Eu Mercury phase out in Measuring and Control Equipment - EEB

More documents

Recommendations

Info

REPORT FROM THE CONFERENCE “EU MERCURY PHASE OUT IN MEASURING AND CONTROL EQUIPMENT”In sum: The “Gold Standard” does not necessarily mean an accurate blood pressure The greatest inaccuracies derive from the measurer The greatest variability is the patient (position, stress, variability of blood pressure, etc.) The product accuracy is often related to the manufacturer and the individual product When maintained & calibrated properly, nearly all inter-device variability is below 4mm ofmercuryThis understanding led WHO to partner with Health Care Without Harm under a United NationsEnvironment Program Products Partnership on mercury in 2008. This project has a series of step bystep goals to urge the health sector to move away from mercury in its entirety.About clinical practice in the USA: you can´t find a new hospital, a new large clinic or anythingelse that is buying mercury sphygmomanometers. Most physicians, when they phase out the oldones get the new mercury free ones.9. The Global Movement for Mercury Free Healthcare(Presentation by Anja Leetz, Healthcare Without Harm Europe /HCWH-E)HCWH is a global network and takes its point of departure from the Hippocratic Oath: “First Do NoHarm”. HCWH looks at the connection between the care that health professionals are giving and theimpact of this has on the environment. HCWH is a coalition of 480 organisations across the globe in52 countries. Our goal is to transform the healthcare sector and raise awareness of the activitiesundertaken by the healthcare sector. HCWH focuses on issues such as medical waste incineration,mercury and PVC, green buildings, climate change in the healthcare sector.What are HCWH’s goals for mercury? The phase out in the healthcare industry globally and toreplace mercury with viable cost effective alternatives. This is achieved by creating a broadcoalition involving governments, hospitals and NGOs. HCWH are still looking for nationalgovernments and healthcare providers to join our efforts, see more on the website 12HCWH sees three main challenges concerning mercury. HCWH wants to replace mercury withdevices that are: Accurate Affordable Unproblematic to dispose ofStudies that have been done in collaboration with the EEB have shown that there are alternatives,which are being used already.HCWH began their mercury campaign in the USA in 1998. HCWH convinced top pharmacy chainsto stop selling mercury containing thermometers. Further, HCWH worked with hospitals andassociations to shift the market to stop purchasing mercury thermometers. It is now virtuallyimpossible to buy a mercury thermometer in the USA. As a result of the work on thermometersHCWH moved onto sphygmomanometers.HCWH produced the report “End of an Era” 13 – that documents the dramatic decline in the US ofmercury sphygmomanometers in the past decade. It contains many statements from a variety ofhospitals. Some of the report findings are:12 www.mercuryfreehealthcare.org13 http://www.noharm.org/lib/downloads/mercury/End_of_an_Era_Mercury.pdf39
REPORT FROM THE CONFERENCE “EU MERCURY PHASE OUT IN MEASURING AND CONTROL EQUIPMENT” According to a 2005 survey of 554 healthcare facilities, conducted by the American HospitalAssociation, 73 % of respondents had removed all mercury sphygmomanometers. According to the Interstate Mercury Education and Reduction Clearinghouse: one third ofthe US population is covered by mercury state level sphygmomanometer bans orrestrictions. Group Purchasing Organisations(GPOs) represent over $52 billion or 96 % of all contracthealthcare purchases made in the U.S. In a 2005 survey of GPOs, three of the five largestUS GPOs had implemented mercury-free purchasing policies that ban items from contractsexcept where a non-mercury alternative is not available. Hospitals and hospital systems representing over 80 medical centres and more than 200,000employees have provided HCWH with letters that detail the success of their mercuryelimination programmes.Kathy Gerwig Vice President of Kaiser Permanente, which is a non profit healthcare provider in theUSA with 156,000 employees, said: “in the years since we made the change to mercury-free(aneroid) devices we have not had any issues with accuracy or other complaints.”A similar statement was made by Nancy Mulvihill, Vice President of the Covenant Health Systems:“In the more than three years that we have made the changes to aneroid units, and digital bloodpressure units, we have not had any issues with accuracy …I hope … that you will be convinced aswe were, that it is in the best interest of all concerned to eliminate mercury sphygmomanometers”.Mary Ellen Leciejewski of Catholic Healthcare West, a not-for-profit healthcare system composedof 41 hospitals, 68 clinics and 9 trauma centers stated: “I am writing to share our successfulexperience in the elimination of mercury blood pressure devices…As our experience hasdemonstrated, cost effective viable alternatives to mercury blood pressure measurement areavailable in the marketplace.”After the success in the USA, HCWH started to focus on the rest of the world. Now HCWH islooking at how to get mercury out of healthcare globally. Part of the strategy is to run workshopsand work with developing countries on pilot projects for substituting mercury devices. As a result ofthat HCWH has policy initiatives on several levels. There are national policy models like in thePhilippines. The Philippines had an administrative order to phase out mercury from the healthcaresector across the country over two years and this includes sphygmomanometers.HCWH also had a big success in Argentina where the Ministry of Health issued a Resolution inFebruary 2009 banning the purchase of all new mercury thermometers and sphygmomanometers inthe healthcare system. On the municipal level there is the example of Buenos Aires, which hasimplemented a policy to phase out mercury from 33 public hospitals and 38 healthcare centres– thelargest public health system in Argentina. The policy is 80 percent implemented. This is a model forlarge cities in developing countries and actually served as a sample for the national law in Argentinaon banning mercury. Buenos Aires is a success story and now the country is ready to go forwardand to follow the example of the city. Also Delhi (India) has developed a city-wide policy. Elevengovernment hospitals have either phased-out or are phasing out mercury thermometers and bloodpressure devices from their facilities.For provincial and state level policies there is the example of Kwa Zulu Natal in South Africa. Hereagain it is the policy replacing sphygmomanometers and thermometers.In Europe there are many hospitals that have phased out mercury sphygmomanometers. Countriessuch as Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands, have eliminated mercury from healthcare almostentirely. Europe has a mercury export ban. The goal should be to phase out mercury40
Page 1 and 2: Report from the ConferenceEu Mercur
Page 3: REPORT FROM THE CONFERENCE “EU ME
Page 6 and 7: REPORT FROM THE CONFERENCE “EU ME

Eu Mercury phase out in Measuring and Control Equipment - EEB

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?