Bell Curve

800 Bibliography Bibliography 80 1Jencks, C. 1979. Who Gets Ahead? The Determinants of Economic Success inAmerica. New York: Basic Books.Jencks, C., and Peterson, P. E. (eds.). 1991. The Urban Underclass. Washington,D.C.: Brookings Institution.Jencks, C., Smith, M., Acland, H., Bane, M. J., Cohen, D., Gintis, H., Heyns,B., and Michelson, S. 1972. Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effect of Familyand Schooling in America. New York: Basic Books.Jennings, J. T. 1991. Voting and Registration in the Election of Nov. 1990. CurrentPopulation Report Series P-20, No. 453. U.S. Bureau of the Census.Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Jensen, A. R. 1969. How much can we boost lQ and scholastic achievement?Harvard Educational Rev. 39: 1- 123.Jensen, A. R. 1974. How biased are culture-loaded tests? Genetic Psych. Monographs90: 185-244.Jensen, A. R. 1977. Cumulative deficit in IQ of blacks in the rural South. DevelopmentalPsych. 13: 184-191.Jensen, A. R. 1978. Genetic and behavioral effects of nonrandom mating. InHuman Variation: Biopsychology of Age, Race, and Sex. R. T. Osborne, C. E.Noble, and N. Weyl (eds.). New York: Academic Press, pp. 5-105.Jensen, A. R. 1980. Bias in Mental Testing. New York: Free Press.Jensen, A. R. 1984a. The black-white difference on the K-ABC: Implicat~onsfor future tests. J. of Special Education 18:377408.Jensen, A. R. 1984b. Test bias: Concepts and criticisms. In Perspectives on "Biasin Mental Testing." C. R. Reynolds and R. T. Brown (eds.). New York:Plenum Press, pp. 507-586.Jensen, A. R. 1985. The nature of the black-white d~fference on various psychometrictests: Spearman's hypothesis. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences.8:193-258.Jensen, A. R. 1986. g: Artifact or reality?]. of Vocational Behavior 29:301-33 1.Jensen, A. R. 1987a. Continuing commentary on "The nature of the blackwhitedifference on various psychometric tests: Spearman's hypothesis." TheBehavioral and Brain Sciences. 10307-53 7.Jensen, A. R. 1987b. The g beyond factor analysis. In The Influence of CognitivePsych. on Testing. Royce R. Ronning, J. A. Glover, J. C. Conoley, and J.C. Witt (eds.). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 87-142.Jensen, A. R. 1989. Raising IQ without increasing g? A review of "The MilwaukeeProject: Preventing Mental Retardation in Children at Risk." DevelopmentalReview 9:234-258.Jensen, A. R. 1990. Speed of information processing in a calculating prodigy.lntelligence 14:259-274.Jensen, A. R. 1992. Spearman's hypothesis: Methodology and evidence. MultivariateBehavioral Research 27:225-233.Jensen, A. R. 1993a. Psychometric g and achievement. In Policy Perspectives onEducational Testing. R. R. Gifford (ed.). Roston: Kluwer Academic Publishers,pp. 117-227.Jensen, A. R. 1993b. Spearman's hypothesis tested with chronometric information-processingtasks. Intelligence 17:44-7 7.Jensen, A. R., and Faulstich, M. E. 1988. Difference between prisoners and thegeneral population in psychometric g. Personality and Individual Differences9:925-928.Jensen, A. R., and Figueroa, R. A. 1975. Forward and backward digit span interactionwith race and IQ: Predictions from Jenscn's theory. ]. of EducationalPsych. 67:882-893.Jensen, A. R., and Inouye, A. R. 1980. Level 1 and Level I1 abilities in Asian,white, and black children. Intelligence 44149.Jensen, A. R., and McGurk, E C. J. 1987. Black-white bias in "cultural" and"nonc~~ltural" test items. Personality and Individual Differences. 8:295-301.Jensen, A. R., and Munro, E. 1979. Reaction time, movement time, and intelligence.Intelligence 3:121-126.Jensen, A. R., and Naglieri, 1. A. 1987. Comparison of black-white differenceson the WISC-R and the K-ABC: Spearman's hypothesis. Intelligence 11:21.Jensen, A. R., and Reynolds, C. R. 1982. Race, social class and ability patternson the WISC-R. Personality and individual Differences 3:423-438.Jensen, R. F., and Nicholas, K. B. 1984. Influence of the social characteristicsof both father and child on the tendency to report child abuse. ProfessionalPsych.: Research and Practice 15: 121-1 28.Johnson, B., and Morse, H. A. 1968. Injured children and their parents. Children15:147-152.Johnson, K.M., et al. 1984. The nature of human ability: An historical perspectiveon intelligence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of theAmerican Educational Research Association, New Orleans.Johnson, R. C., Ahern, E M., and Cole, R. E. 1980. Seci~lar change in degreeof assortative mating for ability? Behavioral Genetics 10: 1-8.Johnson, R. C., Nagoshi, C. T., and Ahern, E M. 1987. A reply to Heath et al.on assortatwe mating for educational level. Behavioral Genetics 17:1-7.Johnson, S. T. 1988. Test fairness and bias: Measuring academic achievementamong black youth. Urban League Rev. 11 :76-92.Johnson, S. T., and Wallace, M. B. 1989. Characteristics of SAT quantitativeitems showing improvement after coaching among black students from lowincomefamilies: An exploratory study. Special Issue: The test item.]. of EducationalMeasurement 26:133-145.Jones, E. E and Forrest, J. D. 1992. Underreporting of abortion in surveys ofU.S. women: 1976 to 1988. Demogyaphy 29:113-126.Jones, G. E. 1988. Investigation of the efficacy of general ability versus specific