MIC - seafdec.org.my

More documents

Recommendations

Info

MIC• A wide range of activities of thedifferent herbs and extract againstthe bacterial tested.• The MIC values indicated that P.betle was more efficient than T.catappa (MIC values ranging from3.25 -12.5mg/ml and MIC valuesranging from 6.25 – 25 mg/mlrespectively.• The MIC values of EtOH extracts ofP. betle is lower in P.damsela andV. vulnificus in comparison to V.alginolyticus; suggests that this twobacteria species showed greatersensitivity towards the extracts.
MBC• The MIC of the plant extractsis < the MBC against the testorganism• No colony growth wasobserved on the solid mediumafter the incubation periodwhen the MBC of the plantextracts was used against testorganisms
Page 1 and 2: MARINE FINFISH PRODUCTION AND RESEA
Page 3 and 4: • Aquaculture is a rapidly expand
Page 5 and 6: • Non-therapeutic alternatives su
Page 7 and 8: • To determine the antibacterial
Page 9 and 10: Azadirachta indica• Local name :S
Page 11 and 12: Terminalia catappa• Local name :
Page 13 and 14: • Vibrio alginolyticus• Vibrio
Page 15 and 16: Preparation of Bacteria• Four dif
Page 17 and 18: PREPARATION OFCRUDE EXTRACT- 2 type
Page 19 and 20: Solvent Extraction• 100 gm dried
Page 21 and 22: ANTIBACTERIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTPa
Page 23: Grading of result (MacKeen et al, 1
Page 26 and 27: METHODS TO DETERMINE MBC• 100µl
Page 28: RESULT
Page 31 and 32: Azadiracta indica
Page 33 and 34: Piper betle
Page 35 and 36: Terminalia catappa
Page 37: Table 2. Minimum inhibitory concent
Page 41 and 42: • MeOH & EtOH extracts of P.betle
Page 43 and 44: • Crude extracts of all herbs tes
Page 45 and 46: • EtOH & MeOH efficient in extrac
Page 47 and 48: • EtOH & MeOH of P.betle and T.ca
Page 49: THANK YOU

MIC - seafdec.org.my

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?