EJTN 2012

Evaluation from participantsAt each seminar, participants were askedto fill in an anonymous evaluation formto give their evaluations of the training.Very positive feedback resulted from theparticipants’ evaluations, which encouragedEJTN to continue with the organisation ofcourses based upon the simulation method.Table 25 – A very positive appreciation of the innovative training method0.2% 0.4% 1.7%62.2%5,8%29.6%No answerPoorAdequateSatisfatoryThe approach of the seminar, based on arole playing game, was greatly appreciatedby the participants who were asked to playa very active role during the seminars.GoodVery goodTable 26 – Approval of the structure of the seminars60%40%20%0%1.3%13.4%0.4% 2.2%44.9%37.8%The structure of the seminars and theway the topics were distributed were alsoconsidered as good or very good by mostof the participants.No answerPoorAdequateSatisfatoryGoodVery goodProviding the participants with an indepthknowledge of EU instrumentsfor cooperation in criminal matters andreinforcing mutual trust and confidencebetween judges and prosecutors from EUMember States were the main goals to beachieved. EU judges and prosecutors hadthe opportunity to discover the functioningof other legal systems within the specificarea of judicial cooperation in criminalmatters. The evaluation of the seminarsdemonstrates that both objectives weresuccessfully achieved.42