12.07.2015 Views

Patterns of Historical Earthquake Rupture in the Iranian Plateau

Patterns of Historical Earthquake Rupture in the Iranian Plateau

Patterns of Historical Earthquake Rupture in the Iranian Plateau

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Patterns</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Historical</strong> <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Rupture</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Iranian</strong> <strong>Plateau</strong> 1351988; Jackson, 1992). Only about 15% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> long-term convergencerate across <strong>the</strong> Zagros Mounta<strong>in</strong>s, estimated at 20mm/yr, can be attributed to seismic moment release dur<strong>in</strong>gthis period. Seismic moment release can account for morethan 50% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> shorten<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>ast Iran, but only about10% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Alborz Mounta<strong>in</strong>s (Jackson and McKenzie,1984; Jackson et al., 1995). In northwest Iran, twentiethcenturyearthquakes account for all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> expected fightlateralcomponent <strong>of</strong> convergence but less than 25% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>expected shorten<strong>in</strong>g by dip slip (Jackson, 1992). Unfortunately,<strong>the</strong>re are no geodetic estimates, ei<strong>the</strong>r space based orterrestrial, <strong>of</strong> active deformation rates with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Iranian</strong> plateau.Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, <strong>the</strong> question about whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> historicalslip deficit is due to aseismic slip or to an <strong>in</strong>adequate sampl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> seismic moment release rate <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> historicalperiod cannot be answered. We return to this question belowwhen we consider <strong>the</strong> seismic hazard <strong>of</strong> long, straight strikeslipfaults with geological evidence <strong>of</strong> Holocene deformationthat have not susta<strong>in</strong>ed large-magnitude earthquakes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>historical period.Temporal Cluster<strong>in</strong>g and Load<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Adjacent FaultsAlthough earthquakes release accumulated elasticstra<strong>in</strong>, <strong>the</strong>y also load faults <strong>in</strong> nearby and even more distantregions that will be <strong>the</strong> location <strong>of</strong> future events (Ste<strong>in</strong> etal., 1992; Ste<strong>in</strong> and Lisowski, 1983; Hudnut et al., 1989;Reasenberg and Simpson, 1992; Du and Ayd<strong>in</strong>, 1993; K<strong>in</strong>get al., 1994; Bennett et al., 1995; Harris and Simpson, 1996;Jacques et al., 1996). The geometry <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>teractions betweengroups <strong>of</strong> active faults is critical for characteriz<strong>in</strong>g seismicsources <strong>of</strong> large earthquakes.The earthquake cluster <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dasht-e-Bayaz area <strong>in</strong>eastern Iran (Figs. 5, 6, and 7) consisted <strong>of</strong> 11 earthquakes<strong>of</strong>M > 6.0 <strong>in</strong> 61 yr (1936 to 1997) <strong>in</strong> an area <strong>of</strong> 160 by 110km, approximately <strong>the</strong> same size as <strong>the</strong> Los Angeles metropolitanarea. The Dasht-e-Bayaz/Abiz earthquake sequenceruptured left-lateral and fight-lateral faults at approximatelyfight angles to one ano<strong>the</strong>r, consistent withCoulomb stress changes predicted for <strong>the</strong> 1992 Landers,California, earthquake, although <strong>in</strong> detail, some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> earthquakesmay not fit this simple pattern. This shows that <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>gsmaller faults may contribute a large part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>hazard <strong>in</strong> Iran and may make up <strong>the</strong> slip deficit <strong>in</strong> a limitedregion <strong>in</strong> a short period <strong>of</strong> time.The Tehran and Tabriz sequences illustrate load<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>fault tips by earthquakes, <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> most likely site for<strong>the</strong> next earthquake would be <strong>the</strong> fault segment just beyond<strong>the</strong> segment that last ruptured. At Tabriz, <strong>the</strong> sequence propagatedfrom east to west <strong>in</strong> a sequence <strong>of</strong> four earthquakesfrom 1721 to 1786. If an earthquake far<strong>the</strong>r west <strong>in</strong> 1807 ispart <strong>of</strong> this sequence, it left a gap. The Tehran sequenceruptured from west to east from 