13.07.2015 Views

Fruitvale Transit Village (Phase 2) Initial Study - City of Oakland

Fruitvale Transit Village (Phase 2) Initial Study - City of Oakland

Fruitvale Transit Village (Phase 2) Initial Study - City of Oakland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Initial</strong> <strong>Study</strong> and Environmental Review ChecklistXV. Transportation/TrafficPotentiallySignificantImpactPotentiallySignificantUnlessMitigationIncorporatedLess thanSignificantwith StandardCondition <strong>of</strong>ApprovalLess thanSignificantNoImpactXV. Transportation/Traffic—Would the project:Project ImpactsCause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the traffic load and capacity <strong>of</strong> the street system (i.e., result in asubstantial increase in either the number <strong>of</strong> vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections), orchange the condition <strong>of</strong> an existing street (i.e.) street closures, changing direction <strong>of</strong> travel) in a manner that would substantiallyimpact access or traffic load capacity <strong>of</strong> the street system?Specifically:a) At a study, signalized intersection which is locatedoutside the Downtown area, the project would causethe level <strong>of</strong> service (LOS) to degrade to worse thanLOS D (i.e., E)?b) At a study, signalized intersection which is locatedwithin the Downtown area, the project would causethe LOS to degrade to worse than LOS E (i.e., F)?c) At a study, signalized intersection outside theDowntown area where the level <strong>of</strong> service is LOS E,the project would cause the total intersectionaverage vehicle delay to increase by four (4) or moreseconds, or degrade to worse than LOS E (i.e., F)?d) At a study, signalized intersection for all areas wherethe level <strong>of</strong> service is LOS E, the project wouldcause an increase in the average delay for any <strong>of</strong> thecritical movements <strong>of</strong> six (6) seconds or more, ordegrade to worse than LOS E (i.e., F)?e) At a study, signalized intersection for all areas wherethe level <strong>of</strong> service is LOS F, the project would cause(a) the total intersection average vehicle delay toincrease by two (2) or more seconds, or (b) anincrease in average delay for any <strong>of</strong> the criticalmovements <strong>of</strong> four (4) seconds or more; or (c) thevolume-to-capacity (“V/C”) ratio exceeds three(3) percent (but only if the delay values cannot bemeasured accurately)?f) At a study, unsignalized intersection, the projectwould add ten (10) or more vehicles and after projectcompletion satisfy the Caltrans peak hour volumewarrant?g) For a Congestion Management Program (CMP)required analysis, (i.e., projects that generate 100 ormore), Metropolitan Transportation System tooperate at LOS F or increase the V/C ratio by morethan three (3) percent for a roadway segment thatwould operate at LOS F without the project?Other Thresholdsh) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, includingeither an increase in traffic levels or a change inlocation that result in substantial safety risks?<strong>Fruitvale</strong> <strong>Transit</strong> <strong>Village</strong> <strong>Phase</strong> 2 72 ESA / 208475<strong>Initial</strong> <strong>Study</strong> December 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!