> Position of 'sIn this section, I would like to consider how Case is assigned to the possessorunder the DP-analysis. It is generally assumed that the 's is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong>Case-assignment to the possessor. But what precisely is the position of 's,and what is <strong>its</strong> relation to the possessor?3.5.aMorphological Case AxOne possibility that can be immediately elim<strong>in</strong>ated is that 's is a morphologicalcase-mark<strong>in</strong>g. As is well-known, 's cliticizes to the entire subjectnoun phrase it does not appear simply as an ax on the head: 19,20(61) a. [a cous<strong>in</strong> of m<strong>in</strong>e]'s houseb. [the man <strong>in</strong> the store]'s sudden disappearance19 If words like m<strong>in</strong>e, your, are suppletive from I's (or me's), you's, then cliticizationof 's feeds morphological processes. This is not problematic.20 <strong>The</strong> text examples are not perfectly well-formed. Later, <strong>in</strong> a dierent context, I markthem as marg<strong>in</strong>al. I th<strong>in</strong>k they are suciently good, though, to illustrate the claim that's is not simply a case ax which attaches to the head of the noun phrase.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!