Page 1 of 2 Bridge Inspection Report Printout - Highway Inspection ...
Page 1 of 2 Bridge Inspection Report Printout - Highway Inspection ...
Page 1 of 2 Bridge Inspection Report Printout - Highway Inspection ...
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Bridge</strong> <strong>Inspection</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>Printout</strong> - <strong>Highway</strong> <strong>Inspection</strong> Administrationhttp://hwdinspections.wstdms.gov.nl.ca/<strong>Bridge</strong>/<strong>Bridge</strong>InspectPrintOut.asp<strong>Page</strong> 1 <strong>of</strong> 27/10/2013GOVERNMENT OFNEWFOUNDLANDAND LABRADORDepartment <strong>of</strong> Transportation and WorksBRIDGE INSPECTION REPORTB05292013-17Printed: Wednesday, July 10, 2013Date: 4/30/2013 Inspected By: Strugnell S & Clendenning C Category: Eng. - EngineeringBRIDGE INFORMATIONSite:3-075 - RATTLING BROOK BRIDGE, KING'S POINTRoute: Overall Length: 28.9 mYear Built: 1979 Est: No Overall Width: 11.5 mYear Last Rehab.: Est: No Roadway Width: 9 mRegion: CENTRAL WEST Sidewalk Width: 0 mJurisdiction:ProvincialClearance to R.D. orN.W.L.:5.5 mType <strong>of</strong> Structure: 02 - Double Tee Max Depth <strong>of</strong> N.W.L.: 1 mPurpose <strong>of</strong> Structure: 03 - Over Navigable Waters Spans:Type <strong>of</strong> Handrail: 01 - Aluminum Rail Span No.: Length Span No.: LengthRoadway Surface:Alignment Vertical:Alignment Horizontal:Restrictions:02 - Asphalt01 - Good01 - GoodNo1 13.8 4 02 0 5 03 0 6 0BRIDGE PHOTOSSUBSTRUCTURECondition: F2 - Fair (<strong>Inspection</strong> within 2 Years) Bearings: U - UninspectableBearing Seat:F2 - Fair (<strong>Inspection</strong> within 2 Years)Comments:Significant salt accumulation on south abutment wall from leaking <strong>of</strong> double T's. Both abutments were wet fromleaking but limited salt staining on north abutment. Minor rebar staining on south abutment. All four creep blocksare cracked and spalled with salt staining/leaching. D/S south creep block is in worst condition with significant saltleaching and cracking into the wingwall and spalling. Minor cracking in top <strong>of</strong> both abutments. North abutmentwith vertical crack from mid point to top.SUPERSTRUCTURECondition: F1 - Fair (<strong>Inspection</strong> within 1 Year) Expansion Joints: I - InapplicableComments:At join locations between all double T's is significant salt leaching and all girders are wet. Notches in double T'snot flush with bearing seat (appears girders were not long enough for the span). D/S curb overhang spalled(significant) at mid span under handrail with rebar visible. Salt leaching on underside <strong>of</strong> curb overhang d/s. Minorrebar staining on double T's. No end blocks and missing 3 hazard markers. Underside <strong>of</strong> double T's in poorcondition.DECKCondition: F1 - Fair (<strong>Inspection</strong> within 1 Year) Curbs: P3 - Poor (Repair within 3 Years)Hand Rail: F2 - Fair (<strong>Inspection</strong> within 2 Years) Roadway Condition: P3 - Poor (Repair within 3 Years)Approach Rail:Comments:I - InapplicableStructural guide rail required (all four). Plow damage d/s north handrail (two sections and one post). One potholein center <strong>of</strong> asphalt and appears to be about 130 mm <strong>of</strong> asphalt on the concrete deck. Deck drains are pluggedand pipe is rusted. Transverse cracking <strong>of</strong> asphalt on the deck. Erosion at the wing wall where it meets the road.Handrail end caps missing.HYDROLOGYWater Velocity: 0 m/s Ice Problem: P - Possible ProblemWater Depth: 0 m Scour Problem: P - Possible ProblemWaterway: 01 - Adequate Debris Problem: N - No Problem
<strong>Bridge</strong> <strong>Inspection</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>Printout</strong> - <strong>Highway</strong> <strong>Inspection</strong> Administrationhttp://hwdinspections.wstdms.gov.nl.ca/<strong>Bridge</strong>/<strong>Bridge</strong>InspectPrintOut.asp<strong>Page</strong> 2 <strong>of</strong> 27/10/2013Comments:Cound not assess for scour due to the water depth therefore need to revisit at a later depth.REPLACEMENT/REHABILITATIONNext Rehab. Date: 2013 Replacement Year: 2013Antic. Rehab. Cost: $0.00 Replacement Cost: $0.00Recommendations: Recommed coring the deck to determine why the deck is leaking so much throughout and determine asphaltdepth. Rehab curbs, install end blocks and affix structural guide rai, install hazard markers adn repair creepblocks.OBSERVATIONSOverall Condition: F1 - Fair (<strong>Inspection</strong> within 1 Year) Requires Further<strong>Inspection</strong>:NoAdditional Observations:LEGEND:Condition Definitions:1 - *Good - [discontinued code].2 - *Fair - [discontinued code].3 - *Poor - [discontinued code].4 - *Unsafe - [discontinued code].G - Good (<strong>Inspection</strong> within 2 Years).F2 - Fair (<strong>Inspection</strong> within 2 Years).F1 - Fair (<strong>Inspection</strong> within 1 Year).P3 - Poor (Repair within 3 Years).P1 - Poor (Repair within 1 Year).P - Poor (Immediate Repair).PHOTO GUIDELINES:<strong>Inspection</strong> Photos:Please provide photos using guidelines below:• Any item which inspector feels should be documented by photograph• All items noted above as being P3, P1, P, or C• Any evidence <strong>of</strong> known ice, scour, debris, waterway problemsC -Unsafe (Closed to Public).U - Uninspectable.I - Inapplicable.Problem Definitions:N - No Problem.P - Possible Problem.K - Known Problem.NA - Not Applicable.Category Definitions:Maint. - Maintenance.Eng. - Engineering.Office - <strong>Bridge</strong> Office.INSPECTION PHOTOSDepartment <strong>of</strong> Transportation and Works, Government <strong>of</strong> Newfoundland and Labrador 2013.
Change language