- Page 3:
Marine litter in theNorth-East Atla
- Page 8 and 9:
ContentsAssessment of the Marine Li
- Page 10 and 11:
Figure 2.20 Proportion of different
- Page 12 and 13:
This report along with others from
- Page 16 and 17:
Figure 2.2 Most common (total numbe
- Page 18 and 19:
Table 2.1 Total amount of rubbish c
- Page 20 and 21:
levels. Despite this drop, overall
- Page 22 and 23:
average density for the UK (2,054/k
- Page 24 and 25:
litter in the North-East Atlantic.
- Page 26 and 27:
Figure 2.15 Fulmars feeding at sea
- Page 28 and 29:
The results of this programme have
- Page 30 and 31:
Celtic Seas16141210Tonnes864201st 0
- Page 32 and 33:
Figure 2.20 Proportion of different
- Page 34 and 35:
The Dutch Seabird Group collected 2
- Page 36 and 37:
Figure 2.25 Proportion of different
- Page 38 and 39:
Figure 2.28 below represents types
- Page 40 and 41:
Table 2.5 Source-specific indicator
- Page 42 and 43:
% Recreational & Beachvisitors% Fis
- Page 44:
2.3.1.4 Bay of Biscay and Iberian C
- Page 47 and 48:
Figure 2.40 A fridge deliberately d
- Page 49 and 50:
Figure 3.2 An entangled Minke Whale
- Page 51 and 52:
Figure 3.5 Eco performance of Fulma
- Page 53 and 54:
It is possible that marine litter w
- Page 55 and 56:
• The stalked barnacle (Dosimia f
- Page 57 and 58:
• Tourism and recreational activi
- Page 59 and 60:
3.3.1 Cost of Management of Marine
- Page 61 and 62:
4 Existing Legal Regimes in the are
- Page 63 and 64:
The three objectives of the CBD are
- Page 65 and 66:
4.2 National and Local Legislation4
- Page 67 and 68:
4.2.7.2 The Merchant Shipping (Prev
- Page 69 and 70:
4.2.7.7 The Anti Social Behaviour A
- Page 71 and 72: The implementation of the following
- Page 73 and 74: 4.3.5 UKMarine litter is covered by
- Page 75 and 76: • Annual report on ship generated
- Page 77 and 78: 5.1 Port reception facilities (PRFs
- Page 79 and 80: Table 5.1 Port Reception Facilities
- Page 81 and 82: 6 Existing Monitoring Programmes re
- Page 83 and 84: was very 'average' for the situatio
- Page 85 and 86: Between locations and Regions in th
- Page 87 and 88: 9 Gaps, Needs, Priorities and Recom
- Page 89 and 90: whole OSPAR Maritime Area is Fishin
- Page 91 and 92: GAUSSAssociation on Environmental P
- Page 93 and 94: BibliographyBrowne, M., et al. 2007
- Page 95 and 96: OSPAR CommissionQuestionnaireAssess
- Page 97 and 98: 2. The scale of the problem2.1 Amou
- Page 99 and 100: Please specify the cost of manageme
- Page 101 and 102: 3. Sources of marine litter in the
- Page 103 and 104: 4. Existing legal regimes in the ar
- Page 105 and 106: What organizations have the legal r
- Page 107 and 108: Please stipulate what the availabil
- Page 109 and 110: How efficient is the collection of
- Page 111 and 112: 7. Scientific studies and researchP
- Page 113 and 114: Additional information:103
- Page 115 and 116: Faroe Islands (Denmark):SURVEYS/MON
- Page 117 and 118: Other monitoring programmes related
- Page 119 and 120: Germany:SURVEYS/MONITORING/OTHERNam
- Page 121: Adopt a Beach and Beachtwatch Progr
- Page 125 and 126: France:SURVEYS/MONITORING/OTHERName
- Page 127 and 128: GermanyCLEMENS, T. & E. HARTWIG (19
- Page 129 and 130: The results of the project show tha