Africa quarterly special on emerging powers.pdf - SAFPI

africaSPECIAL EDITIONVolume 51, No. 3-4Q U A R T E R L YRISE OF EMERGING POWERS IN AFRICAlSECURING AFRICA’S TRANSFORMATION: The India FactorlBRAZIL & AFRICA: Challenges and OpportunitieslRUSSIA & AFRICA: Russia Stages a ComebacklAFRICAN AGENDA: The Pretoria WayI N D I A NC O U N C I LF O RC U L T U R A LR E L A T I O N S

africaQ U A R T E R L YIndian Journal of <strong>Africa</strong>n AffairsVolume 51, No. 3-4, August 2011 — January 2012INDIAN COUNCIL FOR CULTURAL RELATIONSNEW DELHI

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Ycontents28THE OTHER POWERS INTHE CONTINENTThe growing engagement of India and China in<strong>Africa</strong> has compelled western powers to shifttheir perspective towards a renascent continent,says Sanjukta Banerji BhattacharyaEMERGING POWERS IN AFRICA: AN OVERVIEW<strong>Africa</strong> must leverage its growing relations with emergingpowers like India, China and Brazil to promote its owndevelopment. It’s time for <strong>Africa</strong>n leaders to take chargeand set the agenda, says K Mathews1842SECURING AFRICA’STRANSFORMATIONIndia can play a leadership rolein spurring <strong>Africa</strong>’s metamorphosisby helping to deepen andinstitutionalise governancereforms in the continent, therebyencouraging positive changesin its democratisation process,say Paul Musili Wambua andMumo Nzau

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Y66AFRICAN AGENDA, THE PRETORIA WAYSouth <strong>Africa</strong>n foreign policy’s biggest goal today is tointertwine the ‘<strong>Africa</strong>n Agenda’ with its interests in thecontinent, says Rajiv BhatiaOPINION/COMMENT24 Engaging Tanzania102 Middle Powers Zero in on <strong>Africa</strong> Opportunity106 <strong>Africa</strong>n Oil, Asian Growth112 Island Nations: High Stakes on High Seas76BRAZIL & AFRICA: CHALLENGESAND OPPORTUNITIESBuiding upon its historical ties with thecontinent, Brazil is navigating new challengesto expand its influence in <strong>Africa</strong>,says Danilo Marcondes de Souza Neto122 DOING BUSINESS WITH AFRICA134 BOOKS & IDEAS142 SPEECHES86RUSSIA STAGES COMEBACKRussia is working towards increasingits share of trade with the continent,but needs to be more proactive to takeon competition from other countries,says Alexandra Arkhangelskaya

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YRates of SubscriptionAnnual Three-yearSubscription SubscriptionRs. 100.00 Rs. 250.00US $40.00 US $100.00£16.0 £40.0(Including airmail postage)Subscription rates as abovepayable in advance preferablyby bank draft/MO in favour ofIndian Council for CulturalRelations, New Delhi.Printed and Published bySuresh K. GoelDirector-GeneralIndian Council forCultural RelationsAzad Bhavan,Indraprastha EstateNew Delhi — 110002Editor:Manish ChandISBN 0001-9828The Indian Council for Cultural Relations (ICCR), founded in 1950 to strengthencultural ties and promote understanding between India and other countries, functionsunder the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India. As part of itseffort, the Council publishes, apart from books, six periodicals in five languages ––English quarterlies (Indian Horizons and <strong>Africa</strong> Quarterly), Hindi Quarterly(Gagananchal), Arabic Quarterly (Thaqafat-ul-Hind), Spanish bi-annual (Papeles de laIndia) and French bi-annual (Recontre Avec l’Inde).<strong>Africa</strong> Quarterly (Indian Journal of <strong>Africa</strong>n Affairs) is published everythree months.The views expressed in the articles included in this journal are those of the contributorsand do not necessarily reflect the views of the ICCR.All rights reserved. No part of this journal may be reproduced, stored in a retrievalsystem, or transmitted in any from or by any means, electronic, mechanical,photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the permission of the ICCR.Editorial correspondence and manuscripts, including book reviews,should be addressed to:The Editor<strong>Africa</strong> QuarterlyIndian Council for Cultural RelationsAzad BhavanIndraprastha EstateNew Delhi-110 002E-mail: africa.<strong>quarterly</strong>@gmail.com6August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Y■ From the Editor’s DeskEmerging Powers: A time for new dreamsIt’s a moment of unprecedented churn in globalgeo-politics, a moment that comes but rarely when anold order gives way, imperceptibly but surely, to a newone. <strong>Africa</strong>, the continent that was once superciliouslydismissed as a foredoomed place of darkness, is now not onlyshining anew, but is at the centre of a new great game ofcourtship. The rise of emerging powers, <strong>special</strong>ly the BRICScountries, has changed the rules of engagement, compellingthe established status quoist powers to shift their strategy in thisrecalibrated 21st century contest for <strong>Africa</strong>’s resources,markets and friendship. In this arguably post-American world,marked by an inexorable shift of power from the West to therest, <strong>Africa</strong>, a continent of around one billion people which isexpected to grow at a healthy 6 percent in times of thefestering eurozone recession, has a unique opportunity toshepherd its renaissance on its own terms and reclaim its placein an evolving global order.The <strong>special</strong> edition of <strong>Africa</strong> Quarterly brings together expertsand scholars cutting across continents to look at the unfoldingnarrative of Afro-optimism and the implications of the riseof BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South <strong>Africa</strong>) andother middle powers for a renascent <strong>Africa</strong>ncontinent. The statistics are revelatory: the BRIC countriesstepped up their trade with the continent from merely$3.5 billion in 2000 to over $200 billion in 2011. China hasmultiplied its trade with <strong>Africa</strong> from $3.5 billion in 1990 toaround $150 billion in 2011. India’s trade with <strong>Africa</strong> is estimatedto be over $50 billion; Brazil’s trade is pegged at around$16 billion; and Russia’s bilateral trade is around $10 billion.While each emerging power has its own motivations, imperativesand even competing ambitions for engaging <strong>Africa</strong>, thereis a marked realisation that the continent is a different place andrequires new strategies to forge alternative investment anddevelopment paradigms for the continent. The BRICS countriespresent a powerful challenge to the so-called Washingtonconsensus deployed by the U.S. and traditional Westerndonors and partners, some of them former colonialists, todominate the continent through the IMF-World Bank’s prescriptiveaid policies.With the unipolar moment of the American dominationwaning, new models have arisen: the so-called Beijingconsensus, a blend of authoritarian regulated political systemand state-led economic foray, and what some are seeing as the‘New Delhi model’ that is focused on a blend of capacitybuilding, human resource development, trade, aid andan <strong>Africa</strong>n-led consensus. One can also say there is a new“southern consensus” emerging for engaging <strong>Africa</strong> that isbased on the principles of South-South solidarity, whichcontrasts with the hegemonic, prescriptive Washingtonconsensus. Clearly, the accelerated engagement of emergingpowers has provided more choice of models/approaches to<strong>Africa</strong>, but one also needs to look critically to find out whetherthese new players represent real choice or are basicallyrepackaging old wine in new bottle. In other words, we needto ask: are emerging powers different from traditional powersin any substantial way or are they neo-colonial powers indisguise, resorting to simply packaging to differentiate/brandthemselves in <strong>Africa</strong> while following the same policies? In thiscontext, it is important to mention the backlash to Chinesepolicies in some parts of <strong>Africa</strong>.The articles in this edition document in great detail thetrajectory of engagement each of these emerging powers hassought with <strong>Africa</strong>, and provide a diversity of perspectives onthe questions and issues that arise from their trade and diplomacyin the continent. Taking an overarching view,K. Mathews argues that <strong>Africa</strong> must leverage its newpartnership with emerging powers in the interest of its ownlong-term development. “<strong>Africa</strong>n political elites will have tobe much more cohesive at the continental level if they are ableto use the competitive international environment to theircollective advantage. <strong>Africa</strong>n leaders also need to engageemerging powers more proactively in terms of <strong>Africa</strong>’s ownneeds, demands and aspirations,” he writes. In her article“The Other Powers in the Continent,” Sanjukta BanerjiBhattacharya contends that the relationships of the emergingpowers with <strong>Africa</strong> are being increasingly framed in thelexicon of “partnership”, be it strategic or economic. In fact,she points out that the methods of these powers are now beingemulated by both the older players and the new aspirants inthe continent that includes mixing trade with lucrativeinfrastructural investment and partnerships in agriculture,health, sport, education and technology.In a seminal sense, there is a radical shift from merelyself-interested profiteering to forging win-win and mutuallyempowering partnerships with <strong>Africa</strong>n countries. Paul MusiliWambua and Mumo Nzau hold India’s democracy as a modelfor an increasingly democratising continent. More than 30<strong>Africa</strong>n states have embraced democracy and many of themhave voluntarily subjected themselves to the <strong>Africa</strong>n PeerReview Mechanism. The authors argue forcefully that Indiacan play a leadership role in spurring <strong>Africa</strong>’s ongoingresurgence by helping to deepen and institutionalisedemocratic reforms in the continent.In fact, a lot is happening on the ground on this front. Egyptis keen to seek India’s help in bolstering its electioninfrastructure and officials from many <strong>Africa</strong>n countries comeAugust 2011-January 2012 7

E D I T O R I A Lto India to familiarise themselves withthe workings of the world’s mostpopulous democracy.While recent scholarly attention hasfocused mostly on the rising engagementof China and India with <strong>Africa</strong>and the media has obsessed about thelooming rivalry between the two risingAsian powers in the continent, it isimperative to look at how otheremerging and middle powers are configuringtheir engagement with <strong>Africa</strong>.Brazil, for one, has dramatically scaledup its economic and diplomatic forayinto the continent. Brazil has opened37 embassies in <strong>Africa</strong>, out of which 17were opened during former presidentLula da Silva’s tenure. “Brazil’s effortsto expand its commercial space in<strong>Africa</strong> is part of an effort to offer analternative to the increase in Indian,Chinese, South Korean, Turkish andMalaysian influence on <strong>Africa</strong>,” writesDanilo Marcondes de Souze Neto, aRio De Janerio-based professor. Whatdoes Brazil bring to the table? “Brazilis seen to have a more balancedapproach towards <strong>Africa</strong> other thanemerging powers. There is a perceptionof partnership, reciprocity and thecreation of a middle ground betweenthe Chinese state-led approach and theIndian strategy based on private sectorinvestment.” In yet another article,Estefenia Marachan writes about theinspiring narrative of how India andBrazil are investing in <strong>Africa</strong> to help itbecome self-sufficient in agriculture.Russia, a born-again energy giant,too, has not remained immune to theattractions of <strong>Africa</strong>. Although Russia’strade with <strong>Africa</strong> is low compared toother BRIC countries, AlexandraArkhangelskaya says that Moscow haswoken up to new opportunities in thecontinent and is trying to increase itsbilateral trade. Now, there are 18 bigRussian companies active in 13countries of <strong>Africa</strong> and Russia hasinvested $9.7 billion in 47 projects.South <strong>Africa</strong>, the new addition to theBRIC grouping and the only <strong>Africa</strong>nmember of this club of emergingeconomies, is also ramping up itsinvestments across <strong>Africa</strong>, <strong>special</strong>ly inthose markets where its powerfulcompanies in the fields of communicationand broadcasting, infrastructure,mining, pharmaceuticals andbanking enjoy a competitive advantage,says Rajiv Bhatia, a former Indianenvoy to South <strong>Africa</strong>. In his article“<strong>Africa</strong>n agenda, the Pretoria Way,”Bhatia observes that South <strong>Africa</strong>,given the duality of its position, economyand multi-tier relationships, willhave a significant contribution to maketo the development of <strong>Africa</strong> andargues for closer cooperation betweenNew Delhi and Pretoria on the larger<strong>Africa</strong>n agenda.What does this renewed internationalcompetition for <strong>Africa</strong> mean forthe resurgence of the continent? Oncecalled “a dark toy in the carnival ofothers”, will <strong>Africa</strong> now have it owncarnival and not just be a plaything ofdeveloped and emerging powers?While much could still go wrongand there are pockets of instabilityand impending chaos, there areoverwhelming signs of renascenceand renewal. Afro-optimists is passé;Afro-optimism is in. In his article‘<strong>Africa</strong> Unbound’, Simon Freemantle,an analyst at Standard Bank Researchin South <strong>Africa</strong>, maps an upwardeconomic trajectory on the continent.The IMF has predicted that between2011 and 2015, seven of the ten fastestgrowingeconomies in the world willbe from Sub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong>. “Thispositive trajectory is unlikely to alter,”says Freemantle. He writes about thefive major trends that will continue topower <strong>Africa</strong>’s growth and reconfigurethe continent’s global relevance.These include: a larger, younger, moreaffluent population; rapid urbanisation;increasing absorption of telecommunications;natural resources wealth;and a deepening financial sector.These trends should cheer all Afrooptimistsand all those who believe ina more equitable world order.Sadly, despite these upbeateconomic indicators there still remainstubborn Afro-pessimists who refuseto look facts in the face and persist intheir prejudice. But they are clearly ina minority. It’s time to rediscover<strong>Africa</strong> through the eyes of love, thetrue <strong>Africa</strong> of laughter, joy, creativityand playfulness, says celebratedNigerian novelist Ben Okri in alyrical meditation on the continent inhis new book A Time for New Dreams.“<strong>Africa</strong> was seen for many decadesthrough greed. This justified all kindsof violence. The world should begin tosee light in <strong>Africa</strong>, its beauty andgenius,” says the novelist. “It is <strong>Africa</strong>’sturn to smile. That’s the loveliest giftthe world can give to keep <strong>Africa</strong> smiling,”he said when he was in Indiarecently. Poetry does not often squarewith the ruthless world of realpolitik,but the emerging powers will do wellto heed these prophetic words of BenOkri as they navigate and reconfiguretheir engagement with a resurgentcontinent in the midst of this tectonicshifts of power in the globalgeo-political landscape.— Manish Chand8August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YA continent of opportunityDefying the Eurozone debt crisis,<strong>Africa</strong> is poised for an economicupsurge, with theInternational Monetary Fund (IMF)and the World Bank hailing it the “continentof opportunity”.“This is the <strong>Africa</strong> of opportunity —the <strong>Africa</strong> where people take charge oftheir own futures, the <strong>Africa</strong> where peopleare looking for partnerships,” IMFManaging Director Christine Lagardesaid during her first official visit to <strong>Africa</strong>in December 2011.According to Dr. Maxwell M.Mkwezalamba, Commissioner forEconomic Affairs, <strong>Africa</strong>n Union, “Inthe decade prior to the recent economicand financial crisis, the continent registeredan average economic growth rateof above 5 percent and inflation declinedto single digits. This was a result of concomitantimprovements in governance,macro-economic management, andimprovement in the investment climate.Although the impact of the current Eurozone debt crisis on <strong>Africa</strong> is yet to befully understood, the continent hasdemonstrated an impressive post-crisisrecovery and has begun to regain itsgrowth trajectory.”The World Bank has also noted thatgrowth across the 54-nation continenthas averaged 5-6 percent or more overthe past decade. “It varies from countryto country,” said the bank, adding that itwas significant that the poverty rate haddeclined from nearly 60 percent to justover 50 percent in the 10 years up to2005. Noting that <strong>Africa</strong> had been ableto shield itself from the ongoing globaleconomic crisis, Lagarde attributed it tothe “good economic policies” that hadprovided a platform for higher growthand investment, leading to a reduction inpoverty. There are, however, apprehensionsthat growth would be impeded ifthe population surge was not broughtunder control. The UN says the continenthas joined India and China as thethird region of the world where populationhas reached one billion. Thisnumber is certain to reach up to 1.3 billionby 2050. This growth is staggering,considering the fact that by 1950 therewere just 500,000 people living in theurban areas across the continent.“A number of <strong>Africa</strong>n countries havedemonstrated strong growth in 2011 asgrowth slowly returns to trend, post-crisis.Of these, Ghana, with an estimated13.6 percent growth rate, is by far themost impressive,” Standard CharteredChief Economist Gerard Lyons said.Another country that has also performedwell is Angola. The country,which is the third-largest sub-Saharan<strong>Africa</strong>n economy, is set for growthresurgence. “Rising oil production willlikely drive a growth rebound to 8 percent in 2012, with oil production set torise to 1.8 million barrels per day (mbd)from 1.6mbd in 2011,” StandardChartered said in its continental review.Of the other countries, it said:“Mozambique is set to remain a star performerin <strong>Africa</strong> in terms of economicgrowth. The economy expanded at anaverage rate of close to eight per centover the last decade and is likely to growby more than 7 percent in 2012.”Lyons said: “South <strong>Africa</strong> underperformedeven relative to pre-crisistrends... South <strong>Africa</strong> with its deeperlinkages to the global economy is nowthreatened with a slowdown in the globaleconomy, e<strong>special</strong>ly the Eurozone, thedestination of most of its manufacturedexports.” In Nigeria, the resurgence ofreligious attacks is likely to create somesecurity problems for the country andaffect the investment climate. Theresource-rich Democratic Republic ofCongo is still trying to come to termswith a contested election result whichmay affect any attempt to develop theeconomy. The famine in Somalia andthe crisis in Sudan are yet to be fullysolved and this is likely to impinge ongrowth in the two countries.Lagarde’s hope for <strong>Africa</strong> hinges onthe assessment that, though “the foodand fuel crisis of 2008 had a severeimpact on the continent and the globalfinancial crisis that followed, policymakersresponded effectively. Mostcountries were able to maintain criticalspending on health, education andinfrastructure. And we saw countries inthe region recover quickly, with growthrates now returning to levels enjoyed inthe mid-2000s.” She added that “this isa testament to the hard work and dedicationof policymakers and peopleacross the region. Before the crisis, theyreduced budget deficits and public debt;they brought down inflation, and builtup foreign exchange reserves. In short,they put their economies on a fundamentallystronger footing.”The continent has also found a newway of dealing with the adverse effectsof the global financial crisis by acceleratingits engagement with emergingeconomies. Jean Ping, Chairperson ofthe <strong>Africa</strong>n Union Commission (AU),told a meeting in Istanbul, Turkey, inDecember 2011 that “this adverseimpact is alleviated thanks to the strongpartnership that <strong>Africa</strong> has forged withcountries like Turkey, China and India.”“This gives us an assurance thatwhile we cannot be fully insulated fromthe current crisis in Europe, we havedeveloped enough resilience to enableus to cope better with its adverseimpact,” Ping added.Against this background, MthuliNcube, Chief Economist of the <strong>Africa</strong>Development Bank (AfDB), has urged<strong>Africa</strong> to these new relationships to beatthe Eurozone blues. “While theeconomies of Europe and NorthAmerica have stalled, the gloomy pictureis by no means worldwide,” he said.“All was not lost as the BRIC nations —Brazil, Russia, India and China — continueto forge ahead. The Chinese economyis likely to continue with its phenomenalrate of growth: nine and a halfpercent this year, and nine percent in2012. In India, we’re likely to see growthholding steady at around the 7.5-percentmark.”nAugust 2011-January 20129

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YListen to <strong>Africa</strong> on <strong>Africa</strong>naffairs: India to UNIndia on January 13 stressed theneed for the United Nations andits Security Council to “listen to<strong>Africa</strong> and its organisations” for a “betterunderstanding” of the situation inthe continent.“It is important for us to listen to<strong>Africa</strong> and its organisations so that thecouncil’s activities are not only basedon <strong>Africa</strong>’s needs but also complementthose of <strong>Africa</strong>n countries and organisations,”India’s PermanentRepresentative at the United NationsHardeep Singh Puri said during aSecurity Council debate on the partnershipbetween the UN and the<strong>Africa</strong>n Union.“Cooperation with <strong>Africa</strong> will alsoenable the council to act with betterunderstanding of the situation on theground that would establish <strong>Africa</strong>’sownership of the solutions and promotelasting peace and security on the<strong>Africa</strong>n continent,” Puri said.The Security Council has devotedmuch of its time and energy to <strong>Africa</strong>naffairs, he noted. “As much as twothirdsof the active items on the council’sagenda concern <strong>Africa</strong>,” he said.“About three-fourth of the council’stime is spent on <strong>Africa</strong>n issues,” PuriIndia’s Permanent Representative at the UNHardeep Singh Purisaid. “It would, therefore, be no exaggerationto say that the success of theefforts of this Council in <strong>Africa</strong> willdetermine in significant measures itsoverall effectiveness in the implementationof its charter-mandated role asthe principal organ of the UN formaintenance of international peace andsecurity,” said India’s PermanentRepresentative at the UN.On the UN-<strong>Africa</strong>n Union partnership,Puri said: “We think that thispartnership should be based on longtermstrategic and operational perspectivestaking into consideration thecomplementarity of strengths that thetwo organisations possess.”“The focus should be on capacitybuildingof <strong>Africa</strong>n Union’s peace andsecurity architecture so that the AUbecomes a more effective and capablepartner of the UN system,” Puriadded.“The <strong>Africa</strong>n Union has alreadyproven beyond any doubt its ability toaddress <strong>Africa</strong>n problems,” he said.“For an effective and enduringcooperation between the UN and theAU, it is necessary that the council notadopt a selective approach to this cooperation,”Puri added.“Partnership should not berestricted only to areas of the council’sconvenience but also extend to areaswhere there may be differences, andbe based on mutual respect,” Puri said.“This requires a mindset change inapproach and demands expansion ofthe permanent membership to makethe council reflective of contemporaryrealities and wider representation fromdeveloping countries, including<strong>Africa</strong>,” Puri said.nto Enhance India-<strong>Africa</strong> Partnership”,held in New Delhi. The conferencewasorganised by the Ministry ofExternal Affairs’ Investment andTechnology Promotion Division.Prime Minister Manmohan Singhhad, at the India-<strong>Africa</strong> Forum Summitin Addis Ababa in May, announced thatIndia would extend $5 billion worth oflines of credit to <strong>Africa</strong>n nations overthe next three years. Over 40 <strong>Africa</strong>nnations have availed of over a 100Indian lines of credit so far, amountingto over $4.2 billion. In 2010-11 alone,14 lines of credits amounting to $1 billionwere approved and the list continuesto grow.Krishna said at the event that thelines of credit was an important instrumentin the economic engagement withthe <strong>Africa</strong>n continent, directed at meetingthe socio-economic developmentaspirations of developing countries inthe spirit of South-South cooperation.“This takes several forms, includingIndian Technical and EconomicCooperation (ITEC) programmes thatare tailor-made to respond to the capacity-buildingneeds of our partner countries.Several initiatives under our Focus<strong>Africa</strong> Programmes underline our politicalcommitment to build mutuallybeneficial partnerships,” he said.The lines of credits provide supportat highly concessional terms to leastdeveloped countries and developingcountries in the <strong>Africa</strong>n continent.Representatives of 40 <strong>Africa</strong>n countriesattended the event.nAugust 2011-January 201215

N E W SEthiopia seeks India’s helpfor rail projectEthiopia wants $300 million morefrom India for an ambitious railwayproject that would connectit with neighbouring Djibouti, a venturethat India backs as part of its “support forregional integration in <strong>Africa</strong>”. India hasalready inked a loan agreement worth$300 million for the railway project.However, the loan from New Delhi isyet to be disbursed. “The support to therailway is part of India’s support forregional integration in <strong>Africa</strong>. This is thefirst time we are doing a project whichcovers more than one country. That iswhy we are going through the proceduresrather carefully,” said GurjitSingh, Joint Secretary, (East & Southern<strong>Africa</strong>), Ministry of External Affairs, onJanuary 28.Singh said the $300-million disbursementwould depend on how theproject was implemented, which was inthe hands of the Ethiopian andDjiboutian railway corporations.“We are just facilitating and workingwith them on the feasibility study, andfrom that we will discover how our partof the implementation will comethrough. Once all that is settled and theproject goes on stream, we see no difficultyin periodic and timely disbursements,”Singh said. The Ethiopian governmentplans to construct a 2,395 kmnational railway network, out of which1,808 km will be completed by 2015.“At the highest level, India hasexpressed its commitment to the projectand we will try to do whatever we can.But all these possibilities are based ontechnical discussions. So the politicalcommitment is there, but we have tomake sure the technical discussion goesthrough smoothly and they lead to practicalimplementation. That is what weare now focusing on,” he said.Ethiopia and India have seen an“exemplary” relationship in the past,according to Singh, who has also servedas India’s ambassador to the country.With more than $700 millionextended by New Delhi for rural electrificationand sugar production projectssince 2006, Ethiopia is the biggest recipientof India’s lines of credit in <strong>Africa</strong>,Singh said. An Indian delegation led bySingh and the Ethiopian team headedby Arega Hailu, Director-General of theAsia and Oceania Affairs of the Ministryof Foreign Affairs, held discussions atthe second round of India-Ethiopia foreignoffice consultations.It followed up on the decisions takenat the India-<strong>Africa</strong> summit last year andat bilateral meetings between EthiopianPrime Minister Meles Zenawi andPrime Minister Manmohan Singh.Singh had earlier visited Addis Ababa inMay 2011.The two sides discussed the implementationof decisions taken under theIndia-<strong>Africa</strong> Forum Summit I & II,including the establishment of fourcapacity-building institutions inEthiopia. These include a vocationaltraining centre, an IT centre, a women’ssolar engineering vocational trainingcentre and a farm science centre.According to the Indian mission inEthiopia, the two countries agreed thatthe next joint commission meetingwould be held in 2013.n16 August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Y‘<strong>Africa</strong> wants to emulate India’sdevelopment model’Impressed by the efforts of socialentrepreneurs to make the publicdelivery service more effective, five<strong>Africa</strong>n countries want to emulate theIndian models of development, saidSam Pitroda in New Delhi on January21. “At least five <strong>Africa</strong>n countries arelooking at Indian models of developmentto solve the problems at the bottomof the pyramid as Western modelswere not scalable,” said Pitroda, Adviserto Prime Minister Manmohan Singh onPublic Information Infrastructure andInnovations.Addressing 100 young social innovatorsat ‘Action For India Forum 2012’,Pitroda said India was in a unique positionto solve the problems of the poor asSam Pitrodait had the largest number of poor and ahuge amount of talent to address challenges.“There is a lot of talent solvingthe problems of the rich. Innovationsare needed to solve the problems of thepoor,” he told the entrepreneurs andasked them to focus on technology thatcould make social enterprises scale theiroperations to get them to be more pervasivein coverage and impact.Pitroda said the Central and stategovernments were taking steps to supportsocial entrepreneurs to set up newbusiness models. “To support socialentrepreneurs set up new business modelsto bring about change, efforts areunder way to increase the corpus of theNational Innovation Fund as soon as itcollects `5 billion.”The fund is expected to becomeoperational by July, 2012. nNigeria seeks help in capacity-buildingNigeria, which is India’s secondlargest supplier of oiland is aiming to be amongthe world’s top economies, is seeking toramp up bilateral trade and is lookingfor help in capacity-building, includingrestructuring of its “shattered railwaysystem,” Nigeria’s Planning Ministersaid on December 7.“We are looking at enhancing bilateraltrade agreements. We are lookingfor technical relations between yourplanning commission and our planningbody,” visiting Nigerian PlanningMinister Shamsuddeen Usman said atan interactive session at Sapru House inNew Delhi.“We are looking at an exchange ofideas for developing capacity and evolvingsome kind of understanding to arriveat it,” he said at the event, organised bythe Indian Council of World Affairs(ICWA).He said Nigeria, which is aiming tobe among the world’s top 20 economiesby 2020, was focusing on education,health and catering to the weaker sectionsof society.“There is a very strong focus on whatwe need to do,” he said.Usman also said Nigeria could learnfrom India’s efforts to ensure inclusivegrowth.Shamsuddeen Usman“There is not much inclusiveness inNigeria. Fifty-four percent of our peoplelive in poverty and that’s criminal,the minister said. Usman and a 12-member delegation of parliamentariansand officials, was in India at the invitationof Planning Commission DeputyChairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia.On December 6, apart fromAhluwalia, he also met External AffairsMinister S.M. Krishna. He also indicatedthat India could play a role in restructuringthe West <strong>Africa</strong>n nation’s “shatteredrailway system”.“Ahluwalia mentioned that India’strains were not too fancy. I said to him:‘At least your railway system is functional.Ours is not even functional.’”“In the 1960s (before the militaryintervened and ruled for 35 years), 70percent of the freight traffic was handledby the railways. Today, it is downto four percent. We are making a majoreffort to restructure the system,”Usman said.There were other areas too whereNigeria could learn from India, theMinister said. “We have noted thedebate here on FDI in retail. We toohave a parallel debate as we want toreduce petroleum subsidies,”Usman said.nAugust 2011-January 201217

A N A L Y S I SEMERGING Powers in<strong>Africa</strong>: An Overview<strong>Africa</strong> must leverage its growing relations with emerging powers like India,China and Brazil to promote its own development. It’s time for <strong>Africa</strong>nleaders to take charge and set the agenda, says K MathewsIndia’s External Affairs Minister S.M. Krishna, China’s Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi, Brazil’s Foreign Minister Antonio Patriota, Russia’s ForeignMinister Sergey Lavrov and South <strong>Africa</strong>n Ambassador & Director-General for Multilateral Organisation Jerry Matthews Matjila at the BRICSForeign Ministers’ Meeting in New York on September 23, 2011.The world today is at a hinge moment inits history. The Western domination ofthe world and <strong>Africa</strong> is clearly on thedecline. A once-dominant America hasreached the end of its global ascendancy.Europe is in a shambles. It has beenrightly noted that the future the worldfaces is a post-American one. Theunipolar world of the post-Cold War period has ended. Thespectacular growth of countries like China, India, Brazil,Russia, Mexico, South <strong>Africa</strong>, Indonesia, Malaysia, SouthKorea, Vietnam, Iran, Turkey etc. are configuring a new globallandscape. In short, what we are witnessing is the decline ofthe North and West and the rise of the South and East. In 2003,Goldman Sachs, the global investment bank, predicted that theBRIC economies of Brazil, Russia, India and China wouldsurpass the combined gross domestic product of the G-6 by2040. ‘Emerging Powers’ is a phrase coined to describe a newgroup of states that has through a combination of economicpower, diplomatic acumen and military might managed tomove away from developing country status to challenge thedominance of traditional mainly Western powers.China, India and Brazil are the leading emerging powerstoday. They are also challenging the hegemonic positions longmonopolised by the West, particularly, Britain, France and theUnited States in <strong>Africa</strong>. It is estimated that Europe todayreceives 50 percent less of <strong>Africa</strong>’s exports than it did a decadeago. The emergence of the G-20 group of nations in place ofG-8 is symptomatic of the new emerging situation. In theemerging new world order, China, India and Brazil are poisedto play a greater role, particularly in the face of the retreat ofthe ‘Washington Consensus’ and its poor record in <strong>Africa</strong> inproviding some support and an enabling internationalenvironment for the continent to chart its own alternativedevelopment course.<strong>Africa</strong>, one of the fast growing regions of the world todayis once again the arena of competition among the traditionaland emerging powers, which are vying for its resources, marketsand influence. <strong>Africa</strong> must leverage its growing relationswith emerging powers for its own development. It’s time for<strong>Africa</strong>n leaders to take charge and set the agenda.This articleseeks to explore and explain issues relating to the deepeningengagement of emerging powers focusing on China, Indiaand Brazil with <strong>Africa</strong> and its implications for <strong>Africa</strong>n growth18August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Yand renaissance. In this context it may be appropriateto provide a brief historical background toexternal involvements in <strong>Africa</strong>.Background: Slavery,colonialiSm and cold WarFor centuries, Europeans regarded <strong>Africa</strong> merelyas a landmass to be circumnavigated on the wayto the riches of the Indies. It was the ‘DarkContinent’, the last territory to be fully explored bythe Europeans. Incredibly, it was described as aland without history until the coming of theEuropeans. But in reality, the <strong>Africa</strong>n continenthas a rich and varied history stretching back overthousands of years. <strong>Africa</strong> has a triple heritage ofthree civilisations that shaped it — its own rich inheritance,Islamic culture and the impact of Western traditions andlifestyles. The images of the indigenous <strong>Africa</strong> are contradictory:the continent encompasses both the rural simplicity ofvillage life and the sophisticated cultures capable of carryingout such feats of skill as the building of the ancient pyramidsand Great Zimbabwe. The coming of Islam andWesternisation have irrevocably distorted this ancient relationshipwhile the introduction of capitalism and the casheconomy have produced disastrous results.Looking back at history, from 1441 to 1870 the Atlanticslave trade devastated <strong>Africa</strong>.According to estimates between 12million to 20 million <strong>Africa</strong>ns wereuprooted from their homes and villagesand transported to the Newworld. Untold millions died, mostduring the Middle Passage across theAtlantic Ocean. Although anextraordinarily profitable enterprisefor Europe, the trade destroyed<strong>Africa</strong> and eviscerated its people.Slavery, however, was merely Sub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong>’s firstlengthy and consistent contact with the West. Unfortunatelyit was not to be the last. The ultimate demise of slavery andthe slave trade was not the end of a bad relationship, for itoccurred almost simultaneously with the emergence of stillanother negative aspect of the Euro-<strong>Africa</strong>n connection: theimposition of colonial rule.Bridging the close of the slave trade were the developingimperial policies of European states. As the interior of <strong>Africa</strong>began to be opened up by Western explorers, European monarchsand their governments organised official claims to largeswathes of the continent. With Portugal, Spain, Germany,England, France, Italy and Belgium contending for territories,the mammoth land-grab often led to conflicts. Imperialismproved to be a very competitive contest, as the rival parties hadan enormous appetite. In order to prevent the increasinglydangerous friction among themselves, every European power(except Switzerland) and the United States, met in Berlin fromThe skyline of Luanda, the capital of Angola, is lined with construction projects.<strong>Africa</strong> for nearly a centurywas governed with an ironto cater for Europeancolonial economicinterests and washumiliated repeatedlyNovember 1884 to February 1885 to establish recognised frontiers.<strong>Africa</strong> was almost effortlessly diced and distributed amongEuropean nations while its own concerns were completelyignored. As Europe’s consideration of its own imperial interestswas paramount, the conference was very specific in layingout the state boundaries. Many of contemporary <strong>Africa</strong>’sborders, therefore, are synthetic, almost fictional, created outof the needs of European powers rather than <strong>Africa</strong>n states. Inmany cases, unrealistic borders encompassed groups withlittle in common, culturally or geographically.<strong>Africa</strong> for nearly a century was governed with an iron handto cater the European colonial economicinterests. <strong>Africa</strong> had beenhumiliated repeatedly. The colonialmasters on behalf of the ‘civilised’world administered the colonies barbarouslyand savagely, and never consideredit expedient to allow their‘sub-human’ species under theiradministration the same democraticrights as they themselves enjoyed.The British and the French, whocolonised a great deal of Sub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong>, applied differentimperial philosophies in governing their territories. The colonialpolicy of Belgium was openly based on racism. Overall,colonialism was a terribly destructive and divisive force thatresulted in more than 100 years of political, social and economicoppression of <strong>Africa</strong>, with devastating consequences.independence, cold War andexternal interventionThe Second World War, which ended in 1945, called intoquestion the very existence of colonialism. It was a time whenmajor changes in the world’s power structure were about totake place. There were nationalist demands for independenceall over the colonised world. The climate in which the maintenanceof European empires appeared to be part of thenatural political order was disintegrating under a range of newpressures particularly the marginalisation of Europe by theemergence of two superpowers and the coming of the ColdAugust 2011-January 2012 19

