1 - Oregon State University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Test Set Accuracy (%)Experimental Results100959085807570LogLinearTreeCRF65605550Protein NetTalk Hyphen ai-general ai-neural aixDataset20All differences statistically significant p
Tree Boosting for Latent Variable Models Both Friedman’s L2-TreeBoosted logistic regression andour L2-TreeBoosted CRFs assumed that all variables wereobserved in the training data Can we extend Tree Boosting to latent variable graphicalmodels? Motivating application: Species Distribution Modeling21TAAI 201111/11/2011
Page 1 and 2: Graphical Models and FlexibleClassi
Page 3 and 4: Outline Two Cultures of Machine Lea
Page 5 and 6: § 17. Allgemeine Rechtsgrundsätze
Page 7 and 8: Advantages and Disadvantages ofPara
Page 9 and 10: Another Advantage:Interactions and
Page 11 and 12: Can we combine the best of both?Pro
Page 15 and 16: Fitting logistic regression via gra
Page 17 and 18: L2-Tree Boosting Algorithm Let F 0
Page 19: Tree Boosting for Conditional Rando
Page 23 and 24: Species Distribution ModelingObserv
Page 25 and 26: Wildlife Surveys with Imperfect Det
Page 27 and 28: Occupancy-Detection ModelOccupancyf
Page 29 and 30: Standard Approach: Log Linear (logi
Page 31 and 32: Alternating Functional Gradient Des
Page 33 and 34: Features33TAAI 201111/11/2011
Page 35 and 36: Results for AUC of y itNo significa
Page 37 and 38: Partial Dependence PlotSynthetic Sp
Page 39 and 40: PartialDependencePlotBlue Jay vs.Ti
Page 41 and 42: Open Problems Sometimes the OD mode
Page 43 and 44: Next Steps Modeling Expertise in Ci
Page 45 and 46: Occupancy/Detectability/ExpertiseMo
Page 47 and 48: New Project: BirdCast Goal: Contine
Page 51 and 52: Combining Two Approaches toMachine

1 - Oregon State University

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?