12.07.2015 Views

The Sanctity of Contracts in English Law - College of Social ...

The Sanctity of Contracts in English Law - College of Social ...

The Sanctity of Contracts in English Law - College of Social ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> Obligation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Contracts</strong> Clause 69person shall be deprived <strong>of</strong> life, liberty or propertywithout due process <strong>of</strong> law.. In the Supreme Courtop<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>in</strong> the case 3 it was declared that: " <strong>The</strong>Statute necessarily <strong>in</strong>terfered with the right <strong>of</strong> contractbetween employer and employee, concern<strong>in</strong>gthe number <strong>of</strong> hours <strong>in</strong> which the latter may labour<strong>in</strong> the bakery <strong>of</strong> the employer. <strong>The</strong> general rightto make a contract <strong>in</strong> relation to his bus<strong>in</strong>ess is part<strong>of</strong> the liberty <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dividual protected by theFourteenth Amendment. . . . <strong>The</strong> right to purchaseor to sell labour is part <strong>of</strong> the liberty protected bythis amendment." For this reason the Statute <strong>in</strong>question was declared unconstitutional.<strong>The</strong> emphasis <strong>in</strong> the common law countries on thebeneficent economic effects <strong>of</strong> freedom <strong>of</strong> contractand the consequent belief <strong>in</strong> contract as an <strong>in</strong>stitutionmak<strong>in</strong>g for general economic welfare brought <strong>in</strong> theirtra<strong>in</strong> an enhanced respect for contractual obligationsas an extension <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual liberty. This promptedover-statements <strong>of</strong> the degree <strong>of</strong> protection given t<strong>of</strong>reedom <strong>of</strong> contract <strong>in</strong> the Constitution.A dist<strong>in</strong>guished American author i has recentlydeclared that " generally speak<strong>in</strong>g, the protectionafforded by clause 1 does not today go much, if atall, beyond that afforded by Section 1 <strong>of</strong> the Fourteenth.Amendment." <strong>The</strong> learned author cites <strong>in</strong>support <strong>of</strong> his op<strong>in</strong>ion the words <strong>of</strong> the SupremeCourt 5 : " It is settled that neither the ' contract'a Lockner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905).4 Edward S. Corw<strong>in</strong>: <strong>The</strong> Constitution and What it MeansToday, 11th ed., at pp. 82-83.s Atlantic Coast L<strong>in</strong>e Co. v. Goldsboro, 252 U.S., at p. 558.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!