A N A L Y S I SOn April 18, 1980, Zimbabwe gained independence from the United Kingdom.War. The war also eliminated two European powers, Germanyand Italy, who lost their <strong>Africa</strong>n colonial empires. A majordevelopment in the post-Second World War period wasthe development of Cold War. Just as the <strong>Africa</strong>n slave tradeproceeded seamlessly to colonial rule, so colonialism seguedinto the doctrinaire conduct of the Cold War in thepost-Second World War period.Colonialism was replaced by a form of Cold War neocolonialism— control of the newnations of <strong>Africa</strong> via their economiesand through the national elites whohad been cultivated by theEuropeans. One superpower wouldbuttress the elites empowered by thecolonial authorities, while the otheroften backed the opposition, as eachsupported a different client and a differentagenda. The United States, asthe only Western superpower, moved to supplant the nowmarginalised countries, such as France and Great Britain, astheir colonies were freed. It filled the vacuum left by thedeparture of colonisers so as to prevent the spread of communismand radical nationalism, which would threatenAmerican interests. The Soviet Union represented just sucha menacing and alien communist ideology.The Cold War credo, expressed in the Truman Doctrineof 1947, provided the framework of containment withinwhich the United States resolved to pursue a policy ofintervention in <strong>Africa</strong>. For the Soviet Union these newlyindependent states offered opportunities to expand its sphereof interest. From the 1960s to 1991, the year the Soviet Unioncollapsed, the respective interests of the U.S. and the USSRoften clashed in <strong>Africa</strong>. Each succumbed to the propensity toperceive local conflicts in global terms, political conflicts inmoral terms and relative differences in absolute terms. Boththe United States and the Soviet Union, however, pursuedToday, the institutionalframework for doingbusiness with <strong>Africa</strong> hasimproved with the creationof the AU as well asseveral multilateral blocstheir own interests irrespective of thenational political dynamics of the <strong>Africa</strong>nstates. In short, the slave trade, colonialismand the Cold War left <strong>Africa</strong> with a ruinousheritage that has been exceedingly difficultto subdue. For more than five centuries,first Europe, then the United States andthe Soviet Union have done what theycould to devitalise <strong>Africa</strong> and its people.Despite formidable problems, the 1960swas a time of optimism as <strong>Africa</strong>ns enjoyedtheir new independence and prepared totackle their political and economicproblems in their own way. The 1970s,1980s and 1990s spelt a disaster for mostcountries of Sub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong>. In theperiod when other underdevelopedregions, e<strong>special</strong>ly Asia, were experiencingsteady economic growth, <strong>Africa</strong> as a wholesaw its living standards plummet. By the 1990s, dictatorships,corruption, civil wars, genocides, famines, widespread poverty,and the interventions and manipulations of <strong>Africa</strong> byWestern powers had relegated <strong>Africa</strong> to the position of an aid‘basket-case’, the world’s poorest and least developed continent.<strong>Africa</strong> came to be spoken of only in pessimistic terms.The May 20, 2000 issue of the Economist summarised it all inits cover caption, “Hopeless <strong>Africa</strong>”!!the reSurgence of africa inthe 21St century<strong>Africa</strong> today is a fast-movingcontinent. Across the continenteconomic growth rates (in per capitaterms) have been positive since thelate 1990s. Even though <strong>Africa</strong>’s economicgrowth rates still fall short ofAsia’s astounding levels, the steadyprogress that most <strong>Africa</strong>n countries have experienced hascome as welcome news after decades of despair. The pervasiveAfro-pessimism of the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s has givenway to an image of <strong>Africa</strong> that is socially and economicallyvibrant, politically more open, with an assertive civil society,an entrepreneurial indigenous private sector and an aggressivepress playing a central role in articulating an independent andauthentic <strong>Africa</strong>n development agenda.For the first time in more than two decades <strong>Africa</strong> hasbegun to find its rightful place in the world, attractingattention of the Western powers as well as the emerging‘Southern powers’. At the end of the first decade of the 21stcentury, Dorr et al (2010, p.80) captured the mood of the‘<strong>Africa</strong>n Miracle’:…. <strong>Africa</strong> has outgrown the gloom and doom… <strong>Africa</strong>in fact, is now one of the world’s fastest-growing economicregions… revenues from natural resources, theold foundation of <strong>Africa</strong>’s economy, directly account-20August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Yed for just 24 percent of growth during the last decade;the rest came from other booming sectors, such asfinance, retail, agriculture, and telecommunications.Not every country in <strong>Africa</strong> is resource rich, yet GDPgrowth accelerated almost everywhere.Various internal and external factors have contributed tothe rapid growth in many parts of the continent. The firstis the improvement in the security situation in manyconflict-ridden countries — Darfur, DRC and Somalianotwithstanding! At the end of 2000, nearly 15 countries werestill at war. Ten years later that number has been reduced tojust five. Peace has brought with it opportunity for development.There is also greater continental and regional consensuson what needs to be done to accelerate growth, reducepoverty and prevent deadly conflicts. Societies are becomingmore open and democratisation is gaining momentum. Thesuccessful popular revolts in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya in 2011demonstrated this trend. Besides, many <strong>Africa</strong>n countries haveput in place appropriate macro-economic, structural and socialpolicies, which have contributed to improved GDP growthrates. According to reports in the first decade of the 21stcentury six of the ten fastest-growing economies in the worldwere in Sub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong> (Angola, Nigeria, Ethiopia, Chad,Mozambique and Rwanda). The global demand for <strong>Africa</strong>’snatural resources has increased dramatically, thus allowingmany <strong>Africa</strong>n countries to diversify their economies. Also,there is greater consensus among <strong>Africa</strong>n governments nowthan ever before on what needs to be done to address thecontinent’s myriad problems. Regional initiatives under the<strong>Africa</strong>n Union (AU) and the New Partnership for <strong>Africa</strong>’sdevelopment (NEPAD) are allowing <strong>Africa</strong>n countries toimprove governance; assume leadership and accountabilityfor development; increase trade within <strong>Africa</strong> and the world;and enhance regional public goods such as cross-countrytransportation and pooling of electricity. Most significantly,the <strong>Africa</strong>n Union and various Regional EconomicAugustine Mahiga, Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General and Head of the UNPolitical Office for Somalia (UNPOS), addressing the media in Mogadishu, Somalia. Improvedsecurity allowed UNPOS to shift its office permanently to Mogadishu after 17 years.Communities (RECs) are playing an important role indealing with disruptive national crises such as those in Sudanand Somalia.There is also the ‘Emerging Powers in <strong>Africa</strong>’ factor,particularly that of China and India. The global demand for<strong>Africa</strong>’s vast energy and natural resources has increaseddramatically, thus allowing many countries to start to diversifytheir economies for the first time in many decades, and toinvest in strategic infrastructure necessary for raisingproductivity and growth. Even those <strong>Africa</strong>n countries withfew strategic resources, such as oil and gas, have experiencedmoderate growth due to expanded trade with emergingeconomies. Obviously, the increasing role of EmergingPowers in <strong>Africa</strong>n economies, which is likely to be long-term,requires careful analysis.emerging poWerS in africaDuring the last fifteen years or so, emerging powershave made significant inroads in the West’s political andeconomic dominance of <strong>Africa</strong>. The result is a diversificationof the external actors involved across sectors of the <strong>Africa</strong>neconomy with much of this interaction being framed in termsof new forms of multilateral and bilateral arrangements.Driven by the need for resources and markets, theseemerging powers nonetheless are acutely conscious of theirown development challenges and correspondingly, thosefacing <strong>Africa</strong>. The changing dynamics of <strong>Africa</strong>’s internationalpolitics in relation to three of the leading emerging powers,namely, China, India and Brazil, have enormous implicationsfor <strong>Africa</strong> and its development aspirations.Many analysts of the <strong>Africa</strong>n condition today assert that anew scramble for <strong>Africa</strong> is now under way. After decades ofneglect, the continent and its riches are once again beingsought by the outside world. <strong>Africa</strong> has now become the mostfavoured destination for foreign direct investment (FDI)which is said to have increased from a low of US$ 2-3 billionper annum in the early 1990s to over$40 billion today. At present, all theworld’s major economic actors have apresence on the continent. There is nodoubt that besides the United Statesand Europe, China, India and Brazilhave become <strong>Africa</strong>’s most importanteconomic partners and their growingfootprint on the continent is transforming<strong>Africa</strong>’s international relationsin a dramatic way. In addition, a host ofother Asian and other emergingpowers are also actively courting<strong>Africa</strong>n countries through aid,expanded trade and investment instrategic sectors of <strong>Africa</strong>n economiesto leverage international politics, gainaccess to growing markets and acquiremuch needed raw materials from theAugust 2011-January 2012 21

A N A L Y S I Scontinent. Asia looks set to become the dominant economicpresence in <strong>Africa</strong> in the years to come. Europe is becomingincreasingly marginalised in significant decision-making on<strong>Africa</strong>’s future, in particular, because of the United States’greater assertiveness in <strong>Africa</strong> prompted by its ‘War onTerrorism’ and its desire to reduce its dependence on MiddleEastern oil.Is the emerging powers’ presence in <strong>Africa</strong> likely to changethe pattern of <strong>Africa</strong>’s relations with the outside world? Thisis of course not the first scramble for <strong>Africa</strong>’s resources. Thepast two centuries have witnessed two different scrambles onthe continent. The first, organised by the Europeans in the late19th century, carved up the continent leading to the establishmentof colonialism. The second occurred immediatelyafter decolonisation following the Second World War and theCold War between the United States and the Soviet Union,culminating largely in neo-colonial relations, proxy wars, politicalinstability and economic decline. As with the earlier twoscrambles, the new scramble involves both foreign states andtheir multinational corporations playing in the game. Unlikethe earlier ones, however, the new scramble is distinguishedby the deep involvement of two developing nations from Asia:China and India. The key question is, is Asia’s potential economicdominance, then, likely to repeat those exploitative andoppressive relations of the past or is it to herald a new era ofSouth-South Cooperation? Opinions differ.china in africaToday, China and India are the fastest-growing economiesin the world. They both have suddenly ascended the centrestage of the world. They have attracted immense global attentionfor their phenomenal growth stories and rising influencein international affairs. In 2010, China officially became theworld’s second-largest economy overtaking Japan. In the West,this has prompted concerns about China overtaking theUnited States sooner than previously thought. A mix ofmotives is at play. New sources ofenergy are obviously a major motivatingfactor. Fifty percent of China’soil requirements will be imported inthe near future and nearly half of itwould be sourced from <strong>Africa</strong>. Thecountry also requires other rawmaterials — timber, copper, non-ferrousmetals and iron ore — if itsrobust economic performance is tobe maintained. The Chinese also see <strong>Africa</strong> as an ideal marketfor their low-cost manufactured products.China has formal political relations with 49 of the 54<strong>Africa</strong>n countries and close partnerships with almost all theimportant ones. China currently has over 800 businesses in 49<strong>Africa</strong>n countries and the amount of total trade reached $100billion in 2008, up from $10 billion in 2000. China alsocorrectly recognises that a unipolar world dominated by theUnited States is not in its own long-term interests. It has thusToday, the institutionalframework for doingbusiness with <strong>Africa</strong> hasimproved with the creationof the AU as well asseveral multilateral blocsThe new <strong>Africa</strong>n Union building in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, has beenbuilt through Chinese assistance.partnered <strong>Africa</strong>n countries and others to contain the UnitedStates and facilitate the development of a multilateral system,both of which are compatible with the continent’s long-termdevelopment and political interests. One may say that coincidenceof interests, rather than solidarity, is the crucial politicalimpetus for the alliance between <strong>Africa</strong>n nations andChina.india in africaChina’s competitor from the developing world is, ofcourse, India. Even though India’s growth has been less rapidthan China’s its potential impact on the rest of the world and<strong>Africa</strong> in particular should not be underestimated. India’smotivation in the <strong>Africa</strong>n scramble is not far different fromthat of China or other emerging powers. <strong>Africa</strong> is looked uponas an important market for Indian goods and services, a vitalelement in her quest for energy security, a significant sourceof minerals and other natural resources for India’s burgeoningeconomy and a potentially attractive destination for Indianfarmers.Undoubtedly, it is in India’senlightened self-interest to become astrong and reliable partner in <strong>Africa</strong>’squest for economic development.Besides, <strong>Africa</strong> with its 54 votes inthe UN General Assembly and threein the (unreformed) SecurityCouncil will always matter. TheIndian economy has grown rapidlyfrom the 1990s and securing cheapenergy and other strategic raw materials from the <strong>Africa</strong>n continenton a long-term basis has become an economic and politicalimperative. It is projected that by 2030 India will be theworld’s third-largest consumer of energy. Currently, 75 percent of India’s oil imports come from the politically volatileMiddle East. Because India possesses few proven oil reserves,diversifying the sources of its energy supply by developingstronger economic ties with the <strong>Africa</strong>n continent tops thepolitical agenda. Not surprisingly, India has decided to inter-22August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YExim Bank CMD T.C.A. Rangarathan, CII <strong>Africa</strong> Committee Chairman Sanjay Kirloskar, Mozambique’s Prime Minister Aires Bonifacio Ali,India’s Minister of Commerce & Industry Anand Sharma, Prime Minister of Togo Gilbert Fossoun HOUNGBO, CII President Hari Bhartia andCII Director-General C. Banerjee at the 7th CII-EXIM Bank Conclave on India-<strong>Africa</strong> Project Partnership in New Delhi on March 28, 2011.act with the continent in its areas of needs and strengths.India’s dependence on oil imports is expected to grow by over90 percent by 2020. To satisfy the growing energy needs, thegovernment through its energy parastatal, ONGC Videsh Ltd.has begun to pursue foreign oil and natural gas explorationprojects aggressively. As a result, India has a significant presencein the energy sectors of Egypt, Côte d’Ivoire, Nigeria,Sudan and elsewhere.Indian companies are currently involved in renovating oilfields and building petroleum pipeline projects in Sudan,establishing oil refineries, power plants and steel mills inNigeria, and launching information technology projects thatwill electronically connect the continent, so as to facilitatee-commerce, e-governance, and more generic healthcare,education and research initiatives. In addition to its own directdevelopment initiatives such as seconding farmers to cultivateland in East <strong>Africa</strong>n nations, the Indian government is involvedsupportively through its Export-Import Bank of India (EximBank) in extending huge credit facilities for these projects. Thecredit facilities from the Exim Bank are also used to supportIndian conglomerates to expand their presence on thecontinent. As a result, Indian companies are now involved in<strong>Africa</strong>n industries, such as automobile manufacture, banking,information technology, textile manufacture, pharmaceuticaland steel. Overall, bilateral trade between <strong>Africa</strong> and India hasrisen from $ 967 million in 1991 to $4.2 billion in 2001 andover $50 billion in 2011. All assessments are that it is likely torise further given that the Indian economy is expected to growby 7 to 8 percent per annum for the next decade. The Indiangovernment has also accelerated its engement with the continentby hosting so far two India <strong>Africa</strong> Forum Summits inNew Delhi in April 2008 and in Addis Ababa in May 2011.china and india in africaChina and India’s deepening involvement in <strong>Africa</strong> in the21st century has provoked much debate and discussion. Manyquestions are asked: Are they just the latest in the line ofexploiters of <strong>Africa</strong>’s rich natural resources who put their owneconomic interests above humanitarian, environmentalor human rights concerns? Or are their engagement anextension of the South-South Cooperation? Do China’s andIndia’s engagement enable <strong>Africa</strong>n countries to freethemselves from the tyranny of debt and conditionality, thatthrough two decades of structural adjustment programmes(SAPs) have reversed most of the gains of independence?Is <strong>Africa</strong> swapping one set of tyrannies for another? These arecomplex questions requiring careful analyses.Here it may be noted that despite attempts by manyWestern analysts to put the stamp of imperialism or neo-colonialismon China’s and India’s relations with <strong>Africa</strong>, there area number of features of China’s and India’s relations with<strong>Africa</strong> that distinguish them from the Western (EU and theU.S.) engagement. First and foremost, China, India and all<strong>Africa</strong>n countries are still developing countries with identicalproblems and aspirations. Secondly, China and India alongwith the <strong>Africa</strong>n Union (AU) formed part of the South-Southbloc in the World Trade Organisation (WTO), opposing, forexample, the patenting of life forms and the hegemonic plansof U.S. based biotech corporations. Thirdly, China and Indiaare not identified with the structural adjustment policies thatimpoverished <strong>Africa</strong> over the past three decades. Besides,China and India earlier embraced the <strong>Africa</strong>n liberationprocess with diplomatic, political, material and some militarysupport. Moreover, there has been no tradition of Chinese orIndian attempts at colonial occupation of any part of <strong>Africa</strong>,rather they were co-victims of European colonialism.India’s active involvement with <strong>Africa</strong> is motivated by ageneral desire to exert greater influence in global affairs andmore specifically to secure <strong>Africa</strong>n diplomatic support forNew Delhi’s quest to gain a permanent seat on the UNSecurity Council. Although China currently dominates the<strong>Africa</strong>n market, India will more likely gain the comparativeAugust 2011-January 2012 23

A N A L Y S I SThere is growing demand for <strong>Africa</strong>’s natural resources from India and China. Photo: http://africaoil.ning.comadvantage in the medium to long term: its strong diasporiccommunity on the ground in <strong>Africa</strong>, its proximity to thecontinent, its use of historical ties and <strong>special</strong> niche areas topromote its cause of <strong>Africa</strong>n friendship, its first-classeducational system and its enduring democratic tradition willcontribute towards making it more competitive than China(Cheru and Obi 2011).Brazil and africaOf the three major emerging powers discussed here, Brazilis the least engaged in <strong>Africa</strong>. China’s role in <strong>Africa</strong> is nowwidely scrutinised. India’s presence in <strong>Africa</strong> is still a fringetopic, but an emerging group of analysts has begun to studyIndia’s presence systematically. Brazil on the other hand isnew, though its activities in <strong>Africa</strong> are arousing growing interestaround the world. Considering that Brazil does not needto import energy nor food, what are Brazil’s interests in <strong>Africa</strong>?Brazil’s historical origins owes much to <strong>Africa</strong>, in part dueto the role of the Atlantic slave trade and its role in the widercommercial network of the Portuguese empire. Until fairlyrecently, Brazilian foreign and economic policy’s historicalfocus on North America, Europe and South America hadrelegated ties with <strong>Africa</strong> to the margins. The mainconsequence of this lack of active engagement in <strong>Africa</strong> is thatBrazil has lagged behind China and India in formulating andimplementing a comprehensive <strong>Africa</strong> policy. Thus, althoughit is in the process of expanding its commercial and financialties, Brazil’s trade with <strong>Africa</strong> remains relatively low andfocused on only a few countries, while at the same time Brasiliahas actively sought to elevate and integrate <strong>Africa</strong> into itsglobal foreign policy.The evolution of Brazilian foreign policy over the last sixtyyears has produced differing policy approaches to <strong>Africa</strong>.However, there has been a continuum in Brazilian foreignpolicy towards <strong>Africa</strong> in terms of a commitment to respectingsovereignty and non-interference in domestic affairs.Underlying Brazil’s <strong>Africa</strong> policy is a desire to prioritiseBrazilian developmental and commercial aims in approachingthe continent while at the same time responding tobroader foreign policy ambitions. In the period between 1945and 1974, this manifested itself as a policy of general (thoughnot uniform) diplomatic support for French and Portuguesepositions in <strong>Africa</strong> in fora such as the United Nations. Thisapproach was guided in part by mercantilist needs of securingEuropean investment in the Brazilian economy as well asaccessing its markets, and culminated in particularly close tieswith Portuguese territories as well as strong trade ties withSouth <strong>Africa</strong> that practised apartheid.With the collapse of the Portuguese empire in <strong>Africa</strong>in the mid-1970s, Brazil reached out to the rest of <strong>Africa</strong>diplomatically but essentially remained confined in economicterms to Lusophone <strong>Africa</strong>, Nigeria and South <strong>Africa</strong>. WhilePresident Fernando Henarique Cardoso (1995-2002) set thestage for diversifying Brazil’s partnerships after the end of theCold War, it was President Lula (2003-2010) who made <strong>Africa</strong>a strategic priority (as part of a grand strategy to strengthenSouth-South Cooperation). The present government ofDilma Rousseff (since October 2010) also is activelyreversing the decline in ties under earlier predecessors andemphasizes Brazil and <strong>Africa</strong>’s shared historical standing asdeveloping countries. The Lula/Rousseff governments alsolaid emphasis on the cultural affinities of Brazilian societywith <strong>Africa</strong>, built on the shared experiences with Lusophone<strong>Africa</strong> and the influence of Brazilians of <strong>Africa</strong>n origin. It isnotable that Lula made 12 trips to <strong>Africa</strong>, visiting 21 countriesduring his presidency while Brazil received 47 visits of <strong>Africa</strong>n24August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Ykings, presidents and prime ministers from 27 nations. Brazil’sForeign Minister Celso Amorim made 67 official visits to 34<strong>Africa</strong>n nations during his time with the Lula government.Brazil now has 37 embassies in <strong>Africa</strong> (much more than thatof India), up from 17 in 2002.A key aim of Brazilian foreign policy under Lula da Silvahad been to ‘reduce Brazilian vulnerability on the internationalstage’ by engaging in a more ‘muscular foreign policy’ topursue its interests. With respect to <strong>Africa</strong> this has meant thatBrazilian foreign policy has rediscovered its ‘<strong>Africa</strong>n vocation’,framing it within this broader concern of respondingmore effectively to globalisation. Brazil’s <strong>Africa</strong> policy reflectsthis impulse in that the most significant diplomatic initiativesthat involve <strong>Africa</strong> are multilateral while the substance of economicactivity is played out at the bilateral level. A key initiativeis the IBSA (India, Brazil, South <strong>Africa</strong>) initiative, a diplomaticpartnership initially focused onmutual support for a position in areformed UN Security Council.This multilateral approach has beenexpanded into other areas: theCommunity of Portuguese SpeakingCountries (CPLP) has becomeanother global diplomatic vehicle forextending Brazilian influence acrossLusophone <strong>Africa</strong>. Private Braziliancommercial interests are active primarilyin Angola, Mozambique and South <strong>Africa</strong> whileBrazilian multinationals have also made concerted efforts tobreak into areas such as Gabon and Nigeria. In Angola, forinstance, Brazil’s two-way trade has jumped to over $1 billionin 2007 and the country is a leading destination for Brazilianinvestment in <strong>Africa</strong>, receiving $750 million in 2006 alone.Brazilian enterprises, mostly through the activity of largeprivate firms such as Vale and Odebrechts, initially enteredthe <strong>Africa</strong>n market without significant Brazilian governmentsupport. The Brazilian mining giant, Vale, convincedCompared to actors likeChina and the UnitedStates, the EU approachto engaging <strong>Africa</strong>represents a morebalanced understandingof <strong>Africa</strong>’s needsIndia’s Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, South <strong>Africa</strong>’s President Jacob Zuma andBrazilian President Dilma Rousseff at the 5th IBSA Summit in Pretoria, South <strong>Africa</strong>,on October 18, 2011.President Lula to lobby the president of Gabon directly tosupport its iron ore lease, citing the Chinese approach oflinking state diplomacy with commercial interests; thus anew form of direct political engagement to Brazil’s approachto <strong>Africa</strong> has emerged. Moreover, state firms such asPetrobas are embarking on joint ventures in <strong>Africa</strong>, withPetrobas and Angola’s state-owned oil company Sonangolexploring training and cooperation in exploration of oil.As Brazil’s economic engagement in <strong>Africa</strong> grows, the way<strong>Africa</strong>ns see Brazil will inevitably change. While its presenceis still much smaller than that of China and India, Brazil mustbe careful to avoid some of the mistakes made by China thatmay run the risk of facing regional backlashes. Many are of theopinion that Brazilians are well liked across <strong>Africa</strong>. Nowthe challenge is to assure that even despite ever greaterinvestments, such as Vale’s recently signed $1 billion deal tobuild a railway in Malawi to transportcoal from Mozambique, Brazil willcontinue to be seen as a partner, andnot a coloniser that merely seeks toexploit <strong>Africa</strong>’s resources.policy implicationS andimperativeSIt may be justifiably said that thenew scramble for <strong>Africa</strong> could be asruinous to <strong>Africa</strong> as the earlierscrambles unless effective corrective measures are taken.Although it is true that China has successfully implementedan alternative development path, which may have moredevelopmental possibilities for the <strong>Africa</strong>n continent, it isimportant to note that the promise will be realised only if<strong>Africa</strong>ns do not become complicit with the Chineseagendas, but are able to play off the competitors for <strong>Africa</strong>’sresources with a view to maximising the benefits for thecontinent. <strong>Africa</strong> needs to transform the ‘resource curse’ intoa vector for socio-economic development. This requires astrategic engagement and a set of actionsdesigned specifically to enhance the leverageof <strong>Africa</strong>n countries in their relations withChina, India and other traditional andemerging powers.The last time such a scramble took place —during the Cold War — the consequences weredevastating for the <strong>Africa</strong>n continent. Bothforeign powers — the United States and theSoviet Union — established client regimes,funded rebel armies and engaged in proxy wars.The result was a continent wracked by civilwars, displacement of citizens and cross-borderrefugee flows. The competitive internationalenvironment during the Cold War did notbenefit <strong>Africa</strong>. The current conflict situationssuch as in Sudan, DRC and Somalia couldproduce similar situations elsewhere on theAugust 2011-January 2012 25

A N A L Y S I Scontinent. How to avoid such scenarios should be theoverriding concern of <strong>Africa</strong>’s political and economic elite.The crucial challenge for <strong>Africa</strong> today is to see that the newscramble for <strong>Africa</strong> is managed to the benefit of <strong>Africa</strong>.The real danger to <strong>Africa</strong> today does not come from thecompetition among emerging powers in <strong>Africa</strong> but from thereal danger of confrontation between China and the UnitedStates in <strong>Africa</strong> and the more general threat of proxy wars andpolitical instability occasioned by the race for <strong>Africa</strong>’sresources. For <strong>Africa</strong> to develop its political elites must buildthe political will to pursue a comprehensive developmentagenda that benefits their citizens. Such a political will canemerge when the political elite are kept in check by a pluralpolitical system and/or an independent robust national civilsociety. Where this does not exist, as in many <strong>Africa</strong>ncountries today, these political elites easily become proxies forforeign powers and interests, whether traditional or emergingexternal powers.Besides, the <strong>Africa</strong>n political elite should have to be muchmore cohesive at the continental level if they are to be able touse the competitive international environment to theircollective advantage. Such cohesion could emerge frominitiatives towards greater continental unity and integrationand models of a pan-<strong>Africa</strong>n solution in the form of a UnionGovernment for <strong>Africa</strong> or a United States of <strong>Africa</strong>, whichmay be long-term aspiration. To start with, at least a charterof rights governing investments and engagements on thecontinent would be necessary. Such a Charter which wouldhave to be negotiated in the <strong>Africa</strong>n Union (AU), couldsupercede bilateral agreements and force all external, andperhaps even continental, powers to agree to a specific set ofbusiness and diplomatic codes of conduct. If AU could agreeto such a charter, it could be subsequently ratified in the UN,thereby extending and strengthening its institutionalisation,and enhancing the reach of its compliance.concluSionThe rise of China, India, Brazil and other emergingpowers is the definitive economic and political story ofour time. Nowhere is this more apparent than in <strong>Africa</strong>.The accelerated engagement of these powers in <strong>Africa</strong>in recent years presents both threats and opportunitiesfor <strong>Africa</strong>. China is the key emerging power which makesthe most extravagant claim of formulating a relationshipthat is strategic in its aims, equitable in its politicalengagement and founded on the notion of a commonconception of political history. However, some <strong>Africa</strong>n andother critics point to the manner in which China’s tradewith <strong>Africa</strong> replicates features of traditional Westerncolonial trade for <strong>Africa</strong>n resources in exchange formanufactured goods.Despite its longstanding political and socio-economicengagement, India’s recent active drive for acceleratedengagement in <strong>Africa</strong> is relatively new. There is littleevidence that New Delhi aspires to play the continent-widerole. In the case of Brazil, despite the pressure to deeepenits involvement in <strong>Africa</strong>, much of what has been done stillreflects Brasilia’s primary concern for integrating its <strong>Africa</strong>policy in the service of broader foreign policy objectives.Concurrently, the focus on Lusophone <strong>Africa</strong>, where Brazilarguably has an advantage over other external actors, ensuresa neat juxtaposition between the cultural-historicaldimension of Brazil’s <strong>Africa</strong> policy and its currentcommercial interests.As the leading emerging power in <strong>Africa</strong>, China seemsto be setting the pace and example for India and Brazil whohave, to varying degrees, adopted the elements of theChinese approach to <strong>Africa</strong>. Western domination, be itcommercial or otherwise, is waning in <strong>Africa</strong>; but theselective engagement of the United States and the residualpresence of European interests will remain a feature ofThe under-construction site of a stadium in Georgetown, Guyana, which is being built by India’s real estate company Shapoorji Palonji.26August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Yexternal relations of <strong>Africa</strong>n states. It may also be said thatall the countries involved in the new scramble for <strong>Africa</strong> aredriven largely by national interest, and that their behaviouris conditioned far more by competition with each otherthan by the noble sentiments enshrined in their policy documentsand press releases. There are lurking dangers inherentin the new scramble, the possibility of repeating theresults of previous scrambles: neo-colonial relations, proxywars, and ultimately political instability and economic devastation.However, it must be stressed that <strong>Africa</strong> must leverageits new partnership with China and other emerging powersin the interest of its own long-term development. For that,<strong>Africa</strong>ns should develop a collective long-term perspectivein its relations with external powers. Collective strategies areneeded to effectively utilise external capital, training andinvestment for <strong>Africa</strong>’s economic development. <strong>Africa</strong>npolitical elites will have to be much more cohesive at thecontinental level if they are to be able to use the competitiveinternational environment to their collective advantage.<strong>Africa</strong>n leaders also need to engage emerging powers moreproactively in terms of <strong>Africa</strong>’s own needs, demands andaspirations.The rapid growth of emerging powers is also an exampleof the fact that poor societies can rise beyond colonialexploitation and the mangled priorities of societies whichensure that colonial societies continue to remain producersof raw materials.These emerging powers broke with the old models ofaccumulation and the changes in their economies led to anbetter standard of living for their people. The growingpartnership of emerging powers with <strong>Africa</strong> has great potentialto break pre-existing failed development paradigms byfocusing on trade and investment and promotion of genuineSouth-South cooperation.The only way this objective could be reached is for<strong>Africa</strong>n leaders themselves to take charge of their owndestiny. This would require these leaders to be willing to playforeign powers against each other to obtain the best terms fortheir own comprehensive development in the first place,and they would need the institutional capacity to manage theforeign relations to achieve this. Both these preconditionswould also require a united political elite on the continent.Only then can the continent begin to lay the foundations forthe realisation of the long-standing dream of many <strong>Africa</strong>nleaders to make the 21st century, the <strong>Africa</strong>n century. nReferences1. Alden, C., China in <strong>Africa</strong>, London, Zed Books, 20072. Alden, C., and Alves, A., ‘History and Identity in theConstruction of China’s <strong>Africa</strong> Policy’, Review of <strong>Africa</strong>n3. Political Economy, 35 (115): 43 – 584. Ampiah, K. and Naidu, S., Crouching Tiger, HiddenDragon? <strong>Africa</strong> and China, Cape Town, KwaZulu NatalPress, 20085. Beri, Ruchita, “China’s Rising Profile in <strong>Africa</strong>”, ChinaReport, Vol.43, No. 3, 20076. Braughtigam, D., The Dragon’s Gift: The Real Story ofChina in <strong>Africa</strong>, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 20097. Broadman, H.G., <strong>Africa</strong>’s Silk Road: China and India’sNew Economic Frontier, Washington, World Bank, 20068. Campbell, H., China in <strong>Africa</strong>: ‘Challenging U.S. GlobalHegemony’, Third World Quarterly, 29(1), 2008: 89 – 1059. Chand, Manish (ed.) Two Billion Dreams: CelebratingIndia-<strong>Africa</strong> Friendship, New Delhi, IANS Publishing, 201110. Cheru, Fantu., <strong>Africa</strong>n Renaissance: Roadmaps to theChallenge of Globalization, London, Zed Books, 200211. Cheru, Fantu and Obi, Cyril., (eds.) The Rise of Chinaand India in <strong>Africa</strong>, Nordic <strong>Africa</strong> Institute, Zed Books,London, New York, 201012. Cornelissen, S., Cheru. F., and Shaw, T.M.,(eds.) <strong>Africa</strong>and International Relations in the 21st Century, Palgrave,Macmillan, 201213. Davis, M., ‘China’s Developmental Model comes to<strong>Africa</strong>’, Review of <strong>Africa</strong>n Political Economy 35 (1) 2008:134-714. He Wen Ping, “China’s <strong>Africa</strong> Policy: Driving Forces,Features and Global Impact”, <strong>Africa</strong> Review (ASA, NewDelhi) vol. 1., No.1, 2009: 35-5316. Ikenberry, J.G., “The Rise of China and the Future ofthe West”, Foreign Affairs, (New York), Vol. 87,, No.1,January/February 200817. Large, Daniel, “Beyond Dragon in the Bush: The Studyof China-<strong>Africa</strong> Relations”, <strong>Africa</strong>n Affairs (London) Vol.107, No. 426, 200818. Lahiri, Dilip, Schultz, Jorg and Chand, Manish,Engaging with Resurgent <strong>Africa</strong>, New Delhi, MacmillanPublishers, India, 201119. Mathews, K., India <strong>Africa</strong> Cooperation: A StrategicVision, <strong>Africa</strong> Quarterly, Vol. 51, No. 1, 2011: 36-4720. Mawdsley, Emma and McCann, Gerard, (ed.) India in<strong>Africa</strong>: Changing Geographies of Power, Pambazuka Press,Cape town, Nairobi, 201121. Sharma, Anand, ‘India and <strong>Africa</strong>: Sharing RobustPartnership’, in Beri, Ruchita and Sinha, Uttam (eds) <strong>Africa</strong>and Energy Security: Global Issues, Local Responses, NewDelhi, Academic Foundation, 200922. Tull, D.M., “China’s Engagement With <strong>Africa</strong>: Scope,Significance and Consequences”, Journal of Modern<strong>Africa</strong>n Studies, No. 44 (3), 200623. Vines, Alex, “China in <strong>Africa</strong>: Mixed Blessing”, CurrentHistory, May 200724. Zakaria, Fareed, The Post-American World, PenguinBooks, London, 2009August 2011-January 2012 27

