12.07.2015 Views

The Sanctity of Contracts in English Law - College of Social ...

The Sanctity of Contracts in English Law - College of Social ...

The Sanctity of Contracts in English Law - College of Social ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Contracts</strong> which Equity Decl<strong>in</strong>ed to Enforce 21Three eases are cited <strong>in</strong> illustration <strong>of</strong> the statementwhich I have quoted from Equity Cases Abridged.In all three, Equity refused to decree specific performance<strong>of</strong> the contract. In one, 3 A had contractedto purchase B's estate, pretend<strong>in</strong>g that he was buy<strong>in</strong>git " for one whom B was will<strong>in</strong>g to oblige," andthereby got it " somewhat the cheaper, when <strong>in</strong>truth he bought it for another." " <strong>The</strong>re had notbeen fair and open deal<strong>in</strong>g " <strong>in</strong> the matter. In thesecond case, 4 before Lord Chancellor Thurlow, therewas an agreement to purchase an estate. Afterwardsit transpired that the vendor had concealed asubstantial annual outgo<strong>in</strong>g on an obligation torepair a wall to protect the estate from the riverThames. <strong>The</strong> third case 5 was concerned with anagreement by an attorney to buy property from anold lady <strong>of</strong> n<strong>in</strong>ety years <strong>of</strong> age and there were severalsuspicious circumstances appear<strong>in</strong>g. In this last casethe Lord Chancellor would neither decree specificperformance <strong>of</strong> the agreement aga<strong>in</strong>st the heir, nor,<strong>in</strong> a cross suit, order it to be delivered up.A later case illustrative <strong>of</strong> the same attitude isWebster v. Cecil.'' <strong>The</strong>re a pla<strong>in</strong>tiff claimed specificperformance <strong>of</strong> a contract to sell property to him for£1,250. <strong>The</strong> defendant had <strong>in</strong> the first <strong>in</strong>stancerefused to sell certa<strong>in</strong> property to the pla<strong>in</strong>tiff for£2,000, and then had by mistake written <strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>g thesatisfactory <strong>in</strong>formation upon that subject, will not <strong>in</strong>terpose."See also Holliday v. Lockwood [1917] 2 Ch. 50.3 Phillips v. Duke <strong>of</strong> Bucks (1682) 1 Vern. 227.* Shirley v. Stratton (1785) 1 Bro.Chan.Cas 440.* Green v. Wood (1708) 2 Vern. 632.6(1861) 30 Beav. 62.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!