Oral Health inside - Communities and Local Government

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 5Statistical significance (p) of difference in visual (+cavitated) vdmft/VDMFT scoresin RoI between non medical card holders and medical card holders within Fluoridated andNon-Fluoridated groups and in NI between those with low income benefit and othersRoI Full Fl RoI Non Fl NIp p p5
Results% vdmft untreatedFigure 13 Untreated caries as a proportion of total caries experience (vd/vdmft x100,primary teeth, for 5-year-olds, VD/VDMFTx100, permanent teeth, for 8-, 12- and 15-yearolds)among children and adolescents with fluoridated water supplies(Data excluded where numbers are less than 30)Figure 13a: 5-year-olds100908070605040302010080.0 81.6ERHA82.2ERHA-ECAHB87.184.4ERHA-NAHB75.4 75.9ERHA-SWAHB94.289.4MHB79.976.7MWHB85.5 85.6NEHBNWHBMC No MC Yes Health Board Region92.384.577.7 80.4 79.2 79.0SEHBSHB94.890.4WHB83.9 82.4RoIFigure 13b: 8-year-olds% VDMFT untreated100908070605040302010058.673.0ERHA56.0ERHA-ECAHB76.3 77.8 79.1ERHA-NAHB43.5 43.8ERHA-SWAHBMHB46.367.2MWHB38.762.3NEHB97.488.6NWHB40.971.4SEHB25.052.9SHB75.969.051.7 51.5WHB RoIMC No MC Yes Health Board RegionFigure 13c: 12-year-olds10090% VDMFT untreated8070605040302010041.535.728.7 28.4 28.8 29.523.5ERHAERHA-ECAHBERHA-NAHBERHA-SWAHB40.132.7MHB35.145.5MWHB34.924.8NEHB54.8NWHB48.142.925.6 27.4SEHB SHB44.827.2WHB39.931.7RoIMC No MC Yes Health Board RegionFigure 13d: 15-year-olds10090% VDMFT untreated8070605040302010049.340.3ERHA46.1 44.740.8ERHA-ECAHB66.9ERHA-NAHB38.1 40.0 37.434.1ERHA-SWAHBMHB27.7 28.5MWHB31.528.1NEHB50.5NWHB31.341.5SEHB22.634.9SHB32.225.6WHB41.033.6RoIMC No MC Yes Health Board Region31
Page 1: North South Survey of Children’s
Page 6: A fissure sealant is a plastic resi
Page 9 and 10: Introductioncomparable with earlier
Page 11 and 12: IntroductionThe children were asked
Page 13 and 14: ResultsFluoridation status was clas
Page 15 and 16: ResultsAge of the children and adol
Page 17 and 18: Resultsschool based fluoride mouthr
Page 19 and 20: ResultsFigure 6 Mean number of deca
Page 21 and 22: ResultsFigure 7 Percentage of child
Page 23 and 24: ResultsFigure 9 Mean number of prim
Page 25 and 26: ResultsMWHB (mean dmft of 2.9 in 19
Page 27 and 28: ResultsWHO criteria, but not in the
Page 29: ResultsMean vdmftFigure 12 Mean num
Page 33 and 34: ResultsOne might expect to find lit
Page 35 and 36: ResultsThere was considerable varia
Page 37: ResultsDEAN’S INDEX OFFLUOROSIS S
Page 40 and 41: Prevalence of traumatic injuryTable
Page 42 and 43: Comparison with the National Childr
Page 44 and 45: Appendix 2Survey Teams, Republic an
Page 46 and 47: Appendix 5a) Principal Trainer and
Page 48 and 49: Appendix 7aMean number of decayed (
Page 50 and 51: Appendix 7cMean number of decayed (
Page 52 and 53: Appendix 7dMean number of decayed (
Page 54 and 55: Appendix 7eMean number of teeth aff
Page 56 and 57: Bibliography1Quality and Fairness,
Page 58: AcknowledgementsThe study of oral d

Oral Health inside - Communities and Local Government

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?