P A R A D I G M S H I F TThepowersin the continentThe growing engagement of India and China in <strong>Africa</strong> has compelledwestern powers to shift their attention to a renascent continent,says Sanjukta Banerji BhattacharyaU.S. President Barack Obama addresses the Ghanaian parliament in Accra, Ghana, on July 11, 2009.<strong>Africa</strong>’s relations with India and Chinaas a whole have been the subject ofmuch discussion in the media andacademia in recent years because ofthe rather sudden and exponentialgrowth of trade and other relations ofthese two countries with the continentand the impact this has had on<strong>Africa</strong>n countries previously written off as ‘basket cases’.Today, they have emerged as significant economic actors withgrowth rates that, in many cases, have shown more promisethan that of western countries for the past few years. In fact,their terms of relationship have been very different from thatof western countries and have included infrastructuredevelopment, aid and lines of credit — instruments that haveacted as drivers of growth rather than agents of exploitation,and have helped draw <strong>Africa</strong>n states into the emergingmarkets of an increasingly globalised world.Today, several states of <strong>Africa</strong> are attractive destinations forforeign direct investment and trade, and many countries, inaddition to India and China, are vying for an entry or are-entry into the <strong>Africa</strong>n market and are offering terms andconditions similar to those offered by India and China. Theseinclude major powers like the United States, the EU as a bloc,and countries from regions that had so far had very littleinterest in the continent, that is, South East Asia and Latin28August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YAmerica. <strong>Africa</strong>n countries, too, are realising the potential ofgetting the best deals out of the increasing competition andare taking the initiative to engage with countries other thanIndia, China and the major powers. Moreover, having beenvictims of exploitation from colonial times to the post-independenceperiod, they have perhaps learnt the lesson of notputting their eggs in one basket and are diversifying theirrelations to include other powers that are emerging and whoare interested in <strong>Africa</strong> for the same reasons that India andChina profess, that is, to foster South-South cooperation topromote mutual growth. This article provides an overview of<strong>Africa</strong>’s relations with these ‘other’ powers, both major andthe new ones, with a view to understanding what the futureholds for India’s relations with <strong>Africa</strong>.It needs to be mentioned at the outset that the relationshipthat states in general now seek with <strong>Africa</strong> and <strong>Africa</strong>ncountries is not of the earlier type marked by exploitative trade.Relationships are underlined by the lexicon of ‘partnership’,be it strategic or economic. The question is why? There aremany reasons for this: (a) <strong>Africa</strong> is rich in resources that arefast diminishing in other parts of the world; (b) <strong>Africa</strong> is poorin infrastructure and infrastructural capacity and, therefore,welcomes partnerships that will bebeneficial to them and help themto develop; (c) the institutionalstructure of the <strong>Africa</strong>n Union (AU)is perhaps better equipped forpartnerships than that of theOrganisation of <strong>Africa</strong>n Unity(OAU) ever was; (d) the <strong>Africa</strong>ncontinent has 54 states and they areall members of AU and therefore,potentially, <strong>Africa</strong> can be a goodpartner in multilateral fora like the World Trade Organisation(WTO), the United Nations (UN) and climate change forawhere issues are raised that pit states against other states andwhere the support of 54 countries may be crucial in decidingan issue; and (e) the climate for economic relationswith <strong>Africa</strong>n states has shown an overall upswing with animprovement in the political environment in many states.These reasons are by no means the only ones that act asmotivating factors in bilateral and multilateral relationsbetween <strong>Africa</strong>n and other states or regions or regional blocs,but they are some of the more important ones. It will also beuseful to remember that the new interest in <strong>Africa</strong>, whichinvolves paying at least lip service to <strong>Africa</strong>n ownership,co-management and co-responsibility, goes back only to theturn of the century. That was the time when India andChina’s success in evolving a new pattern of relationshipwith <strong>Africa</strong>n states, which had begun five to ten yearsearlier, had started paying dividends in terms of increasingtrade figures. Also, the benefits of such trade viewed interms of entry into the energy sector of <strong>Africa</strong>’s largelyunexploited oilfields became self-evident.Of <strong>Africa</strong>’s ample resources, oil is not the only areaMuch of the mineralresources in <strong>Africa</strong> arestill being explored.Therefore, there is scopefor new countries andcompanies to competefor a share of the pieattractive to states all over the world. Its mineral and otherresources range from cobalt and copper to gold, diamonds,uranium, hydrocarbons and other energy sources. Some ofthese energy sources such as solar energy, thermal power andwind energy have great future potential. <strong>Africa</strong> is alsoendowed with large tracts of land where plants for bio-fuelscan be cultivated. Other resource-rich parts of the world areeither developed or being developed by their own countries’private or public sectors or are under the control of foreigncompanies who do not encourage competition from othertransnational companies. <strong>Africa</strong>n countries, on the otherhand, lack the skills needed to exploit their own resources.Moreover, they need investment for not only overall developmentbut also for infrastructure and capacity building.Further, much of the mineral resources in <strong>Africa</strong> are stillbeing explored and therefore, there is scope for newcountries and companies to compete for a share of the pie inareas where resources are diminishing in other parts of theworld. Petroleum is a case in point. At 4 million bpd,Sub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong> already produces as much oil as the totaloutput of Iran, Mexico and Venezuela put together. As such,it is on a forward curve in terms of oil production unlike mostof the known oil producing regionswhere older oil fields are located[Khapoya, 1998:112]. The output,for instance, increased 36 percent inthe past 10 years; for most of theother regions, the figure was around16 percent [Servant, 2003]. Quite afew of the most promising fields arelocated offshore in the SouthAtlantic.However, <strong>Africa</strong>n states such asNigeria, Angola, or Equitorial Guinea do not have thetechnology to extract deep offshore oil embedded in theirrespective territorial seas. Even Chinese companies are not ata par with western developed countries in such technologies.On the other hand, the U.S. and some EU countries possessstate-of-the-art technologies that are necessary for theextraction of deep-sea oil [Khapoya, 1998]. Another factorthat makes this oil attractive to other countries is that apartfrom Nigeria, none of the other countries where oil is beingdiscovered and new fields are being opened up, is a memberof the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries(OPEC) and, therefore, has more flexibility in productionand pricing. This amplifies their attractiveness to interestedpowers.In earlier years, much of <strong>Africa</strong> had been subject todictatorships, conflicts and coups. Some major powers,notably, France, the U.K. and the U.S., had carved outspheres of influence and interest and in some cases had helpedto prop up dictatorships if it suited their purpose, providingarms (clandestinely or otherwise) and aid in their owninterest. So far as <strong>Africa</strong>’s mineral wealth was concerned,while a select few multinational companies had benefitedAugust 2011-January 2012 29

P A R A D I G M S H I F TFormer U.S. President George W. Bush with a group of dancers in Ghana during his visitto the country in 2008. Photo: the.honoluluadvertiser.commanifold, <strong>Africa</strong>n dictators, often in connivance with theirpatrons, had also exploited their country’s wealth for theirown aggrandisement. Things have, however, changed for thebetter, with democracy slowly finding a foothold in thecontinent, making it a better place to do business with.Moreover, in earlier times most relationships between <strong>Africa</strong>and the outside world were bilateral, leading often to a kindof patron-client bond. Today, the institutional framework fordoing business with <strong>Africa</strong> has improved with the creation ofthe AU as well as several multilateral blocs like the CommonMarket for Eastern and Southern <strong>Africa</strong> (COMESA), theEconomic Community of West <strong>Africa</strong>n States (ECOWAS),the East <strong>Africa</strong>n Community (EAC)the Southern <strong>Africa</strong>n DevelopmentCommunity (SADC), to name justa few. Countries are now not onlyinterested in bilateral tie-ups but alsoin multilateral institutional tie-ups.Another trigger has been theexpanding relations of India andChina with <strong>Africa</strong>n states. Since the1990s, the two emerging powershave acted as drivers of growth by providing alternativesources of investment, with attractive terms for the <strong>Africa</strong>ns.China, for instance, has offered a kind of ‘triple whammy’ —arms sales, cancelled debts and soft loans. As a result, Chinahas already cornered some of the best oil prospects in Sudanand Angola, the two countries ravaged by civil war from the1970s through the 1990s, and therefore considered to be toorisky for oil extraction by the major powers [Klare, Volman,2006].The emerging powers are also revealing <strong>Africa</strong>’s economicpotential, because some of the countries have now becomesafer places to invest and trade is increasing between <strong>Africa</strong>nnations and the new powers in <strong>Africa</strong>. The competition fromToday, the institutionalframework for doingbusiness with <strong>Africa</strong> hasimproved with the creationof the AU as well as theseveral multilateral blocsthese countries has shaken the majorpowers and they are now becomingaggressive in their efforts to outbid theemerging nations and promote their owneconomic interests in <strong>Africa</strong>. In short, theyhave woken up to the fact that <strong>Africa</strong> is nolonger their backyard, where aid could winthem ‘everlasting’ allies, and their only taskwas to keep these allies in power in orderto get the kind of deals that they wanted.The U.S. and africaSo far as the U.S. is concerned, itshould be noted that during the Cold Waryears, it had hardly any kind of <strong>special</strong>relations with any Sub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong>nstate except for South <strong>Africa</strong>. It did,however, have a patron-client relationshipwith several states, such as Somalia andEthiopia under Emperor Haile Selassie inthe 1970s, in areas where it had geostrategic Cold Warinterests. In fact, it was the East-West rivalry that motivatedmany of its interventions in <strong>Africa</strong>, for instance, throughproxy forces in Angola [Baptiste, 2005]. Mineral wealth andCold War interests prompted the U.S. to develop a <strong>special</strong>relationship with South <strong>Africa</strong>. This was, to some degree,responsible for the perpetuation of apartheid at a time whenmost other countries had no relations with that country.The fact that <strong>Africa</strong> was of little interest to America isevident from the lack of any high-level visits to that continent.Although the U.S. had set up a Bureau of <strong>Africa</strong>n Affairswithin the State Department in 1958, the first state visit by anAmerican president to Sub-Saharan<strong>Africa</strong> was 20 years later in 1978when president Jimmy Cartervisited Nigeria and Liberia. The nextstate visit came 29 years later in 1998,when president Bill Clinton paid abrief visit to <strong>Africa</strong>. The year 1998was a turning point because the U.S.embassies in Kenya and Tanzaniawere bombed that year. From 1999,the beginning of some kind of engagement, particularly inpublic diplomacy and trade, can be observed. The same year,the U.S. Congress passed the <strong>Africa</strong>n Growth andOpportunity Act (AGOA) to spur exports to the U.S. from<strong>Africa</strong>. The fact that this Act was passed following thebombing incidents is significant.There was more activity during the presidency of GeorgeW. Bush, who visited the continent twice, once in 2003 andthe second time in 2008. There were also attempts atpromoting sustainable development, particularly throughmultilateral fora like G-8 summits and the World EconomicForum at Davos. The American interest, however, also hada security angle. What is e<strong>special</strong>ly significant is the announce-30August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Yment in 2007 of the creation of a newand separate <strong>Africa</strong> Command tocoordinate all U.S. military andsecurity interests throughout thecontinent. Actually, even priorto that, in November 2002, thecontinent saw the first permanentU.S. base, when the Combined JointTask Force–Horn of <strong>Africa</strong> (CJTF-HoA) was set up in a former Frenchmilitary base, Camp Lemonier, inDjibouti [afrol News, 2004].The U.S. also set up the East<strong>Africa</strong> Counter Terrorism Initiatives(EACTI) in 2003, and disbursedapproximately $100 million throughthe programme to Djibouti, Eritrea,Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania andUganda. Diplomatic initiativesdeepened under the Obamaadministration, with the President himself visiting Ghana inJuly 2009 within a few months of his inauguration followedby several high-level visits including that of the Secretary ofState, the U.S. Permanent Representative to the UN, theUnder Secretary of State for Democracy and Global Affairsand many others. The increased activity underscores anenlarged U.S. interest in <strong>Africa</strong> [Carson, 2010].The main driving factors behind this augmented attentionare resources and security, the two often interacting to buildpolicy [Ceukelaire, 2004]. It should be noted here that U.S.foreign policy has never been altruistic but realistic anddriven by its national interests, with foreign aid acting as aninstrument of foreign policy. In the current context, the U.S.main so far as resources are concerned, is in hydrocarbons.According to forecasts made by the U.S. National IntelligenceCouncil, the U.S. could be importing as much as 25 percentof its oil from Central <strong>Africa</strong> by 2015, compared to16 percent at present [Servant, 2003].If one looks at the trade figures of the U.S. CensusBureau’s Foreign Trade Division, imports from <strong>Africa</strong> grewfrom $19.9 billion in 1997 to an estimated $113.4 billion in2008, falling somewhat in 2009, presumably because of theeconomic recession [U.S. Census Bureau, Foreign TradeDivision, 2009]. While exports to <strong>Africa</strong> increased from $11.3billion in 1997 to $22.3 billion in 2008, between 2007 and2008, imports from oil producing states grew at a muchhigher rate than with other countries. To quote some figures,the rate of growth for Angola was 51.2 percent, for theRepublic of Congo, it was 65.2 percent, for EquatorialGuinea, it was 89.5 percent and for Chad, it was 55.4 percent.In 2008, the U.S. imports under AGOA amounted to $66.3billion, but petroleum products accounted for the largestportion with 92.3 percent share of the AGOA imports.With fuel products excluded, AGOA imports amounted to$5.1 billion. If these figures are correlated to the U.S.Senior officers and staff members of the Ugandan People's Defence Force Senior Command andStaff College taking part in a briefing led by officers from the U.S. Embassy in Kampalaon January 11, 2011. Photo: Africomdevelopmental aid to individual countries, the results areinteresting [U.S. Department of Commerce, InternationalTrade Administration, 2009].During the Cold War period, the U.S. had supportedclient states like Somalia and Sudan without regard todemocracy and governance. Between 1992 and 2000, whensuch clients no longer mattered in its geopolitics with the endof the Cold War, the amount of aid dropped 52 percent from$1.93 billion to $933 million. And although the U.S. pays onthe face of it supports governance and democracy, after 9/11,developmental aid has focused on countries where the U.S.has oil or security interests, and some of these countries havevery poor human rights records. For instance, aid to Kenyaincreased from $19.5 million in 1998 to $44.1 million in2005; to Sudan, it increased from $4.5 million in 2001 to $81million in 2005; to Nigeria, from $7 million in 1998 to $59.3million in 2005, and to Djibouti from nothing in 2001 to $2million in 2005 [Williams, 2006]. Aid to Sudan, which isconsidered “Not Free” by Freedom House, increased by94.4 percent in the course of four years, at a time when theDarfur crisis was beginning to peak on one hand, and Chinawas signing deals for prospecting some of the best oil fields,on the other. Kenya was one of the two <strong>Africa</strong>n countrieswhere the U.S. embassies were the target of terror attacks;Djibouti is the country where the U.S. has set up a militarybase, and Nigeria, of course, is rich in oil and manycountries are vying for prospecting deals. So, it appears thata new set of countries is receiving a disproportionate amountof U.S. foreign aid based on newly re-evaluated Americanstrategic concerns.Another point that has to be made in this context is thatwhile the U.S. developmental assistance has increasedapproximately 10 percent since 2001, spending on militarypreparedness has gone up over 20 percent, and spending toassist <strong>Africa</strong>n governments to purchase weapons has increasedAugust 2011-January 2012 31

P A R A D I G M S H I F T17 percent. Since 2001, funding for IMET and FMF hasincreased approximately 35.6 percent and 27.8 percent,respectively [Williams, 2006].This marks a shift away from issues of humanitarian aid,peacekeeping and democracy to security and law and orderissues. Countries seen as central to the War on Terror —Ethiopia, Eritrea, Djibouti and Kenya — received the bulkof IMET assistance between 2001 and 2005. Angola, whichit needs to keep satisfied because of its oil resources, andRwanda, in which it is developing a strategic interest, havealso received such funding. The biggest loser in this periodwas South <strong>Africa</strong>, its strategic ally through the better part ofthe 20th century, where there was a 95 percent decline insuch funds.At the same time, the U.S. signed a memorandum ofunderstanding in April 2010 with South <strong>Africa</strong> to lay theframework for a ‘Strategic Dialogue’ focusing on issuesinvolving health, trade, energy and non-proliferation, amongothers [U.S. Department of State, 2010]. While militaryprogrammes and aid have declined, South <strong>Africa</strong>’s stabilisingpotential and its latent importance as a partner is recognised,particularly under the Obama administration, which has beenfurthering an ongoing Non-proliferation and DisarmamentDialogue, and has also signed an agreement on Cooperationon Nuclear Energy Research and Dialogue in April 2010[U.S. Department of State, 2010].In fact, apart from trade, particularly in hydrocarbons,security issues appear to be uppermost in U.S. foreignpolicy considerations. Such security considerations may belinked to securing its oil interests particularly since it appearsto be keen on shifting out of its dependence on MiddleEastern oil after the Iraq War and the highly volatile natureof its current politics. Even President Obama, despite hisrhetoric of viewing <strong>Africa</strong> as a “partner” and being “ready tocontribute to <strong>Africa</strong>’s growth and stabilisation”, strengthening<strong>Africa</strong>n governments so that ultimately “<strong>Africa</strong>n leaderstake control”, is, in essence, continuing and expandingformer president George W. Bush’s unilateralist securitypolicy in the continent.The Obama administration asked for $38 million for aforeign military financing programme to pay for U.S. arms salesto <strong>Africa</strong>, $21 million for IMET and $24.4 million forAnti-Terror Financing Programmes in 2010 [News & Trends:<strong>Africa</strong>, 2010]. Overarching all these is the new <strong>Africa</strong>nCommand or AFRICOM, which transited to an independentUnified Command Status in 2008 [Dickinson, 2009]. Therewas no separate defence Command for <strong>Africa</strong> prior to the settingup of AFRICOM, which is now responsible for U.S.military relations with all <strong>Africa</strong>n countries, given the fact,according to its website, that <strong>Africa</strong> is “growing in military andeconomic importance in global affairs” [U.S. AFRICOMPublic Affairs Office, 2010]. Obama also appointed a SpecialEnvoy to Sudan, Gen. Scott Gration, as well as a Special Adviserfor the Great Lakes, former Congressman Howard Wolpe.While the new U.S. relationship with <strong>Africa</strong>n statesreflects a kind of aggressive diplomacy that may not beovertly attractive to <strong>Africa</strong>n states, the fact remains that theU.S. is still the world’s sole superpower and has the world’slargest GDP. As such, it is attractive as a trading partner andit is in <strong>Africa</strong>n countries’ interest to trade with it if the termsare suitable.eU and africaThe EU, on the other hand, follows a different policy andits diplomacy is much more subtle but perhaps moreeffective. The EU appears to have taken lessons in diplomaticstrategy from the emerging powers and is pursuing itsagenda in <strong>Africa</strong> on similar lines. Although the Eurozonecrisis has affected its investment and purchasing power andshifted priorities for the time being, the EU has a long-termagenda for <strong>Africa</strong>. Europe has had trade links with<strong>Africa</strong> going back a long time. These links were in morecontemporary times enhanced by privileged agreements likethe Yaoundé and Lome Conventions and the more recentCotonou agreement (2001) [Douaud, Caprile, 2008].In view of the fact that the EU is the biggest market for<strong>Africa</strong>n products, taking in around 85 percent of its cotton,fruits and vegetables, it is no wonder that Europe hasenduring interests in <strong>Africa</strong>. Faced with the World TradeOrganisation’s (WTO) regime institutionalisation, it has beenforced to move away from privileged bilateral to WTOcompatiblemultilateral trade deals. As such, the EU alsolaunched negotiations on Economic Partnership Agreements(EPAs) with all <strong>Africa</strong>n, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP)countries in 2002 [Nolte, 2002].It is interesting that the EU now focuses on <strong>Africa</strong>’sdevelopment as part of its agenda in that continent much asIndia and China speak of cooperation for mutual benefitinvolving infrastructural and other kinds of development in<strong>Africa</strong>. The difference, however, is that the EU emphasisesgood governance and human rights along with economicgrowth. The security-development nexus, changes withinboth the AU and the EU, new international developmentcommitments under the Millennium Development Goals(MDGs), increasing competition with the emerging powers(Asia is now <strong>Africa</strong>’s third-largest trading partner after theU.S. and the EU) and depleting energy and natural resources,are all factors behind the EU’s increasing interest in <strong>Africa</strong>ndevelopment. One of the objectives of the EU Strategy for<strong>Africa</strong>’s Development of 2005 was to “give people in lessadvanced countries control over their own development”,focusing on four main pillars: peace and security, humanrights and good governance, health and education, andeconomic growth [Europa, 2005].Accordingly, the <strong>Africa</strong>-EU summit of 2007 in Lisboncreated a new <strong>Africa</strong>-EU Strategic Partnership providing anaction plan for 2008-10 on eight points of cooperation thatinclude peace and security, MDGs, trade, democraticgovernance, science and space, energy, and climate change[<strong>Africa</strong>-EU Ministerial Troika, First Action Plan, 2007].32August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YeU Trade WiTh The WorLd and eU Trade WiTh africa (2010)* (ranking by Trade flows in 2010)eU imporTS from…<strong>Africa</strong>TDS World Millions Share of Share ofSelections of euro Total total EUImportsTOTAL 1 509 073 134 326 100% 8.9%TDC 05 411 171 82 159 61.2% 20%TDC 04 34 878 7 097 5.3% 20.3%TDC 14 38 825 6 908 5.1% 17.8%TDC 16 344 652 6 662 5% 1.9%TDC 11 84 773 6 446 4.8% 7.6%TDC 02 36 943 5 760 4.3% 15.6%TDC 15 88 336 5 344 4% 6%TDC 06 126 045 3 086 2.3% 2.4%TDC 17 102 251 2 313 1.7% 2.3%TDC 01 19 777 1 799 1.3% 9.1%TDC 07 42 086 1 089 0.8% 2.6%TDC 09 10 312 928 0.7% 9%TDC 12 17 037 821 0.6% 4.8%TDC 08 11 749 570 0.4% 4.9%TDC 21 16 385 522 0.4% 3.2%TDC 20 37 383 497 0.4% 1.3%TDC 18 51 624 391 0.3% 0.8%TDC 10 16 034 345 0.3% 2.2%TDC 03 6 989 319 0.2% 4.6%TDC 13 10 772 267 0.2% 2.5%TDC 19 1 050 7 0% 0.6%eU exporTS To…<strong>Africa</strong>TDS World Millions Share of Share ofSelections of euro Total total EUImportsTOTAL 1 349 165 125 609 100% 9.3%TDC 16 379 077 35 123 28% 9.3%TDC 05 80 931 14 696 11.7% 18.2%TDC 17 194 617 14 667 11.7% 7.5%TDC 06 211 580 12 886 10.3% 6.1%TDC 15 94 776 10 960 8.7% 11.6%TDC 11 34 165 4 896 3.9% 14.3%TDC 04 46 817 4 689 3.7% 10%TDC 07 53 989 4 545 3.6% 8.4%TDC 02 17 877 4 476 3.6% 25%TDC 01 17 912 3 182 2.5% 17.8%TDC 18 62 660 3 153 2.5% 5%TDC 10 28 300 2 925 2.3% 10.3%TDC 09 9 401 1 668 1.3% 17.7%TDC 20 20 937 1 647 1.3% 7.9%TDC 13 15 815 1 466 1.2% 9.3%TDC 14 38 231 1 276 1% 3.3%TDC 21 19 621 852 0.7% 4.3%TDC 03 3 170 464 0.4% 14.6%TDC 08 10 986 409 0.3% 3.7%TDC 12 5 979 359 0.3% 6%TDC 19 2 325 61 0% 2.6%Tdc SecTionS (harmonized SySTem):TDC 01 Ch.01-05 Live animals; animal productsTDC 02 Ch.06-14 Vegetable productsTDC 03 Ch.15 Animal or vegetable fats and oils andtheir cleavage productsTDC 04 Ch.16-24 Prepared foodstuffs; beverages, spirits andvinegar; tobaccoTDC 05 Ch.25-27 Mineral ProductsTDC 06 Ch.28-38 Products of the chemical or allied industriesTDC 07 Ch.39-40 Plastics and articles thereof; rubber andarticles thereofTDC 08 Ch.41-43 Raw hides and skins, leather, furskinsand articles thereofTDC 09 Ch.44-46 Wood and articles of wood; wood charcoal;cork and articles of corkTDC 10 Ch.47-49 Pulp of wood or of other fibrous cellulosicmaterial; paper or paperboardTDC 11 Ch.50-63 Textiles and textile articlesTDC 12 Ch. 64-67 Footwear, headgear, umbrellas, sunumbrellas, walking-sticksTDC 13 Ch.68-70 Articles of stone, plaster, cement, asbestos,mica or similar materialTDC 14 Ch.71 Natural or cultured pearls, precious orsemi-precious stonesTDC 15 Ch.72-83 Base metals and articles of base metalTDC 16 Ch.84-85 Machinery and mechanical appliances;electrical equipmentTDC 17 Ch.86-89 Vehicles, aircraft, vessels and associatedtransport equipmentTDC 18 Ch.90-92 Optical, photographic, cinematographic,measuring, checking, precisionTDC 19 Ch. 93 Arms and ammunition; parts andaccessories thereofTDC 20 Ch.94-96 Miscellaneous manufactured articlesTDC 21 Ch.97 Works of art, collectors’ pieces and antiques* The sums of the individual TDC categories are less than the totals due to confidentiality reasons.Source: EUROSTAT (Comext, Statistical regime 4); World excluding Intra-EU trade and European Union: 27 members.August 2011-January 2012 33

P A R A D I G M S H I F TDelegates at a seminar on <strong>Africa</strong>-EU relations at the <strong>Africa</strong>n Union Commission in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, in October 2010.The third <strong>Africa</strong>-EU summit of November 2010 reiteratedthese goals and set out the second action plan which alsoincluded issues of migration, mobility and employment[<strong>Africa</strong>-EU Partnership, Action Plan, 2010], This ‘partnership’is further complemented by objectives laid out inthe Cotonou Agreement, the Trade Developmentand Cooperation Agreement (TDCA), the Europe-Mediterranean Partnership and the EuropeanNeighbourhood Policy, which also include support forpolitical reform and economic modernisation. Thesepartnerships have led to someviable developmental projectsfocusing on ways to build andconsolidate <strong>Africa</strong>’s infrastructure,such as the building of a highwayfrom Dakar to Djibouti andanother from Djibouti to Gabon(Libreville), which would actuallyprovide an almost transcontinentalEast-West road connectivity[Commission of the <strong>Africa</strong>nUnion, 2004]. There is another project to connect all <strong>Africa</strong>ncapitals to their counterparts in neighbouring countriesthrough fibre-optic broadband cable by 2012 [EuropeanCommission, 2010].The EU is ready to provide large sums for such projects,with a number of EU financial institutions pitching in withmoney. The lion’s share comes from the EuropeanDevelopment Fund (EDF), which has 22 billion euros at itsdisposal between 2008 and 2013, of which 20 billion euroshave been earmarked for Sub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong>. Other fundingagencies are: the European Neighbourhood and PartnershipCompared to theself-interested actors likeChina and the U.S., the EUapproach to engaging<strong>Africa</strong> represents a morebalanced understandingof <strong>Africa</strong>’s needsInstrument (ENPI) for North <strong>Africa</strong>; the Instrument forStability; the Instrument for Democracy; the EuropeanCommunity Humanitarian Aid Department (ECHO);and the European Trust Fund for <strong>Africa</strong> (the co-financinginstrument of the EU-<strong>Africa</strong> partnership on Infrastructure).Apart from these, there are bilateral contributions from EUmember states, trust funds like the <strong>Africa</strong>n Peace Facility(APF) and the AU Peace Fund, development banks like the<strong>Africa</strong>n Development Bank and the European DevelopmentBank, which facilitate aid/loans/investments from the EU[Kotsopoulos J, 2007].In the sphere of security, the EUhas focused on building regionalmechanisms and has provided fundsto enable the AU and other regionalorganisations to conduct their ownpeace support operations. The<strong>Africa</strong>n Peace and SecurityArchitecture (APSA) has beenoperationalised, though a lot remainsto be done. This involves acontinental early warning system, a ‘Panel of the Wise’, an<strong>Africa</strong>n Standby Force, enhancing the capabilities of the AUand other regional mechanisms and empowerment of theEU-AU civil-social networks capable of sustaining andsupporting peace and security initiatives, among others. TheEU will also financially enable the AU and other regionalmechanisms to plan and conduct peace support operations[<strong>Africa</strong>-EU partnership.org, 2010].Compared to the self-interested actors like China and theU.S., the EU approach to engaging <strong>Africa</strong> represents a morebalanced understanding of <strong>Africa</strong>’s needs and seeks to34August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Ypromote self-reliance vis-à-vis its security issues. The EU’sengagement, however, attracted criticism. Critics argue thatthe changes sought by the EU are not mutually beneficial.Despite emphasis on ‘partnership’ and rhetoric on newpost-colonial relations, agreements between the EU and<strong>Africa</strong> have served to reentrench and maintain Europeaninterests [Kotsopoulos, 2007]. Trade figures show that whilethe EU accounts for the bulk of sub-Sahara’s trade, <strong>Africa</strong> isan increasingly marginal market for both EU exports andimports, leaving aside direct investment. The argumentis that there is a necessity to go beyond the traditional‘North-South’ equation if any kind of true partnership is tobe engendered.While the EU agenda is better balanced than that of theUnited States, <strong>Africa</strong>’s equations with both the EU and theU.S. are still unequal and there is always the possibility forthe development of a new kind of dependency. However,the new terms of contact with both the major powers andthe emerging powers have made <strong>Africa</strong>n countries moreaware of their own potential to get the best deals with notonly these countries but also other states and regional blocsthat are trying to get a toehold in the vast prospectiveimport-export market of <strong>Africa</strong>.Among the newer regions to show an interest in doingbusiness with <strong>Africa</strong>n states are South East Asia and LatinAmerica, areas that contain newly industrialised nations(NICs) which, in order to promote their own growth, needto invest in new markets and draw their resources fromcompetitive sources. For <strong>Africa</strong>, these regions, whichcontain essentially developing countries, provide a morelevel-playing field than the major powers or even China.Again learning from India and China, the countries of theseregions too are offering terms that include some form ofdevelopment or other incentives like educational trainingand collaboration in sport.As such, the choice is expanding for <strong>Africa</strong>n countries andmany of them are actively seeking better trade and otherrelations with states of South East Asia and Latin America.The regions also provide the possibility of multilateral tie-upsbetween regional organisations since the Association of SouthEast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the MERCOSUR(Mercado Commun del Sur or Common Market of theSouth) are both well developed and experienced. However,there has been little earlier contact between the two regionsand <strong>Africa</strong>. Although the willingness is becoming apparent,it will take time for the required infrastructure to develop.SoUTh eaST aSia and africaSo far as Southeast Asia is concerned, except for Malaysia,other states are just waking up to the investment and tradepossibilities with <strong>Africa</strong>. In fact, the initiative appears to becoming more from the <strong>Africa</strong>n side than the South EastAsian one. According to Jean-Louis Billon, the president ofthe Ivory Coast Chamber of Commerce, “We are basicallyA Japanese medical expert trains nursing staffers of Josina Machel Hospital in Luanda, Angola. The training was part of a capacity-buildingprogramme conducted jointly by the Brazilian and the Japanese governments. Photo: www.impactalliance.orgAugust 2011-January 2012 35

P A R A D I G M S H I F Tthe same type of countries, and we have much to learn fromthis region than from Europe or anywhere else” [Reuters,2010]. There is some truth in this although South East Asiahas some countries with high per capita incomes. If one considersthe average GDP real growth rate for South East Asia,it was 5 percent between 2000 and 2005, while it was 4.4 percentfor <strong>Africa</strong>. While the per capita GDP for Singapore in2005 was $20,000, the figures for Cambodia, Laos, Myanmarand Timor-Leste were less than $500. In <strong>Africa</strong>, thecorresponding figures for the same year showed that whilecountries like Equatorial Guinea had a per capita GDP of$13,410, half the Sub-Saharan states had GDP per capita ofless than $500 [UNDP, 2007]. Many South East Asian countrieshave faced socio-political problems typical to ThirdWorld nations and are now transiting to their own forms ofdemocracy just as <strong>Africa</strong>n states are trying to do. These stateshave also known war and conflict and have faced theproblem of re-building their economies. <strong>Africa</strong>n countriescan, therefore, relate to these countries in a way that theycannot with the major powers or even China.However, South East Asian nations do not have much ofa history of investing abroad, particularly outside the region.Transaction and information costs are higher wheninvesting in <strong>Africa</strong> than in other Asian economies and bothhost and home-country regulatory frameworks often imposeconstraints. Only Singapore,Malaysia and Indonesia began toinvest in <strong>Africa</strong> prior to this centuryand even then the investment waslimited. However, driven by soaringcommodity prices, FDI in naturalresources in <strong>Africa</strong> showed aconsiderable increase from 2005.Investment was, however, directedto only a limited number ofcountries.<strong>Africa</strong>n countries, on the other hand, are actively seekinginvestment from this region, which has several transitionaleconomies with good investment potential as well asexpertise in commodity production like palm oil, rice andrubber. According to BJR Itoua, Congo’s Energy Minister,“It is not an <strong>Africa</strong> that needs humanitarian consideration orpity, it is an <strong>Africa</strong> that needs investment and partnership”[Reuters, 2010]. In pursuit of mutual benefits, therefore, thefirst <strong>Africa</strong>-South East Asia Business Forum was organised inSingapore in April 2010 with the aim of bringing togetherbusinessmen, policy makers and investors from both regionsto explore business prospects.Firms of South East Asia were urged to invest in theupgrade of airports, seaports, transportation infrastructure,real estate, food processing, mining and energy. Given thatthe region’s average growth was strong at 5.6 percent in 2010,it was better placed to invest than the U.S. and Europe. Therewere dividends from this forum: Temasek, an autonomouswealth fund of Singapore commanding around $122 billion,Malaysian transnationalcorporations (TNCs) havebeen active in variousparts of <strong>Africa</strong> and insectors of the economyother than hydrocarbonsis all set to invest in <strong>Africa</strong>; Olam, a well knowncommodities firm, has agreed to purchase one of the threelarge wheat millers of Nigeria for $107.6 million. SingaporeTelecommunications, too, will enter the <strong>Africa</strong>n marketthrough Bharti Airtel’s recent purchase of Kuwaititelecommunication company Zain’s <strong>Africa</strong>n assets. In theaftermath of the Forum, an <strong>Africa</strong>-South East Asia Chamberof Commerce has also been set up [Borden, 2011].At the bilateral level, Malaysia is the foremost country toseek relations with <strong>Africa</strong>n states. Malaysia’s trade with <strong>Africa</strong>increased from RM4.8 billion (US$1=RM380) in 2001 toRM25 billion in 2010 [Borneo Post, 2011]. According toMaTrade (Malaysia External Trade Development Company),bilateral trade increased 51 percent in 2010 over 2009 toRM17.99 billion. Malaysia’s top trading partners in <strong>Africa</strong>are Egypt, South <strong>Africa</strong>, Benin, Togo, Djibouti, Algeria,Ghana, Nigeria, Mauritius and Tanzania. Palm oil was themajor export and petroleum the major import. In fact,Malaysia has encouraged bilateral relations through itsLangkawi International Dialogue (LID) initiative, establishedin 1995, which seeks to strengthen ties with <strong>Africa</strong>n andCaribbean countries. Here, ideas on trade, development,investment and even topics like religious extremism areexchanged. The initiative is underlined by the concept of‘Smart Partnership’, the brainchild of Prime MinisterMahathir Mohamad.As part of the Smart PartnershipDialogue, the Southern <strong>Africa</strong>nInternational Dialogue (SAID) wasset up in 1995 to enhance relationsnot only with South <strong>Africa</strong> but othercountries in the region likeBotswana, Mozambique andNamibia. SAID is a follow-up andcounterpart of LID, and it isadvertised as a potential growth area and hotbed forinter-regional trade and investment with particular focus onblocs like the COMESA and SADC [Aliyn, 2011]. Inaddition, a Malaysia-<strong>Africa</strong> Business Forum (MABF) has alsobeen formed recently with its first meeting being held inJune 2011 on the sidelines of the LID meet at Putrajaya. Theinaugural theme was ‘Exploring New Dimensions’.At the meet, <strong>Africa</strong> was represented by 177 delegates from27 states, highlighting the importance now being paid toMalaysia. What is interesting is that the talks focused not onlyon economic but political and social issues, including aneducational exchange programme and an internshipprogramme for <strong>Africa</strong>n students in Malaysian educationalinstitutions through which <strong>Africa</strong>n students already inMalaysia could familiarise themselves with the local culture.It should be noted that there are about 21,000 <strong>Africa</strong>n studentscurrently studying in Malaysia: the ‘soft’ power diplomacy atdisplay here is similar to that of the emerging powers. Itshould also be mentioned that ASEAN is not part of MABF,which is Malaysia’s own initiative.36August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YCoffee growers in Bamenda, Cameroon, celebrate in 2009 the completion of the first year of a Douwe Egberts Foundation initiative toimprove the local coffee trade. The foundation is run by the Singapore-based OLAM and Sara Lee Corporation. Photo: OLAM internationalIn fact, many Malaysian transnational corporations havebeen active in various parts of <strong>Africa</strong> and in sectors of theeconomy other than hydrocarbons, such as, hotel, real estate,banking, infrastructure and telecommunications. Some of thebetter known firms are Genting (a conglomerate that includeshotels, power generation, plutonium etc), IOI Corp (oil palmrefining, property and trading, mainly based in Mauritius),MISC (shipping, the main centre being Nigeria), MRCB(broadcasting, based in Ghana), Opus International (assetmanagement with a focus on South <strong>Africa</strong>), Petronas (oil andgas, based in Chad, Mozambique, Guinea, Niger, Somalia,Sudan and South <strong>Africa</strong>), Puetra Capital (financial services,with bases in Ghana, Mozambique and Tanzania), RanhillPower (power generation in Tanzania), Sime Darby (palm oilrefining, in Egypt, Tanzania andTunisia) and Telekom Malaysia(telecommunications, in Guinea andMalawi) [UNDP, 2007]. What isnoticeable here is that only one of thelarge companies is involved in oil andgas; the other firms are investing inareas that will help <strong>Africa</strong> developvital infrastructure for the future, andfurther, such sectors will not attract the accusation of beingexploitative of <strong>Africa</strong>’s mineral resources.LaTin america and africaThe other region that is keen on improving ties with <strong>Africa</strong>is Latin America. Earlier relations had been primarily betweenCuba (a Soviet surrogate at the time) and Ethiopia andcertain guerilla groups fighting for power in Angola andMozambique, but trade relations had been negligible. It isonly recently that Brazil began to engage with <strong>Africa</strong>,The creation of the <strong>Africa</strong>-South America Summitmechanism in 2006 aimsat strengthening relationsbetween the two regionsparticularly with South <strong>Africa</strong> and the Lusophone countries,not only as an emerging power with economic dynamicssimilar to other emerging countries but also as part of multilateralforums like the India-Brazil-South <strong>Africa</strong> (IBSA)Dialogue which goes beyond trade to security issues, amongothers. Mexico and Argentina are the two other countries thathave shown growing interest in <strong>Africa</strong> in recent years.However, there are several similarities between the tworegions like vibrant growth rates on one hand and poverty andsocial inequalities on the other; further, some North <strong>Africa</strong>ncountries are undergoing processes of political change thathave parallels in Latin American history. There is much toshare by way of experience. The two regions also have sharedinterests in global issues such as the need for a new internationalfinancial architecture, the foodcrisis that has resulted in high internationalcommodity prices and energypolicies and their implications forthe environment.Earlier contacts between <strong>Africa</strong>and Latin America had beenthrough multilateral forums likeUNCTAD and G-77, but then itwas a different world. The G-24 is newer and contains eightcountries each from the two regions apart from other countries.They came together with more current issues in mind,namely, the objective of coordinating the positions of developingstates on financial and monetary matters as well asdevelopmental issues. The creation of the <strong>Africa</strong>-SouthAmerica (ASA) Summit mechanism in 2006, an internationalframework that aims at strengtheningrelations between the two regions in the long run, wasanother important milestone. The first summit, held atAugust 2011-January 2012 37

