sets, values, attitudes, and habits of people, <strong>in</strong> short, its culture,will determ<strong>in</strong>e the ultimate success of efforts to create a bettercountry. The heart and m<strong>in</strong>d of any revolution is the revolutionof hearts and m<strong>in</strong>ds. In partnership with and <strong>in</strong> support of civilsociety, the key actor <strong>in</strong> culture, Perlas will encourage a culturalrevolution that is peaceful, creative, and celebratory. Thiswill be the foundation, the liv<strong>in</strong>g basis for massive reforms <strong>in</strong>government and bus<strong>in</strong>ess that will propel the renaissance of thePhilipp<strong>in</strong>es, domestically and globally.While most political leaders have no idea of the nature andcapabilities of civil society and have often been <strong>in</strong> conflict withits active citizens, Perlas has been a leader <strong>in</strong> civil society forover 40 years and has written one of the most <strong>in</strong>fluential bookson civil society <strong>in</strong> the world. Perlas will use his expertise andcompetence <strong>in</strong> this area to encourage wide-rang<strong>in</strong>g partnershipswith civil society to lay the cultural basis for renew<strong>in</strong>gPhilipp<strong>in</strong>e society.Inner Change and Creativity as Basis of SocietalTransformationComputer science has a say<strong>in</strong>g: garbage <strong>in</strong>, garbage out. Thewrong software can render the most sophisticated computerhardware dysfunctional and worthless. The same is true <strong>in</strong> societaltransformation. We may create the most wonderful constitution,sets of laws, and structures of governance, but if peoplerema<strong>in</strong> lazy, cynical, apathetic, corrupt, and hopeless, then ourstructural reform will never take off. Profound societal transformationcan only be done on the basis of <strong>in</strong>ner change.Past and present governments, with rare exceptions, haveno understand<strong>in</strong>g of and appreciation for the importance of humandevelopment with<strong>in</strong> a societal transformation context. ButNicanor Perlas has had extensive experience <strong>in</strong> socially engagedhuman and leadership development. Perlas will harness hiscompetence <strong>in</strong> this area to secure the long-term renewal of government<strong>in</strong>stitutions on the basis of self-directed <strong>in</strong>ner changeof its key leaders, management, and staff.Tayong Lahat! Ngayon! (All together! Now!)Systemic transformation, societal threefold<strong>in</strong>g partnerships,positive <strong>in</strong>itiatives, cultural transformation, and <strong>in</strong>ner-changeall po<strong>in</strong>t to one reality. No s<strong>in</strong>gle person, no matter how brilliantand competent, can change the country alone. It will requirethe engagement of millions of citizens to renew a country. Mostgovernments do not appreciate the genius of its people, no matterwhat economic class they may belong to. But Nicanor Perlashas been facilitat<strong>in</strong>g national and global workshops on harness<strong>in</strong>gthe collective <strong>in</strong>telligence of groups of people. With his rallycry, TAYONG LAHAT! NGAYON!, Perlas will become the firstPhilipp<strong>in</strong>e President, if voters say so, to harness the collective<strong>in</strong>telligence of a nation to realize its highest aspirations and tochange its dest<strong>in</strong>y forever.JOB 9-0347.5 X 5As accessed 11/25/2009 at www.nicanor-perlas.com/Nicanor/whyvote-for-nicky.html.Evolv<strong>in</strong>g News for Members & <strong>Friends</strong> doesANTHROPOSOPHICAL SOCIETYnot endorse political candidates. The op<strong>in</strong>ions expressed aboveare those of the authors.let the journey beg<strong>in</strong>…australia • ch<strong>in</strong>a • costa rica<strong>in</strong>dia • taiwan • thailand • turkeyDur<strong>in</strong>g its 44-year history, Global College (previously <strong>Friends</strong> WorldProgram) has established itself as one of the nation’s lead<strong>in</strong>g experientialeducation programs. Students benefit from <strong>in</strong>ternational experiences as wellas a broad-based liberal arts education offered by one of the largest, mostcomprehensive private universities <strong>in</strong> the country. Global College is the onlyglobal studies program <strong>in</strong> the nation that <strong>in</strong>tegrates a series of year-longcultural immersions <strong>in</strong>to a progressive, four-year Bachelor of Arts degree.718.780.4312 • www.brooklyn.liu.edu/globalcollegeglobalcollege@liu.edu14 Evolv<strong>in</strong>g News for Members & <strong>Friends</strong>
The Web as Will and IdeaEugene SchwartzIn the summer of 1984 I was <strong>in</strong>vited to the Goetheanum bythe Section for Belles-Lettres 1 to help lead an English-languageconference on the <strong>in</strong>fluence of Albert Steffen <strong>in</strong> the West.Throughout the conference week the leaders would gather <strong>in</strong>the even<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the office of Hagen Biesantz, the Section leader.One night, after a long and lively conversation, we made readyto leave, only to discover that we were locked <strong>in</strong>side the build<strong>in</strong>g.Even <strong>in</strong> those pre-9/11 days the Goetheanum had a vigilantsecurity team who, though they saw us walk<strong>in</strong>g through thehallways, had no <strong>in</strong>tention of releas<strong>in</strong>g us. The sight and soundof those men <strong>in</strong> brown uniforms call<strong>in</strong>g out commands to theirpolice dogs <strong>in</strong> harsh Swiss-German, evoked some unpleasant associations<strong>in</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>d of this Jewish boyfrom Brooklyn. I was relieved when Dr.Biesantz said that he knew of anotherway out of the build<strong>in</strong>g.Down, down, down we went <strong>in</strong>to passagesso constricted and labyr<strong>in</strong>th<strong>in</strong>ethat they seemed to confirm the Goetheanum’sstature as a modern mysterycenter. The exit was <strong>in</strong> sight, but beforewe came to it Dr. Biesantz drew us tothe nondescript door of a storage room.