12.07.2015 Views

“Airbus vs. Boeing in Super Jumbos: A Case of Failed Preemption”

“Airbus vs. Boeing in Super Jumbos: A Case of Failed Preemption”

“Airbus vs. Boeing in Super Jumbos: A Case of Failed Preemption”

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

plane <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> ced<strong>in</strong>g the VLA market to Airbus. And <strong>Boe<strong>in</strong>g</strong>’s senior managementappeared to f<strong>in</strong>d the commercial aircraft group’s claims on corporate wealth difficult toresist because the division still represented more than 60% <strong>of</strong> <strong>Boe<strong>in</strong>g</strong>’s total revenues andwas a key part <strong>of</strong> company’s corporate identity.Place Figure 4 approximately hereThat <strong>Boe<strong>in</strong>g</strong>’s top management ultimately did manage to resist the <strong>in</strong>ternalimpetus to build a very large aircraft seems to reflect, <strong>in</strong> part, three macro-organizationalchanges at the company <strong>in</strong> the late 1990s. First, <strong>Boe<strong>in</strong>g</strong> built up its defense, space andcommunications bus<strong>in</strong>esses by acquir<strong>in</strong>g Rockwell International’s aerospace bus<strong>in</strong>esses<strong>in</strong> 1996, McDonnell-Douglas <strong>in</strong>1997, and Hughes Space and Communications <strong>in</strong> 2000. 66These acquisitions and a newfound emphasis on commercial aircraft services helpedcreate growth options outside the traditional realm <strong>of</strong> commercial aircraft construction: <strong>in</strong>late 2001, <strong>Boe<strong>in</strong>g</strong> executives have publicly stated that the company would stake neartermgrowth on its Southern California space, communications and missile operations<strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> commercial aircraft. 67Second, aided by an <strong>in</strong>flow <strong>of</strong> top managers from McDonnell Douglas andelsewhere <strong>in</strong>to what had historically been an <strong>in</strong>sular, eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g-driven environment,<strong>Boe<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong>stituted a much more detailed system <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial controls and performancemeasurement. A system for track<strong>in</strong>g product l<strong>in</strong>e pr<strong>of</strong>itability was reportedly put <strong>in</strong>toplace for the first time, and to further the company’s stated goal <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g its stockprice five times <strong>in</strong> five years, 68 the Board <strong>in</strong>stituted a new <strong>in</strong>centive program that l<strong>in</strong>kedcompensation with stock price appreciation, and established stock ownership guidel<strong>in</strong>esfor top executives. 69 These changes facilitated a shift <strong>in</strong> the mode <strong>of</strong> resource allocationthat placed more emphasis on efficiency and shareholder value rather than historicalentitlement, eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g challenges, and a host <strong>of</strong> other non-economic criteria.Third and most recently, <strong>Boe<strong>in</strong>g</strong> decided to relocate its corporate headquartersfrom Seattle to Chicago. An important reason for the move, accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>Boe<strong>in</strong>g</strong>’s topmanagement, was the belief that the corporate center would rema<strong>in</strong> too prone to the<strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> the commercial aircraft group as long as the two headquarters rema<strong>in</strong>ed36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!