Cross-Asset Speculation in Stock Markets∗ - Econometrics at Illinois ...
Cross-Asset Speculation in Stock Markets∗ - Econometrics at Illinois ...
Cross-Asset Speculation in Stock Markets∗ - Econometrics at Illinois ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
V AppendixProof of Proposition 1. Use the law of recursive projections to expand the first term <strong>in</strong> thefirst-order condition (5),E [ v ∣ ∣ s i ,X + u ] = E [ v ∣ ∣ X + u]+ E[v − E [ v ∣ ∣ X + u] ∣ ∣ ∣∣ s i − E [ s i∣ ∣ X + u] ][= p + E v − E [ v ∣ ] ∣ X + u ∣∣ s i − E [ e ∣ ] ] X + u ,where the last equality reflects th<strong>at</strong> E [ v ∣ ∣(X + u) ] = p. By construction, the vector of net orderflows X + u is orthogonal to the vector of forecast errors s i − E [ s i∣ ∣ X + u], so th<strong>at</strong>E[E [ v ∣ ∣X + u ] ∣ ∣ ∣∣ s i − E [ s i∣ ∣X + u ]] = 0.Hence, we can remove the condition<strong>in</strong>g on X+u from the first-order condition (5), which reduces to[ (p [ ∣0 = E + E v∣s i − E [ ∣s i∣ ]]] )∣ X + u − p − qi ∣∣∣ ′λ ′ x i s i= E[E [ v ∣ ∣s i − E [ s i∣ ∣X + u ]] ∣ ] ∣∣∣− q i′ λ ′ x i s i .Solv<strong>in</strong>g for x i yieldsx i = (λ ′ ) −1 (q i′ ) −1 E [ E [ v ∣ ∣ s i − E [ s i∣ ∣ X + u]]].Proof of Lemma 1. Substitute for γ i and Γ <strong>in</strong>to the first-order condition (5). Recogniz<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>at</strong>we do not need to condition on net order flow, u drops out, and the first-order condition becomes[()∣N∑∑N ∣∣∣∣0 = E v − λΓ b k s k − q i′ λ ′ b i s i + γ i b k s k s].ik=1k=1The goal is to remove q i = (I − ∑ k≠i Bk ) −1 from the first-order condition. To do this, we useΓ = I + ∑ iγ i= I + ∑ iB i (I − ∑ kB k ) −1= (I − ∑ kB k + ∑ kB k )(I − ∑ kB k ) −1= I(I − ∑ kB k ) −1 (15)29