“Come <strong>in</strong>,” he said, unlock<strong>in</strong>g the portaland switch<strong>in</strong>g on the light, “Look!”There it rested, immutable, bland,and mostly plastic: the Goetheanum’sfirst (and only) computer. “We don’tknow what to do with it,” Dr. Biesantzconfided to our pale and shaken group(first the police dogs, and now . . . . this.And it was 1984!). He went on. “It is theunmentionable,” he <strong>in</strong>toned, and placedhis foref<strong>in</strong>ger aga<strong>in</strong>st his lips. We understoodthat we were pledged to silence.Today, of course, the idea of a solitary computer is all butunth<strong>in</strong>kable. In the Goetheanum, as <strong>in</strong> many centers of anthroposophyworldwide, computers work <strong>in</strong> tandem, whetherthrough <strong>in</strong>ternal networks or the <strong>in</strong>ternet. In spite of the remarkableproliferation of computers throughout the anthroposophicalmovement (compared, say, to devices such as televisions oriPods) very little has been written about them. We must thereforebe especially grateful to Sergei Prokofieff for “The Be<strong>in</strong>g ofthe Internet,” an article that appeared <strong>in</strong> the English-languagePacifica Journal three years ago. 2 The article is no less germanenow than it was <strong>in</strong> 2006, and with the hope of mak<strong>in</strong>g it knownto a wider audience I offer the follow<strong>in</strong>g elucidation.As is only to be expected, Prokofieff’s article is concise and1 This section is now known <strong>in</strong> the USA as the Section for the LiteraryArts & Humanities.2 Editor’s note: Pacifica Journal noted prior publication <strong>in</strong> the newsletterof the <strong>Anthroposophical</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>in</strong> Great Brita<strong>in</strong>. The first USE-News po<strong>in</strong>ted the article out onl<strong>in</strong>e last spr<strong>in</strong>g, and the San MiguelBranch newsletter <strong>in</strong> San Diego repr<strong>in</strong>ted the article this fall.well researched. He touches on so many important po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong>such a compressed way that it would be far beyond the scope ofthis article to speak to them all. Therefore, <strong>in</strong> this commentary Iwant to address only three of the myriad issues he raises:1. Who stands beh<strong>in</strong>d the <strong>in</strong>ternet?2. The question of the compression of spiritual content.3. Our responsibility vis-à-vis the <strong>in</strong>ternet.The Imag<strong>in</strong>ation of the Spiderweb“It is frighten<strong>in</strong>g,” Prokofieff writes, “how poignantly RudolfSte<strong>in</strong>er describes this spirit world <strong>in</strong> comparison with the worldsituation of today,” and he then presents a lengthy quote fromPerspectives on Human Development, aMay 13, 1921 lecture. Because this lectureis not readily available, I, too, willquote his excerpt <strong>in</strong> full:And from the earth will well up terriblecreations of be<strong>in</strong>gs who <strong>in</strong> their characterstand between the m<strong>in</strong>eral k<strong>in</strong>gdom andthe plant k<strong>in</strong>gdom as automative be<strong>in</strong>gswith a super-natural <strong>in</strong>tellect, an immense<strong>in</strong>tellect. When this development takeshold, the earth will be covered, as witha web, a web of terrible spiders, spidersof enormous wisdom, which, however,<strong>in</strong> their organization doesn’t even reachthe plant status. Terrible spiders whichwill <strong>in</strong>terlock with each other, whichwill imitate <strong>in</strong> their movements all thatwhich humanity has thought of with theirshadowlike <strong>in</strong>tellect that was not <strong>in</strong>spiredby a new imag<strong>in</strong>ation, through that whichis to come through Spiritual Science. Allman’s thoughts of this k<strong>in</strong>d, which areunreal, will come alive. The earth will becovered […] with terrible m<strong>in</strong>eral-plantlike spiders, which will l<strong>in</strong>k up with empathy but evil <strong>in</strong>tention.And man […] will have to unite with these terrible m<strong>in</strong>eralplantlike spider creatures.Prokofieff goes on to say,These spider creatures will be of a dist<strong>in</strong>ctly ahrimanic character.When you read these prophetic words of the spiritual scientisttoday, <strong>in</strong> an era of world wide connections via computerand the <strong>in</strong>ternet you may be disheartened to f<strong>in</strong>d how quicklythis prophecy has become a reality on earth. It is as if RudolfSte<strong>in</strong>er, with his spiritual gaze, described today’s <strong>in</strong>ternet frombeyond the threshold, categorically warn<strong>in</strong>g humanity that <strong>in</strong>a not too distant future, with the unification of the moon andearth, this whole <strong>in</strong>ternet-computer-web and <strong>in</strong> fact everyth<strong>in</strong>gconnected with the development of artificial <strong>in</strong>tellect will suddenlycome alive . . . .Ste<strong>in</strong>er’s 1921 lecture is unusual for its strongly prophetictone. As if the nearly apocalyptic picture of the spider webs andtheir sp<strong>in</strong>ners were not enough, Ste<strong>in</strong>er also spoke of “Supermen,”super-human be<strong>in</strong>gs who began to descend to the earthFall-W<strong>in</strong>ter 200915