12.07.2015 Views

Cross-Asset Speculation in Stock Markets∗ - Econometrics at Illinois ...

Cross-Asset Speculation in Stock Markets∗ - Econometrics at Illinois ...

Cross-Asset Speculation in Stock Markets∗ - Econometrics at Illinois ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

V AppendixProof of Proposition 1. Use the law of recursive projections to expand the first term <strong>in</strong> thefirst-order condition (5),E [ v ∣ ∣ s i ,X + u ] = E [ v ∣ ∣ X + u]+ E[v − E [ v ∣ ∣ X + u] ∣ ∣ ∣∣ s i − E [ s i∣ ∣ X + u] ][= p + E v − E [ v ∣ ] ∣ X + u ∣∣ s i − E [ e ∣ ] ] X + u ,where the last equality reflects th<strong>at</strong> E [ v ∣ ∣(X + u) ] = p. By construction, the vector of net orderflows X + u is orthogonal to the vector of forecast errors s i − E [ s i∣ ∣ X + u], so th<strong>at</strong>E[E [ v ∣ ∣X + u ] ∣ ∣ ∣∣ s i − E [ s i∣ ∣X + u ]] = 0.Hence, we can remove the condition<strong>in</strong>g on X+u from the first-order condition (5), which reduces to[ (p [ ∣0 = E + E v∣s i − E [ ∣s i∣ ]]] )∣ X + u − p − qi ∣∣∣ ′λ ′ x i s i= E[E [ v ∣ ∣s i − E [ s i∣ ∣X + u ]] ∣ ] ∣∣∣− q i′ λ ′ x i s i .Solv<strong>in</strong>g for x i yieldsx i = (λ ′ ) −1 (q i′ ) −1 E [ E [ v ∣ ∣ s i − E [ s i∣ ∣ X + u]]].Proof of Lemma 1. Substitute for γ i and Γ <strong>in</strong>to the first-order condition (5). Recogniz<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>at</strong>we do not need to condition on net order flow, u drops out, and the first-order condition becomes[()∣N∑∑N ∣∣∣∣0 = E v − λΓ b k s k − q i′ λ ′ b i s i + γ i b k s k s].ik=1k=1The goal is to remove q i = (I − ∑ k≠i Bk ) −1 from the first-order condition. To do this, we useΓ = I + ∑ iγ i= I + ∑ iB i (I − ∑ kB k ) −1= (I − ∑ kB k + ∑ kB k )(I − ∑ kB k ) −1= I(I − ∑ kB k ) −1 (15)29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!