AVSI OVC Project Final Evaluation Children Report

More documents

Recommendations

Info

while Rwanda has the highest percentage of improving cases and the lowest of veryworsening cases. 17Tab. 26 - The family debts 2006/09 – Contingency table (%on total, Total=917)Family has material or financial debts 2009no Yes total % total countFamily has material orfinancial debts 2006No 26.9 23.9 50.8 466Yes 13.1 36.1 49.2 451total % 40.0 60.0 100.0total count 367 550 917Tab. 27 - The family debts for the households receiving IGA support in 2006/09 – Contingencytable (%on total, Total=149)Family has material or financialdebts 2009Households receiving IGA support by <strong>AVSI</strong> in 2006 No yes total % total countFamily has material or financialdebts 2006No No 22.8 29.5 52.3 78Yes 14.8 32.9 47.7 71total % 37.6 62.4 100.0total count 56 93 149Tab. 28 - Variation of the total resources available for the family between 2006 and 2009according to the guardians’ judgment (%)CountryAreatotal Kenya Rwanda Uganda RuralUrbanslumUrbanvery worsened 8.4 17.1 7.0 4.0 6.7 12.9 4.1worsened 41.2 50.8 41.9 35.5 39.0 45.6 33.8remain unchanged 21.1 14.7 18.6 25.5 21.4 19.5 25.5improved 27.9 17.4 29.1 33.5 31.4 21.4 33.1very improved 1.4 0 3.5 1.5 1.5 0.5 3.4total % 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%total count 934 299 128 507 458 363 144However for the project’ s sustainability the provision of income generating activitiesseems to have been an effective and promising strategy which <strong>AVSI</strong> should increase,especially considering that the overall economic wellbeing of the households consideredis still very fragile4.3 EducationTo analyze the level of education of the household members, the guardians were askedin 2009 to indicate the number of family members holding one of the followingeducation levels: illiterate, literate, primary education, secondary education, universityeducation (each level has been indicated as whether completed or not, attended or stillattending). Each household has on average 2.9 members holding a primary awardcertificate, 1.5 members hold a secondary school award, while the average presence of17 In Rwanda the Property Index scores were better to start. To express their self-evaluation guardianshave presumably considered their property which appears more perceptible compared to monetaryincome.34
higher education levels is very low (Fig.17). In line with the results registered for theguardians, the Kenyan households are those having on average more illiterate members,while Uganda is the one showing the highest average of secondary and universityeducation, which is also in line with the higher prevalence, in this country, of householdmembers involved in office work.Tab. 29 - The family educationN Minimum Maximum Mean Std. DeviationN. of household illiterate 983 0 7 0.35 0.861N. of household alphabetized 871 0 5 0.16 0.533N. of household primary school 964 0 19 2.88 2,111N. of household secondary school 910 0 12 1.48 1.590N. of household university 870 0 7 0.17 0.584Valid N 867Fig. 31 - Family members’ Education level each country - Averages35
Page 1 and 2: AVSI OVC ProjectFinal EvaluationChi
Page 3 and 4: 8.4 Children Profiling for Some Cri
Page 5 and 6: applying a longitudinal approach. I
Page 7 and 8: 2.0 Children’s Situation and Vuln
Page 9 and 10: It’ s important to mention that t
Page 11 and 12: Tab 2 - Changes in the Child Nutrit
Page 13 and 14: Tab. 3 Child Health Index every cou
Page 15 and 16: experienced an improvement, and onl
Page 17 and 18: Tab. 7 - Change of Child’s person
Page 19 and 20: 3. EVOLUTION IN THE GUARDIANS’ CH
Page 21 and 22: service sector, 15 while in Kenya t
Page 23 and 24: Tab. 12 _ Guardian’ s HIV status
Page 25 and 26: Fig. 22 - Changes in guardian’ di
