view pdf - Seas At Risk

More documents

Recommendations

Info

AcronymsALFGAbandoned and Lost Fishing GearASMOEnvironmental Assessment and Monitoring Committee (OSPAR)BBCBDCBritish Broadcasting CorporationBiodiversity CommitteeBIMCBDCEDRECEFASCEIDABoard Lascaigh Mhara. Irish Sea Fisheries BoardConvention on Biological DiversityCentre of Documentation, Research and Experimentation ofAccidental Water PollutionCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture ScienceCentros de Educación e Investigación Didáctico-Ambiental(Environmental Research and Education Centre)CEMPCETMARCoordinator Environmental Monitoring ProgrammeCentro Tecnologico del Mar. Sea Technologic CentreCOBSEACPsEast Asian <strong>Seas</strong>Contracting PartiesCPSPSSouth East PacificDEFRADGzRSDepartment of Environment, Food and Rural AffairsGerman Maritime Rescue ServiceEEZENCAMSExclusive Economic ZoneKeep Britain Tidy CampaignEPAFAOFEEEnvironmental Protection ActFood and Agriculture Organisation of the United NationsFoundation for Environmental EducationFFLFishing for Litter80
GAUSSAssociation on Environmental Protection and Safety in ShippingGECCGPAGlobal Environmental Change CommitteeGlobal Programme of ActionHELCOMHWDTICGBaltic Marine Environment Protection CommissionHebridean Whale and Dolphin TrustInter-Sessional Correspondence Group on Marine LitterIFREMERFrench Research Institute for Exploitation of the SeaIMOInternational Maritime OrganisationINBOResearch Institute for Nature and ForestIOCKIMOIntergovernmental Oceanographic CommissionKommunenes Internasjonale Miljoorganisasjon. Local AuthorityInternational Environmental OrganisationLIFEMARPOLEU Financial Instrument Supporting Environmental and NatureConservation projectsInternational Convention for the Prevention of Pollution fromShips 1973, 1978MCSMEPCMNRMarine Conservation SocietyMarine Environment Protection CommitteeMarine Nature ReserveMOUNGOsMemorandum of UnderstandingNon-Governmental OrganisationsNOWPAPNPANSO-NZGNorthwest Pacific Action PlanNational Programme of Action for the protection of the marineenvironmentBeached Bird Survey of the Dutch Seabird GroupOSPARConvention for the Protection of the Marine Environment81
Page 3:
Marine litter in theNorth-East Atla
Page 8 and 9:
ContentsAssessment of the Marine Li
Page 10 and 11:
Figure 2.20 Proportion of different
Page 12 and 13:
This report along with others from
Page 16 and 17:
Figure 2.2 Most common (total numbe
Page 18 and 19:
Table 2.1 Total amount of rubbish c
Page 20 and 21:
levels. Despite this drop, overall
Page 22 and 23:
average density for the UK (2,054/k
Page 24 and 25:
litter in the North-East Atlantic.
Page 26 and 27:
Figure 2.15 Fulmars feeding at sea
Page 28 and 29:
The results of this programme have
Page 30 and 31:
Celtic Seas16141210Tonnes864201st 0
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
The Dutch Seabird Group collected 2
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Figure 2.28 below represents types
Page 40 and 41: Table 2.5 Source-specific indicator
Page 42 and 43: % Recreational & Beachvisitors% Fis
Page 44: 2.3.1.4 Bay of Biscay and Iberian C
Page 47 and 48: Figure 2.40 A fridge deliberately d
Page 49 and 50: Figure 3.2 An entangled Minke Whale
Page 51 and 52: Figure 3.5 Eco performance of Fulma
Page 53 and 54: It is possible that marine litter w
Page 55 and 56: • The stalked barnacle (Dosimia f
Page 57 and 58: • Tourism and recreational activi
Page 59 and 60: 3.3.1 Cost of Management of Marine
Page 61 and 62: 4 Existing Legal Regimes in the are
Page 63 and 64: The three objectives of the CBD are
Page 65 and 66: 4.2 National and Local Legislation4
Page 67 and 68: 4.2.7.2 The Merchant Shipping (Prev
Page 69 and 70: 4.2.7.7 The Anti Social Behaviour A
Page 71 and 72: The implementation of the following
Page 73 and 74: 4.3.5 UKMarine litter is covered by
Page 75 and 76: • Annual report on ship generated
Page 77 and 78: 5.1 Port reception facilities (PRFs
Page 79 and 80: Table 5.1 Port Reception Facilities
Page 81 and 82: 6 Existing Monitoring Programmes re
Page 83 and 84: was very 'average' for the situatio
Page 85 and 86: Between locations and Regions in th
Page 87 and 88: 9 Gaps, Needs, Priorities and Recom
Page 89: whole OSPAR Maritime Area is Fishin
Page 93 and 94: BibliographyBrowne, M., et al. 2007
Page 95 and 96: OSPAR CommissionQuestionnaireAssess
Page 97 and 98: 2. The scale of the problem2.1 Amou
Page 99 and 100: Please specify the cost of manageme
Page 101 and 102: 3. Sources of marine litter in the
Page 103 and 104: 4. Existing legal regimes in the ar
Page 105 and 106: What organizations have the legal r
Page 107 and 108: Please stipulate what the availabil
Page 109 and 110: How efficient is the collection of
Page 111 and 112: 7. Scientific studies and researchP
Page 113 and 114: Additional information:103
Page 115 and 116: Faroe Islands (Denmark):SURVEYS/MON
Page 117 and 118: Other monitoring programmes related
Page 119 and 120: Germany:SURVEYS/MONITORING/OTHERNam
Page 121 and 122: Adopt a Beach and Beachtwatch Progr
Page 123 and 124: Denmark:SURVEYS/MONITORING/OTHERNam
Page 125 and 126: France:SURVEYS/MONITORING/OTHERName
Page 127 and 128: GermanyCLEMENS, T. & E. HARTWIG (19
Page 129 and 130: The results of the project show tha
show all

view pdf - Seas At Risk

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?