Final report for One North East And NEPIC 21/12/10 - The Carbon ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The case for a Tees CCS networkFinal ReportAny organisation should share lessons with others on stakeholder organisation 99 , riskmanagement and allocation, attracting investment, technical specification 100 , and CCScosts and performance.Recommendation Three – Provide key stakeholders with an independent, robustassessment of accessible CO 2 storage options.Recognising that transport and storage costs and risks will depend on the storage sitechosen, and that transparency will be critical to obtaining the necessary stakeholdersupport, this report recommends a continuation of efforts already underway to evaluateaccessible CO 2 storage options.Recommendation Four – Strengthen and support the commercial scale for a CCSanchor project and a CCS network in North East England.Local stakeholders should critically review, strengthen and where appropriate, stronglypromote proposals for CCS demonstration projects to be located in the North East ofEngland and the overall business case for a CCS network. This will ensure suitablenetwork anchor projects are seen as viable in delivering all the objectives of CCSdemonstration and have the support of stakeholders making them realistic candidates tonucleate a CCS network.Recommendation Five – Include CCS within planning policies.Continue to examine opportunities to reduce costs and barriers through the optimalinclusion of CCS infrastructure requirements within national and local planning policies.This could include updating further the North South Tees Industrial DevelopmentFramework to safeguard further potential rights of way identified for potential CO 2pipelines.Recommendation Six –Explore public/NGO support for CCS deployment in the TeesValley.Consider a pilot public/NGO engagement study to understand social drivers and barriersfor CCS deployment in Teesside.Recommendation Seven – Continue to support other options for CO 2 reduction.Recognising that reducing the amount of CO 2 to collect will reduce absolute costs forcapture, transport and storage, Tees Valley CO 2 emitters will still need to continue toexamine all opportunities for reducing CO 2 emissions and share their forecast emissionswhere possible.Recommendation Eight – Examine the impacts of pipeline entry specifications onthe costs and feasibility of CO 2 capture and compression for North East emittersand potential storage operations.Recognising that the entry specification for any transport network may influence captureand storage investments, the Task Force should ensure key stakeholders are fullyinformed as to the impacts of choices, to ensure system-wide benefits are not threatened.99 See for example Yorkshire Forward‟s CCS network, Scotland, Rotterdam and the ZEP Task Force.100 As an example, DNV‟s Pipetrans phase project examines common entry specification for CO 2 pipelines.68
The case for a Tees CCS networkFinal ReportParticipation in international programmes would ensure stakeholders are up-to-date withtechnology development.A suggested timeline for implementing the steps needed to deliver a joint venture isdescribed below in Figure 19..69
Page 1 and 2:
Project NameDocument NameDeveloping
Page 3 and 4:
The case for a Tees CCS networkFina
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Annual emissions (MtCO2/yr)The case
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29: The case for a Tees CCS networkFina
Page 46 and 47: Commercial risk profileThe case for
Page 56 and 57: POLICY & REGULATORYTECHNICAL & OPER
Page 58 and 59: 5 Financing a Tees Valley CCS netwo
Page 74 and 75: 6.6 The role of the EU and UK Gover
show all

Final report for One North East And NEPIC 21/12/10 - The Carbon ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?