958 to 1830, but <strong>the</strong> westand east ends <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mosha fault ruptured before <strong>the</strong> centralsection did. Also, <strong>the</strong> Qazv<strong>in</strong> earthquake <strong>of</strong> 1119 is west <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> 958 rupture, leav<strong>in</strong>g an unruptured gap. These relationssuggest that although fault load<strong>in</strong>g is important, strength <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>dividual fault segments may allow an earthquake to skipa segment and fill it <strong>in</strong> later.The Sangavar earthquakes <strong>of</strong> 1863 and 1896 rupturedadjacent segments, but <strong>the</strong> Pambukh and Badalan earthquakesleft unruptured segments, as did <strong>the</strong> Gowk and Sirchearthquakes <strong>in</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>astern Iran.Slip Rates and Recurrence IntervalsIntraplate deformation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Iranian</strong> plateau, which isa result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> collision <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Arabian and Eurasian plates,is nonuniformly distributed and is concentrated along severalbelts that surround more stable, relatively aseismicblocks. The rates <strong>of</strong> shorten<strong>in</strong>g and uplift are highest <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>Zagros belt, close to <strong>the</strong> Arabian plate boundary, where <strong>the</strong>NE-SW shorten<strong>in</strong>g between Arabia and central Iran is accommodatedpredom<strong>in</strong>antly by bl<strong>in</strong>d reverse faults with slipvectors oriented <strong>in</strong> a direction similar to that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plateconvergence vector, and decreases nor<strong>the</strong>astward. The Zagrosis characterized by rapid uplift, high seismicity, andmoderate-magnitude earthquakes on several bl<strong>in</strong>d reversefaults with historical recurrence <strong>in</strong>tervals <strong>of</strong> 300 to 500 yr<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lar and Qir region and medium- to large-magnitudeearthquakes on strike-slip faults around <strong>the</strong> edges <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Zagros,especially <strong>the</strong> Zagros Ma<strong>in</strong> Recent fault (Berberian,1995a).In contrast, lower slip rates are characteristic <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Iranian</strong>plateau away from <strong>the</strong> plate boundary. Areas such as<strong>the</strong> Alborz Mounta<strong>in</strong>s and Kopeh Dagh are characterized bylarge-magnitude, shallow earthquakes accompanied by surfacefault<strong>in</strong>g separated by quiescent periods <strong>of</strong> 3000 to 5000yr on frontal reverse faults and some strike-slip faults, basedon historical recurrence <strong>in</strong>tervals on <strong>the</strong> Ipak fault and <strong>the</strong>Rudbar fault (Baklor-Kabateh-Zard Geli fault segments)southwest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Caspian Sea (Berberian and Yeats, 1999).Active faults have reactivated ancient collisional zones,and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terven<strong>in</strong>g blocks are more stable. Based on <strong>of</strong>fsetqanats and Holocene <strong>of</strong>fsets <strong>of</strong> streams, a m<strong>in</strong>imum slip rate<strong>of</strong> 2.5 mm/yr and a recurrence <strong>in</strong>terval <strong>of</strong> 1000 yr were estimatedfor <strong>the</strong> Dasht-e-Bayaz fault.With<strong>in</strong> central Iran, <strong>the</strong>re are temporal variations <strong>in</strong> recurrence<strong>in</strong>tervals <strong>of</strong> large-magnitude earthquakes. The Tabrizearthquakes <strong>of</strong> 1273 to 1304 and 1721 to 1786, <strong>the</strong> 1209to 1405 Neyshabur-B<strong>in</strong>alud earthquakes, and <strong>the</strong> 1968 to1997 Dasht-e-Bayaz/Abiz earthquakes were temporal clusters<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>teractive earthquakes, although pretwentieth centuryearthquakes at Dasht-e-Bayaz/Abiz show no evidence<strong>of</strong> cluster<strong>in</strong>g. However, <strong>the</strong> Sabzevar, Esfarayen, Kumes,Ipak, Nauzad, and Nosratabad earthquakes were not <strong>in</strong>teractive.The presence <strong>of</strong> cluster<strong>in</strong>g has been demonstrated <strong>in</strong>several parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Iranian</strong> plateau, but <strong>the</strong> variability <strong>in</strong>earthquake recurrence patterns is greater than had been assumed.Could an M 8 <strong>Earthquake</strong> Strike <strong>the</strong> <strong>Iranian</strong> <strong>Plateau</strong>?Most large earthquakes <strong>in</strong> Iran for which magnitude estimatescan be made are <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> range M 6.6 to M 7.2, with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!