P A R A D I G M S H I F TOfficials from various <strong>Africa</strong>n nations on a field visit to Gansu Province in western China as part of a programmeconducted by the International Poverty Reduction Center in China and the World Bank. Photo: www.impactalliance.orgAbuja, Nigeria, adopted the Abuja Declaration and theAbuja Action Plan, which mentioned among other things,the creation of an energy commission for South Americaand <strong>Africa</strong>, a South America-<strong>Africa</strong> bank, a network ofuniversities and a proposal to connect <strong>Africa</strong> with SouthAmerica through communications.The second summit at Margarita Island, Venezuela, in2009 brought together nine South American and 20 <strong>Africa</strong>nHeads of State along with representatives from 61 out of the63 countries that comprise the ASA — quite a recordnumber by any standards. Here, areas of joint cooperationwere identified, ranging from science and technology, ICT,education and culture, sports,human rights and political affairs,crime, peace affairs, democracy andgovernance to rural development,agriculture, agro-business, investmentand tourism, water resources,energy, trade, health and labour, andinfrastructure development.In the follow-up summit inAugust 2010 — the First ASAMeeting of the Presidential StrategicTable — an agreement was signed on a South America-<strong>Africa</strong> Strategic Agenda 2010-2020 to serve as an instrumentthat would give greater viability to cooperative actions ofinterest in both regions. There were agreements to strengthenSouth-South cooperation in eight areas — economy, foodproduction, energy, stability, maritime, air and communicationalconnection and defence of the Earth in light of climatechange.What is worth noting are the institutional mechanisms thathave been formed to ensure the success of the ASA,However, relations between<strong>Africa</strong> and Latin Americancountries are as yetunderexplored. Bi-regionaltrade is still at anearly stage with fewproducts involvedsomething that Latin American countries are very good atsetting up and observing. Apart from the follow-upmechanism of ministerial meetings, there is also amonitoring mechanism to monitor implementation andmake recommendations [SELA, 2011].To facilitate trade between the two regions — high tariffsand lack of preferential agreements being an obstacle —established trade blocs like the MERCOSUR have alreadysigned trade agreements with several countries and blocs in<strong>Africa</strong>. For instance, MERCOSUR signed a trade agreementwith Egypt in August 2010, with Morocco in December 2010(reciprocal preferential agreement on tariffs), and with theSouthern <strong>Africa</strong>n Customs Union(SACU) in December 2004(preferential trade agreement).So far as bilateral agreements areconcerned, Argentina has signeddiverse types of agreements (scienceand technology, trade, culture andeducation, energy, technologicaldevelopment, fishery, health, creditlines) with 22 countries, includingZimbabwe, South <strong>Africa</strong>, Togo,Namibia and Mozambique.Brazil has abandoned its policy of privileging relationswith Portuguese-speaking <strong>Africa</strong>n countries and networkswith 28 <strong>Africa</strong>n countries, including Nigeria, South <strong>Africa</strong>,Namibia the Republic of Congo (ROC) and the DemocraticRepublic of Congo (DRC) in various fields like humanrights, sport, culture and education, professional training inlaw, health and transportation apart from energy andpetroleum. Cuba has developed relations with manycountries, including the DRC, Equatorial Guinea, Kenya,38August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YUganda's Minister of Energy Irene Nafuna Muloni (second from left) with India’s Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee and Petroleum MinisterS. Jaipal Reddy (extreme right) at the 3rd India-<strong>Africa</strong> Hydrocarbons Conference in New Delhi on December 9, 2011.Malawi, Mali, Mauritius, Senegal, Tanzania and Swazilandin agriculture, science and technology, media, health,cinema, TV, radio, mining, news agencies and sports, apartfrom combating drugs. Mexico has agreements with eightcountries and Venezuela with 35 [SELA, 2011].However, the relations between <strong>Africa</strong> and LatinAmerican countries are as yet underexplored. Bi-regionaltrade is still at an early stage with few products involved. In2009, <strong>Africa</strong>n imports from Latin America amounted to$13,494 or only 1.86 percent of its total imports. In terms ofmarket share, however, these figures are on the increase.<strong>Africa</strong>n exports to the region for the same year totalled$10,018 million or 1.52 percent of <strong>Africa</strong>’s total exports[SELA, 2011]. The problem is that bilateral trade has involvedonly a small number of countries on both sides so far,focusing on the larger and petroleum-rich states of <strong>Africa</strong>.Latin American countries, on the other hand, export mainlyagricultural commodities. Moreover, there is a problem ofinformation and connectivity.Till date, 21 of the 54 <strong>Africa</strong>n countries have had nodiplomatic representation in Latin America and this includessome larger ones like Uganda, Tanzania, Mauritius andSeychelles. Those that have diplomatic representation in theregion are concentrated in a few countries like Brazil,Argentina, Mexico and Venezuela. Latin American countries,too, have little diplomatic representation in <strong>Africa</strong>, with 12countries having no representation. Since diplomaticrepresentation is a measure of the political importance that isgiven to a country or region, it tells its own tale. However,matters are expected to change in the present decade as <strong>Africa</strong>’simportance becomes more evident. What is interesting is thatthe countries that are engaging with <strong>Africa</strong> are using lubricantslike sport (which is well developed in Latin America),education and health to improve relations — these are perhapslessons learnt from the successful engagement of India andChina with <strong>Africa</strong>n countries over the last decade.The growing interest in <strong>Africa</strong> is certain to benefit <strong>Africa</strong>nstates, some more than others perhaps, but since <strong>Africa</strong> hasso much potential, it is bound to have a trickle-downeffect on the non-resource-rich countries as well.The increasing competition is sure to provide the best pricesfor commodities, and most countries and groupings, even theEU, are providing ‘extras’, presumably to ensure markettraction. Against this backdrop, one has to examine India’sfuture in <strong>Africa</strong>.india and africaIndia was one of the first two emerging countries toinvest in <strong>Africa</strong>, offer Lines of Credit, draw up trainingprogrammes for <strong>Africa</strong>n personnel, provide educationalscholarships and engage in a country-to-continent forumwith mutual interests in mind — the India-<strong>Africa</strong> Forum.It is, in fact, the competition from India and China that notonly drew <strong>Africa</strong>n countries into the global market andhelped improve their rates of growth, but also orchestrateda change in the terms of engagement vis-à-vis the majorpowers since these would otherwise have lost their contractsto the new powers in <strong>Africa</strong>. But the situation is changingas these new terms of engagement, which are also beingemployed by newer players, challenge India’s trade andmarket position in future years. India does not need to worryyet about the new players who are now being actively wooedby <strong>Africa</strong>n states who realise the advantage of havingpartnerships with these countries, but the U.S. and the EUhave far more money power (and therefore investmentpotential) than India can hope to have in the near future.August 2011-January 2012 39

P A R A D I G M S H I F TExternal Affairs Minister S.M. Krishna, Ghanaian Vice-President John DramaniMahama and Commerce & Industries Minister Anand Sharma at the inauguralceremony of India-<strong>Africa</strong> Partnership Summit in New Delhi on March 15, 2011.Although the two areas are suffering a current economicdownturn, as the past has proven time and again, suchdownturns are temporary.India, however, has certain advantages. The Indianprivate sector’s presence in <strong>Africa</strong> goes back many decadesand its products are trusted and recognised. India’seducational institutions have been hosting <strong>Africa</strong>n studentssince the 1960s and this has created connections thatgo beyond trade and commerce. When the Indian governmentstepped in with active engagement in finance andinvestment, it sought to develop those areas that needed Indianexpertise. The Pan-<strong>Africa</strong>n e-network that promises digitalconnectivity, the Team-9 initiative which is geared towardsocio-economic development through access to technology,supply of photovoltaic equipment to 35 rural schools inRwanda that will fetch them electrical connection, supply ofbuses and computers to Benin are just a few of the initiativesthat India has taken for <strong>Africa</strong>’s development. While trade andcommerce and energy security are in India’s interests as well,it is interesting to note that a significant section of India’sinvestment is in the non-hydrocarbons sector.The upside is that India has built a lot of goodwill overthe years; the downside is that India does not engage <strong>Africa</strong>as much as it should and the fear is that othercountries too will be able to build up similargoodwill, unless it takes an active effort in strengtheningrelations on the ground. India has a headstart,particularly in sectors like ICT and health, and itshould build on its advantages if it wishes to remaincompetitive.concLUSionIn conclusion, it may be said that India and Chinaopened new avenues at a time when <strong>Africa</strong>n countrieswere not only exploited by Western multinationalcompanies for its mineral resources, but werealso considered not worth investing in because of thedismal performances of their economies. Thisprompted the World Bank and the InternationalMonetary Fund to prescribe structural adjustmentprogrammes that sometimes had a reverse effect. As a resultof the engagement of the emerging powers, <strong>Africa</strong> is todayseen as a prime place for investment and trade given its steadyand positive GDP average annual growth figures and its considerableuntapped natural resources.India’s and China’s methods, which focus on partnershipand cooperation for mutual benefit, are now being emulatedby both the older players and the new aspirants in thecontinent, that is, mixing trade deals with lucrativeinfrastructural investment and partnerships in agriculture,health, sport, education and technology, among other areas,to help lubricate commercial negotiations.Although the newer regions are yet to invest in and tradewith <strong>Africa</strong> in a major way, <strong>Africa</strong>n countries are interestedin diversifying because this is in their interest, and given theincreasing trade figures, it will not be long before South EastAsia and Latin America also become important competitorsin the <strong>Africa</strong>n trade market.It is, therefore, imperative for India to strengthen its bilateraland multilateral ties and increase its diplomatic engagementwith <strong>Africa</strong> in order to maintain the edge that it hascarved for itself in its manifold relations with countries of thecontinent.nReferences1. <strong>Africa</strong>-EU Ministerial Troika, First Action Plan (2007),First Action Plan (2008-2010) for the Implementation of the<strong>Africa</strong>-EU Strategic Partnership, http://www.africaunion.org/root/AU/Conferences/2007/December/euau/docs/action_plan_2008_2010.pdf,date accessed 23 April2010.2. <strong>Africa</strong>-EU Partnership.org (2010), <strong>Africa</strong> and Europe inPartnership, “Peace and Security”, http://www.africa-eupartnership.org/partnerships/peace-and-security,dateaccessed 17 December 2010.3. <strong>Africa</strong>-EU Partnership, Action Plan (2010), Joint <strong>Africa</strong>EU Strategy, Action Plan 2011-2013, http://www.africa-eupartnership.org/sites/default/files/doc_jaes_action_plan_2011_13_en.pdf, date accessed 17 December 2010.4. Afrol News (2004), “US Expands Military Presence in<strong>Africa</strong>”, 23 September 2004, available athttp://www.afrol.com/articles/14269, date accessed 16 May2010.5. Aliyn, Rafeeat (2011), “Bridging <strong>Africa</strong> and Malaysia: TheLangkawi International Dialogue, Consultancy <strong>Africa</strong>Intelligence, 2 Nov. 2011, available at http://www.consultancyafrica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=ar40August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Yticle&id=879:bridging-africa-and-malaysia-the-langkawiinternational-dialogue&catid=58:asia-dimension-discussion-papers&Itemid=264,date accessed 27 December 2011.6. Baptiste, Fitzroy Andre (2005), “The United States, theCaribbean and <strong>Africa</strong>: From the Cold War to the War onInternational Terrorism”, <strong>Africa</strong> Update, Vol XII, Issue 1,Winter 2005, available athttp://web.ccsu.edu/afstudy/upd12-1.html#Caribbean, dateaccessed 12 February 2010.7. Borden, Zach (2011), “New Opportunities in <strong>Africa</strong> forSoutheast Asian Countries”, available athttp://www.biztechreport.com/story/995-new-opportunities-africa-southeast-asian-countries,date accessed 26December 2011.8. Borneo Post online (2011), DPM: Take Malaysia-<strong>Africa</strong>Trade to the Next Level”, 19 June 2011, available athttp://www.theborneopost.com/2011/06/19/dpm-takemalaysia-africa-trade-to-the-next-level/,date accessed 27December 2011.9. Carson, Johnnie (2010), “US-<strong>Africa</strong> Policy under theObama Administration”, speech at the Harvard university<strong>Africa</strong> Focus Program, 5 April 2010, available atwww.state.gov/plaf/rls/rm/2020/139462.htm, date accessed20 April 2010.10. Ceukelaire, Win de (2004), “Aid as a weapon in the ‘waron terror’”, available at http://www.health-now.org/article.php?,date accessed 29 December 2009.11. Commission of the <strong>Africa</strong>n Union (2004), Strategic Planof the Commission of the <strong>Africa</strong>n Union, Volume 3, 2004-2007 Plan of Action, Programmes to Speed up Integration ofthe Continent, http://www.africa-union.org/root/au/AboutAu/Vision/Volume3.pdf, date accessed 2 May 2010.12. Dickinson, Elizabeth (2009), “Think Again: Africom”,Foreign policy, November 17,http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2009/11/17/think_again_africom, date accessed 2 January 2010.13. Douaud, Armelle and Anna Caprille (2008), “Relationswith the Countries of <strong>Africa</strong>, the Caribbean and the Pacific:From the Yaoundé and Lome Conventions to the CotonouAgreement”, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ftu/pdf/en//FTU_6.5.4.pdf, date accessed 17 December 2010.14. Europa, Summaries of EU Legislations (2005), EUStrategy for <strong>Africa</strong>, adopted by the EU Council, 15-16December 2005,15. http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/development/african_caribbean_pacific_states/r12540_en.htm, dateaccessed 2 January 2010.16. European Commission (2010), “<strong>Africa</strong>n Highways andInformation Superhighways”, 13 April,http://ec.europa.eu/development/icenter/featured_20100413_en.cfm,date accessed 2 May 2010.17. Khapoya, Vincent B (1998), The <strong>Africa</strong>n Experience: AnIntroduction, 3rd ed., Prentice Hall.18. Klare M and David Volman (2006), “America, Chinaand the Scramble for <strong>Africa</strong>’s Oil”, Review of <strong>Africa</strong>nPolitical Economy, vol. 33, no. 108.19. Kotsopoulos, John (2007), “The EU and <strong>Africa</strong>: ComingTogether at Last?”, Policy Brief, European Policy Centre,July 2007, se2.isn.ch/serviceengine/Files/ESDP/44084/.../PB_July07_<strong>Africa</strong>.pdf, date accessed 2 January 2010.20. Nolte, Stephan-Alfons (2002), “From Lome IV toCotonou and EBA – An Analysis of Trade Preferences andRedistribution of Economic Benefits”, http://www.acp-eu-trade.org/library/files/Nolte_EN_2002_From-Lome-IV-to-Cotonou-and-EBA.pdf, date accessed 16 May 2010.21. Reuters (2010), “<strong>Africa</strong> to Attract Fundfrom SoutheastAsia”, available at http://234next.com/csp/cms/sites/Next/Money/Business/5551065-147/africa_to_attract_fund_from_southeast.csp, dateaccessed 23 December 2011.22. SELA (2011), Latin American and Caribbean EconomicSystems, Permanent Secretariat), Relations of Latin Americaand the Caribbean with <strong>Africa</strong>: Current Status and Areas ofOpportunity, Caracas, June 2011, SP/Di No. 07-11, availableat http://www.sela.org/attach/258/EDOCS/SRed/2011/06/T023600004775-0-Relations_of_ALC_with_<strong>Africa</strong>_-_Current_status_and_areas_of_oportunity.pdf, dateaccessed 29 December 2011.23. Servant, Jean-Christophe (2003), “External Interests andInternal Security: The New Gulf Oil States”, Le Monde, 13January 2003, available at www.hartfordhwp.com/archives/45/245.html,date accessed 16 February2010.24. UNDP (2007), Asian Foreign Direct Investment in<strong>Africa</strong>: Towards a New Era of Cooperation amongDeveloping Countries, United Nations: New York andGeneva, available at http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/iteiia20071_en.pdf,date accessed 23 December 2011.24. US AFRICOM Public Affairs Office (2010), UnitedStates <strong>Africa</strong> Command: Fact Sheet,http://www.africom.mil/getArticle.asp?art=1644, dateaccessed 2 January 2010.25. US Census Bureau, Foreign Trade Division (2009),US-<strong>Africa</strong> Trade, www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c0013.html#2009,accessed 16 May 2010.26. US Department of Commerce, International TradeAdministration (2009), US-<strong>Africa</strong> Trade Profile,www.agoa.gov/resources/US_<strong>Africa</strong>_Trade_Profile_2009.pdf, date accessed 16 May 2010.27.US Department of State (2010), “US – South <strong>Africa</strong> SignMOU”, available at www.africom.mil/getArticle.asp?art=4287&long=, date accessed 16 May2010.28. Williams, J Michael (2006), “Rhetoric and Reality: US-<strong>Africa</strong> Relations since 9/11”, all academic research,International Studies Association, available athttp://www.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/0/9/9/0/6/pages99063/p99063-8.php, date accessed 16May 2010.August 2011-January 2012 41

P O L I T I C A L R E F O R M SSecuring <strong>Africa</strong>’sTRANSFORMATIONIndia can play a leadership role in spurring <strong>Africa</strong>’smetamorphosis by helping to deepen and institutionalise governancereforms in the continent, thereby encouraging positive changes in theirdemocratisation process, say Paul Musili Wambua and Mumo NzauExternal Affairs Minister S. M. Krishna and Ethiopian Minister for Finance and Economic Development Sufian Ahmed exchanging the DoubleTaxation Avoidance Agreement at Addis Ababa on May 25, 2011. India’s Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is also seen.Democratisation refers to the processby which states move towards moredemocratic structures, actors andprocesses. Nonetheless, an assessmentof democratisation sometimeswould have to rely on the conceptionof democracy itself. Most conceptionsof democracy are based onthe principle of “government by the people”. This impliesthat, in effect, people govern themselves; that they participatein making the crucial decisions thatstructure their lives and determine the fate of their society.Such participation can take a number of forms ranging fromdirect and continuous involvement in decision-makingthrough referenda and mass-meetings to active involvementthrough mass media. The alternative to this kind ofdemocracy is one that is representative, mainly operationalisedthrough the process of voting. Voting and electioneering processesaim at selecting public office holders and giving themthe mandate to decide on policy and implement such policieson behalf of the people and in accordance with law as stipulatedin constitutions (Burnell P and Calvert P, 1999).Today, many sitting governments around <strong>Africa</strong> arehighly compromised due to the low degree of legitimacythey actually enjoy among the populace. It was notsurprising that due to this state of things many presidential42August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Yelections have been highly contested but poorly conductedand ill-informed elections, culminating in violence and massprotests, destruction, and economic retrogression aswitnessed in Kenya in late 2007 and early 2008, with areplication of the same in Zimbabwe (2008) and Ivory Coast(2010 and 2011). Recent electionsin Uganda, Liberia and theDemocratic Republic of Congowere accompanied by many protestsand violent skirmishes associatedwith vote buying, harassment andblackmail (BBC Focus on <strong>Africa</strong>,April-June 2011, 5).Similarly, in late 2010 and early2011, North <strong>Africa</strong> drew worldattention to itself in a mostprofound way.A popular uprising in Tunisia inDecember 2010 and January 2011toppled President Zine el AbedineBen Ali. He had ruled Tunisia for23 years. Soon thereafter in Januaryand February 2011, mass protests in Egypt forced presidentHosni Mubarak to resign after 30 years in power. Yet noneof these uprisings turned controversial, brutal, dramatic andmassively violent as that in Libya. From the beginning of theuprising in February 2011 to the time of Col. MuammarGaddafi’s capture and subsequent killing in October 2011,over 25,000 people had lost their lives (Vandewalle D.,2011).The IMF, World Bank andother donor agencies andbilateral donors urgedtheir partner countriesin the Third World torecognise the fact that anew age of donor-recipientrelations was under wayand that this wasoperationalised by theidea of good governanceIn the western sense, democratisation means a shift fromauthoritarian forms of government to more liberaldemocratic ones. In this sense, democratisation is very mucha Western and/or Eurocentric phenomenon. In the late1980s, democratic transformation in and around <strong>Africa</strong>increasingly became associated withthe question and/or idea of ‘goodgovernance’. A report prepared bythe World Bank in 1989 was the firstto highlight this term when itreferred to <strong>Africa</strong> as experiencing a“crisis of governance”. A number ofissues to do with the dynamics ofinternational politics and globaleconomic relations brought thisterm to the fore in the <strong>Africa</strong>ncontext. As the late 1980s and early1990s witnessed the collapse of theSoviet empire, a wave of democraticchange swept across thecontinent. This state of affairs wasmarked by radical changes in themodus operandi of relations between Western donorcountries and agencies on one hand, and the developingcountries, <strong>Africa</strong> included, on the other (Haynes J., 2001).The IMF, World Bank and other donor agencies andbilateral donors urged their partner countries in the ThirdWorld to recognise the fact that a new age of donor-recipientrelations was under way and this was operationalised bythe idea of good governance. The World Bank (1992)An Algerian musical group performs during the 2nd India-<strong>Africa</strong> Forum Summit in Adis Ababa, Ethiopia, in May 2011.August 2011-January 2012 43

P O L I T I C A L R E F O R M SPrime Minister Manmohan Singh being briefed about supercomputer PARAM at the India-Tanzanian Centre for Excellence in Information andCommunication Technology, in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, on May 27, 2011.defined governance as “the manner in which power isexercised in the management of a country’s economic andsocial resources for developing, creating and sustaining anenvironment which fosters strong and equitabledevelopment (Skinner E, 2000).Good governance required agreater pre-occupation with thecreation of an enabling frameworkfor development, larger responsibilitiesfor the private sector, areduction in direct governmentinvolvement in production andcommercial activity and thedevolution of power from the centreto lower levels of government.In this light, a state pursuing goodgovernance would do the following:actively fight corruption andthe use of public office for privategain; enhance democratic procedures, institutions andprinciples; institute limited terms for key public offices;reduce government in size and functions; remove economiccontrol; privatise state enterprises; establish and enforcecodes of conduct; and, promote independent and effectivejudiciary (Hulme D. and Turner M., 1997:11-12). Thepertinent question is: what can <strong>Africa</strong> learn from India, aseasoned democracy and emerging world power? What canIndia on its part offer as far as democratic transformation in<strong>Africa</strong> is concerned? In other words, how can Indo-<strong>Africa</strong>nPerhaps the advent ofEuropean colonialismcatalysed even moreinteraction between Indiansand <strong>Africa</strong>ns. Indianlabourers were used tofacilitate the entry ofcolonial expedition in mostof Sub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong>cooperation provide fertile grounds for democratictransformation for the latter?IndIa-afrIcan relatIons In retrospectIndia and <strong>Africa</strong> have had unique and commonhistorical experiences. Internationaltrade between India and <strong>Africa</strong> datesback several centuries (Amutabi,2009). Perhaps the advent ofEuropean colonialism catalysedeven more interaction betweenIndians and <strong>Africa</strong>ns. India wasGreat Britain’s most valued colonialpossession. It was particularly thegreatest source of cheap labourfor the colonial empire. Indianlabourers were used to facilitatethe entry of colonial expeditionin most of Sub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong>.Subsequently, Indian soldiers and their <strong>Africa</strong>ncounterparts found themselves serving the colonisers’interests during the First and Second World Wars.Thousands lost their lives in these wars. Soon after theend of the Second World War, India led the way in thedecolonisation process (Jioreman 2006, 190-210).The demonstration effect by Indian nationalism led byMahatma Gandhi and subsequent independence in 1947strongly influenced the rise of <strong>Africa</strong>n nationalism inthe same direction during the 1950s and 1960s. At44August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Yindependence, most <strong>Africa</strong>n states formed even strongerbilateral ties with India, paving the way for enhanced trade,commercial and industrial relations (D’Souza, 2008). It isnoteworthy that India remained at the forefront of theUnited Nations-led campaign against apartheid in South<strong>Africa</strong> and closely partnered with <strong>Africa</strong> under theOrganisation of <strong>Africa</strong>n Unity (OAU) banner. At the sametime, India was a forerunner in championing Third Worldinterests right from the Bandung Declarations 1955, theGroup of 77 and the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM)(Abraham I. 2008, 195-219).These platforms of South-South cooperation andengagement at the United Nations platform were used notonly to agitate for the recognition ofSouthern interests and concerns ina Western-dominated internationalpolitical economy, but also topresent a solid stand at the height ofthe Cold War and its arms race thatthreatened the world with nuclearannihilation. These historical andcommon experiences between<strong>Africa</strong> and India perhaps paved theway for stronger ties with <strong>Africa</strong>ncountries for more than fourdecades. At the beginning of the21st century, Indian investments in<strong>Africa</strong> ranged from small retailholdings in the remotest partsof <strong>Africa</strong>, to multinationalinvestments ranging from oilexploration, manufacturing, real estate, banking, insurance,and construction works, just to name but a few.IndIa’s democratIc experIence: lessonsfor afrIcaIn a discussion of India’s democratic experience and thelessons for democratic transformation in <strong>Africa</strong>, it wouldbe crucial to begin by examining <strong>Africa</strong>’s governanceexperience. At independence, <strong>Africa</strong>n political leaders werefaced with several key challenges. First, they differed on thebest strategy to promote development in their countries.However, they agreed substantially over methods.The “instrument of both diagnosis and remedy was thedevelopment plan”.There were three options as far as development planningwas concerned. The first one was the western model ofdevelopment planning (also known as the Indicative Model).This essentially Western model allowed for politicaleconomy to be shaped by market forces with limitedstate interference. The second was the socialist modelof development planning (also known as centralised orimperative model). The third was a model that adopted whatappeared like a blend of the capitalist and socialist models;hence, most <strong>Africa</strong>n leaders chose to adopt centrallyAt the beginning of the 21stcentury, Indian investmentsin <strong>Africa</strong> ranged from smallretail holdings in theremotest parts of <strong>Africa</strong> tomultinational investmentsranging from oilexploration, manufacturing,real estate, banking,insurance, andconstruction works, just toname but a fewcontrolled development planning that was to operatewithin a mixed economy — one in which both the public andprivate sectors played an important role. Somecountries, however, chose to follow a purely socialist modelin which the state controlled the economy in terms of whoproduces what and in what quantities. This was applied incountries like Tanzania under Dr. Julius Nyerere,Mozambique under Samora Machel, Libya under Gaddafiand Guinea under Sekou Toure (Thomson Alex: 2004, 1-23).At the same time, <strong>Africa</strong>n political leaders were facedwith the great challenge of uplifting the standards of life oftheir peoples through the provision of basic needs and thecreation of a favourable environment by government —one that would engender economicgrowth and the creation ofnational wealth. Another challengewas associated with the ideologicalpath that was to guide the developmentprocess. <strong>Africa</strong>n countriesattained political independenceat a time when the internationalpolitical system was stronglyshaped, conditioned and divided bythe Cold War. The choice wasthree-fold: whether to adopt thesocialist ideology or adopt thecapitalist ideology or even declaretheir support for the Non-AlignedMovement. Most <strong>Africa</strong>n countrieschose to be non-aligned andevolved their own ideological styleunder the rubric of <strong>Africa</strong>n socialism (Tordoff W., 2003,140-150).In reality, however, <strong>Africa</strong>n regime elites traded onesuper power against another depending on which onesuited them best and ensured their continued stay in power.<strong>Africa</strong> became a battlefield for proxy wars between thesocialist Eastern Bloc and the capitalist Western Bloc. InWestern leaning systems, dissidents and/or belligerentgroups were branded socialist/Marxist, while in Easternleaning systems dissidents and/or opposition groups andindividuals were branded imperialist elements and agents ofneo-colonialism. The sad reality, however, was that asstruggles for power, control and influence took place in<strong>Africa</strong> in the name of “weeding out” either socialist orimperialist elements, the noble aspects of politics andnational development were lost. In essence, Cold Warpolitics catalysed bloody civil wars and forms of totalitarianregimes regardless of which side of the ideological dividethese countries belonged — it bred <strong>Africa</strong>n totalitariandictators such as Jean Bedal Bokassa in the Central <strong>Africa</strong>nRepublic, Mobutu of Zaire (now Congo DRC), Somaliaunder Siad Barre and Ethiopia under Mengistu HaileMariam (Nzau M. 2007).There is another line of argument. At independence,August 2011-January 2012 45

P O L I T I C A L R E F O R M S<strong>Africa</strong>n countries inherited economies that were invariablynot indigenous to them and at the same time theseeconomies were dominated almost in every sector byforeign companies or firms, which had operated in thecolonial economies. This meant that there was a very smalldomestic private sector of the indigenous kind. The localpopulations could not raise enough financial capital tosupport the economy. This small domestic industrial andfinancial base drove <strong>Africa</strong>n governments to seek alternativesthat took two forms. The first alternative was to set upstate-owned and controlled enterprises to run the economy— commonly known as ‘Parastatals’. These enterprises weresupposed to jump-start industrialisation in the newlyindependent countries. Such ventures included banking,transport and telecommunication, manufacturing as well asmarketing. Unfortunately, regime members interfered withthe management of these organisations, turning thetop management positions into objects of reward forindividuals who were “politically correct” — the politicalfinanciers, advisers and sycophants of the ruling presidentand his party. It is no wonder that by the early 1980s suchpublic enterprises had collapsed dueto heavy losses.The second option that was opento the <strong>Africa</strong>n countries in theirquest for industrialisation was thatof supplementing their fiscalbudgets through economic aid andOfficial Development Assistance.This was done with the view ofaccessing much-needed foreignexchange, and further offsettingbalance of payments deficits.<strong>Africa</strong>n countries reached out tovarious bilateral and multilateraldonors and lenders (World Bankand IMF, among other internationalfinancial institutions). It was thusdriven by the need to raise moreliquid capital that was crucial for thepurchase of capital goods necessaryfor industrial activity in thoseearly years of independence. Yet inmany countries, the regimes in power used these fundsfraudulently, and in some cases, with blatant impunity —leading to the accumulation of national debts, which reachedcrisis proportions in what became the <strong>Africa</strong> debt crisis ofthe 1980s and 1990s (Nzau M. 2010).Finally, perhaps the greatest challenge to <strong>Africa</strong>n leadersin the early years of independence was purely political.Perhaps this had to do with the question of regime survivaland the intrigues of state formation. Whilst new states wereformed at independence, the regimes that were in powergot lured into the trap of popularising and perpetuatingthemselves. Subsequently, they adopted authoritarian stylesThe greatestchallenge to <strong>Africa</strong>nleaders in the early yearsof independence waspurely political. Perhapsthis had to do with thequestion of regime survivaland the intrigues of stateformation. Whilst newstates were formed atindependence, theregimes that were inpower got lured into thetrap of popularising andperpetuating themselvesor governance and soon towards the late 1960s and early1970s most <strong>Africa</strong>n countries were either faced withcivil wars and rebellions, personal dictatorships andunconstitutional power take-overs through the barrel of thegun. It may be argued that the challenges facing <strong>Africa</strong>nleaders at independence were many and to tackle them,political leaders needed both vision and informedobjectivity (Hyden G. and Michael B., 1992).How best <strong>Africa</strong>n leaders handled these challenges wasperhaps the distinguishing factor between good and badand/or irresponsible governance systems. It is not easy to tellwhich among <strong>Africa</strong>n leaderships truly wished to formgovernments for the good of all citizens. Nonetheless, somecountries in <strong>Africa</strong> can be said to have been formed by greatleaders who had foresight and extraordinary cognitiveendowments, no matter if they were liberal-democratic ortotalitarian, capitalist, socialist or both. Ghana, Senegal,Namibia, Botswana, South <strong>Africa</strong> (Since 1994), Egypt(under Nasser) and Libya (in Col. Gaddafi’s early years inpower) are worthy examples (Nzau M, 2010).India is a relatively young democracy in the world andperhaps an older one among thegroup of developing countries.Having attained independence inthe mid-20th century, India hasgone a long way to establish whatwould be termed “a near-mature”participatory and developmentaldemocracy (Pelizzo R 2010,261-280). Having attained itsindependence in 1947 and blessedwith a population of 1.2 billionpeople, in the last decade Indiaboasted an average economicgrowth rate of 6 percent per annum,making it one of the fastest-growingeconomies in the world. There areseveral important lessons for <strong>Africa</strong>as far as India’s governanceexperience is concerned (Kholi A.and Basu A., 2007, 251-297).At independence, India wasfaced with serious problems of stateformation that were quite similar to the <strong>Africa</strong>n governancechallenges at that time. On the eve of independence, Indiawas faced with a partition and subsequent war with Pakistan,a weak economy and mass poverty. Some monarchical(princely) states, which wanted to stay independent, alsochallenged the federal setting and unity of India. Theaftermath of the partition threatened to tear the countryapart. Nonetheless, Jawaharlal Nehru (India’s first PrimeMinister), who was a staunch believer in liberaldemocratic principles, worked hard to build a secular andunited state between 1947 and 1964 (Kapur A., 2006).It is also noteworthy that India had a woman Prime46August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YGhananian artistes performing a dance at the 2nd <strong>Africa</strong>-India Forum Summit in Adis Ababa, on May 25, 2011.Minister, Indira Gandhi, as early as 1966, at a time whenhaving women legislators, let alone a prime minister in most<strong>Africa</strong>n countries, was almost unthinkable. Indira Gandhimade several governance mistakes during her leadership(1966-1977 and 1980-1984), namely personalising, sectionalisingand ‘nationalising’ Indian politics; failing to effectivelydecentralise administrativeauthority; and failing to translatepopulist rhetoric to real gains forIndia’s poor. Nonetheless, subsequentprime ministers in Indiawent a long way to minimise themistakes made by the IndiraGandhi administration, e<strong>special</strong>lythrough enfranchising and enhancingthe participation of the poor andminority groups in national politicalaffairs and economic processes(Wolpert S. 2003, 451-470).India’s political system slowlydrifted from the unstable formativeyears in the immediate post-independenceperiod and authoritariantendencies in the late 1970s to onecharacterised by a vibrant civil society, periodic elections,unfettered media and relatively autonomous courts andbureaucracy in the 1990s. In a nutshell, India’s democratisationexperience presents worthy lessons for <strong>Africa</strong>. The mostoutstanding lesson for <strong>Africa</strong>n countries is that, despite theserious challenges of state formation — poverty, disease andethnic nationalism — at independence, the turbulent yearsIndia’s democratisationexperience presentsworthy lessons for <strong>Africa</strong>.The most outstandinglesson for <strong>Africa</strong>ncountries is that, despitethe serious challenges ofstate formation, Indianever degenerated intobecoming a military juntaor a state of total regimecollapse or genocideof Indira Gandhi’s administration and the longstandingconflict with Pakistan and other separatist groups, India neverdegenerated into becoming a military junta or a state of totalregime collapse or genocide. Indeed, despite these challenges,India has slowly risen to major-power status. Better still, Indiaseems to have weathered the storms associated with thegrowth of western neo-liberalismsince the end of the Cold War andthe attendant economic governancechallenges and much so to itsadvantage. At the same time, Indiahas dealt fairly well with its internalpolitical and socioeconomicchallenges. That is the test of goodgovernance for <strong>Africa</strong>.a case for IndIa’s leadershIprole In Governance reformsIndia’s entry into the nuclearand missile clubs posed a challengeto the non-proliferation and themissile control regimes. It showeda determination to stay the course inits nuclear and missile policies inthe face of international sanctions and pressures, while at thesame time avoiding drifting into a nuclear war with otherpowers in the region (Nayar R., 2001). This took by surprisecritics in the developed world who thought that SouthAsians were not capable of pursuing coercive diplomacywith restraint. Strategically, India stood out as anautonomous player and not as a client or proxy of globalAugust 2011-January 2012 47

