13.07.2015 Views

IDI Creative Axis - Institute of Designers in Ireland

IDI Creative Axis - Institute of Designers in Ireland

IDI Creative Axis - Institute of Designers in Ireland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

16 RICHARD SEYMOURIf you build it, they will comeProduct designer Richard Seymour is one half <strong>of</strong> the redoubtable London design duo Seymour Powell, anda man at the top <strong>of</strong> his game. He came to Dubl<strong>in</strong> at the <strong>in</strong>vitation <strong>of</strong> <strong>IDI</strong> to talk about ‘optimistic futurism’,a phrase picked up from Steve Jobs, and to encourage product designers towards a k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> tough love.Marion Hancock reports.If there is such a th<strong>in</strong>g as a celebrity productdesigner, Richard Seymour is one – look at thesexy portfolio, the media pr<strong>of</strong>ile, and thecharismatic man himself, a k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> rock’n’rollhairy biker meets Orson Welles. At the momenthe’s work<strong>in</strong>g on Virg<strong>in</strong>’s ‘unspeakablyaudacious’ privateer spaceship which will hurlpeople <strong>in</strong>to space for 4 m<strong>in</strong>utes at a ticketprice <strong>of</strong> £100,000 a pop, on tra<strong>in</strong>s that will goat 400 mph (and will, quite likely, make a lot<strong>of</strong> air travel redundant), and on the world’sfirst hydrogen-fuelled motorbikes. This is thestuff boys’ dreams are made <strong>of</strong>, and SeymourPowell, the consultancy Seymour co-pilots <strong>in</strong>London with Dick Powell, has always had morethan its share <strong>of</strong> ‘deep futures’ Aust<strong>in</strong> Powersprojects.Then there’s the saucy stuff. He’s designeda new k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> bra – the research requir<strong>in</strong>gclose contact with breasts <strong>of</strong> every volume.And sex toys for sale <strong>in</strong> high street chemists:picture the <strong>in</strong>vestigations that led to the DurexLittle Gem. And self-clean<strong>in</strong>g, user-friendlytoilets (‘if you’d seen as much simulatedultraviolet backsplash as I have…’). OK,maybe the last one’s not so glamorous, butstill. As Seymour says, ‘Don’t you wish you hadmy job?’These projects do sound like huge fun, and<strong>of</strong> course not everyone gets to hobnob withRichard Branson and Steve Jobs (the latter‘like spend<strong>in</strong>g two hours too close to avolcano’). But lately, uneasy lies the head thatwears these serious creative laurels. It’s beenbother<strong>in</strong>g Seymour that designers have a k<strong>in</strong>d<strong>of</strong> carte blanche when it comes to stack<strong>in</strong>g upproblems for the future. ‘I woke up one nightto the horrible truth that because everyth<strong>in</strong>g Idid took a long time to reach the market –even a kettle takes years – each onerepresented a little corner <strong>of</strong> the future. In thefuture, there’s nobody there to stop you do<strong>in</strong>gth<strong>in</strong>gs. So if I know what a tra<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> 2013 lookslike, or a plane <strong>of</strong> 2050 – and I do – there’s aresponsibility that comes with that: am I do<strong>in</strong>gsometh<strong>in</strong>g terrible?’A case <strong>in</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t – the ‘24/7’ sweet dispenserhe designed. This did well on the market,sell<strong>in</strong>g far and wide and becom<strong>in</strong>g a commonsight on petrol forecourts. ‘Then one day I gotan email from somebody <strong>in</strong> Australia with thesubject l<strong>in</strong>e: You bastard. That got myattention. This email basically said, Iunderstand you’re the guy that designed that24/7 mach<strong>in</strong>e. I’m a backpacker and whereverI go <strong>in</strong> the outback, I f<strong>in</strong>d your fuck<strong>in</strong>gdispenser <strong>in</strong> the sand’.This gave Seymour pause, s<strong>in</strong>ce like mostdesigners he wants to ‘make th<strong>in</strong>gs better forpeople, either physically or emotionally orboth’. S<strong>in</strong>ce then he’s been th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g a lotabout the m<strong>in</strong>dset <strong>of</strong> the future-fac<strong>in</strong>g productdesigner. To make th<strong>in</strong>gs better, he says,what’s needed is to look back with honesty (‘t<strong>of</strong>ix the s<strong>in</strong>s’) and to look forward with a blend<strong>of</strong> conscious responsibility and perky<strong>in</strong>ventiveness, even when the signs aren’tauspicious. ‘I switched on the news recentlyand the head <strong>of</strong> MI5 <strong>in</strong> London was say<strong>in</strong>gthey’re look<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to 60 different terror plots,some <strong>of</strong> which may <strong>in</strong>volve nuclear materials’,he says. ‘Now I can clutch my head and saywhat’s the po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> gett<strong>in</strong>g out <strong>of</strong> bed, it’s allterrible...but if I wake up pissed <strong>of</strong>f andapproach my design<strong>in</strong>g table overburdenedwith negativity, then at least a bit <strong>of</strong> the futureis go<strong>in</strong>g to be shit.’Dream<strong>in</strong>g up a positive future should also<strong>in</strong>volve seek<strong>in</strong>g the mundane and replac<strong>in</strong>g itwith ‘m<strong>in</strong>or magic,’ such as the sleep light onthe Mac; the way a car’s <strong>in</strong>terior light fadesslowly not abruptly. It’s all about the designerus<strong>in</strong>g his or her own m<strong>in</strong>d and senses toexam<strong>in</strong>e what’s worked and what hasn’t, andto forge a positive way ahead – forget focusgroups. ‘I never do them’, says Seymour. ‘Theamount <strong>of</strong> crap that comes out <strong>of</strong> them, andthe money wasted on them, is unbelievable.’What he does <strong>in</strong>stead is ‘video anthropology,’video<strong>in</strong>g people and then watch<strong>in</strong>g the footagewith the sound turned <strong>of</strong>f, the better to see‘what the animal does’. When he wants towatch a physical task be<strong>in</strong>g performed, he maythrow <strong>in</strong> some diversionary questions, thebetter to see the animal <strong>in</strong> action. ‘It’s not thatpeople lie. It’s that they don’t know what they

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!