with small adjustments to the system.They are distinct from an upgradeinvolving increased functionality suchas voice or a labor management module,or a change-out event such as anew WMS implementation or supplier.That said, upgrading an old WMScan look very much like a new implementation,according to Tom Kozenski,vice president of product strategyat RedPrairie. Aside from businessexpansion, a few key reasons could justifyan upgrade, Kozenski says. If thetechnical underpinnings—the server,the database or the layered products—are going out of support, a customercan reduce future maintenance costsby upgrading.Many companies are proactivelyinstalling the capability to comply withinitiatives like e-pedigree in the pharmaceuticalmarket or the product traceabilityinitiative (PTI) in food handling.In these cases, a company reduces risk,says Kozenski, and can use that as a differentiatorto win new business.Softer compliance pressures canalso come into play, according to ChadCollins, chief marketing officer forAccellos. For example, a large retailermight require pallets from smaller suppliersbe configured and labeled a certainway. “Those compliance requirementsdrive small- and mid-sizedbusinesses to adopt or update WMS,”says Collins. “Retailers continue to beaggressive about squeezing cost outof their overall supply chain and thatcomes back to their suppliers meetingthose requirements.”The benefits of a WMS go beyondlabeling pallets, but that doesn’t stopcustomers from implementing themto address isolated needs. A wiserapproach, says Collins, is to considerthe benefit to each application in thewarehouse. “If a customer is going toupgrade, they will be better off if theyuse it as an opportunity to re-evaluatebusiness processes.”What should I look for?The market has matured to the pointthat solutions to these challenges aremmh.com MODERN MATERIALS HANDLING / N O V E M B E R 2 0 1 2 41
MODERN equipment report“ If a customer is going to upgrade, they will bebetter off if they use it as an opportunity tore-evaluate business processes.”—Chad Collins, chief marketing officer for Accellosnot well-kept secrets. In fact, accordingto Kozenski, “Customers expect everythingto be in there. They want it allintegrated, they want a single architecture,and they don’t want to do bolt-onsanymore.”Before any outlay, an end-usershould look deeper into the capabilitiesof its current WMS. For instance,some end-users like to continue todo directed putaway manually, saysCollins, and others continue to usepaper rather than scanners at the pointof picking and shipping.Not only are many end-users notfully using their WMS, it may be thelimiting factor for fuller use of currentequipment. For example, if 80%of associates on the floor are usingmobile handheld terminals, says EricLamphier, senior director of projectmanagement for Manhattan Associates,upgrading that technology can makethose terminals more intuitive and theassociates more productive.Many have yet to fully use coreWMS functionality, says Hill, but othershave deliberately postponed usingadd-on modules. There is a certainstrategic benefit to being future-proof,says Hill, acknowledging that featurespurchased at one time might notbe needed until a later one. In fact,although an upgrade might be a goodtime to implement a new module, orvice versa, most agree it is wise to takeone thing at a time. It might take aslong as a year to fully acclimate tothe core WMS, or to add on modulessuch as labor management.Any added functionality will requirea strong relationship between operationsand IT staff, says Hill. The two groupsshould work closely to ensure a successfuldeployment. Lamphier agrees. “If theinitiative is too heavily biased and ledby one half of the company, either ITor operations, and the other half doesn’thave a strong seat at the table and aninvestment in the outcomes, that’s arecipe for disaster,” he says.What’s new?New WMS products are much fasterand more intuitive, process greatervolumes of data, and require lesshardware and less cost, accordingto Lamphier. Not only are they lessexpensive to deploy, but new systemsare easier to maintain.“Across the board, it has gottena lot easier to upgrade and stay currentthan in years prior,” says ChuckFuerst, director of product strategy forHighJump Software. “With more modernversions, work flow modificationstailored for the customer’s environmentare separated from the underlying technology,”he says. “We can pull that outand slide a new one in without havingto re-architect anything they’ve done onthe business process layer.”Integration with the enterpriseresource planning (ERP) and downstreamintegration with automationequipment and conveyance systems ismuch easier, says Lamphier. “Ten yearsago those integrations would have beencompletely customized,” he says. “Nowit’s data-driven and that has driven downthe cost of integration significantly.”These advances will allow upgradesto be performed more frequently in thefuture. “The WMS of today are muchWith interleaved task management, an up-to-date WMS can keep workersproductive for more of each day.42 N O V E M B E R 2 0 1 2 / MODERN MATERIALS HANDLING mmh.com