P O L I T I C A L R E F O R M Spowers. India has, therefore, been able to project its powerwith an air of solidity among the states of the Indian OceanRim (IOR) and beyond (Ashok K., 2006).In a discussion of India’s foreign policy towards <strong>Africa</strong>,Yoshioka (2008, 1-5) observed that despite the absence of acomprehensive strategy, India’s strategic interests in <strong>Africa</strong>revolve around the urge to assume a leading role and responsibilityin <strong>Africa</strong> as a major development and investment partnere<strong>special</strong>ly in the energy sector and security of the IndianOcean. It should not, therefore, besurprising that India is a formalcontender for a permanent seat in theUnited Nations Security Councilwith many <strong>Africa</strong>n countriessupporting this move (Wysoczanska2011, 193-201).In this regard, India has soughtto forge strategic partnerships withleading sub-regional powers in<strong>Africa</strong>, including South <strong>Africa</strong> andNigeria. For instance, in 1997, Indiaand South <strong>Africa</strong> agreed to establisha strategic partnership based on arelationship beyond bilateral andregional settings. It encompassed issues of South-Southcooperation, United Nations reform and regional cooperationin the IOR area (Sardesai and Raju, 2002). As a result,India and South <strong>Africa</strong> spearheaded the establishment of theIndian Ocean Rim Association for Regional Cooperation(IOR-ARC). Further, India signed a memorandum ofunderstanding (MoU) with the Southern <strong>Africa</strong>nIndia’s strategic interests in<strong>Africa</strong> revolve around theurge to assume a leadingrole and responsibility in<strong>Africa</strong> as a majordevelopment andinvestment partnere<strong>special</strong>ly in the energysector and security of theIndian OceanDevelopment Community (SADC) on cooperation, andthe two have since worked together in organising jointforums from 2006.India has also continued to strengthen ties with Nigeria,a leading sub-regional power in Western <strong>Africa</strong>. India is aleading importer of Nigerian oil. In the same way, in the past10 years, India has sought to enhance bilateral military tieswith littoral states along the Eastern and Southern <strong>Africa</strong>Indian Ocean SLOC (Strategic Line of Communication).India’s world-class militaryinstitutions, particularly theNational Defence University, continueto offer training and capacitybuilding to officers from countries,such as Mozambique, Tanzania,Seychelles, Botswana and Lesotho.These countries, particularlyMozambique, held joint militaryand naval exercises between 2003and 2004.During the same period, South<strong>Africa</strong> and India signed an MoU ondefence cooperation and defencesupplies for India. India’s defenceindustry has made gains in the <strong>Africa</strong>n market in which several<strong>Africa</strong>n countries have bought several air and navalassets, including defence boats and light helicopters fromIndia (Scott D. 2008, 1-20).Most recently at the <strong>Africa</strong>-India Forum summit held inAddis Ababa, Ethiopia, in May 2011, India and <strong>Africa</strong> furtherpledged to strengthen their cooperation in regional andIndian construction company Punj Lloyd is building a US$290-million Melita-Tripoli Pipeline.48August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YIndia is the third-biggest contributor of UN peacekeepers to <strong>Africa</strong>.global security, as well as economic and trade areas. Throughthe Addis Ababa Declaration and the Frameworkfor Cooperation, the two sides resolved to cooperate incombating international terrorism, eradicating the menaceof piracy and safeguarding shipping activities in the Gulf ofAden, the Arabian Sea and the Indian Ocean.On the economic front, the two sides sought to enhancecooperation through stable and long-term investments andcapital flows, e<strong>special</strong>ly in the area of infrastructuraldevelopment. These seem to be bold steps in a positivedirection on the part of India and <strong>Africa</strong>.As far as human security issues are concerned, India’spharmaceutical industry continued to offer sustainablesolutions to problems of healthcare in <strong>Africa</strong>. The HIV/AIDSscourge, coupled with many tropical diseases and non-communicableones, proved difficult to control and/or contain formost of Sub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong>. The patented drugs neededproved too expensive to purchase, e<strong>special</strong>ly from dominantwestern drug manufacturing multinational corporations.The production of safe and affordable generic drugs byIndian pharmaceutical companies proved to be a formidablesolution to these challenges.In January 2011, India organised a conference onSouth-South cooperation at Mumbai University, whosecentral theme was “India, <strong>Africa</strong> and Food Security”. In thiscontext, it’s important to note that India’s economic diplomacyeffected the debt cancellation of five highly indebted poorcountries in <strong>Africa</strong>, namely Ghana, Zambia, Zimbabwe,Uganda and Mozambique. These developments point tohealthy gains in as far as India-<strong>Africa</strong> cooperation in the pastdecade is concerned. Nonetheless, as far as India’s leadershiprole in the region is concerned, she must not be seen to bemaking inroads into <strong>Africa</strong> solely for economic benefitsthrough various forms of investment, while ignoringauthoritarianism and misrule — a state of affairs that will makeher a ‘status quo’ emergent power in <strong>Africa</strong>. Such an approachmay neither be favourable nor sustainable in the long run.conclusIonIndia, therefore, is equipped to play a leadership role inenhancing democratic transformation in the continentthrough Indo-<strong>Africa</strong>n cooperation that focuses ondeepening and institutionalising governance reforms in<strong>Africa</strong>n countries, thereby spurring positive changes in theirdemocratisation process. Supporting such reforms wouldfurther institutionalise transparency, accountability and therule of law in many <strong>Africa</strong>n countries.In this regard, India should work to form constructiveand more purposive cooperation aimed at furtherstrengthening anti-corruption commissions, public complaintscommissions and offices of the ombudsman in<strong>Africa</strong>n countries. Similarly, India’s federal experiencewould go a long way to inform the processes ofadministrative decentralisation and devolution of power inmost of Sub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong>n countries.Finally, such development cooperation should alsoenhance and inform administrative and governance reformsaimed at improving the efficiency and effectiveness of thepublic service and the public sector in <strong>Africa</strong>n countries.What more? India and <strong>Africa</strong>’s unique and outstanding historicalexperiences and relationships form the best launchingpad for Indo-<strong>Africa</strong>n cooperation in this direction. nAugust 2011-January 2012 49

P O L I T I C A L R E F O R M SReferences1. Abraham Itty, “From Bandung to NAM: Non-Alignmentand Indian Foreign Policy, 1947-65 in Commonwealth andComparative Politics (Vol. 46, No. 2, April 2008), pp. 195-2192. Ahmed Ishtiak, State, Nation and Ethnicity inContemporary Asia (London, Pinter, 1996), pp. 99-1693. Ahmed S. (2006), “New Opportunities Beckon IndianIndustries” in Economic Times (November 2006).4. Alemayehu Makonnen, Industrialising <strong>Africa</strong>:Development Options and Challenges for the 21stCentury (Princeton NJ, <strong>Africa</strong> World Press, Inc., 1999)5. Amutabi M. Nyamanga, Editor Studies in the EconomicHistory of Kenya (Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press,2009).6. Ayittey B.N. George (2005:57-93) <strong>Africa</strong> Unchanged:The Blueprint for <strong>Africa</strong>’s Future (New York, PalgraveMcMillan).7. Back Irit “The Arab Spring and Sub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong>” inTel Aviv Notes (Vol 5, No. 10, May 26, 2011), pp. 1-48. BBC Focus on <strong>Africa</strong>, “Update: News and Views froman <strong>Africa</strong>n Perspective” (April-June 2011:5).9. Brown E. Bernard (2006), Comparative Politics: Notesand Readings (New York, Thomson Wadsworth).10. Carole Spary “Female Political Leadership in India”, inCommonwealth and Comparative Politics (Vol. 45, No. 3,July 2007), pp. 253-27711. Crook Richard ‘Rethinking Civil Service Reform in<strong>Africa</strong>: ‘Islands of Effectiveness and OrganisationalCommitment’, in Commonwealth and ComparativePolitics (Vol. 48, No. 4, November 2010), pp. 479-50412. D’Souza Rocha Blanche (2008), Harnessing the TradeWinds: The History of the Centuries Old Indian Tradewith East <strong>Africa</strong> Using the Monsoon Winds (Nairobi,Kenya Colourprint Ltd).13. Das Runa “State, Identity and Representations ofDanger: Competing World Views of Indian Nuclearisation”in Commonwealth and Comparative Politics (Vol. 46, No.1, February 2008), pp. 2-2814. David Martin Jones and Michael L. R. Smith, “MakingProgress ASEAN and the Evolving East Asian RegionalOrder” International Security Vol. 32, No.1 (2007)pp. 48-18415. Destradi Sandra “Regional Powers and their Strategies:Empire, Hegemony and Leadership” in Review ofInternational Studies (Vol. 36, No. 4, October 2010), pp.903-93016. Dutt, V.P. (1999), India’s Foreign Policy in a ChangingWorld (New Delhi, Vikas)17. Ethridge E. Marcus and Handelman Howard (2004),Politics in a Changing World: A Comparative Introductionto Political Science (Australia, Wadsworth).18. Ghoshal Baladas, “Linkage Between Domestic Politicsand Foreign Policy: A Case Study of India”, in GhoshalBaladas (1996) et al Diplomacy and Domestic Policy inSouth Asia (Colombo, Konark Publishers), pp. 29-61.19. Goetz Anne Marie, “Manoeuvering Past Clientelism:Institutions and Incentives to Generate Constituencies inSupport of Governance Reforms”, in Commonwealth andComparative Politics (Vol. 45, No. 4 November 2007), pp.403-42420. Gupta Vijay (1996), <strong>Africa</strong>: Post Cold War Era (NewDelhi, Har-Anand Publications, 1996).21. Haynes Jeff (2001), Towards Sustainable Democracy inthe Third World (UK: Palgrave).22. Hulme David and Turner Mark (1997:11-12),Governance, Administration and Development: Making theState Work (London, Macmillan).23. Jioreman Sandra Fullerton, “The Evolution of theCommon Law: Legal Development in Kenya and India” inCommonwealth and Comparative Politics (Vol. 44, No. 2,July 2006), pp. 190-21024. Kapur Ashok (2003), Regional Security Structures inAsia (London, Routledge Curzon), pp. 152-16325. Kapur Ashok (2006), India: From Regional to WorldPower: India in the Modern World (London, Routledge),pp. 197-20826. Karnad Bharat, “India: Global Leadership and SelfPerception” a Paper Presented at the Workshop on India asan Emerging Power (New Delhi, United Service Instituteof India, January 22 1999).27. Kholi Atul and Basu Amrita, “India” in, KesselmanMark. Kriegler Joel and Joseph A. William (2007) eds,Introduction to Comparative Politics (New York,Houghton Mifflin Company), pp. 251-29728. Mansingh Surjit (1998), India and Chinese ForeignPolicies in Comparative Perspective (New Delhi, RadiantPublishers).29. Mitra Kumar Subrata, “Parties and People: India’sChanging Party System and the Resilience of Democracy”in Burnell Peter and Calvert Peter (1999), The Resilienceof Democracy: Persistent Practice, Durable Idea (London,Frank Cass), pp. 123-12530. Mohan S. (2005), “Rethinking India’s Grand Strategy”in N. Sisodia and C. Bhaskar Emerging India: Security andForeign Perspectives (New Delhi, Institute for DefenseStudies and Analyses).31. Mondal A. Anshuman (2003), Nationalism and Post-Colonial Identity: Culture and Ideology in India and Egypt(London, Routledge Curzon), pp. 237-24332. Naidu Sanusha, “India’s Growing <strong>Africa</strong>n Strategy” inReview of <strong>Africa</strong>n Political Economy (Vo. 35, No. 115,March 2008), pp. 116-12833. Naidu Sanusha and Corkin Lucy, “China and India in<strong>Africa</strong>: An Introduction” in Review of <strong>Africa</strong>n PoliticalEconomy (Vo. 35, No. 115, March 2008), pp. 114-11634. Nasongo S. Wanjala (2009), “From an Extractive State50August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Yto Rentier Economy: Roots of Kenya’s DevelopmentImpasse”, in Amutabi M. Nyamanga, Editor Studies in theEconomic 34. History of Kenya (Lewiston: The EdwinMellen Press).35. Nayar Baldev Raj (2001), Globalisation andNationalism: The Changing Balance in India’s EconomicPolicy (New Delhi, Sage).36. Nayar R, Baldev and Paul T.V. (2003), India in theWorld Order: Searching for Major-Power Status(Cambridge University Press), 249-27237. Ndulo Muna., Democratic Reform in <strong>Africa</strong>: It’s Impacton Governance and Poverty Alleviation (UK:James Currey Publishers, 2006).38. Nzau Mumo (2007), “Inter-<strong>Africa</strong>n Diplomacy and theCrises of the Post Cold War Period” in East<strong>Africa</strong>n Journal of Humanities and Sciences (Nairobi,CUEA Press).39. “<strong>Africa</strong>’s Industrialisation Debate: A Critical Analysis”,in Journal of Language, Technology and Entrepreneurshipin <strong>Africa</strong> (Vol. 2. No. 1, 2010- ISSN; 1998-1279).40. “On Political Leadership and Development in <strong>Africa</strong>:A Case Study of Kenya” in Kenya Studies Review (Vol. 3,No. 3. Fall 2011).41. Pal Singh Sidhu Waheguru and Yuan Jing-dong (2003),China and India: Cooperation or Conflict? (London, LynneRienner).42. Pelizzo Ricardo, “Fragmentation and Performance: theIndian Case”, in Commonwealth and Comparative Politics(Vol. 48, No. 3, July 2010), pp. 261-28043. Pham J. Peter, “India’s Expanding Relations with <strong>Africa</strong>and Their Implications for U.S Interests” in AmericanForeign Policy Interests (No. 29, 2007:ISSN1080-3920),pp. 341-352.44. Richardson L (2002), “Now Play the India Card” inPolicy Review (Vol. 115, 2002), pp. 19-3245. Roehring T. (2009), “An Asian Triangle: India’sRelationship with China and Japan Asian Politics and Policy(Vol. 1, No. 2), pp. 163-18346. Sahni Varun (1997), “India as a Global Power: Capacity,Opportunity and Strategy” in India’s Foreign Policy:Agenda for the 21st Century (Vol 1, New Delhi, ForeignService Institute and Konark).47. Salih M., (2001), <strong>Africa</strong>n Democracies and <strong>Africa</strong>nPolitics (London: Pluto Press).48. Sardesai, Damodar and Raju G.C Thomas (2002),Nuclear India in the 21st Century (New York, Palgrave).49. Scott D. (2008), “The Great Power ‘great game’ betweenIndia and China: The Logic of Geography Geopolitics (Vol.13, No. 1), pp. 1-2050. Seddon David and Seddon-Daines Dantel (2005), Eds,A Political and Economic Dictionary of <strong>Africa</strong> (NewYork, Routledge).51. Shaun Narine, Explaining ASEAN: Regionalism inSoutheast Asia, (Boulder: Lynne Reiner 2002), pp. 139-15952. Shraeder Peter (2004) <strong>Africa</strong>n Politics and Society: AMosaic of Transformation (Belmont CA; ThomsonWadsworth).53. Sindima, Harvey J., <strong>Africa</strong>’s Agenda: The Legacy ofLiberalism and Colonialism in the Crisis of <strong>Africa</strong>nValues. (Westport: Greenwood, 1995).54. Skinner Elliot, ‘<strong>Africa</strong>n Governance and PoliticalCultures’ Global Bioethnics (Vol. 13, No. 1 2000)55. T.V.Paul, The India Pakistan Conflict: An EnduringRivalry (London, Routledge, 2005).56. Tagwa, G. (1998), Democracy and Development in<strong>Africa</strong>: Putting the Horse before the Cart: Road toDemocracy and Meritocracy. (Bellingham, WA: Kola TreePress).57. Thomson Alex (2004), An Introduction to <strong>Africa</strong>nPolitics (New York, Routledge-Taylor and Francis Group).58. Tordoff William (2003), Government and Politics in<strong>Africa</strong> (Indianapolis, Indiana University Press).59. Vandewalle Dirk (2011), “After Gadaffi: How Does aCountry Recover From 40 Years of Destruction by anUnchallenged Tyrant?” in Newsweek Magazine (March7th 2011).60. Wolpert Stanley (2003), A New History of India(Oxford, Oxford University Press), pp. 451-47061. Wysoczanska Karolina, “Sino-Indian Cooperation in<strong>Africa</strong>: Joint Efforts in the Oil Sector in Journal ofContemporary <strong>Africa</strong>n Studies (Vol. 29, No. 2, April 2011),pp.193-20162. Yoshioka M. Izuyama, “India’s Foreign Policy toward<strong>Africa</strong>” The National Defense for Defense Studies News(No. 124, August and September 2008), pp. 1-563. Zakaria, Fareed (2011), “What if He Doesn’t Go?: TheWar Against Gaddaffi” in Time Magazine (April 4, 2011),pp. 21-23August 2011-January 2012 51

F U T U R E T R A J E C T O R Y<strong>Africa</strong> UNBOUNDA younger and affluent population, urbanisation, ICT access, naturalresources, and a deepening financial sector are five key trends poweringa fast-developing continent, says Simon FreemantleCONTINENT OF CITIES: Nairobi, the capital of Kenya. As a result of urbanisation, around 40 percent of <strong>Africa</strong>ns live inthe continent’s cities. By 2050, this number is expected to rise to nearly 60 percent.Over the course of the past decade,<strong>Africa</strong> has fundamentally reconstitutedits role in the global economy.Emerging from the periphery,<strong>Africa</strong>n economies today areincreasingly integral cogs in a vastlyaltered global economic map.Measured by the InternationalMonetary Fund (IMF), between 2001 and 2010, no fewerthan six of the ten fastest-growing economies in the world(excluding those with populations lower than 10 millionpeople) were from Sub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong> (SSA).Contrasting this performance is the fact that, in the twodecades to 2000, the only <strong>Africa</strong>n country to rank in the topten was Uganda, surrounded by nine Asian economies.Looking ahead, several <strong>Africa</strong>n economies are set to register arecord upsurge in national output this year and next. AcrossSSA, growth in 2011 averaged an estimated 5.2 percent in2011, compared to a world average of 3.9 percent. The IMF isfurther predicting that between 2011 and 2015, seven of theten fastest-growing economies in the world will be fromthe SSA region. This positive trajectory is unlikely to alter.Indeed, five major trends will continue to power <strong>Africa</strong>’sgrowth and reconfigure the continent’s global relevance.These are:1. A larger, younger, more affluent population;2. Rapid urbanisation;3. Increasing absorption of telecommunications;4. Natural resource wealth (including agricultural potential;and5. A deepening financial sector.AfricA’s lArge, youthful, AndincreAsingly Affluent populAtionAccording to the United Nations, <strong>Africa</strong>’s currentpopulation of 1 billion is expected to increase by an averageof 2.2 percent a year over the next decade, meaning that, by2050, it will have doubled from today’s size to reach 2 billion.Two core benefits may spring from this undeniably swiftpopulation growth.52August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YFirst, when coupled with the robust economic growth forwhich many <strong>Africa</strong>n economies are increasingly becomingknown, population growth will enlarge the continent’sconsumer base — providing markets for local firms, creatingeconomic opportunities, and drawing in foreign investment.Second, for countries able to provide the necessaryinfrastructure and services, a youthful and growing populationhas the potential to yield a demographic dividend of young,energetic and increasingly educated workers to power <strong>Africa</strong>’sservices and manufacturing sectors — fundamentally alteringthe prospects of these institutionally stronger economies on thecontinent.Consider a few statistical indicators of these core advantages:l At present, <strong>Africa</strong>’s median age is 19.7, compared to 32 forthe BRIC nations and 40.1 for Europe.l According to the IMF, Sub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong>’s per capitaincome has swelled by 70 percent since 2000, compared tothe growth of 15 percent between 1990 and 2000. Withinthe next five years <strong>Africa</strong>’s spending power will increase by25 percent.l By 2050, nearly 1.2 billion <strong>Africa</strong>ns will be of working age,meaning that one in four workers in the world will be<strong>Africa</strong>n, compared to one in eight from China, reversingtoday’s balance. Falling fertility rates and improvedhealthcare (evidenced by enhanced life expectancy) arelowering dependency ratios, providing the means forpotentially profound demographic gains.A continent of citiesNot only is <strong>Africa</strong>’s population rising, but it is alsourbanising rapidly, deepening the structural foundations of itsongoing economic momentum. United Nations data suggeststhat today around 40 percent of <strong>Africa</strong>ns live in the continent’scities. By 2050, this ratio will have risen to 60 percent —implying that, within the next four decades, around800 million <strong>Africa</strong>ns will either be born in or migrate to urbanareas. While these shifts are naturally driving themushrooming of <strong>Africa</strong>’s main urban nodes, it is interestingto note how upwards of 75 percent of all urban growth on thecontinent is taking place in cities and towns with populationsof less than 750,000.Urbanisation brings several potential gains, of which twoare particularly important. First, because of the benefits ofagglomeration and economies of scale, urban-basedenterprises are generally more productive, and thus contributea greater share to GDP, than their rural equivalents. Second,urban inhabitants have better access to basic infrastructure,including education and healthcare. World Bank analysisshows how over 70 percent of urban inhabitants in <strong>Africa</strong> haveaccess to electricity, compared to 10 percent of ruralinhabitants.improved ict AccessAcross the world, technological advances are fundamentallyaltering the way individuals and firms connect, communicateand transact. Unlike in the past, <strong>Africa</strong> has not been leftstranded behind these trends. In fact, in certain areas, ande<strong>special</strong>ly in mobile banking, <strong>Africa</strong> has taken the lead.The numbers show how enthusiastically <strong>Africa</strong> has embracedICT:l According to the International TelecommunicationsUnion, in 2000 there were 15 million mobile subscriptionsin <strong>Africa</strong>. By the end of 2010, there were over 500 million;by 2015 it is believed there will be almost 800 million.l Between 2000 and 2011, internet usage in <strong>Africa</strong> grew by2,527 percent, compared to a world average of 480 percent.A youthful and growing population can potentially help yield a demographic dividend packed with energetic and increasingly educated workersto power <strong>Africa</strong>’s growth.August 2011-January 2012 53

F U T U R E T R A J E C T O R YlSince launching in 2007, Safaricom’s mobile paymentssystem M-Pesa has amassed over 15 million users in Kenya.Last year, an amount equivalent to 20 percent of thecountry’s GDP was transferred via mobile phones inKenya. Estimates suggest that by 2015 mobile banking willbe worth over $20 billion in <strong>Africa</strong>.These trends emerge from <strong>Africa</strong>’srapid economic development — andhelp to reinforce it. The World Bankestimates that a 10 percentage pointincrease in broadband penetration inan average <strong>Africa</strong>n country could leadto an increase in economic growth of0.73 percentage points. And for every10 new mobile phones per 100 peoplea country adds, GDP could increaseby 0.8 percentage points.AfricA’s nAturAl resourcepotentiAl remAins highAccording to the United States Geological Survey, <strong>Africa</strong>is home to 95 percent of the world’s platinum group metalsreserves, 90 percent of chromite ore reserves, 85 percent ofphosphate rock reserves and more than half of the world’scobalt.Even more importantly, the production and reserves ofcore commodities have been expanding rapidly. For instance,between 2006 and 2010, copper production in <strong>Africa</strong> increasedby 75 percent. British Petroleum statistics show how crude oil<strong>Africa</strong> is home to95 percent of the world’splatinum group metalsreserves, 90 percent ofchromite ore reserves,85 percent of phosphaterock reserves andmore than half of theworld’s cobaltreserves have doubled since 1990, with natural gas reservesincreasing by 70 percent within the same period.However, perhaps more critically, <strong>Africa</strong>’s agriculturalpotential is capturing newfound attention in light of theworld’s population recently reaching 7 billion, raising thespectre of food shortages and the social instability that this mayengender. Indeed, food is widelyexpected to emerge as the ‘new oil’ ofthe 21st century.While pervasive and meaningfulchallenges confront <strong>Africa</strong>’s agriculturalsector, its potential is undoubtedlyimmense. It is estimated that over 60percent of the world’s available andunexploited cropland is in Sub-Saharan<strong>Africa</strong>. In Sudan alone, over 80 millionhectares of arable land remainunderused. In order to feed a globalpopulation of 9 billion in 2050 it isestimated that over $80 billion needs to be invested indeveloping world agriculture each year for the next fourdecades. Increasingly, these funds, from private andgovernmental institutions, will find their way to <strong>Africa</strong>.Importantly, much of the demand for <strong>Africa</strong>’s commoditieswill originate from the world’s rapidly advancing emergingnations. China alone accounted for a quarter of total globalplatinum group metals consumption, 65 percent of global ironore consumption, and, together with India, 15 percent of totalcrude oil consumption in 2010.Increasingly, <strong>Africa</strong>’s young people are preparing to play a role in the governance of their respective countries. Seen in the picture is a batchof young <strong>Africa</strong>ns who underwent a training programme in governance practices under the auspices of the International Republican Institute.54August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YLagos, the capital of Nigeria and one of <strong>Africa</strong>’s largest cities. It is also the second most populous city in the continent after Cairo.A rApidly growing finAnciAlsector with room for expAnsionAs incomes go up, new technologies are absorbed,and urbanisation intensifies, the demand for moresophisticated financial services will inevitably result. Accordingto Bain and Company, the financial services sector in <strong>Africa</strong>expanded at a compound annual growth rate of 15 percentbetween 2004 and 2008, and now contributes 8 percent of thecontinent’s GDP.A range of supporting factors,underpinned by a sounder regulatoryenvironment and swifter generalgrowth, will conspire to allow thefinancial services sector to accountfor 20 percent of the continent’sGDP by 2020. Much of this growthwill come from the expansion ofretail banking as <strong>Africa</strong>’s vastunbanked, or at leastunder-banked, population gainsaccess to financial services.An indication of the growthpotential can be found in the fact that, according to IMF data,bank credit to the private sector in <strong>Africa</strong> represents, on anaverage, 15 percent of GDP, compared to over 100 percent inmany developing economies.Fewer than one in five adults in key economies such asNigeria, Kenya and Malawi have a formal relationship with afinancial institution. Based on recent growth rates, it isfeasible that over 300 million new deposit accounts will beopened in <strong>Africa</strong> over the course of the next decade.Hastened by theongoing global economicdownturn, the rise of theBRIC economies, as wellas others such as Turkey,Indonesia and Thailand,are forging a new,fundamentally multi-polar,commercial globeties with emerging world Are elevAtingInspired by the shifts and opportunities outlined above,a host of large, and swiftly advancing, emerging powersare reinvigorating commercial ties with <strong>Africa</strong>. Indeed,hastened by the ongoing global economic downturn, therise of the BRIC economies, as well as others such asTurkey, Indonesia and Thailand, are forging a new,fundamentally multi-polar, commercial globe. Importantly,<strong>Africa</strong> has participated in these alterations. Consider, forinstance, that BRIC-<strong>Africa</strong> trade hasincreased more than ten-fold since2001. Last year, China-<strong>Africa</strong> tradereached almost $150 billion, makingit the continent’s largest singletrade partner.<strong>Africa</strong>’s abundant naturalresources and fast-growingconsumer markets offer vital newopportunities. In turn, new sourcesof capital are providing profoundsupport to <strong>Africa</strong>’s ongoingeconomic growth assertions. To besure, the advanced economies remain critical components of<strong>Africa</strong>’s broadening commercial vista; a wider array ofcommercial partners, if managed well, offers the potential forsignificant gains across the continent.Clearly, towering challenges remain for all <strong>Africa</strong>neconomies. However, considering the robust trendsand the manner in which growth on the continent isfinding structural pillars, there is undoubtedly greatcause for cheer.nAugust 2011-January 2012 55

S H I F T I N G E Q U A T I O N SEASTERNISATION: A newphenomenon in <strong>Africa</strong>The rise of India and China in <strong>Africa</strong> and on the world stage is causingapprehension and envy amongst leading world economies, who fearlosing out to the resurgent Asian giants, says Prof. Maurice N. AmutabiPrime Minister Manmohan Singh with <strong>Africa</strong>n leaders at the opening plenary session of the 2nd <strong>Africa</strong>-India Forum Summit in Addis Ababa,Ethiopia, on May 24, 2011.There has been a lot of interest in therole China and India play in thedevelopment of <strong>Africa</strong> and the globaleconomy. Much of the interest hasbeen generated by four related reasons.First, there has been nervousness onthe part of European powers and theUnited States, who are concernedabout a resurgent China and India in the global economy.The fact that today the two Asian powers control industrialoutput and exports on the global stage is a matter of worry forthe West. It is an open secret that China and India have greatshares of global manufacturing while many of the westernpowers have remained stagnant or are declining.Second, for China and India, their large populations are asource of key advantage. It provides them a ready market thatwestern countries can only dream of. The demographic giantsare reservoirs of labour. These huge markets definitely makethe western powers envious. (Amutabi, 2001)Third, the West is apprehensive about China and India’salleged disregard for patents and trademarks, which have ledto great undercutting of its products. Its profits are radicallyreduced through generic and other practices regarded asunethical in the West but against which they can do little.Fourth, the proximity to Asian population centres, suchas Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia and other nations, hasprovided the two Asian powers unprecedented access toneighbouring markets.China also surprised the world by unveiling one ofthe most successful industrial undertakings of the century.It overtook five economic powers in the past one decade tobecome the second-largest economy in the world. The Westhas been alarmed by the direct and indirect investment advantagessecured by China and India in <strong>Africa</strong>, particularly inregard to resources in Eastern <strong>Africa</strong>. The role of China in thescramble for ‘colten’ (used for making microchips forcomputers and cellphones) has been exaggerated in the Westbecause of its geopolitical and geo-economic interests. Thediscovery of oil in Sudan (north and south) and in Ugandacomplicated the whole situation. India’s involvement in thescramble for markets and resources in <strong>Africa</strong> has equally beenlooked at suspiciously by the West.56August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YIndia is a leader in information and communicationtechnology in the world. Indian cellphone companies such asAirtel and many more are taking the communication sectorby storm and causing a lot of ripples in the financial market.It is against this background that this article seeks tointerrogate the tensions that attend the activities of Chinaand India in <strong>Africa</strong>. The main argument is that there isapprehension and envy that has attended the views andattitudes of Europeans and Americans against China and India,which is based on historical relations and the fear that theycould lose the number one or first-world status to China andIndia. There has been an orchestrated attempt by westernscholars to demonise the activities of China and India in <strong>Africa</strong>.Has the time come to talk about Easternisation, in themanner we talked about Westernisation in the past? This is aquestion that is at the core of thisarticle, because there is a need to findout the effects of the relationsbetween <strong>Africa</strong> and Asia. To have aclear picture, let’s begin by comparingthe role played by Asia in <strong>Africa</strong>with that of western powers.Why are western countries apprehensiveabout China and India?What are the factors that lead to thisanxiety about China and India? Are the accusations levelledagainst China and India’s activities in <strong>Africa</strong> justified? Arethese suspicions about Chinese and Indian activities in <strong>Africa</strong>legitimate or a part of western propaganda and hegemony?These are some of the key issues that this article seeks tointerrogate closely.BackgroundIndia’s independence in 1947 and the success of MaoZedong’s Communist Revolution in China in 1952 have beencited as the two most important events that influenced <strong>Africa</strong>nnationalism in the 1950s. Towards the end of the 1950s,Chinese leader Mao Zedong sent thousands of agriculturaland construction workers to <strong>Africa</strong>n states to expand ties withcountries emerging from colonialism. Kwame Nkrumah, thefirst president of Ghana, cited China and India as among thegreatest influences in his nationalist aspirations (Nkrumah,1965). Julius Nyerere also mentioned the two Asian countriesas veritable influences in his ideas of nation-building becausethey had shared occupation and colonial oppression. Indeeda thorough examination of the Arusha Declaration on whichNyerere’s socialist ‘Ujamaa’ policy was predicated, oneencounters some notions similar to the ‘Great Leap’ ideas ofChairman Mao, as well as notions of the ‘Green Revolution’in India and Mahatma Gandhi’s idea of self-reliance andself-sufficiency.Today, Kwame Nkrumah and Julius Nyerere areregarded as perhaps some of the greatest leaders <strong>Africa</strong> has everproduced. It should be noted that before 1957, NelsonMandela experimented with non-violence as a form ofIn the past five years,China and India havegiven more grants andloans to <strong>Africa</strong>n countriesthan WB and IMF havedone in the last 10 yearsresistance against apartheid. Beyond political and socialinfluences, the greatest influence in Eastern <strong>Africa</strong> has alsobeen in the realm of economics.China and India’s relations with <strong>Africa</strong> are expanding fast,which straddle different realms like social, political andeconomic. Many <strong>Africa</strong>n students have been trained in Chinaand India. Over 50,000 Kenyans hold degrees from Indianuniversities. Sino-<strong>Africa</strong>n and Indo-<strong>Africa</strong>n diplomaticrelations have helped to expand and develop a wide range ofrelations in many areas. China has more consulates in <strong>Africa</strong>than the United States. China has representatives to regionalbodies such as Southern <strong>Africa</strong>n Development Cooperation(SADC), the Economic Commission of West <strong>Africa</strong>n States(ECOWAS) and the Common Market for East and Southern<strong>Africa</strong> (COMESA). India is also represented in many of theregional economic communities aswell. There is a perception that Chinahas boosted employment in Eastern<strong>Africa</strong>. China has also made basicgoods such as watches, radios andtelevisions more affordable. On theother hand, there are critics who saythat China has flooded <strong>Africa</strong>nmarkets with cheap goods that haveundermined competitiveness of localproducts. But these political and economic relationships havecreated possibilities that would help free <strong>Africa</strong> from Europeanand North American hegemony. <strong>Africa</strong> had been engaged asa marginal and disempowered partner for a long time.China and India have created new lending bases outside thedictates of the World Bank (WB) and the InternationalMonetary Fund (IMF). In the past five years, China and Indiahave given more grants and loans to <strong>Africa</strong>n countries than theWB and the IMF have done in the last 10 years.Over 40 percent of electronic and other manufacturedgoods sold in Eastern <strong>Africa</strong> are made in China. Radio,television, telephone sets, watches and computers made inChina, as a result of outsourcing by western companies, areincreasingly flooding the market. While indigenous Chinesecompanies are selling to East <strong>Africa</strong> more products in thisarea. On the other hand, over 50 percent of generic drugs soldin Eastern <strong>Africa</strong> are made in India.In Kenya, from the 1970s to 1990s, about 5,000 universitygraduates were trained at Indian universities. Over 100,000holding key positions in government and the private sectorhave been trained in India. Close to 80 percent of staff atKenya Irrigation Board is manned by graduates trained inIndia. Today, Indian-grown basmati and pishori rice dominatesupermarket shelves. The emerging Asian powers have playedan important role in the development of Eastern <strong>Africa</strong> inmore pervasive ways as compared with those in the previousdecades.The presence of China and India is not confined tomanufacturing and industrial products alone. It also includesinfrastructure development. The biggest railway developmentAugust 2011-January 2012 57