Page 27 and 28: 3.4 Guardian’s involvement in the
Page 29 and 30: more. The number of children and yo
Page 31 and 32: Tab. 22 - The family sources of inc
Page 33: An increase in AVSI’ s interventi
Page 37 and 38: Although urban areas show a higher
Page 39 and 40: Fig. 34 - Children’ s kind of wor
Page 41 and 42: 33.1% of the habitations have walls
Page 43 and 44: Tab. 41 - Latrine/toilet in the hou
Page 45 and 46: The changes in the SRI during 2006-
Page 47 and 48: Fig. 32- Changes in the Social Risk
Page 49 and 50: 6.1 Characteristics of the school a
Page 51 and 52: Tab. 50 - Level of school attended,
Page 53 and 54: present in the schools attended by
Page 55 and 56: Tab. 60 - Children attendance at sc
Page 57 and 58: differences, however younger childr
Page 59 and 60: their performance are 24,2% and tho
Page 61 and 62: 8. EVOLUTION IN THE SUPPORT PROVIDE
Page 63 and 64: Fig. 41 - Support provided by AVSI
Page 65 and 66: 80,0%70,0%60,0%50,0%40,0%30,0%20,0%
Page 67 and 68: Part 2Outputs of Multivariate Analy
Page 69 and 70: the data driven indicators have an
Page 71 and 72: §¦¨Fig 1 - Multiple Corresponden
Page 73 and 74: Living conditionFig 2 - Multiple Co
Page 75 and 76: and live mainly in houses built wit
Page 77 and 78: ural area, and a further 15% with a
Page 79 and 80: The Uganda cluster is sub-divided i
Page 81 and 82: • the state of cleanliness of the
Page 83 and 84: • 66% of children have three meal
Page 85 and 86:
• Although nutrition is not alway
Page 87 and 88:
VariablesTab 7 - Characterization o
Page 89 and 90:
those who are more than 13 years ol
Page 91 and 92:
VariablesTab 14 - Characterization
Page 93 and 94:
VariablesTab 17 - Characterization
Page 95 and 96:
Also a group of guardians have wors
Page 97 and 98:
age of the guardian (6 classes) 36-
Page 99 and 100:
155 Child’s personality shy 19,86
Page 101 and 102:
8.5 The Structural Equation ModelTh
Page 103 and 104:
Guardian’s handicap Ordinal, 3Gua
Page 105 and 106:
the inner model the dependencies (p
Page 107 and 108:
Fig 6 - The estimation of WBSI mode
Page 109 and 110:
with the highest value for WBII is
Page 111 and 112:
Drivers for WBII0,9000,8000,700AICI
Page 113 and 114:
Part 3CONCLUSIONS andRECOMMENDATION
Page 115 and 116:
The research team constructed the s
Page 117 and 118:
variables of interest, that can be
Page 119 and 120:
cases the final CGI score does not
Page 121 and 122:
The high regularity in school atten
Page 123 and 124:
In this direction, interesting find
Page 125 and 126:
Aggregations of these scores accord
Page 127 and 128:
objectives of the OVC program - foo
Page 129 and 130:
AnnexAnnex 1. OVC POPULATION AND SA
Page 131 and 132:
Table. 1.3 - Territorial distributi
Page 133 and 134:
Chart 1 - Children age trend: 2006
Page 135 and 136:
the questionnaire of 2006. In both
Page 137 and 138:
Final Evaluation- March 2009QUESTI
Page 139 and 140:
QUESTI ONS BASED ON THE GUARDI AN
Page 141 and 142:
K.15 The Household’s sources ofno
Page 143 and 144:
K.23 The child’s nutritionCough/r
Page 145 and 146:
nutritional support 1 2 3 9 191recr
Page 147 and 148:
K.31.2A After your have entered in
Page 149 and 150:
K.4 When filling this question refe
Page 151 and 152:
K.27.1K.11.3andK.11.9K.27.1K.4K.11.
Page 153 and 154:
K.4 On AVSI interventions: Since of
Page 155 and 156:
Value assigned to vegetables, fruit
Page 157 and 158:
18005 2 0.2 0.2 50.618050 4 0.3 0.3
Page 159 and 160:
6 4 0.3 0.5 0.5 Very good8 69 5.4 8
Page 161 and 162:
1000000205 1 0.1 0.1 80.3 bad100000
Page 163 and 164:
Distribution Frequency Percent Vali
Page 165 and 166:
2012 32 2.5 3.2 97.62013 4 0.3 0.4
Page 167:
Missing System 158 12.3total 1281 1
show all

AVSI OVC Project Final Evaluation Children Report

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?