- Page 1: ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENTR
- Page 5: ContentsGlossaryA Ga Pila Executive
- Page 9 and 10: A: EXECUTIVE SUMMARYA.1 INTRODUCTIO
- Page 11 and 12: The GRMT committee was transformed
- Page 13 and 14: appointed by AP (in consultation wi
- Page 15 and 16: Consultation during the AuditThe st
- Page 17 and 18: Lack of Monitoring and Corrective A
- Page 19 and 20: process. This does not appear to ha
- Page 22 and 23: IFCPerformanceStandard &Section (#)
- Page 24 and 25: IFCPerformanceStandard &Section (#)
- Page 26 and 27: B.2 KEY EVENTS IN THE RESETTLEMENT
- Page 28 and 29: Compensation for Loss of AssetsMuch
- Page 30 and 31: During the review, ERM had sight of
- Page 32 and 33: construction process), no adequate,
- Page 34 and 35: S21’s failure to report back effe
- Page 36 and 37: IFCPerformanceStandard &Section (#)
- Page 38 and 39: IFCPerformanceStandard &Section (#)
- Page 41 and 42: C: EXECUTIVE SUMMARYLOOKING FORWARD
- Page 43: implementation of any such interven
- Page 48 and 49: 1.1 THE BRIEFIt is within the conte
- Page 50 and 51: There were also several other villa
- Page 52 and 53: ERM has applied four types of ratin
- Page 54 and 55: AP was supported through the reloca
- Page 56 and 57: As at Ga Pila, both the S21s and th
- Page 59: ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENTP
- Page 62 and 63: 6 Topic 6: Grievance Management 286
- Page 64 and 65: The EIA goes on to state that none
- Page 66 and 67: It was thus appropriate that AP’s
- Page 68 and 69: Security of Tenure: Communal Rights
- Page 70 and 71: esettled as a whole village. This a
- Page 72 and 73: 3.3 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTAn assess
- Page 74 and 75: 4.2 OVERVIEW OF CONSULTATION FOR GA
- Page 76 and 77: It is also not clear whether the fo
- Page 78 and 79: Consultation and Participation duri
- Page 80 and 81: 4.3 SUMMARY FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS4.
- Page 82 and 83: differed markedly to AP’s recolle
- Page 84 and 85: the early decision to relocate the
- Page 86 and 87: 5.2.2 Provide Replacement Property
- Page 88 and 89: 5.2.5 Compensation Costs to be Paid
- Page 90 and 91: TOPIC 66 Grievance Management6.1 WH
- Page 92 and 93: are reportedly still a large number
- Page 94 and 95:
TOPIC 77 Provide Relocation Assista
- Page 96 and 97:
TOPIC 88 Improve/Restore Living Con
- Page 98 and 99:
community members complained that t
- Page 100 and 101:
in particular to a portion of the l
- Page 102 and 103:
TOPIC 99 Implementation Planning, E
- Page 104 and 105:
9.2.4 Ensure Adequate Capacity forI
- Page 107 and 108:
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENTP
- Page 109:
5.2.5 Village Infrastructure and Se
- Page 112 and 113:
AP also looked at the settlements o
- Page 114 and 115:
The evidence suggests therefore tha
- Page 116 and 117:
Land Lease Arrangements and Documen
- Page 118 and 119:
2.3 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTAn assess
- Page 120 and 121:
Table 3.1 List of Assets Audited (S
- Page 122 and 123:
3.3 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTAn assess
- Page 124 and 125:
4.2 OVERVIEW OF CONSULTATION FOR MO
- Page 126 and 127:
oth Ga Puka and Ga Sekhaolelo. The
- Page 128 and 129:
At the time of writing this report,
- Page 130 and 131:
esults thereof. The explanation of
- Page 132 and 133:
All evidence clearly suggests that
- Page 134 and 135:
were provided with opportunities to
- Page 137 and 138:
TOPIC 55 Compensation5.1 WHAT THE I
- Page 139 and 140:
however and may be linked more to t
- Page 141 and 142:
BOX 5.1DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTEREDDURI
- Page 143 and 144:
Complaints were also raised by trad
- Page 145 and 146:
TOPIC 66 Managing Grievances6.1 WHA
- Page 147 and 148:
6.2.2 Effectiveness and Implementat
- Page 149 and 150:
This is considered a critical flaw
- Page 151 and 152:
TOPIC 77 Provide Relocation Assista
- Page 153 and 154:
TOPIC 88 Improve/restore living con
- Page 155 and 156:
While recognising issues related to
- Page 157 and 158:
the company is now providing servic
- Page 159 and 160:
expectations for employment and ski
- Page 161 and 162:
8.3 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTAn assess
- Page 163 and 164:
9.2 SUMMARY FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS9.
- Page 165 and 166:
Box 9.1 Project Management Structur
- Page 167:
9.3 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTAn assess
- Page 170 and 171:
iiiiii
- Page 173 and 174:
PART 4Looking Forward Report1.1 INT
- Page 175 and 176:
Publically Accept Findings of the R
- Page 177 and 178:
1.5.2 Key RecommendationsThis secti
- Page 179 and 180:
social monitoring and evaluation pr
- Page 181 and 182:
• Consider using specialists (e.g
- Page 183 and 184:
services), rather than being paid d
- Page 185 and 186:
of Ga Pila and Motlhotlo. In additi
- Page 187:
development initiatives. AP already
- Page 190 and 191:
PART FIVE1 Conclusion1.1 INTRODUCTI
- Page 192 and 193:
During the 18 month period of this
- Page 194 and 195:
Annexure AMaps of Relocated Settlem
- Page 196 and 197:
Map A2 Territorial and Administrati
- Page 198 and 199:
Community QuestionsKEY ISSUEAssessi
- Page 201 and 202:
Annexure CList of Consultation Acti
- Page 203 and 204:
Date and TimeStakeholderPhase ofEng
- Page 205 and 206:
Annexure DPhotolog
- Page 207 and 208:
Photo A3 Old Evangelist Church - Mo
- Page 209 and 210:
Photo A8 The Old Cornelius Masebe P
- Page 211 and 212:
Photo A14 190m 2 house Ga-Sekhaolel
- Page 213 and 214:
Photo A18 Typical 50m 2 House - Old
- Page 215:
Annexure EDesign Criteria
- Page 238 and 239:
Action Aid (2008) Precious Metal: T
- Page 241 and 242:
ERM Ga Pila and Motlhotlo Resettlem
- Page 243 and 244:
The following things were not done
- Page 245 and 246:
ThemeImprove/RestoreLiving Conditio
- Page 247 and 248:
ThemeGrievance MechanismRelocation
- Page 249 and 250:
5Tekodišišo ya ERM ya go Thothiš
- Page 251 and 252:
Dilo tše di latelago ga se tša di
- Page 253 and 254:
Morero Senyakwa sa Molawana wa Pank
- Page 255 and 256:
Morero Senyakwa sa Molawana wa Pank
- Page 257 and 258:
Annexure HList of Tables and Boxes
- Page 259:
L IST OF BOXESBox 1.1Box 2.1Box 4.1