S H I F T I N G E Q U A T I O N SAnother milestone project of China, the Moi International Sports Centre, Nairobi is the largest stadium in Kenya.project in post-colonial <strong>Africa</strong> remains the Tanzania-Zambia(Tazara) railway built by China, linking Tanzania and Zambia.Tazara transformed the development of Tanzania andZambia, and opened up the landlocked Zambia and enhancedits export of copper and other commodities.Tazara was built in record time and has remained oneof the most enduring projects in <strong>Africa</strong>. Tazara was aculmination of a long relationship between Tanzania andChina, going back to the period of liberation of <strong>Africa</strong>, inwhich China funded the activities of many liberation movementsin <strong>Africa</strong>. Liberation movements such as Mozambique’sFRELIMO, Zimbabwe <strong>Africa</strong>n National Union (ZANU),Zimbabwe <strong>Africa</strong>n Peoples Union (ZAPU), <strong>Africa</strong>n NationalCongress (ANC), and South West <strong>Africa</strong>n Peoples’Organisation (SWAPO) had bases in Tanzania. Thisrelationship has endured and only recently, China hasassisted in the construction of the biggest university inTanzania, the University of Dodoma (UDOM). As China’sdevelopment initiatives are celebrated,India has not been left behind.There was tremendous amountof excitement in the region whencountries started importing low-costpickups and trucks from India,manufactured by Tata. The Tatatrucks were much cheaper comparedto those from Europe such as Fiat,Leyland and Volvo and MercedesBenz. Soon afterwards, the regionstarted receiving Mahindra cars fromIndia, again a huge hit with low-budgetbuyers. But the greatest influenceof China and India has been in therealm of motorcycles where theThere was tremendousexcitement in the regionwhen the <strong>Africa</strong>n countriesstarted importing low-costpickups and trucks fromIndia, manufactured byTata. The Tata trucks weremuch cheaper comparedto those from Europe suchas Fiat, Leyland and Volvoand Mercedes BenzIndian auto rickshaw dominates urban areas in Eastern <strong>Africa</strong>as taxis and delivery vans. Many of the ‘boda boda’ (bicyclesand motorcycle taxis) are either made in India, China or Japan.China and India are also interested in oil, coltan, platinum,iron, titanium, copper and timber.TheoreTical imperaTives on The role of china andindia in africaThere are many theoretical thrusts that can directdiscussions about states, many of which fall in the realm ofpolitical relations, economy and power. The creation of ChinaInternational Fund Limited (CIFL) and Industrial andCommercial Bank of China (ICBC) as governmentsupportedforeign investment consortia has proved that Chinais a global power. In her book Spreading the American Dream,Emily Rosenberg gives many examples to show how theUnited States used several strategies to ensure its economicand cultural expansion. American expositions “glittered withartistic splendour and burgeonedwith America’s latest technologicalachievements” (Rosenberg, 1996: 3).America has always tried to make theworld believe that it was the bestthrough many shows andexhibitions. Rosenberg notes that theintention was to demonstrate,“…that America was not justanother power that would rise andthen decline but that it was thequintessential civilisation that wouldpermanently culminate some longprogression toward humanbetterment” (Rosenberg, 1996: 3).What is interesting is that the U.S.58August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Yhad long realised that China was a potential rival. From thetime of President Woodrow Wilson, the U.S. had identifiedChina as a country of American interests. “In August 1918, theWilson Administration completed plans for the creation of twointernational consortia of bankers, one to offer loans to China,and one to deal with Mexico” (Rosenberg, 1996: 72). Today,CIFL is playing a similar role that American agencies playedin early 20th century, whereas Rosenberg has noted the U.S.used private capital to serve official foreign policy objectives.In his book The Location of Culture, Homi K. Bhabha hassuggested that those with hegemonic prowess tend to defineevents and activities for those who do not have power. Thepowerful often name and provide form and direction to thesubordinate. Bhabha has suggested that the dominant culturealways has sway and advantage in defining the ‘other’ becauseit has the requisite instruments of control and domination.Mahmoud Mamdani makes the same argument in his bookCitizens and Subjects, when he says that the colonial project in<strong>Africa</strong> created citizens (privileged) and subjects (subordinate)groups, predicated on imperial designs of divide and rulepolicies. Sino-<strong>Africa</strong>n relations should be seen in terms ofpower relations. There is always a power relation betweendominant and subordinate states, and China’s relations with<strong>Africa</strong> should be seen under this light.China has four major strands of relations with <strong>Africa</strong>:economic, intellectual, political and ideological. In theeconomic mode, China should be seen as an economic powerthat seeks to expand its economic interests regardless ofimplications to social groups on the continent (Amutabi,2001). There is evidence that China is collaborating with<strong>Africa</strong>’s economic elite and rulers such as President YoweriMuseveni of Uganda and President Paul Kagame of Rwandato buttress its interests in the continent (Amutabi, 2001).There is also an intellectual explanation for China’ssuccess predicated on the success of the Chinese model, basedon the vision of Mao Zedong, and strongly embedded inChinese religious pluralism and cultural multiplicity. Theexplanations suggest that the Chinese brand of socialism hassucceeded because it is a hybrid and domesticated in orientalethos and values. One can argue that its success is largelya result of having a marathoner’s mind of endurance and asumo’s body to withstand hard times, underpinned bya Confucian vision. It is a realisation that friendship is betterthan the use of AK47 or arm-twisting. A political explanationof China’s activities in <strong>Africa</strong> seems to suggest that China isacting according to the way dominant powers have acted, byseeking allies. <strong>Africa</strong> simply happens to be the stage whereChina seeks to demonstrate its political and economicobjectives by getting followers. It is the stepping-stone forChina’s ascendance, just like Britain’s ascendance was throughAmerican colonies before the independence of the UnitedStates in 1776.Finally, we can interpret the ascendance of China as aresurrection of socialism, as an ideological phoenix of sorts.One can interpret this success as a coup of Sino-socialismagainst western capitalism, coming less than 20 years after thefall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. It is a triumph of ‘Easternism’against ‘Westernism’, or the success of ‘Easternisation’ against‘Westernisation’.Optimists feel that China can help in the achievement of<strong>Africa</strong>’s renaissance. Sino-optimists, as they are called, see a lotof potential and positive developments coming from <strong>Africa</strong>’sfriendship with China.There are so many such optimists in the continent and whoare responsible for granting Chinathe many lucrative contracts onthe continent. They see China asa fresh breath of air in the crudepolitics of foreign aid. Some ofthem have assisted in defendingChina against attacks fromwestern observers, pundits andjournalists.On the other hand, anothergroup of individuals has alsoemerged in <strong>Africa</strong> who see Chinain the same light as colonial orimperial powers do. Theseindividuals — the Sino-pessimistssee China as insidious andinterested in the resources on thecontinent despite its declaredinterests of helping <strong>Africa</strong> as partners.These pessimists see Chinaas one of those former Europeanpowers, whose activities and aimsFormer president of South <strong>Africa</strong> Nelson Mandelawere the resources of theAugust 2011-January 2012 59

S H I F T I N G E Q U A T I O N Scontinent. There is also a third category of observers in <strong>Africa</strong>,who perceive China’s actions in <strong>Africa</strong> in a practical way. Theyargue that the rise of China should be looked at as anexample of how <strong>Africa</strong> can proceed, and not as a saviour of thecontinent. This group, known as Sino-pragmatists, suggeststhat <strong>Africa</strong> should go back to its indigenous structures andinstitutions just like China has done over the last hundredyears. They seem to echo the views of the <strong>Africa</strong>n Union,which is pushing for the recovery of <strong>Africa</strong>n indigenousknowledge systems (IKS).making a case for easTernisaTionLooking at the way Chinese motor manufacturer Foton,India’s Tata and South-Korean car models of Kia, Hyundaiand Daewoo, have taken hold in <strong>Africa</strong>, like the way Japanesemodels of Toyota, Honda and Mitsubishi have becomeglobal icons in the industry, it is time to talk aboutEasternisation in <strong>Africa</strong> and in the world. To me,Easternisation is represented by new forms of collaboration ineconomic, social, political and cultural realms between Asianor Eastern powers, and the rest of the world. Easternisation isrepresented by friendship, and cultural and economicexchanges that have taken place between the East and the restof the world. It includes Asian influences such as yoga, karateand judo in the form of mental and physical exercise and fitnesssolutions, and cultural influences like food and the culinarytraditions of curry, spices, pepper and roti. Easternisationis represented by the alternative that acupuncture and otheralternative forms of medicine have created in <strong>Africa</strong> and therest of the world. Easternisation has emerged out of mutualrelations rather than through colonisation. It has been spreadwithout hegemonic ideology but rather through inventivenessand persuasion.By the mid 2000s, it became clear that Beijing was the nextglobal economic superpower following the financial doldrumsin the American economy and instability in the EuropeanUnion and the rise of the Chinese economy. It had arousedthe interest of American and European think tanks inSino-<strong>Africa</strong>n relations. There have been all kinds of alarmingreports from institutions such as the Center for StrategicInternational Studies and Brookings Institution, both inWashington DC. The reports have one thing in common —they are panicky about the growing Sino-<strong>Africa</strong>n relations andwould rather see an end to such relations.What many western scholars are penning on the role ofChina and India in <strong>Africa</strong> vindicates the points that EdwardSaid cited in his book Orientalism, which was about thewestern conspiracies being hatched to keep the rest of theworld subordinate. Therefore, it’s not surprising to find thealarming writings that described Chinese and Indian activitiesin <strong>Africa</strong> in a threatening way using terms like ‘dragon’ andagents of ‘exploitation’ and ‘dictatorship’ in <strong>Africa</strong>. However,in this context, it must be stressed that it’s China, rather thanIndia, which is often the target of such polemics.Two recent works, Deborah Brautigam’s The Dragon’s Giftand Stefan Halper’s The Beijing Consensus, claimed to haveIndia’s Minister of State for Commerce and Industry Jyotiraditya Madhavrao Scindia with South <strong>Africa</strong>n Deputy Minister for Trade &Industry Elizabeth Thabethe, seen here, following a bilateral meeting at Pretoria, South <strong>Africa</strong>, on September 21, 2011.60August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Ybeen written, based on research and ‘objective’ analyses ofChina’s role in <strong>Africa</strong>. They were, however, merely couchedin propaganda. Both works try to portray China and India ascountries keen to exploit <strong>Africa</strong>’s resources and wealth, whilespreading Asian hegemony in more menacing ways than theWest has done over the years.Anything about ‘consensus’ reminds <strong>Africa</strong> of theWashington Consensus pushed down the throat of <strong>Africa</strong> bythe IMF in the 1980s and the World Bank in the 1990s, whichwas a bitter experience for <strong>Africa</strong>ns. The WashingtonConsensus was basically a push for unpopular neo-liberalistpolicies that later suffered disrepute because of their massivefailure in <strong>Africa</strong>. To refer to China’s policies in <strong>Africa</strong> as‘consensus’ is to suggest that China’s policies in <strong>Africa</strong> is theChinese version of the unpopular ‘Washington Consensus’.However, that is not true. For<strong>Africa</strong>n nations, China and Indiahave not been patronising and havenot dispensed aid in a condescendingand belittling manner. It does notmatter to <strong>Africa</strong>n nations whether it’sa world dominated by Beijing orDelhi or one dominated by Britain orthe United States as long as they geta fair price for what they offer to theglobal market, and due respect andrecognition as equal partners.Easternisation cannot, therefore, beseen in the same light and perspectiveas westernisation.Easternisation is represented bythe ways in which Asian powers have tried to negotiate for aplace in the global arena through their high quality productsand attractive cultures. It is represented by ways in which theyhave created alternative narratives of success at national andregional levels, largely thorough ingenuity and creativity.There are many similarities and differences betweenEasternisation and Westernisation. Both phenomena aretriggered by economic interests, which are sometimes referredto as benevolent acts. Both policies require followers ordisciples, with whom they can work or control according totheir convenience and agenda. They also look forward tolong-lasting relations, which can bring them benefits to theirrespective countries.Western and eastern powers are interested in worldleadership and dominance. They are all engaged in globalcompetition in which they seek to acquire a share in theglobal arena. They are both guided by moral questions, wherethe West seeks to follow the Judeo-Christian traditionsunder the Greco-Roman structure, the East is guided bymultifarious influences such as Hindu, Buddhist, Confucian,Zoroastrian, Islamic, Shinto and other traditions that can helpin achieving excellence. It is possible that the attraction ofEasternisation to the present world is predicated on diverse andpluralistic traditions of the East.Easternisation appearsto be benign, benevolentand voluntary whileWesternisation washegemonic, forceful andexploitative. Easternisationseems to be predicated onshared interests whileWesternisation was drivenby hidden motives of bigwestern powersEasternisation appears to be benign, benevolent andvoluntary while Westernisation was hegemonic, forceful andexploitative. Easternisation seems to be predicated on sharedinterests while Westernisation was driven by hidden motivesof big western powers many of which were colonial.My submission is that we might be witnessing a new formof globalisation represented by Easternisation in whichdominant countries seek to involve themselves in local affairswithout seeking to be hegemonic. It seems that we aremoving to an era in which there will be more cooperation andfriendship between countries rather than arm twisting, ‘gundiplomacy’ or the will of the strong. These indicate the emergenceof a different version of democracy, which is not definedby political institutions but by economic welfare and generalwell-being of citizens of all countries. The increasingmovement of people from the rest ofthe world to Asia implies that peopleare driven by economic andmaterial needs more than democraticappeal. The rate at which westernmultinational corporations areinvesting in the East is also anindication of the shifting powerbalance in the economic realm.<strong>Africa</strong> is interested in benefiting fromthe success of Asia, and many Asianfirms and states are increasinglymoving to <strong>Africa</strong> to take advantage.The negative writings aboutChina and India’s activities in <strong>Africa</strong>indeed fuels suspicion but <strong>Africa</strong>npolicymakers and decision-makers are capable of readingbetween the lines and can see the exaggerations. Therefore,there are little chances of being swayed by cheap propagandaand biased writing.One of the most popular lines, in many of the articles bywestern scholars and journalists, has been that the Chinese arelooking for strategic resources in <strong>Africa</strong>, e<strong>special</strong>ly oil, andthat is the reason they are investing in <strong>Africa</strong>. The accusationcannot be true because China has been investing all aroundthe globe. Kenya does not have important strategic resourcesbut China has invested massively in infrastructuredevelopment in the country (Amutabi, 2011).In other words, what we hear about the unfavourableactivities of Chinese companies in <strong>Africa</strong> are only partly true,and more often than not exaggerated. We hear that Chinesecompanies bring in their own workers and do not employ<strong>Africa</strong>ns. A quick inspection of the labour composition ofworkers on the Thika Superhighway, Nairobi, which iscurrently under construction, suggests otherwise. There aremore <strong>Africa</strong>ns working on the highway than on any publicproject I know of in Kenya. Kenyans or <strong>Africa</strong>ns make up themajority of the labourers, though most of the engineers andsupervisors are mainly Chinese. However, in many countriesthe Chinese practice of bringing their own labour has triggeredAugust 2011-January 2012 61

S H I F T I N G E Q U A T I O N SChinese Vice-President Xi Jinping (R) with South <strong>Africa</strong>n Vice-President KgalemaMotlanthe in Beijing on September 28, 2011. Photo: Xinhua Pang Xingleia backlash. Chinese labourers have also been involved in smallworks like operating simple machines such as forklifts andearthmovers. There are also claims that China is leading ingrabbing land in <strong>Africa</strong>. There have been rumours that Chinagrows food in <strong>Africa</strong>n nations and then takes it back to China.There are reports of land being rented out by <strong>Africa</strong>n governmentsto Gulf states in some of Eastern <strong>Africa</strong>, in exchangefor oil, but we are yet to hear about the same by China.infrasTrucTure developmenTIn the past twenty years, China and India have emerged asstrong economic players in world affairs. By 2011, China wasregarded as the second-largest economy in the world and Indiahas made significant strides towards becoming a top-teneconomy in the world. The two Asian powers have sharedmany characteristics, because they have both been colonies,occupied by external powers at different times. China andIndia have the highest and second-highest populations, respectively,in the world. They have multiple religious traditions,such as Hinduism, Buddhism and Confucianism. Both ofthem are also beneficiaries of great ideas emanating from twopatriarchs — Mao Zedong for China and Mahatma Gandhifor India. Unlike Western powers, which have beenhegemonic and domineering, China has been rather benignand inclusive in its activities.In 1987, China completed the construction of the largeststadium in Kenya on time for the 1987 All <strong>Africa</strong> Games,which was held in Nairobi. The stadium, later known as MoiInternational Sports Center (Kasarani), was an architecturalwonder in the country.The stadium was opened with great pompand fanfare, extolling the virtues of Chinesetechnology (Amutabi, 2011). One Kenyanremarked, “The British left us with a 10,000capacity stadium [City Stadium, Nairobi) andthe Chinese built us a 60,000 capacity stadium.Now, tell me, who is better? The Chinesehave shown that they have better technologyand value our relationship. They want us tohave what they have” (Omwambe, 2011).China has boosted employment in Kenya, andin a country where the unemployment rate isabove 20 percent this is a welcome opportunityfor many as well as the government.For positive appraisals such as Onyango’s,China was given a contract to construct thesecond National Referral hospital in Eldoret inKenya, between 1991 and 1994. The hospital,which was later named Moi Teaching andReferral Hospital, attracted even moreattention to the Chinese prowess intechnology. China had proved to Kenyans thatit did not just build stadiums, but could buildhospitals as well. These two governmentprojects thrust China into Kenya’sdevelopment discourse and it came as no surprise when Chinastarted to play a more visible road in infrastructuredevelopment in Kenya. China took many road projects suchas the Emusutswi-Kima Road in Western Kenya, which wasalso completed in record time. The road was completed aheadof other road projects commissioned earlier, such as the StandKisa-Ebuyango road. What was also remarkable was that theEmusutswi-Kima road remained steady and free of potholescompared to other roads built after it. It must have come asno surprise to development observers when a Chinese firmwon the contract to build the biggest road project in Kenya,the Thika superhighway, worth 28 billion Kenya shillings.The Thika Superhighway project was a planningnightmare for engineers, but China was equal to the task.Things were made much better for China when the road wasprojected as one of the projects in the country to becompleted ahead of schedule.Despite the positive appraisal of Chinese investment inKenya, there is also a downside to the relations between Chinaand <strong>Africa</strong>. Chinese goods are regarded as inferior to thosefrom Japan and the West. Although Chinese goods areregarded as poor and of low quality, they are relatively cheapand affordable to many people. Chinese companies have alsobeen accused of engaging in corruption in Angola, Sudan, theDemocratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda. They havebeen accused of not following proper procurementprocedures in <strong>Africa</strong> (Amutabi, 2011). Their cheap exports to<strong>Africa</strong> have been blamed for many problems in <strong>Africa</strong>.In Kenya, the collapse of textile factories has been blamedon China.62August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YHundreds of textile factories across Kenya have collapsedsince the 1980s following liberalisation because they couldnot compete with cheap Chinese garments. Rift ValleyTextiles (Rivatex), Mount Kenya Textiles (Mountex), KenyaTaitex Mills (KTM), Kisumu Cotton Mills (Kicomi) andRaymond Textiles, have collapsed. Thousands of jobs werelost as a consequence, leading to economic hardships for manyfamilies from which many are yet to recover.In Dodoma in Tanzania, and Eldoret and Nairobi inKenya, locals have accused Chinese workers of eating theirdogs during the construction of their development projects.In Tanzania, there has been a lot of concern over theactivities of Chinese traders in Kariakoo market in Dar esSalaam, which created tensions with local traders. There hasbeen a similar hue and cry in Zambia where there was a crackdownon informal Chinese tradersoperating without permits in Lusaka’sKamwalla market. This is likely tochange even more with the electionof President Michael Sata who wouldlike to see less Chinese involvement insectors where <strong>Africa</strong>ns can work.Many Chinese workers have beenaccused of ignoring local needs andsensibilities during the constructionof their giant projects. Motorists onthe Thika super highway have oftencomplained about the shape and stateof detours they have been forced touse, many of which are muddy, withgully sections that have damaged their vehicles. They arguethat this is different from European and local companies whooften create better roads for detours before vehicles aredirected to follow them.china and human righTs in africaIn 2010, Human Rights Watch released a controversialreport on China’s Non-Ferrous Mining Corporation(CNMC) copper mines in Zambia. The Chinese companywas accused of mistreating <strong>Africa</strong>n workers. There was afeeling that China was practising a type of racism in which<strong>Africa</strong>n workers were underpaid and lived in squalidconditions. The Chinese were accused of systematic violationof labour laws and regulations. They were accused of takingfor granted the safety of <strong>Africa</strong>ns. The company was accusedof pursuing what looked like imperial and exploitativeobjectives. Tensions escalated in 2010 when miners insouthern Zambia in a small town called Sinazongwe,complained against pitiable working conditions. Two Chineseadministrators shot at a crowd, injuring at least ten people(BBC, 2011). The response from the West was immediate andalmost predictable in detail, basically taking the line of ‘did wenot warn you about these Asians’, so watch out, for they willdo worse things.What many writers, most of whom were western, did notBeing the most powerfuleconomy of the continent,South <strong>Africa</strong> has muchto gain by leveragingits competitiveness,technological advancementand financialresources and acumenin an expanding market.Its companies are boundto have an edgesay was the comparative fact that the mines were run bywestern companies before the Chinese came in, and thatneutral reports indicated that the miners were treated betterthan their counterparts in some mines in South <strong>Africa</strong>,Zimbabwe and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Theintention by the writers, it appears, was to demonise theChinese company while suggesting that European andAmerican companies were better. Unfortunately, many<strong>Africa</strong>ns and <strong>Africa</strong>n scholars saw through the plot andprovided counter reports and explanations on what reallyhappened in the mines in Zambia.After many years of seeing and experiencing Chinese goodssuch as Greatwall television, and construction work such asthe Moi International Sports Centre, Kasarani, and theMoi Teaching and Referral Hospital, there is a need to besceptical about myths perpetuated bywestern writers about China andChinese goods and products. Beforethese products were tested and roadsand buildings compared to Europeanones, the assumption was thatChinese goods were inferior and thatChinese buildings were generallycheap but sloppy.China has received a lot of badpress in the past ten years for whatseems to be Eurocentric reasons.First, the bad press is predicatedlargely on the ascendant ideologicaland continental rivalry where Chinaand India are pitted against European and North Americaninvestors and other interests in <strong>Africa</strong>. As the internationalmedia is dominated by media houses from Europe andNorth America, China and India have been at the receivingend. Sometimes one can sense much of the hostility tingedin nostalgia of the Cold War mentality in some of thearticles that have been penned on China and India,particularly on China.Second, China’s name has suffered heavily at the hands ofthe hegemonic and propagandist role of western media andintellectuals, many of whom have been recruited as anti-Chinacrusaders on behalf of the home governments with the hopeof bringing China down, the way they did to the former SovietUnion. Much of this negative press has taken the form ofbashing and demonising Chinese economic growth andexpansion, usually through axis of human rights, democracyand gender. A few years ago, many western journalists andscholars started China bashing where it is constantlypresented as corrupt and undeserving of its new status. A fewyears ago, a commentary in the op-ed page of The New YorkTimes described China as a ‘rogue donor’ while manyenvironmentalists have condemned the China developmentmodel as dirty. China has been accused of causing heavypollution and for refusing to sign up for the Kyoto Protocol,but which incidentally the United States has also not endorsed.August 2011-January 2012 63

S H I F T I N G E Q U A T I O N SOusmane Tandia, Ambassador of the Republic of Mali, interacting with <strong>Africa</strong>n students of Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab.China has also been accused of allowing underage workers inwhat has been described as ‘sweatshops’ where workingconditions have been described as inhuman. What is ironicis the fact that many of these factories are owned by ormanufacture on behalf of western entities such as AmericanWal Mart or K-Mart or Nike.Third, many western media houses have pushed the ideaof democracy against China, arguing that China is spreadingnegative ideals across the world, by dealing and promotingrogue and dictatorial regimes such as those in Zimbabwe andSudan. They have pointed out that China does business withbad regimes across the world and its focus seems to be onresources. These arguments have been dismissed by DeborahBrautigam in her book The Dragon’s Gift. AlthoughBrautigam’s book is presented as a defence against China, itsphrasing and presentation of China in unmistakably‘Occidental’ terms as the ‘dragon’ clearly shows bias.(Brautigam, 2009).Reports on activities of China in <strong>Africa</strong> have been ratheralarmist and grossly exaggerated. China has been accused ofassisting the genocidal Sudanese regime of Omar El-Bashiragainst Darfur. The accusation has been that China suppliedarms to El-Bashir in exchange for Sudanese oil. This isclearly a case of double standards because the same mediahouses did not condemn western powers for supportingdictators such as Mobutu Sese Seko because of resources.China has also been accused as the only power that stoodbehind dictator Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe, even as hepresided over a kleptocracy that threatened to annihilate hisown people through bad policies. Even as thousands died offamine and suffered the effects of hyperinflation, nothingappeared to bother Mugabe and China’s backers.Further, Brautigam suggests that focusing only onthe China threat makes the world blind to the actualopenings that China’s engagement offers for <strong>Africa</strong>ndevelopment (Brautigam, 2009). Brautigam’s assertion thatthere is very little information about what China is really doingin <strong>Africa</strong> requires a critical scrutiny (Brautigam, 2009).Contrary to her assertions, there is no lack of informationbecause what has happened is that the West has decidedto engage in selective information flow. This is whatEdward Said has ably explained in Orientalism in hisdiscourse on selective presentation of the ‘other’.In a UN report of August 1, 2001, a Thai merchantoperating in Beni and the proprietor of Dara Forest Limited,a Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)-based company,which deals in timber and mineral exports, denied accusationsthat he was connected with President Yoweri Museveni ofUganda or his relatives. However, the merchant concededthat there were some Ugandans with shares in his business(Mugisha and Wasike, 2001: 1). What was significant in thiscase was that there was a connection between locals andinvestors in a company operating in the Democratic Republicof Congo. The revelation was a moral indictment of PresidentMuseveni who had been accused of looting the Congo andsharing resources with outside forces, mainly China.64August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YAlthough the merchant had argued that his activities in theCongo were legal and he had bought timber for export to theUnited States, Japan and China, what was of concern were therelations he had with <strong>Africa</strong>n governments and the role ofChina in these activities.The Asian merchant is quoted as saying that he boughtcoltan and caciterate from the local people and exported themto Germany, Thailand and China. The merchant said that hisgoods were transported through Uganda’s Entebbe Airport(Amutabi, 2001). The merchant was responding to accusationsof the UN panel on the DRC which had cited unconfirmedreports that Museveni’s family were shareholders in DaraForest and the company was plundering Congo minerals andforests. The UN report had “also accused Dara of connivingwith China, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium, Kenya, Japan,United States and Uganda to fraudulently beat timberinternational certification systems” (Mugisha and Wasike,2001:1). At the time, observers thought that the players in theDemocratic Republic of Congo were not just Museveni andKagame. Yoweri Museveni and Paul Kagame were seen asmere ‘errand boys’ of bigger, global powers. Against thisbackdrop, China has been accused of not pursuing the humanrights agenda in its pursuits in <strong>Africa</strong>. Chinese companies havebeen blamed for perpetuating colonial-like policies inextraction. The word “imperial” is now appearing on the lipsof many, to refer to China.conclusionFrom the foregoing, it is obvious that China’sactivities in <strong>Africa</strong> have been misunderstood, largely becauseof western propaganda. What needs to be noted is that,the two Asian economic giants have raised a lot ofinterest in the global economic arena because of theirpower to change the discourse on development in manyparts of the world, e<strong>special</strong>ly <strong>Africa</strong>. The emergingeconomic powers, India and China, have contributed a lotto <strong>Africa</strong>’s development in the past 20 years than manyEuropean countries have done on the continent incenturies. Projects of enormous proportions such as TazaraRailway in Tanzania and Zambia and Thika superhighwayin Kenya must be seen in order to imagine the kind ofimpact Chinese aid has had on <strong>Africa</strong>. Foton and Tatabesides other motor vehicle brands from China and Indiaare transforming lives in <strong>Africa</strong>.The popular tuk-tuk and other motorcycle brands arealso causing a lot of excitement in the transport industry forthe common man in <strong>Africa</strong>. What is also instructive are thegood financial terms under which aid from China and Indiaare dispensed in <strong>Africa</strong>.On the other hand, India has brought its coreexpertise in capacity building and human resourcedevelopment to help in the development of many <strong>Africa</strong>ncountries.nReferences1. Amutabi, Maurice N (2010), “China and Developmentin Kenya: Why Chinese Intentions in <strong>Africa</strong> are good.”Kenya Social Science Forum, Nairobi, 2011.2. Amutabi, Maurice (2001), “<strong>Africa</strong>n Plunderers in theCongo and the Paradox of <strong>Africa</strong>n Solutions for The DRC:The case of Uganda and Rwanda” (with Winston Akala andJoy Williams-Black) Paper presented at the conference on‘Reclaiming the Congo and its Potential for <strong>Africa</strong>: StrategicPlans for the Reconstruction of the Democratic Republic ofCongo (DRC): The Role of Congolese Intellectuals andfriends of DRC’, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA, October 11 -13, 2001.3. Brautigam, Deborah (2009), The Dragon’s Gift: The RealStory of China in <strong>Africa</strong>. New York: Oxford UniversityPress.4. Colvin, Lucy (2008), “All’s Fair in Loans and War: TheDevelopment of China-Angola Relations,” in KwekuAmpiah and Sanusha Naidu, eds., Crouching Tiger, HiddenDragon? <strong>Africa</strong> and China. Scottsville, South <strong>Africa</strong>:University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, 2008, pp. 108--23.5. Ferreira, Manuel Ennes (2008), “China in Angola: Just aPassion for Oil?” in Chris Alden, Daniel Large and RicardoSoares de Oliveira, eds., China Returns to <strong>Africa</strong>: A RisingPower and a Continent Embrace. New York: ColumbiaUniversity Press, 2008, pp. 295—317.6. Lee, Henry and Dan Shalmon (2008), “Searching for Oil:China’s Strategies in <strong>Africa</strong>,” in Robert I. Rotberg, ed.,China into <strong>Africa</strong>: Trade, Aid and Influence (WashingtonDC: Brookings Institution Press, 2008), p. 120.7. Jiangong, Zhou (2011), “<strong>Africa</strong> Frenzy Feeds China StockBubble,” Asia Times Online, March 27, 2007, available at:www.atimes.com/atimes/China_Business/ IC27Cb01.html(accessed December 11, 2011).8. Halper, Stefan (2010), The Beijing Consensus: HowChina's Authoritarian Model Will Dominate the Twenty-First Century. New York: Basic Books.9. Mamdani, Mahmood (1996), Citizen and Subject:Contemporary <strong>Africa</strong> and the Legacy of Late Colonialism.Princeton: Princeton University Press.10. Mugisha, Anne & Alfred Wasike (2001), “MerchantDenies Museveni Link” in New Vision, Kampala.http://allafrica.com/stories/ (accessed September 12, 2001).11. Rosenberg, Emily (1996), Spreading the AmericanDream: American Economic and Cultural Expansion in1890-1945. New York: Hill and Wang.12. Swann, Christopher & William McQuillen (2006),“China to Surpass World Bank as Top Lender to <strong>Africa</strong>,”Bloomberg.com, November 3, 2006.August 2011-January 2012 65

S T R A T E G Y<strong>Africa</strong>n AGENDA,the Pretoria waySouth <strong>Africa</strong>n foreign policy’s biggest goal today is to intertwine the‘<strong>Africa</strong>n Agenda’ with its interests in the continent, says Rajiv BhatiaIndia’s Prime Minister Manmohan Singh with South <strong>Africa</strong>’s President Jacob Zuma, on the sidelines ofthe 5th IBSA Summit in Pretoria on October 18, 2011. Photo: PIBThere are two differences between thefirst “Scramble for <strong>Africa</strong>” and theunfolding second “Scramble for<strong>Africa</strong>”. The first “scramble” was therace among European powers tocapture and colonise <strong>Africa</strong>n lands inthe 19th century’s last quarter. Thesecond one is the ongoing competitionamong developed and developing countries to have access to<strong>Africa</strong>n markets, minerals, energy supplies and cooperation.The differences are notable.The first “scramble” brought with it violence and conflictsince the motive was subjugation and colonisation of the“Dark Continent”. The European nations were motivatedby self-interest and a belief in the faulty doctrine of the “WhiteMan’s Burden”.However, in the second “scramble”, the main players —the United States, the European Union, China and India —are using peaceful methods to help <strong>Africa</strong>n countries developin diverse ways even as they secure their own interests.Also, unlike in the 19th century, <strong>Africa</strong>n nations are todaypassing through a period of renaissance, led by a variety ofthinkers and political leaders. While they express themselvesthrough institutions such as the <strong>Africa</strong>n Union (AU), theyalso draw strength from the fact that some of the countries inthe union (notably South <strong>Africa</strong>) offer competition to outsidepowers seeking a footprint on the continent.South <strong>Africa</strong>, which used to practise apartheid (a systemof racial segregation), was an ostracised country till the1980s, shunned by most of <strong>Africa</strong> and the internationalcommunity, except the West. Even though South <strong>Africa</strong>’sneighbouring countries were dependent on it economically,it was given a very limited role on the world stage.But after a turbulent but fascinating transition between1990 and 1994, a new and democratic South <strong>Africa</strong> emerged,with Nelson Mandela at the helm.66August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YNow, 17 years later, it is a country with enormouspolitical and economic clout in the region, the continent andthe world. The years 2010 and 2011 have been e<strong>special</strong>lyremarkable due to two international events the countryhosted: the FIFA World Cup (for the first time in <strong>Africa</strong>) andthe 17th Conference of Parties (COP) of the United NationsFramework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).Becoming a democracy hashelped South <strong>Africa</strong> craft andconduct an active foreign policyand create and sustain a web ofeconomic relationships with other<strong>Africa</strong>n nations. The web is set togrow bigger even though not all<strong>Africa</strong>n nations love South <strong>Africa</strong>.The intensifying “scramble” for<strong>Africa</strong> can, therefore, be seen moreclearly if we study South <strong>Africa</strong>’sinterests, ideological motivations,policies, achievements and setbacks in an in-depth andobjective way.Dual roleI returned to Delhi towards the end of 2009 after aproductive and rewarding tenure in South <strong>Africa</strong> as India’shigh commissioner.One day in the Ministry of External Affairs, while I wasbriefing a senior colleague, he suddenly exclaimed: “But, sir,South <strong>Africa</strong> is not <strong>Africa</strong>!”The remark was pregnant with meaning, but waspartially correct.While driving the car at 130 km an hour on the gleaminghighway between Pretoria and Johannesburg and looking atthe glass-and-chrome buildings of the Sandton area, I wouldfeel that I was living in Europe or America.South <strong>Africa</strong>’s economy,valued at $525 billion onpublic-private partnership(PPP) formula in 2010,is the biggest in <strong>Africa</strong>.This economy accountsfor nearly a quarter of<strong>Africa</strong>’s GDPHowever, my extensive tours of South <strong>Africa</strong> took me totownships and villages where poverty, unemployment,disease, violence and misery ruled.It became evident that, like India, South <strong>Africa</strong> too was anation with dual personalities — it was a rich as well as a poorcountry, a unique cross between a developed and developingsociety, a nation living on the cusp of the 21st century yetstruggling to resolve problems leftbehind by the previous era.This duality made South <strong>Africa</strong>a giver as well as a receiver — ofassistance, technology, tradeconcessions and foreign investment.South <strong>Africa</strong>’s approach andcontribution towards thedevelopment of other nations of thecontinent show that it has beenguided by its own interests as well asby the idea that promoting <strong>Africa</strong>’development would benefit it too, e<strong>special</strong>ly its industries,and the continent on the whole.South <strong>Africa</strong>’s economy, valued at $525 billion on apublic-private partnership (PPP) formula in 2010, is thebiggest in <strong>Africa</strong>. This economy accounts for nearly aquarter of <strong>Africa</strong>’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP).However, after growing steadily for a long time, South<strong>Africa</strong> passed through a period of recession beginning in 2008.The economy gradually recovered and registered an annualgrowth rate of 2.8 percent in 2010 and is now projected togrow at 4.3 percent in 2012.With the GDP’s major share coming from mining,manufacturing and services and a minor portion fromagriculture, the South <strong>Africa</strong>n economy needs to strengthencooperation with neighbouring countries, with distant<strong>Africa</strong>n nations and countries outside the continent.As an emerging economy, South<strong>Africa</strong> may be smaller then Chinaand India but when seen in the<strong>Africa</strong>n context and noting its localand global links, the country hasconsiderable significance.A statue of Nelson Mandela at Mandela Square in Sandton. Photo: activeeducation.blogspot.comPlans anD PrioritiesIf a government is judged by howit articulates plans and priorities, theSouth <strong>Africa</strong>n regime is ahead ofmany, including that of India.This fact is best illustrated by thepresentation of details about thecountry’s foreign policy priorities,year after year.The current Strategic Plan, validfor the period 2011 to 2014, has eightpriorities, three of which touch uponthe theme being discussed here:August 2011-January 2012 67

