12.07.2015 Views

The Sanctity of Contracts in English Law - College of Social ...

The Sanctity of Contracts in English Law - College of Social ...

The Sanctity of Contracts in English Law - College of Social ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

28 Encroachments on <strong>Sanctity</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Contracts</strong>agreement to pay a sum <strong>of</strong> money by way <strong>of</strong> fee orreward <strong>in</strong> respect <strong>of</strong> any services relat<strong>in</strong>g to suchcontract. 18<strong>The</strong> statute <strong>of</strong> 1664 which I have already mentioned,as well as mak<strong>in</strong>g all wager<strong>in</strong>g debts over £100 onplayers irrecoverable, declared all securities givenfor such debts void. <strong>The</strong> statute 9 Anne, c. 14, wasmore sweep<strong>in</strong>g: it declared void all securities givenfor money lost <strong>in</strong> play<strong>in</strong>g at games or pastimes or<strong>in</strong> bett<strong>in</strong>g upon players or know<strong>in</strong>gly advanced forsuch purposes. <strong>The</strong> Gam<strong>in</strong>g Act, 1835, s. 1, modifiedthat sweep<strong>in</strong>g provision and <strong>in</strong>troduced the modernrule whereby securities caught by the Act <strong>of</strong> Anneare deemed to have been made or accepted on anillegal consideration.<strong>The</strong> net effect <strong>of</strong> the bett<strong>in</strong>g legislation <strong>in</strong> the field<strong>of</strong> contracts was to make bets as such and securitiesgiven for lost bets unenforceable (as between theimmediate parties) <strong>in</strong> the courts, leav<strong>in</strong>g them to betreated as debts <strong>of</strong> honour or gentlemen's agreements.INFANTS' CONTRACTSYet another l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> country <strong>in</strong> which the legislaturehas from time to time declared contracts void iswhere, ow<strong>in</strong>g to the presumably <strong>in</strong>ferior barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gposition <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the parties, the other party mighttake advantage <strong>of</strong> this weakness. <strong>The</strong> obvious exampleis that <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>fant. At common law thecontracts <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>fant other than those for goods18 Thua revers<strong>in</strong>g the rule <strong>in</strong> Read v. Anderson (1884) 13 Q.B.D.779, which requires a pr<strong>in</strong>cipal to <strong>in</strong>demnify his agent.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!