S T R A T E G YMap of the member nations ofSouthern <strong>Africa</strong>n DevelopmentCommunity (SADC)promoting the <strong>Africa</strong>n agenda and sustainabledevelopment; strengthening political and economic integrationof Southern <strong>Africa</strong>n Development Community (SADC);and strengthening of South-South cooperation and relations.The document lists deliverables, timelines and otherdetails which need a close study tounderstand the mindset and theevolved thinking of the policymakersin Pretoria and Cape Town.One of the main goals of South<strong>Africa</strong>’s foreign policy is to promotethe “<strong>Africa</strong>n Agenda”.A lot of literature exists on thesubject and it is the favourite phraseof South <strong>Africa</strong>n leaders andspokespersons. Put simply, the<strong>Africa</strong>n Agenda means thatSouth <strong>Africa</strong> favours peace anddevelopment on the continentthrough “<strong>Africa</strong>n solutions” and generous foreign assistance,which should be secured in such a manner that South <strong>Africa</strong>gets to play a key role.Maite Nkoana-Mashabane, South <strong>Africa</strong>’s Minister ofDepartment of International Relations and Cooperation(DIRCO), spells out Pretoria’s policy. “The focus of South<strong>Africa</strong>’s engagements on the <strong>Africa</strong>n continent is to promotesocio-economic development, contribute to the resolution ofconflicts, and the building of an enabling environment inwhich the development of the continent can take place 1 .”The duality, which I had referred to, is reflected in thecountry’s foreign economic policy.South <strong>Africa</strong> seeks Direct Foreign Investment (DFI) inmarkets where its powerful companies, in the fields ofcommunication and broadcasting, infrastructure, mining,South <strong>Africa</strong> seeks DirectForeign Investment (DFI) inmarkets where its powerfulcompanies, in the fields ofcommunication andbroadcasting, infrastructure,mining, pharmaceuticalsand banking, enjoy acompetitive advantagepharmaceuticals and banking, enjoy a competitiveadvantage. The officials spell out areas where thecountry welcomes and facilitates DFI, such as energy,transport, agriculture, agro-processing, mining,manufacturing, green technologies and tourism.Also, South <strong>Africa</strong> is currently reforming its externalassistance machinery. For many years, aid waschannelled through the <strong>Africa</strong>n Renaissance andInternational Cooperation Fund (ARF). Now, a processis under way to transform ARF into the South <strong>Africa</strong>nDevelopment Partnership Agency (SADPA). Thetransitional period is scheduled to be completed by2013-14 when ARF will be terminated and SADPAoperationalised. It is set to become an instrument forsecuring the objectives of the country’s developmentcooperation strategy and foreign economic policy.Multi-tier activisMSouth <strong>Africa</strong>’s external economic relationships shouldbe studied as a set of concentric circles that start in theneighbourhood and go beyond <strong>Africa</strong>.At the primary level is the Southern <strong>Africa</strong>n CustomsUnion (SACU), which welds the country with Botswana,Lesotho, Swaziland and Namibia to form a <strong>special</strong>arrangement. SACU is the world’s oldest customs union,providing common external and excise tariffs. The unioncredits all duties into South <strong>Africa</strong>’srevenue fund, which are sharedamong the member states accordingto a formula.In 2010, SACU completed acentury and marked a “historicyear” 2 , said Tswelopele CorneliaMoremi, the union’s executivesecretary, on July 29, 2011, at theSACU regional conference held onthe theme of ‘Implementing aCommon Agenda TowardsRegional Integration’.Yet, SACU appears to be facing anexistential dilemma. On one hand, it has the ambition tospearhead regional integration in the context of a broaderframework of expanding continental unity. “For SACU todevelop as a viable regional economic entity, progress isneeded in the intra-SACU policy development andharmonisation,” says the union’s website. 3 The union aims toencompass industrial policies and strategies, agricultural andcompetition policies, laws and regulations and also promisesto address unfair trade practices. The Heads of State in theunion stand committed to turning it into “an economiccommunity”.On the other hand, due to the ongoing global financialcrisis, the common revenue pool has suffered a deficit, leavingbehind a huge fiscal impact on smaller SACU economies.Besides, the asymmetry of their needs as compared to68August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YSandton, a wealthy and premier business centre of Johannesburg, South <strong>Africa</strong>.those of South <strong>Africa</strong> and differences over the EconomicPartnership Agreements (EPAs) with the European Union(EU) has deepened the divide.In my conversations with leaders and officials of Lesotho,I discovered a peculiar mixture of a small kingdom’sscepticism and assertiveness along with an awareness of itsdependence on South <strong>Africa</strong>, which surrounds this countryand Swaziland, making them both landlocked.The Southern <strong>Africa</strong>n Development Community(SADC) and Common Market for Eastern and Southern<strong>Africa</strong> (COMESA) form the next two concentric circles,which overlap but are not identical.SADC, a 15-member inter-governmental organisation,based in Gaborone, Botswana, was set up in 1992.It emerged from its predecessor, the Southern <strong>Africa</strong>nDevelopment Coordination Conference (SADCC),established in 1980.SADC’s mission is “to promote sustainable and equitableeconomic growth and socio-economic developmentthrough...deeper cooperation and integration...”. 4 Judgingfrom the communique of its latest 31st Head OfStates/Government Summit, SADC focuses on two areas,both of which benefit South <strong>Africa</strong>:i) Review of progress in implementation of infrastructureprojects related to power, information and communicationstechnology and regional corridors such as the Zimbabwe-Zambia-Botswana-Namibia Interconnector along withfinalisation of the infrastructure master plan.ii) Expediting progress in consolidating SADC Free TradeArea by directing the ministerial group concerned to producean agreement on the roadmap for SADC Customs Union 5 .The COMESA has 19 members and is based in Lusaka,Zambia. Its aim is “to be fully integrated, internationallycompetitive regional economic community with highstandards of living for all its people, ready to merge into an<strong>Africa</strong>n Economic Community”.From this motto flows its mission to facilitate the region’ssustained development through economic integration 6 .The Eastern <strong>Africa</strong>n Community (EAC), too, has asimilar approach towards regional unity. But South <strong>Africa</strong> isnot its member.This explains why the three institutions launched‘Tripartite Grand Free Trade Area Negotiations’ recently.Committed to speeding up negotiations, the member statesare working towards turning the three pillars of a free tradearea, industrial development and infrastructural integrationinto a reality.The communique issued after the second TripartiteSummit said: “The tripartite initiative is a decisive step toachieve the <strong>Africa</strong>n vision of establishing the <strong>Africa</strong>nEconomic Community.”The community, when it comes into existence, willcombine 26 countries, with a population of 600 million andgross domestic product (GDP) of $1 trillion. This willrepresent 57 percent of <strong>Africa</strong>’s population and 58 percentof its GDP.The foregoing analysis of regional integrationprocesses is key to understanding the politics andeconomics behind it.The official view of Pretoria is clear: South <strong>Africa</strong>advocates regional integration in the south and sees itself asintegral to the endeavours towards deeper integration intoAugust 2011-January 2012 69

S T R A T E G YSADC and across southern and eastern <strong>Africa</strong>.Being the most powerful economy on the continent, South<strong>Africa</strong> has much to gain by leveraging its competitiveness,technological advancement, financial resources and acumen inan expanding market. Its companies are bound to have anedge over perceived competitors in <strong>Africa</strong> (such as Egypt,Nigeria and Kenya) and outside <strong>Africa</strong> (such as China, India,Brazil and Russia).However, many outside South <strong>Africa</strong> evaluate thecountry’s role differently. Although many of South <strong>Africa</strong>’spartners are appreciative and supportive of its policyapproach, the country is not without its quota of critics andsceptics.In this context, two examplesshould suffice.When a controversy was ragingover the Economic PartnershipAgreements (EPA), RampholoMolefhe, a minister fromBotswana, had said South <strong>Africa</strong>could no longer be allowed tobehave like a ‘Big Brother’ inSACU and do as it wished.Recalling this, Molefhe said:“Should this leadership role go toSouth <strong>Africa</strong>’s head of state, it caneasily get in the way of a harmoniouseffort in southern <strong>Africa</strong> toconsolidate political and economic relations that will preparethe region for a smooth integration into an united <strong>Africa</strong>ngovernment in the long run.” 7In a similar manner, intra-SADC tensions come into theBeing the most powerfuleconomy of the continent,South <strong>Africa</strong> has muchto gain by leveragingits competitiveness,technologicaladvancement, financialresources and acumen inan expanding market. Itscompanies are boundto have an edgepublic from time to time. It has been evident that South<strong>Africa</strong> enjoys a pivotal position in SADC. But SADC’sdependence on this country can become an obstacle.As South <strong>Africa</strong>n advocate and lecturer Saurombe Amossaid: “What is obvious is that SADC needs South <strong>Africa</strong> butat the same time South <strong>Africa</strong> is at liberty to choose when todrive SADC agenda.” 8South <strong>Africa</strong> has been proactive in other parts of <strong>Africa</strong>and within the AU since it is conscious of the adversereactions its size, strength and policy generate and since itsinterests demand engagement with the larger communitybeyond southern and eastern <strong>Africa</strong>.Going beyond that level, South<strong>Africa</strong>, through its membership ofIBSA Dialogue Forum (which givesit an entry into Asia and LatinAmerica) and the recently acquiredmembership of BRICS (which putsit in the top league of emergingeconomies), has been playinga multifaceted global role. Noexternal power interested in engaging<strong>Africa</strong> can afford to ignore thiscountry. However, there is a questionmark on South <strong>Africa</strong>’s institutionaland managerial capacity to dojustice to its wide-rangingcommitments.One remembers how foreign ambassadors based inPretoria found South <strong>Africa</strong>n ministers and senior officialsinaccessible as they seemed to be on a perpetual safari toother <strong>Africa</strong>n capitals.The United Nations Climate Change Conference in Durban in December 2011.70August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YOur experience showed that often progress on bilateralagenda issues suffers because of the work burden ongovernmental machinery, stemming from South <strong>Africa</strong>’strilateral, regional or multilateral agenda.iMPlications for inDiaIn formulating and implementing India’s <strong>Africa</strong> policy,New Delhi needs to include the changing contours, notonly of international competition for <strong>Africa</strong>, but also ofSouth <strong>Africa</strong>’s <strong>Africa</strong>n Agenda. A conflict of interest may notarise but right mix of cooperation and competition needs tobe identified and promoted within the framework of the“strategic partnership” that links India and South <strong>Africa</strong>.From this flow several implications.First, in bilateral discussions, India should help South<strong>Africa</strong> to understand South Asia and South East Asia betterand make it a point to get regular briefings from South<strong>Africa</strong> about southern and eastern <strong>Africa</strong> and <strong>Africa</strong> as awhole. This will appear to be normal, but often it does nottake place in reality. Doing so will help the two countries inbroadening mutual understanding and pave the way forcloser cooperation.Secondly, the time is ripe for deepening bilateraleconomic relationships. South <strong>Africa</strong> and India need toexpedite the implementation of a number of pendinginitiatives, such as the finalisation of the investmentpromotion and protection agreement, the India-SACUpreferential trade agreement, effective measures toaccelerate growth of bilateral trade and investment flows,and trilateral projects in <strong>Africa</strong> involving Indian, South<strong>Africa</strong>n and other <strong>Africa</strong>n companies.Thirdly, South <strong>Africa</strong>’s most important economicrelationship in Asia, with China, needs to be monitoredclosely. This should not only be done by governmentagencies but also by Indian academics, for the strengtheningof South <strong>Africa</strong>-China ties in future, as in the past, willhave repercussions on South <strong>Africa</strong>-India ties.Fourthly, an unspoken competition between theIndia-Brazil-South <strong>Africa</strong> (IBSA) and BRICS seemsinevitable. South <strong>Africa</strong>’s interest or disinterest should beassessed through its actions and not words.It should be the joint endeavour of India and South <strong>Africa</strong>,along with Brazil, to give priority to IBSA in their foreignpolicy matters. This means producing long-windeddeclarations after each summit is no substitute for concrete,tangible and people-friendly projects embodying the interestsand values that bind the three IBSA partners.Finally, the wisdom behind India’s decision to conduct its<strong>Africa</strong> policy at three different though interconnected levels— bilateral, regional and continental — needs to beappreciated.A regional dimension, through dialogue and cooperationwith the Regional Economic Communities (RECs), isacquiring momentum. Following the second India-RECmeeting, the <strong>Africa</strong>n side indicated that it “considered Indiaan important partner and was happy to have a structureddialogue in this format”. 9 Opening up towards <strong>Africa</strong>n RECsand a sustained nurturing of the relationship will benefitIndia in the long run.conclusion<strong>Africa</strong> is going through a period of transition. Stakes forits political and economic development are high, but theoutlook for its renaissance is uncertain.Where the continent stands in 2025 or 2050 will dependon what its leaders, elites, institutions and people achieve.The outcome will also be moulded by what <strong>Africa</strong>’spartners do.Will they be driven by self-interest, mutual benefit orimpulse to accord due priority to <strong>Africa</strong>’s interests? Viewedfrom this angle, South <strong>Africa</strong>, given the duality of its position,economy and multi-tier relationships, will have a significantcontribution to make.India, the benign partner of <strong>Africa</strong>, should reappraise itsrelationship with South <strong>Africa</strong> to decide what more needsto be done and what needs to be done differently. nReferences1. Strategic Plan 2011-14. (n.d.). Retrieved from DIRCO,South <strong>Africa</strong>: http://www.dfa.gov.za/2. 2011 Speeches. (2011, July 29). Retrieved from SACU website:http://www.sacu.int/3. Policy Development and Research . (n.d.). Retrieved fromSACU website: http://www.sacu.int/policy.php?id=4174. About SADC. (2011). Retrieved from SADC website:http://www.sadc.int/5. SADC news, 31st Summit Communique. (2011, August19). Retrieved from SADC website :http://www.sadc.int/english/current-affairs/news/6. About us, Vision and Mission (n.d.). Retrieved fromCOMESA: http://www.comesa.int/7. MOLEFHE, R. (2009, June 17). Is South <strong>Africa</strong> a bully inSACU? Mmegionline http://www.mmegi.bw/index.php?sid=6&aid=8&dir=2009/June/Wednesday178. Amos, S. (Vol 5, Number 3 2010). The role of South <strong>Africa</strong>in SADC regional integration: the making or braking of theorganization. Journal of International Commercial Law andTechnology , 124-131.9. Statements — Press Releases on Second India — RECsMeeting. (2011, November 09). Retrieved from Ministry ofExternal Affairs, New Delhi: http://www.mea.gov.in/mystart.phpAugust 2011-January 2012 71

S Y N E R G YIndia and Brazil: Joininghands for FOOD securityIndia and Brazil are investing in <strong>Africa</strong> to help it become self-sufficient inagriculture, an involvement that will have far-reaching impact onfood security in <strong>Africa</strong>, says Estefanía MarchánBean farming in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Many <strong>Africa</strong>n countries are dependent on food imports and rising food pricesand vulnerability to external shocks threaten food security in the continent.There is a big buzz around BRIC’s (Brazil,Russia, India, China) investment in<strong>Africa</strong>. Rightly so: the emerging powersare spurring the region’s integration intothe global economy as never before,offering unprecedented levels ofdevelopment assistance under thebanner of South-South Cooperation.Much has been heard about China’s infrastructure building in<strong>Africa</strong> and its competitive edge in the race for natural resources.But what are the two democracies within the groupingcontributing to the continent?To distinguish themselves, India and Brazil have identifiedagriculture — on which two-thirds of <strong>Africa</strong>ns depend fortheir livelihood — as a priority sector for cooperation. <strong>Africa</strong>nagriculture has long suffered from low output, due in large partto severe under-capitalisation and neglect. The majority of<strong>Africa</strong>n farmers work smallholder, subsistence farms, and havepoor access to markets and technology to improveproductivity. Many <strong>Africa</strong>n countries are thus dependent onfood imports. Therefore, rising food prices and vulnerabilityto external shocks continually threaten their food security.The harm to human life is clear: the Food and AgricultureOrganisation reports that nearly one in three <strong>Africa</strong>ns ismalnourished!There are many good reasons for new global players likeIndia and Brazil to get involved. After South America, <strong>Africa</strong>possesses the largest share of uncultivated arable land in theworld — a land ready for transformation. Here, India andBrazil are providing important inputs in the form ofaffordable goods and services and badly-needed technicalexpertise. Both countries have had their own agriculturalrevolutions and are among the world’s top food producers.Together, their venture into <strong>Africa</strong>’s agriculture sector canreignite a primary engine for growth and prove vital to theregion’s food security.<strong>Africa</strong>n policymakers recognise that greater investmentsin the agricultural sector, particularly in R&D and skill72August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Ydevelopment, are essential for poverty eradication and theregion’s long-term development. For <strong>Africa</strong>ns, there isplenty of room for Indian and Brazilian investments andboth are welcome in the continent.Independent Investment pathsIndividually, India and Brazil are leveraging theirstrengths in affordable low-tech and scientific research toboost <strong>Africa</strong>’s agricultural productivity. At the second<strong>Africa</strong>-India Forum in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia in 2011, Indiare-affirmed its commitment to help in boosting <strong>Africa</strong>’sagriculture and helping the region get closer to achieving theMillennium Development Goal of halving the number ofpeople suffering from extreme hunger by 2015. Indiapledged, among other things, to extend scholarships to<strong>Africa</strong>n students in the agricultural sciences, and to sendteams of experts from the Indian Council of AgricultureResearch (ICAR) to several <strong>Africa</strong>n countries to exploreIndia’s role in training human resources. The governmenthas set aside $700 million to establish institutions in <strong>Africa</strong>,including the proposed India-<strong>Africa</strong> Institute of Agricultureand Rural Development.However, India’s most valuable contribution is itsincreasing lines of credit — up to $5 billion now — whichare driving private investment, such as a $15-million loan todevelop commercial agriculture in Sierra Leone (India <strong>Africa</strong>Connect, 2011). Indian firms provide what they call TripleA — adaptable, appropriate and affordable — technologies,which are a boon to <strong>Africa</strong>. These companies offer capital,as well as necessary equipment, like small tractors andirrigation equipment suitable for <strong>Africa</strong>’s smallholdingfarms. Their investments are India’s comparative advantagein the continent. The Federation of Indian Chambers ofCommerce and Industry (FICCI) is working with Indianbusinesses to invest across many sectors in <strong>Africa</strong>, butits main focus is agriculture. Indian investment inEthiopia alone stands at $4.5 billion, dominated mostly byfloriculture and agriculture (Abate,2011). Leading Indian companies,including Karuturi Global Ltd.,Kirloskar Brothers Ltd., Mahindraand Mahindra, Jain Irrigation andRenuka Sugars, have established apresence in agriculture and relatedsectors (Modi, 2011). Over 80companies have already investedaround $2.3 billion directly intocommercial farming activitiesin several <strong>Africa</strong>n countries(Kumar, 2011).Brazil’s strength, on the otherhand, is in scientific researchappropriate to <strong>Africa</strong>’s agriculturalecosystem. Brazil has launchedresearch and food security initiativesthroughout the continent. Through Embrapa, the country’spioneering agricultural research institute, Brazil hasstationed personnel in Ghana, Mozambique, Senegal andMali to share the skills that have transformed its own drysavannah, the cerrado, into one of South America’s mostfertile regions. In the 1970s, the agricultural giant was a foodimporter, as its agriculture suffered from low yields. TheBrazilian cerrado was, like much of <strong>Africa</strong>, tropical andnutrient-poor, but today it accounts for 70 percent of Brazil’sfarm output. Its revitalisation holds important lessons for<strong>Africa</strong>. The <strong>Africa</strong>-Brazil Agricultural InnovationMarketplace, established in 2010, extends research effortsacross the continent, facilitating technology transfer andpolicy dialogue among <strong>Africa</strong>n and Brazilian experts andinstitutions, and more importantly, linking projects to funds.Another important part of Brazil’s aid to the region is the<strong>Africa</strong>-Brazil Cooperation Programme on Social Protection,launched in 2009. It is a platform for Brazilian experts andtheir <strong>Africa</strong>n counterparts to exchange knowledge on socialdevelopment programmes such as Fome Zero (ZeroHunger), Brazil’s revolutionary strategy for combatingdomestic food insecurity by strengthening small-scaleagriculture, and introducing innovative schemes such ascash transfers. Small-scale farms employ over 70 percent ofall agricultural workers in Brazil, many of whom belong tothe vulnerable, low-income population. To promote socialand economic inclusion and to energise rural economies,Brazil’s National Programme to Strengthen Family Farming(PRONAF) provides credit and insurance to farmers, whilethe Food Acquisition Programme from Family Farming(PAA) procures food directly from small-scale farmers anddonates it to vulnerable populations and school mealsprogrammes (Rocha, 2009). The PAA is part of the FomeZero strategy. Largely as a result of the Fome Zeroprogramme, the number of Brazilians living in povertydecreased by 20 million from 2003 to 2009, and extremehunger was halved (Oxfam, 2010).The chairman of Zain Nigeria, Dr. Oba Otudeko (L), in conversation with Sunil Mittal (R),founder and chairman of Bharti Airtel, India’s largest mobile phone company,and the company’s managing director (Nigeria), Rajan Swaroop (C), during the launch of thecompany’s rebranding effort in Lagos, Nigeria. India’s largest mobile phonecompany symbolises the rise of Indian investment in <strong>Africa</strong>.August 2011-January 2012 73

S Y N E R G YThen Brazilian president Luiz Inacio Lula Da Silva (L) and South <strong>Africa</strong>n President Jacob Zuma join hands during a news conference at theUnion Buildings in Pretoria July 9, 2010. Photo: Thomas Mukoya, Reutersa joInt Investment modelCombined, India and Brazil’s investments seem to be justwhat <strong>Africa</strong> needs. In Senegal, for example, low-cost irrigationpumps provided by the Indian company Kirloskar BrothersLtd have boosted rice production and, in five years, allowedthe largely agricultural nation to meet twice as much of itsdomestic rice demand (Modi, 2011). Simultaneously,Embrapa has partnered with Senegal, investing in technicaltraining and experimenting with upland rice varieties suitedfor the country.Senegal has long been dependent on food imports,particularly of rice. Between 2001 and 2005, more than80 percent of domestic rice consumption in the countrydepended on imports, making Senegal the world’stenth-largest rice importer (<strong>Africa</strong> Rice Centre, 2007). In 2008,the government launched the Great Push Forward forAgriculture, Food, and Abundance (GOANA) project, withthe objective of becoming self-sufficient by 2012 (Matsumoto-Izadifar, 2008). Today, India and Brazil are working unilaterallyto help Senegal meet this goal. Their complementary andinterlocking investments could be the new investment modelfor the country and indeed for the rest of <strong>Africa</strong>. Together,India and Brazil can help develop the skills of the 77 percentof the Senegalese labour force that is engaged in agriculture;and by transferring technology and providing appropriateinputs, they can help Senegal achieve self-sufficiency.FIllIng the Investment voIdIndia and Brazil’s investments in <strong>Africa</strong>’s agriculture couldnot have come at a better time. Agricultural productivity in thecontinent has been declining just as traditional sources of aidhave shrunk. The share of World Bank loans that went toagricultural development in <strong>Africa</strong> fell from 30 percent to8 percent between 1978-2006, and agricultural assistance fromthe United States shifted away from capacity-building to foodaid. By 2006, the United States was spending twice as muchproviding free food to the region as it was on helping <strong>Africa</strong>nsfeed themselves (Paarlber, 2011). Such aid has done little toencourage <strong>Africa</strong>’s development or to mitigate widespreadmalnutrition. The global economic slowdown will surelycontinue to impact food aid.However, India and Brazil can fill the investment void.To catalyse change, what is needed is a formalised India-BrazilPartnership for <strong>Africa</strong>’s food security. A partnership can havepositive effects both in <strong>Africa</strong> and for broader India-Brazilrelations, without hindering each country’s individual effortsin the region. The creation of IBSA, the India, Brazil andSouth <strong>Africa</strong> trilateral forum, shows India and Brazil’swillingness to cooperate on issues of shared importancebeyond their borders. IBSA’s Facility for Poverty and HungerAlleviation programme, for example, pools $1 million fromeach member to implement small development projects ininterested countries. Yet, while the fund constitutes apioneering initiative in South-South cooperation, it is neithersystematic nor targeted enough to have far-reaching impact.Because it focuses on one-off projects, it does little toencourage lasting political and economic ties between donorand patron countries.Now is a propitious time for India and Brazil to capitaliseon the relationships being built with <strong>Africa</strong>, and with eachother. From 2001 to 2010, bilateral trade between India and<strong>Africa</strong> grew from $1 billion to $50 billion, and Brazil-<strong>Africa</strong>74August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Ytrade grew from $3 billion to $20 billion. Meanwhile,bilateral engagement between India and Brazil has alsointensified, deepening just as their presence on the global stagehas increased. These types of secondary and tertiary interactionspresent an opportunity for India and Brazil to buildmutual confidence and demonstrate the commonalities thatexist between them at a time when both countries areemerging as the leaders of the global South.Their investments to develop <strong>Africa</strong>’s agriculture sectorare also critical to leveraging the continent’s recent economicupturn. In 2010, <strong>Africa</strong> was one of the fastest-growing regionsin the world, expanding at an average rate of 4.9 percent.Despite the momentum, high food and oil prices remain athreat to sustained growth.towards a collaboratIve approachThe memoranda of understanding (MoUs) can beexplored with the Comprehensive <strong>Africa</strong>n AgricultureDevelopment Programme, the <strong>Africa</strong>n-led initiative for foodsecurity and agriculture, or regional bodies like the Southern<strong>Africa</strong>n Development Community, for cooperationappropriate to specific economic or agricultural climates. WhileBrazil’s topography and climate more closely resemble <strong>Africa</strong>’s,India’s agricultural ecosystem has many lessons to offer. Theaverage Indian farm is smaller than its Brazilian counterpart(1.3 ha versus 68 ha), and the sector employs more people inIndia than it does in Brazil. Labour-intensive farming is what<strong>Africa</strong> needs, as well as India’s expertise in small-farmmechanisation and experience of empowering womenthrough microfinance and cooperative enterprises. <strong>Africa</strong>ninstitutions can host Indian and Brazilian scientists and privateand social sector leaders to share their know-how.The funding for this and similar partnerships can besought from international development organisations.In Senegal, for example, the World Bank spent $10 millionto support food security initiatives in 2010 (World Bank,2011). Some of the funds can be used as seed money todevelop programmes created in partnership with India andBrazil and their <strong>Africa</strong>n counterparts. The Indian Council ofAgricultural Research and the Indian Agency for Partnershipin Development can work with Embrapa and the BrazilianAgency for Cooperation. The World Bank, and governmentsof countries like the United Kingdom, Japan and the UnitedStates already collaborate with Brazilian-led institutions in<strong>Africa</strong>. There is no reason why India should not be involved.If the partnership works, then India and Brazil can extend thistype of targeted investment and knowledge-sharing to otherdeveloping countries. IBSA can serve as a springboard forgreater cooperation.Not so long ago, India and Brazil seemed destined to playthe role of the recipients of foreign aid and technical assistance.Today, however, they are engaging internationally withmarked confidence, offering their leadership and resources totackle global challenges. In May 2011, the Indian Agency forPartnership in Development was created, overseeing $11.3billion of foreign aid over the next five to seven years.The Brazilian Agency for Cooperation, established in 1996,administers an estimated $1 billion annually. India and Brazil’sincreasing engagement in <strong>Africa</strong> is a clear sign that both countriesare embracing their new roles as global diplomats. As theleading developing democracies, India and Brazil have muchto gain from championing <strong>Africa</strong>’s development. A collaborationfor <strong>Africa</strong>’s food security should be seriously considered.Policymakers and academics have historically called thistype of collaboration ‘South-South cooperation,’ a term meantto distinguish the mutually beneficial interactions developingnations can have with one another versus the oftenunfavourable relationships they have with Western powers.South-South cooperation has long been a popular catchphrasein the Indian and Brazilian diplomatic lexicon, but it is onlynow, with the emergence of these countries as economicpowers, that the expression is beginning to carry any realpromise. By joining forces to bolster <strong>Africa</strong>’s food security,India and Brazil have the chance to break ground on atangible South-South agenda that could have a far-reachingimpact on a matter of urgent global concern.nBibliography1. Abate, Groum, 2011, ‘Indian investors upbeat aboutEthiopian agriculture’, <strong>Africa</strong> Quarterly, vol. 51, no. 2,(May–July), pp. 14.2. ‘Fighting Hunger in Brazil: Much Achieved, More to Do’.2010. Oxfam.3. India <strong>Africa</strong> Connect, 2010. [Online: web] URL:http://www.indiaafricaconnect.in/index.php?param=India-<strong>Africa</strong>-Projects/7.4. Kumarat, Suresh, 2011, ‘Agriculture as an Emerging Sector:Mutual Interests of India and <strong>Africa</strong>’, <strong>Africa</strong>n Review, April.5. Matsumoto-Izadifar, Yoshiko, 2008, ‘Senegal – Challengesof Diversification and Food Security’, OECD.6. Modi, Renu, 2011, ’Partnering for food security’, GatewayHouse, 24 June, at [Online: web] URL: http://www.gatewayhouse.in/publication/analysis-amp-background/books/partnering-food-security7. Paarlber, Robert, 2011, ‘Famine in Somalia: What Can theWorld Do About It?’ The Atlantic, 2 August, at [Online: web]URL:http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2011/08/famine-in-somalia-what-can-the-world-do-about-it/242960/8. Rocha, Cecilia, 2009, ‘Developments in National Policies forFood and Nutrition Security in Brazil’, Development PolicyReview, vol. 27, no.1, pp.51-66.August 2011-January 2012 75

N E W T R A J E C T O R YBRAZIL & <strong>Africa</strong>: Challengesand opportunitiesBuiding upon its historical ties with the continent, Brazil is navigatingnew challenges to expand its influence in <strong>Africa</strong>,says Danilo Marcondes de Souza NetoBrazil’s President Dilma Rousseff during an official visit to Maputo, Mozambique, with South <strong>Africa</strong>’s President Jacob Zuma (to her left) andMozambique’s President Armando Guebuza (to her right) on October 19, 2011. Photo: Agência BrasilBrazil carries several labels in itsinteraction with <strong>Africa</strong>: a South AtlanticPortuguese-speaking developing nationand a part of the <strong>Africa</strong>-South AmericaSummit. Brazil’s current engagementwith the continent is not a newdiplomatic strategy. It reflects anemphasis present since the 1970s andrepresents a revision of the Brazilian outlook towards <strong>Africa</strong>.Brazil had supported Portuguese colonialism in <strong>Africa</strong> atthe United Nations between the late 1940s and 1950s. But fora short period in the 1960s (the so-called “IndependentForeign Policy” period 1 ), the country began adopting adifferent stand on the decolonisation of <strong>Africa</strong>.Brazil was then interested in diversifying its internationalpartners and the Foreign Ministry began to articulatean <strong>Africa</strong>n policy, which became a reality only in the 1970s.If during the 1970s, Brazil sought close ties with thedeveloping world, in the 1980s to 1990s, it began to disengageitself from <strong>Africa</strong> as a result of several economic crises that hitthe country. It was being said that Brazil had turned its backon <strong>Africa</strong> (Saraiva, 2010).Brazil today sees <strong>Africa</strong> as essential to its success in thepursuit of a greater voice and recognition in the international1. ‘Brazil’s Independent Foreign Policy’ period lasted from 1961 to 1964. In this period, Brazil expanded its relationship with new partners, includingcountries in Asia, <strong>Africa</strong> and Eastern Europe.76August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Yarena. Brazilian elites believe that, given its size, population andthe size and strength of its economy, the country’s role andposition in the international arena is smaller than what itshould be. The Brazilian government, to reduce the gapbetween Brazil’s aspirations and the reality of internationalpolitics, has appointed several of its nationals to run forelections in international bodies such as World TradeOrganisation, United Nations Educational, Scientific andCultural Organisation (UNESCO) and Food and AgricultureOrganisation (FAO). And in this bid, the support of <strong>Africa</strong>,which has over 50 votes, is essential.For example: In June 2010, José Francisco Graziano waselected FAO Director General (for the 2012-2015 tenure)because his campaign on food security appealed todeveloping countries, e<strong>special</strong>ly <strong>Africa</strong>n nations. He had beenBrazil’s <strong>special</strong> minister for food security and hunger for twoyears during Lula da Silva’s first government. And when hetook over the new post at FAO inJanuary 2012, he said <strong>Africa</strong> wouldbe a priority area during his term. 2When it comes to Brazil’sengagement with <strong>Africa</strong>, itsdiplomats and the country’srepresentatives overseas display ahigh degree of professionalism.As compared to other LatinAmerican countries, Brazil hasmore diplomatic representations in<strong>Africa</strong>, with 37 embassies.Seventeen of these opened during Lula da Silva’s tenure(2003-2010). The United States has 49 embassies in thecontinent, followed by China, 48, France, 36 and Russia, 38.Several emerging economies like Brazil are trying to deepentheir presence in <strong>Africa</strong>: Turkey has 31 embassies (20 of whichwere opened in the last three years) 3 and India has over 30.As compared to otherLatin American countries,Brazil has more diplomaticrepresentations in <strong>Africa</strong>,with 37 embassies.Seventeen of theseopened during Lula daSilva’s tenure (2003-2010)AfricA policy during lulA’s tenureIn 2002, Brazilians elected a Leftist politician as theirpresident for the first time since independence in 1822. Lulada Silva, leader of the Worker’s Party (Partido dosTrabalhadores or PT) and a former trade unionist, received53 million votes or 62 percent of the valid votes in his fourthbid for the top job. In his inauguration speech in January 2003,Lula talked about his interest in strengthening the bondbetween Brazil and <strong>Africa</strong> to help the continent reach its fullpotential (IPEA, World Bank, 2011, p.43).In fact, even before this, Marco Aurelio Garcia, foreignpolicy adviser to the Worker’s Party, and later the presidentialadviser on international relations, had said that Brazil neededan <strong>Africa</strong>n policy 4 .Lula campaigned to change the country’s political systemand develop policies that benefited the majority of thepopulation historically marginalised in the absence of inclusivepolicies.On foreign affairs, he promised to strengthen Brazil’spresence abroad by promoting a sovereign and independentpolicy, including a proactive engagement with the GlobalSouth, e<strong>special</strong>ly South America and other countries withsimilar background and aspirations, such as China, India andSouth <strong>Africa</strong>.Brazil’s desire to prioritise relations with the Global South,including <strong>Africa</strong>, is illustrated by the high number ofpresidential visits to the continent. Both former presidentsFernando Henrique Cardoso (1994-2002) and Lula(2003-2010) served two terms. However, Henrique visitedonly three <strong>Africa</strong>n nations where as Lula visited 27 on11 different occasions. Lula also distanced himself from hispredecessor, who was criticised foremphasising Brazil’s relations withEurope and the United States and“forgetting” regions within the South,such as <strong>Africa</strong> (Saraiva, 2002).Lula’s decision to bring about achange in Brazil’s international imageneeded the country’s diplomatic corps’collaboration. Brazil’s foreign ministryhas always maintained a level ofautonomy on policy-making, evenduring the military rule from 1964 to1985. While some principles of the Brazilian foreign policy— such as non-intervention, the emphasis on internationallaw, multilateralism and restrictions on the use of force —were preserved, the authorities began to use a more assertivespeech in defending the country’s interests.In these speeches, <strong>Africa</strong> was a priority, as part of Brazil’scampaign for an inclusive agenda in terms of economic andpolitical participation on the part of Southern states.Brazil’s strategy for <strong>Africa</strong> under the Lula government hadtwo fronts: cooperation with South <strong>Africa</strong>, due to thecountry’s economic potential and influence in Southern<strong>Africa</strong>; and cooperation with the Portuguese-speakingcountries which had received the Brazilian government’ssupport to become independent from Portugal in themid-1970s and currently receive 70 percent of all Braziliantechnical cooperation to <strong>Africa</strong> (IPEA, 2010).During the Lula government, the continent becameBrazil’s fourth-largest commercial partner. Trade betweenBrazil and <strong>Africa</strong> increased from $4 billion in 2000 to$20 billion in 2010 ( IPEA, World Bank, 2011, p. 83). Between2003 and 2010, 48 <strong>Africa</strong>n heads of state (including presidents2. Andrei Netto ‘A África será minha prioridade, diz Graziano’, Estado de São Paulo, January 4, 2012.3. See: João Fellet ‘Brasil tem 5ª maior presença diplomática na África”‘, BBC News Brasil, October 17 2011,Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/portuguese/noticias/2011/10/111017_diplomacia_africa_br_jf.shtml Access on January 3, 20114. Marco Aurélio Garcia ‘PT negociará ALCA’ Correio Braziliense, Ocotber 25 2002, p 19.August 2011-January 2012 77

N E W T R A J E C T O R Yand prime ministers) visited Brazil and 67 <strong>Africa</strong>n foreignministers visited the country (IPEA, World Bank, 2011,p. 123). In 2009, the Brazilian National Bank for Social andEconomic Development (BNDES) started a $265-millionline of credit and another worth $360 million in 2010for companies willing to do business in <strong>Africa</strong> (IPEA, WorldBank, 2011, p. 7).Lula also took some social initiatives. In his first year aspresident, a new law made it mandatory for public andprivate schools in Brazil to offer classes on <strong>Africa</strong>n andAfro-Brazilian history 5 . This caused some apprehensionin the educational system since it lacked resources andprofessionals to teach these subjects.Another initiative, in 2006, was the creation of the post ofSecretary for the Promotion of Racial Equality Policies, toimprove living conditions of Afro-Brazilians and otherhistorically marginalised groups, such as indigenous people.Racial inequality and discrimination is a reality in Brazil andreflects in its external affairs. In 1961, Brazil had sent anAfro-Brazilian writer to Ghana to serve as ambassador.However, it was only in 2011 that the first Afro-Braziliancareer diplomat was promoted to the rank of an ambassador 6 .On diplomacy, Lula continued the scholarship programmestarted by president Cardoso in 2002 for Afro-Braziliansthrough which theyreceived financial assistanceto prepare for admissioninto the national diplomatictraining institute. A diplomat’sis an elite career inBrazil and the examinationfor it is one of the mostcompetitive in the Braziliancivil service. The scholarshipaimed at makingBrazil’s diplomatic bodymore representative of thecountry’s racial diversity.During the Lulagovernment, Brazil’s relationswith <strong>Africa</strong> alsoincluded the setting up in2003 of the India-Brazil-South <strong>Africa</strong> DialogueForum (IBSA). The forumhas a development fund thathas financed projects inGuinea-Bissau, Cape Verde, Burundi, Palestine and Haiti(White, 2010, p. 238). Bi-regional cooperative efforts alsoinclude the 2004 Mercosur 7 -Southern <strong>Africa</strong> Customs Unionpreferential trade agreement, which evolved from the 2000Mercosur-South <strong>Africa</strong> free-trade agreement (IPEA, WorldBank, 2011, p. 119). Recent initiatives include the <strong>Africa</strong>-South America Summit (ASA), which the Nigerian head ofstate proposed during Lula’s visit to the country in 2005. It waslaunched in 2006, followed by the South America-Arab StatesSummit (ASPA) in 2005, which has 10 <strong>Africa</strong>n nations.Also, during Lula’s regime, Brazil established adiplomatic representation in São Tomé and Príncipe in 2003,the last Portuguese-speaking nation to have a Brazilianembassy. It was also under Lula that Brazil establisheddiplomatic relations with Central <strong>Africa</strong>n Republic, the last<strong>Africa</strong>n nation to obtain diplomatic recognition from Brazil 8before the independence of South Sudan in July 2011. Braziland South Sudan already have diplomatic relations.The Brazilian government’s intention to strengthen itsrelations within the Global South, however, faced criticismfrom businessmen, analysts and former diplomats associatedwith the Cardoso government. Brazil’s approach to <strong>Africa</strong> alsobecame controversial, when Lula met leaders, who, as per theWest, had low or non-existent democratic credentials.Former president of Brazil Lula da Silva with current President Dilma Rousseff during the opening ceremonyof a bridge over Rio Negro on October 25, 2011. Photo: Agência Brasil5. Law 10693 was sanctioned by the president on January 9, 2003 and can be located at: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/2003/L10.639.htm.Access on January 4, 2012.6. For the best account of Brazil-<strong>Africa</strong> relations between 1960 and 1980, including Sousa Danta’s impressions of his time in <strong>Africa</strong>, see: Jerry Dávila,‘Hotel Trópico: Brazil and the challenge of <strong>Africa</strong>n decolonization, 1950-1980’. Durham, Duke University Press, 2010.7. Mercosur refers to the Southern Common Market, created in 1991 and includes Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay as full members and otherSouth American states as associated states.8. Diplomatic relations between Brazil and the Central <strong>Africa</strong>n Republic were established on April 27th , 2010. Source: http://www.itamaraty.gov.br/sala-de-imprensa/notas-a-imprensa/estabelecimento-de-relacoes-diplomaticas-com-a-republica-centro-africana Access on January 4 , 2012.78August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YFernando Henrique Cardoso, who served as the president ofBrazil from 1995-2003. Photo: Agência BrasilLula was criticised for meeting Equatorial Guinea’sPresident Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo in July 2010,Paul Biya, the President of Cameroon, in April 2005,Denis Sassou-Nguesso, the President of Congo, andBlaise Compaoré, the President of Burkina Faso, in October2007 and Muammar Gaddafi, the Libyan dictator, twice,the latest in July 2009.On Equatorial Guinea, the government was underpressure from Brazilian and Portuguese activists not tosupport Mbasogo’s desire to make his country a full memberof the Community of Portuguese Speaking Countries(CPLP). Equatorial Guinea became an observer associate stateof the organisation in 2006. A final decision on its status wasto be taken in 2010, but a series of protests in the CPLP led tothe postponement of a summit meeting in 2012. Brazil’sformer foreign minister Celso Amorim supported EquatorialGuinea’s entry. He said that bringing the country closer toBrazil and other Portuguese-speaking countries would havea positive effect on the political situation.Nonetheless, the controversy generated from Lula’s visitsto Libya and the status of Equatorial Guinea has not beenenough to reduce the symbolism of Brazil reaching out to<strong>Africa</strong>. In April 2005, Lula, accompanied by ministers, wentto the island of Gorée in Senegal, which had a fortress fromwhich <strong>Africa</strong>ns were once shipped as slaves to the Americas,including Brazil. Echoing a similar visit by Pope John Paul IIin 1992, Lula apologised for the use of <strong>Africa</strong>n slaves in Braziland recognized Brazil’s historic debt to <strong>Africa</strong>. At theceremony, Senegal’s President Abdoulaye Wade called Lula“Brazil’s first <strong>Africa</strong>n president” 9 . Under Lula, diplomats hadstressed that Brazil, with 76 million Brazilians of <strong>Africa</strong>ndescent, had the second-largest <strong>Africa</strong>n population in theworld after Nigeria.Although symbolism has played an important role in theBrazilian government’s relations with <strong>Africa</strong>, its approachtowards the continent is also pragmatic and strategic.During his visit to <strong>Africa</strong> in July 2004, Lula waived offGabon’s $35-million debt to Brazil, saying that this amountwould be converted into credit for Brazilian companies thatwant to invest in the country.Brazil, like other countries that want to be permanentmembers of the United Nations Security Council, knowsthat <strong>Africa</strong>’s support is essential for a successful candidacybecause of the large presence of <strong>Africa</strong>n states in the UNGeneral Assembly. Lula, in fact, discussed reforms in theSecurity Council and a permanent seat in the council, duringhis visit to Cameroon, Guinea-Bissau, Nigeria, Ghana andSenegal in April 2005.The fact that <strong>Africa</strong>n nations could not reach a consensuson which states could have permanent seats set aside for the<strong>Africa</strong>n continent was a frustrating outcome for Braziliandiplomacy, which had expected a real reform of the SecurityCouncil on the UN’s 50th anniversary in 2005. Brazil hasbeen seeking a permanent UNSC seat since the 1990s, a pleaconnected to its aspirations from the time of the League ofNations.Lula’s commitment to <strong>Africa</strong> and his popularity inthe continent is still used to garner support for Brazil’s involvementin the continent. After leaving office at the end of 2010,Lula headed the Brazilian delegation in the <strong>Africa</strong>n Union’s17th General Assembly session in Malabo in June 2011 10 .AfricA policy during rousseff’s tenureDilma Rousseff, Brazil’s first woman president, took overfrom Lula in January 2011. Though coming from the samepolitical party and sharing a similar perspective on promotingBrazil’s development, Rousseff has kept a low profile and hastravelled lesser. In fact, she has made some foreign policychanges that involve distancing Brazil from the Iraniangovernment and seeking closer relations with the UnitedStates (Barack Obama visited Brazil in March 2011 11 ).As president, her first visit to <strong>Africa</strong> was to attend theIBSA Summit in South <strong>Africa</strong> in October 2011. The trip alsoincluded visits to Angola and Mozambique, the two traditionalallies of Brazil, and important markets for its state-ownedand private companies.In her tenure, Mozambique continues to be a majorpartner. The Brazilian mining company, Vale do Rio Doce,is building a coal mine there. The project also includes theconstruction of a 210-km railway line to export coal andexpects to double the coal production in the country by 2014 12 .9. See: Francisco Leali ‘Perdão pelo que fizemos’, O Globo, April 15, 2005.10. See: Sandra Manfrine and João Domingos, ‘Dilma escolhe Lula para chefiar missão diplomática na <strong>Africa</strong>’, Estado de São Paulo, June 28, 2011.11. See: ‘Obama’s Brazil visit: Fresh start for ties’, BBC News Latin American and CaribbeanSource: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-12731912, Accessed on January 3, 2012.12. See Tânia Monteiro, ‘Dilma defende direito dos governos locais’, Estado de São Paulo, October 20, 2011.August 2011-January 2012 79

N E W T R A J E C T O R YShe has also included <strong>Africa</strong> in Brazil’s new commercialpromotion strategy. All over the world, the Brazilian governmentis looking to strengthen the commercial promotioncapacity of its diplomatic representations.Based on economic growth projections and expecteddemand for Brazilian goods, 12 diplomatic posts in <strong>Africa</strong>were selected to receive more staff. These posts are in thecities of Khartoum, Tripoli, Rabat, Cape Town, Dakar,Lusaka, Kinshasa, Brazzaville, Lagos, Tunis, Addis Ababa andDar es Salam. 13Also, to boost commercial relationships with <strong>Africa</strong>, theBrazilian National Bank for Economic and SocialDevelopment (BNDES) has opened a line of credit forBrazilian companies that want to enter the continent.The bank will focus on companies in energy, medicine,banking services, bio-fuel and agriculture sectors. Thesesectors will complement the three other sectors of oil and gas,infrastructure and mining in which Brazilian companies haveinvested heavily. The bank also wants to increase the exportof high-value industrial equipment, such as electrical andagricultural machinery, to <strong>Africa</strong>. 14Brazilian multinational companies have been present in<strong>Africa</strong> in construction and mining since the 1980s. Odebrecht,a civil engineering and infrastructure company, is today thelargest private employer in Angola, with 14,000 employees, 95percent of them Angolans. Recent partnerships see <strong>Africa</strong> as amarket for airplanes and executive jets, manufactured byEmbraer. The Brazilian company has sold 130 airplanes to 47airlines in 19 countries. 15However, Brazil’s relationship with <strong>Africa</strong> in the Rousseffgovernment is not merely commercial. Since Brazil has anon-permanent seat in the UNSC 16 , it was called to take aposition on <strong>Africa</strong>’s security problems. On the political crisisin Ivory Coast, the government supported a negotiatedsolution and expressed concern over the possibility of amilitary intervention. Brazil held a position similar to otheremerging powers such as India and South <strong>Africa</strong>, also servingas non-permanent seats in the UNSC. Brazil has traditionallyexpressed concern on UNSC resolutions that called for“all means necessary” (meaning the authorisation of militaryforce, as per the UNSC resolution of 1975) to resolveconflicts, such as the one in Ivory Coast. Brazil, with India andSouth <strong>Africa</strong>, has said that the <strong>Africa</strong>n Union should play aleading role in helping find a solution to the crisis in thecountry. Although Brazil favoured protecting civilians whowere under threat in the country, it was concerned about thepossibility of expanding the mandate to include otherfunctions, such as military intervention, which, it felt, couldbring more harm than good. 17Brazil has also made contributions to peace and security in<strong>Africa</strong> by sending in military and police observers to variousUN missions and by serving as chair of the Guinea Bissauworking group in the UN Peacebuilding Commission.development cooperationBrazil has been receiving development cooperation sincethe 1950s, e<strong>special</strong>ly in its north and northeast regions.As earlier described, in the 1970s, Brazil tried to deepen anddiversify its foreign relations and became a provider ofdevelopment cooperation as well as continued to be arecipient. It was only under Lula’s regime that Brazil startedbecoming an important non-DAC (Development AssistanceCommittee) donor 18 . Several <strong>Africa</strong>n and Latin Americancountries were the first to receive aid from Brazil andcontinue to be the focus of Brazil’s aid programme.The Brazilian government 19 and external actors, such asOverseas Development Institute (ODI), are key players in thecountry’s aid programme. Brazil rarely provides aid in cash,preferring to implement capacity building and professionaltraining initiatives (ODI, 2010; IPEA, 2010). The cooperativeefforts are coordinated by the Brazilian CooperationAgency (Agência Brasileira de Cooperação (ABC).The agency was created in 1987. But it lacks institutionalautonomy and remains a branch of the Foreign Ministry. It isstaffed by career diplomats and other foreign ministry officialsand by staffers hired on contract with the United NationsDevelopment Programme (UNDP) in Brazil.Therefore, there is a need to create a professional career,within the civil service, of employees exclusively dedicated tointernational cooperation. At the moment, the Brazilianpresidency is analysing a project to include the creation ofsuch a category. In addition to the problems with staffers andthe lack of autonomy, Brazilian cooperation is dispersed overa group of more than 120 institutions, including severalministries (Sousa, 2010, p. 3).By the end of 2010, Brazilian and international mediastarted noticing the country’s new role as a provider ofdevelopment cooperation. At that time, ABC was developing77 technical cooperation projects, more than half of them in<strong>Africa</strong>. In 2009, <strong>Africa</strong>n nations accounted for 50 percent ofABC’s budget and in 2010 this increased to 60 per cent (IPEA,World Bank, 2011, p. 45).As mentioned, it was during Lula’s government that Brazilraised its profile as a provider of cooperation as part of a desire13 See Daniel Rittner, ‘Governo usará embaixadas em ofensiva comercial’, Valor Econômico, November 15, 2011.14. See: Ricardo Leopoldo, ‘BNDES vai apoiar negócios com a África’ Estado de São Paulo, November, 17 , 2011.15. For the website of the company see: http://www.embraer.com/pt-BR/Paginas/Home.aspx , Access on January 3, 2012.16. Brazil was a member since 2010 and left the Security Council at the end of 2011.17. Eliane Oliveira e Fernanda Godoy ‘Brasil pede negociação na União <strong>Africa</strong>na’, O Globo, April 8, 2011.18. DAC refers to the Development Assistance Commitee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).19. The Brazilian government only produced its first mapping of Brazil’s development cooperation in 2010, covering the 2005-2009period. The report was produced by the Institute of Applied Economic Research (IPEA).80August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YBrazil’s former president Lula da Silva and President of Senegal Abdoulaye Wade at aparade in Dakar on April 13, 2005. Photo: Agência Brasilfor greater participation in international politics. A report fromthe Institute of Applied Economic Research (IPEA) says thatBrazil received $2 billion in development cooperation andprovided $1.7 billion between 2009 and 2010. IPEA hascalculated Brazil’s agrreggated development assistance,including technical assistance worth $480 million, itsexpenses on peacekeeping missions, like the one to Haiti, aswell as budgetary contributions to UN agencies such as Foodand Agriculture Organisation (FAO) and the World FoodProgramme (IPEA, 2010).During Lula’s tenure, emphasis was on agriculturalcooperation with <strong>Africa</strong>. To help Brazil’s domesticallydeveloped technology, Lula stressed on energy sufficiency andpromoted sugarcane-based ethanol production to help reducethe country’s dependency on fossil fuels. The BrazilianAgricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA) opened anoffice in Accra in 2006 and today has projects in 13 <strong>Africa</strong>nnations. Brazilian plants and seeds have been introduced in<strong>Africa</strong> for over 20 years (Sotero, 2009, p 20).<strong>Africa</strong> has also benefited from the social programmesimplemented during Lula’s tenure. Representatives fromseveral <strong>Africa</strong>n countries visited Brazil as part of the<strong>Africa</strong>-Brazil Cooperation Programme on Social Protection(ABCP) to learn about these programmes which focus onsocial development strategies, child labour reduction and cashtransfers, creating incentives for families to send children toschools (Sotero, 2009, p. 19).Brazil, along with China and India, is also interested in thearable land available in <strong>Africa</strong>. In August 2011, the governmentof Mozambique allocated 6 million hectares to a group ofBrazilian farmers to plant soy, corn and cotton. The land wasgiven at a concessional rate for 50 years, and is renewable foranother 50 years. The Brazilian farmers, whowill have to pay the Mozambican governmenta symbolic amount for the use of the land, areinterested in exporting crops grown inMozambique directly to the Chinese market.Mozambican authorities said the decision wasmade because they wanted Brazilian farmers toimplement in Mozambique what Brazilexperienced in the 1970s in terms of theexpansion of the agricultural frontier. The onlycondition was that 90 percent of the workforceshould be Mozambican.In the agriculture sector, Mozambique hasthe largest project outside of Brazil by theEMBRAPA. Brazilian farmers are looking forland abroad following an increase in land pricesat home. Similarities between Brazil and <strong>Africa</strong>in terms of climate, vegetation, crops, culturesand languages facilitate the engagement between the two.Grain production and cattle grazing in Brazil needs conditionssimilar to the ones in several regions of <strong>Africa</strong>.Nevertheless, despite cultural similarities and politicalaffiliations, Brazil is also aware of the fact that <strong>Africa</strong> now hasa competitive scenario in terms of partnerships, and istherefore drawing attention to advantages beyond thecommon culture. Brazil’s former minister of agriculture,Roberto Rodrigues, has said that China is in <strong>Africa</strong> to extractits riches where as Brazil’s intentions are technology transferand improvement of the local situation 20 .Brazil also wants to reproduce, at the start of 2012, asuccessful national programme that has increased family-basedagricultural production. The programme will support thecapacity of <strong>Africa</strong>n and Latin American nations to increaseproductivity. It wants to designate $640 million for <strong>Africa</strong>.Ghana and Zimbabwe have already signed agreements withthe Brazilian government while Kenya, Mozambique,Tanzania, Cameroon, Namibia and Sudan have applied forsimilar deals. Brazilian authorities say the programme includesa strategic dimension since it will increase the capacityof Brazilian companies to export agricultural machineryto <strong>Africa</strong>. 21ABC and EMBRAPA also run a Cotton-4 Project in Mali,which benefits Benin, Burkina Faso and Chad. The projectaims to increase cotton productivity in the four countries toempower local producers and reduce poverty 22 (IPEA, WorldBank, 2011, p. 56).Mozambique has also received Brazil’s cooperation inhealthcare. Lula in 2003 had announced the construction of afacility to produce generic drugs for HIV treatment (Sotero,2009, p. 18). In 2010, Brazil inaugurated a FIOCRUZ 23 office20 Patricia Campos Mello, ‘Moçambique oferece terra à soja brasileira’, Folha de São Paulo, August 14, 2011.21. Mauro Zafalon, ‘Nove países de candidatam a ter programa Mais Alimentos’, Folha de São Paulo, November 19, 2011.22. Further information on the project can be found in English at ABC’s website: http://www.abc.gov.br/projetos/Cotton4I.asp23. FIOCRUZ refers to the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, a governmental research foundation created in 1900 and renowned for theproduction of vaccines and studies on tropical diseases such as yellow fever and malaria.August 2011-January 2012 81

N E W T R A J E C T O R YThe inaugural ceremony of the second <strong>Africa</strong>-South America Summit in Porlamar, Margarita Island, in progress on September 27, 2009.Representatives from 60 countries attended the summit.in Mozambique. Brazil today has 53 agreements in healthcooperation with 22 <strong>Africa</strong>n nations (IPEA, World Bank,2011, p. 5).Education is another area of cooperation. Brazil hasbeen providing scholarships to <strong>Africa</strong>n students to do theirgraduate and undergraduate studies in Brazilian publicinstitutions.Brazil has helped Cape Verde create its first highereducation institution in 2006. In 2010, it inaugurated theFederal University for Afro-Brazilian Integration 24 forstudents and teachers from <strong>Africa</strong>. The university is locatedin Redenção, the first Brazilian district to abolish slavery in1883, before the same ban was imposed across the country in1888 (IPEA, World Bank, 2011, p. 81).Earlier, a similar initiative was taken in southern Brazil topromote integration with South American nations.In formulating its development cooperation policy, Brazil,like China and India, does not participate in the Organisationfor Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD)Development Assistance Committee (DAC) and does notabide by the Paris Declaration. Therefore, it has drawncriticism from Western donors for not supporting thepromotion of democracy and accountability in countries thathave benefited by its aid programmes. Brazil initially refusedto sign the declaration, but agreed to sign it as a recipientcountry and not as a donor.Brazilian diplomats have said that the cooperativeNorth-South relations are often characterised by theimposition of standards to donors and that the country seesSouth-South cooperation as an alternative to this hierarchicalrelationship (Sousa, 2010, p.2). As aid disbursement is notsystematically reported, it is difficult to assess the resourcesavailable for Brazil’s aid programmes, which vary between$340 million to $1 billion (Sousa, 2010, p. 2). In the words ofLula, Brazil’s development cooperation is not based on thedonor and recipient logic, but on the perception that theinitiatives should be an exchange with mutual benefits to allparties involved (IPEA, 2010). Like Lula, Rousseff, while inMozambique, said that local governments should have a sayon how foreign investment was distributed.In evaluating Brazilian cooperation in <strong>Africa</strong>, it isimportant to note that most of the projects were implementedless than 10 years ago, making it too recent to properlyevaluate the impact of these initiatives (IPEA, World Bank,2011, p. 5). One important element of success for theinitiatives is the fact that Brazil only exports social technologysuccessfully implemented domestically. Brazil’s successstory in <strong>Africa</strong> involves the perception that it is better to investin a small number of long-term projects in order to promotepartnerships with local actors ( IPEA, World Bank,2011, p. 40).Although Brazilian authorities have praised the country’semergence as an important donor contributing to an increasein the country’s international profile, Brazilian NGOs haveexpressed concern because of the lack of financing and theincapacity to compete with <strong>Africa</strong>n NGOs for internationalassistance. Similar reactions have been recorded in theBrazilian Congress where the representatives from the pooreststates in Brazil have expressed scepticism towards Brazil’srole as a donor. They claim that some regions in the countryhave social indicators worse or as low as some <strong>Africa</strong>n or LatinAmerican countries that benefit from Brazilian cooperation.24. The university’s website with information in Portuguese can be found at: http://www.unilab.edu.br/25. See Janaina Figueiredo and Fabio Fabrini, ‘Dilma: Brasil não pode ter opinião sobre tudo’, O Globo, February 1, 201182August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YBrAzil And the ArAB springThe Arab Spring that swept three Northern <strong>Africa</strong>ncountries also impelled Brazil to modify its stance on <strong>Africa</strong>nissues. When questioned about Brazil’s position on theprotests in Cairo, Rousseff, with less than a month in office,was cautious. She affirmed that Brazil could not have a say onan Egyptian internal question. 25 The Brazilian governmentsaid that it intended the outcome of the crisis to be ademocratic solution that involved social inclusion andprosperity of the population. Foreign Minister AntonioPatriota said that Egypt was an important trade partner and asper the Brazilian government, the protests started in the wakeof frustration about the economic situation and the lack ofsocial inclusion. 26On account of this cautious tone on Egypt and later onLibya, the Brazilian government’s foreign policy decisionswere criticised. Soon after taking office, Rousseff, a formerpolitical prisoner during an earlier military dictatorship, hadsaid human rights would play a central role in the country’sforeign policy.However, even as Brazil expressed concern about theUNSC’s actions in Libya, it voted in favour of expelling Libyafrom the UN Human Rights Council in March 2011.The Libyan situation reveals tensions regarding Brazil’sperception of its role in the international arena. Brazil believesthat human rights should play an important role, and isdoubtful about the implementation of these rights byoutsiders, e<strong>special</strong>ly in a scenario where the country hadpursued commercial interests that can be threatened byforeign action and could legitimatise emerging normativeprinciples such as the Responsibility to Protect 27 , which Brazilis uncomfortable with.Brazil supported the UNSC resolution of 1970 (approvedduring Brazil’s February presidency of the UNSC) thatrequired the Libyan regime to stop human rights violations butabstained from the resolution of 1973 which supportedinternational action (approved in March).When NATO started bombing Libya, three majorBrazilian multinational construction companies were operatingin the North <strong>Africa</strong>n country (one of them with a 2.3-bneuro contract) along with the Brazilian state oil company,Petrobrás, who had started projects in Libya in 2005. Duringthe bombings, 500 to 600 Brazilians were living in Libya 28 .Between 2008 and 2010, Libya had become the seventhmajor destination for Brazilian exports to <strong>Africa</strong>. 29 In March2011, the Brazilian government had rejected calls from theLibyan government to act as mediators between the rebels andthe authorities. Lula had met Muammar Gaddafi on fouroccasions during his twin terms. He had met the leader on twovisits to Libya in 2003 and 2009 and twice in two summits andused to refer to him as a brother and a friend. 30Brazil resisted recognising the National TransitionalCouncil (NTC) as Libya’s government and it was only in Julythat the government sent a senior diplomat to Benghazi toestablish informal talks with the rebels.According to sources in the Brazilian media, representativesof the NTC were not receptive towards the Brazilianenvoy, but assured that all contracts with Brazilian companieswould be honoured. 31In Libya, Brazil found itself in a situation similar to Russiaand China, whose companies also had contracts with theLibyan government which the rebels were threatening tocancel because the countries had opposed NATO airstrikesand UNSC action. 32On meeting the rebels, the Brazilian foreign minister saidthat Brazil would only recognise the rebel government as theofficial government after the United Nations took a positionon the case. Brazil was also the last Western country to removeits ambassador from Tripoli. 33 Brazil’s position also expressedsome division in Latin America, where the governments ofCuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua supported Gaddafi and otherstates such as Colombia, Ecuador and Panama recognisedthe rebel government. Colombia’s president receivedrepresentatives of the rebel movement in late August andPanama recognised the new government in mid-June. 34Amorim criticised the UNSC resolution of 1973, callingthe document ambiguous and praised the Rousseffgovernment for abstaining from voting in the resolution.Brazil’s concern was that the language of the resolution infavour of protection of civilians would in practice bring moreviolence to the country, allowing for unlimited military actionfrom Western countries. 35It was only on September 16 that the Brazilian governmentrecognised the new Libyan government after voting in favourof its participation in the UN General Assembly. Brazil’sdecision was not shared by other Latin American nations, such26. Fernanda Godoy, ‘Desigualdade alimenta revolta, diz Patriota’, O Globo, February 11, 2011.27. The idea of claiming that the Libyan case was an example of a Responsibility to Protect case is not without controversy, however, it is not the intention ofthis article to discuss the issue. Resolution 1973 does mention the national responsibility of the Libyan state in protecting its civilian population andauthorizes the international community to use all means necessary to protect the civilian population uder attack.28. Fabiana Ribeiro et al, ‘Itamaraty aguarda para resgatar brasileiros’, O Globo, February 22, 2011.29. Claudia Antunes, ‘Brasil envia equipe para limpar minas líbias’, Folha de São Paulo, November 26 th 201130. Fabiana Ribeiro et al “ Itamaraty aguarda para resgatar brasileiros” O Globo, February 22, 2011.31. See Lisandro Paraguassu, ‘Líbia cumprirá contratos com Brasil, diz Patriota’, Estado de São Paulo, August 24, 2011.32. See ‘Punição inédita no Conselho de Direitos Humanos’, O Globo, February 26, 2011.33. Marcelo Nino, ‘Rebeldes líbios recebem com frieza o enviado do Itamaraty a Benghazi,’ Folha de São Paulo, August 24 , 2011.34. Newton Carlos ‘América Latina exibe dissenso sobre Gaddafi,’ Folha de São Paulo, September 8, 2011.35. Amorim critica texto aprovado na ONU, Estado de São Paulo, March 29, 2011.36. See: clippingmp.planejamento.gov.br/cadastros/noticias/2011/9/17/brasil-reconhece-novo-governo-da-libia, Access on January 3, 2012.August 2011-January 2012 83

N E W T R A J E C T O R Yas Venezuela, Bolivia, Cuba, Ecuador and Nicaragua, and<strong>Africa</strong>n countries such as Angola, Zimbabwe, Malawi andKenya. 36Contemporary events in Libya also revealed some of thepast relations between Brazil and Libya. By the end ofSeptember, several Brazil-made military vehicles, ammunitionand armaments (including 70 mm rockets and vehicles with90 mm cannons) were found in Libyan governmentwarehouses. These products, made between 1975 and 1981,were no more usable, and were sold at a time when Brazil wasan important arms manufacturer in the Third World. Lightarmaments, such as bullets, meant for the Libyan police werehowever, exported in 2005. 37As a goodwill gesture towards the new government, Brazilsent a de-mining team to Libya in November. The team wassupposed to confirm the possibility that some of thelandmines, stocked by the Gaddafi regime and used against therebels, were made in Brazil in the 1980s and early 1990s beforeBrazil banned landmine production.The Brazilian government also donated $100 million to theUN for de-mining in Libya. 38Recent events in Libya and Egypt illustrate that Brazil’sgrowing involvement in <strong>Africa</strong> will also have to take intoaccount the possibility of political changes in the region. Brazil,India and South <strong>Africa</strong> faced high visibility on the Libyansituation because theywere serving onnon-permanent seats atthe UNSC then.Nevertheless, countriesthat wanted tohave a voice in theinternational arena, willhave to get used totaking a stand onglobal issues, whetherthey were on theUNSC or not andmight even have toadapt to emergingnorms, such as theResponsibility toProtect.conclusionWhile consideringthe future challenges toBrazil’s presence in<strong>Africa</strong>, regional considerations become important. Brazil’slocation in South America is an advantage, in terms ofsecurity concerns that otherwise challenge the strategy ofemergence of other countries. Brazil is in a peaceful zonecompared to the surroundings regions of Russia, India andChina. Brazil’s location might also set the limits of itsSouth-South strategy and further cooperation with <strong>Africa</strong>.Since the creation of Mercosur in the early 1990s, Brazilhas been pursuing a strategy of uniting South Americapolitically, socially and economically, while staying aregional power. This strategy has led to large Brazilianinvestments in the region and the country accepting thedemands of its less powerful neighbours such as Bolivia andParaguay and Argentina on trade. South America and LatinAmerica, as a whole, have been playing a crucial role in Brazil’spolicy of South-South cooperation, since the country wantsto assert itself as a regional leader 39 and this might limitpossibilities of it increasing its presence elsewhere, either in<strong>Africa</strong> or the Far East.The commitments to Haiti show the limitations of Brazil’sglobal aspirations. Ninety-six percent of Brazil’s troopcontributions to UN peace missions has gone to Haiti.The troops are part of the Mission des Nations Unies pour lastabilisation en Haïti (MINUSTAH). Because of this, Brazilhas been unable to take part in other UN missions, in placesFormer Brazilian president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva meeting Army soldiers, who were part of the UnitedNations Stabilisation Mission in Haiti in May, 2004. Photo: Agência Brasil36. See: clippingmp.planejamento.gov.br/cadastros/noticias/2011/9/17/brasil-reconhece-novo-governo-da-libia, Access on January 3, 2012.37. Roberto Godoy, ‘Blindados brasileiros são encontrados em Sirte,’ Estado de São Paulo, September 23, 2011.38. Claudia Antunes, ‘Brasil envia equipe para limpar minas líbias’, Folha de São Paulo, November 26, 2011.39. Claudia Antunes, ‘Brasil envia equipe para limpar minas líbias’, Folha de São Paulo, November 26, 2011.40. It is important to stress that while sending an additional military contingent to a location other than Haiti, would pose a logistical challenges for the ArmedForces, Brazil has also used its military commitments to the Haitian mission as an excuse in order not to be pressured to involve itself in missions in locationsit might feel there is a high political risk, such as the Sudan.84August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Ysuch as Sudan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo,limiting its presence to sending military observers and notbattalions. 40Practical challenges also add to the limitations. For Brazilto establish contact with <strong>Africa</strong> is difficult. There are few flightsbetween Brazil and <strong>Africa</strong>. At the moment, there are onlythree direct flights — from Fortaleza in north-east Brazil toPraia in Cape Verde, from Rio de Janeiro to Luanda in Angolaand from São Paulo to Johannesburg. To go to other <strong>Africa</strong>ndestinations, one has to first fly to Europe or the US. But withseveral non-Western airlines, mostly from the Middle East,now going to Brazil, there is a chance that Brazilians will usethese airlines to reach <strong>Africa</strong>. In addition, there is excessivebureaucracy which increases the time ships take to travelbetween <strong>Africa</strong> and Brazil. Another challenge is the stereotypicalimage of <strong>Africa</strong> and Brazil (IPEA, World Bank, 201, p. 40).Returning to political challenges, Brazil’s efforts to expandits commercial space in <strong>Africa</strong> is part of an effort to offer analternative to the increase in Indian, Chinese, South Korean,Turkish and Malaysian influence on <strong>Africa</strong>. Brazil is trying topreserve its traditional markets and old political allies such asthe Portuguese-speaking nations and extend its presence tounexplored markets. Brazil’s commercial presence in <strong>Africa</strong> —70 percent of its exports are to South <strong>Africa</strong>, Nigeria, Egyptand Angola — is an additional limitation (Barbosa et al, 2009,p 79). Brazil needs to diversify and Rousseff’s initiativestowards this show that they are working at it.Brazil’s final challenge is the country’s own status as an aidreceiver. Brazil’s new profile as an international donor hasled to a decrease in international assistance to projects in thecountry from NGOs in the Northern nations. Since thesecond semester of 2010, Brazilian media has been reportingthat international NGOs have been leaving the country.They feel it no longer needs attention and financial supportfrom international donors. Statistics have demonstrated thatthe average support received by domestic NGOs frominternational donors has been reduced by 50 percent from2009-2010. 41 Most of the aid, the media says, has beenrelocated to Asia and <strong>Africa</strong>. 42However, there are some advantages too. Brazil is seen tohave a more balanced approach towards <strong>Africa</strong> than otheremerging powers. There is a perception of partnership andreciprocity and the creation of a middle ground between theChinese state-led approach and the Indian strategy based onprivate sector investment (White, 2010, p. 239).Brazilian authorities are aware that the country’s dealingwith <strong>Africa</strong> takes place in the context of the growing interestof emerging powers in the continent. Lula said that Brazil andChina are competitors in <strong>Africa</strong> and Brazil needed to promoteits comparative advantages, which included better qualityproducts and providing employment to locals (IPEA, WorldBank, 2011, p.106).To conclude, two episodes reveal the challenges that Brazilfaces in <strong>Africa</strong> as it tries to expand its presence. Last December,a young Brazilian diplomat died of malaria after returningfrom a short mission to Equatorial Guinea. Her death was saidto be due to lack of medical care and monitoring on the partof the Foreign Ministry after her return. As a rare gesture,Brazilian diplomats wrote a letter to the minister asking for animprovement in the medical assistance and pre-departureorientation of diplomats told to serve in areas of harshconditions, such as some countries in Asia and <strong>Africa</strong>. 43The second episode involves a kidnapping attempt, bypirates off the coast of Tanzania, of a Petrobrás (a Brazilianstate oil company) ship in October, 2011. The attempt wasfoiled by Tanzanian authorities. 44The two episodes show that Brazil will have to deal withnew challenges to increase its presence in <strong>Africa</strong>, and in a waythat benefits <strong>Africa</strong> nations as well as Brazil. The Brazil-<strong>Africa</strong>relationship continues to be a work in progress. n41. Clarice Spitz & Leticia Lins, ‘Com economia forte no Brasil, ONGs correm risco de fechar as portas’, O Globo, October 17, 2010.42. Duda Teixeira, ‘A caridade foi para outro lugar,’ Veja, August 4, 2010. The European Union has recently announced that it will cut all of its social,educational and environmental programs in Brazil by 2014. See: Jamil Chade, ‘UE decide acabar com ajuda financeira ao Brasil, Estado de São Paulo,December 8, 2011.43. ee: http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/bbc/1027964-em-ato-raro-diplomatas-questionam-itamaraty-sobre-morte-de-colega.shtml, Access on January 4, 2012.44. For information in Portuguese see: http://g1.globo.com/mundo/noticia/2011/10/tanzania-prende-7-piratas-apos-ataque-navio-da-petrobras.html, Accesson January 3, 2012.References1. Barbosa, Alexandre et al, ‘Brazil in <strong>Africa</strong>: AnotherEmerging Power in the Continent?’ Politikon, vol 36, n. 1,2009, pp 59-86.2. IPEA, World Bank. Ponte sobre o Atlântico. Brasil e Áfricasub-saariana. Parceria Sul-Sul para o crescimento.Brasília, 2011.3. IPEA. Cooperação brasileira para o desenvolvimentointernacional, 2005-2009, Brasília, 2010.4. Saraiva, José Flávio S. ‘The new <strong>Africa</strong> and Brazil in theLula Era: The rebirth of Brazilian Atlantic Policy’, RevistaBrasileira de Política Internacional, vol 53, <strong>special</strong> edition,2010, pp 169-182.5. Sotero, Paulo, ‘Brazil’s as an emerging donor: Hugepotential and growing pains’, Special Report, DevelopmentOutreach, World Bank Institute, 2009.6. White, Lyal, ‘Understanding Brazil’s new drive for <strong>Africa</strong>’,South <strong>Africa</strong>n Journal of International Affairs, vol. 17 n. 2,2010, pp 221-242.August 2011-January 2012 85

A W A K E N I N GThe Russian COMEBACKThe Russian government is working towards increasing its share of tradewith the continent, but needs to be more proactive to take on competitionfrom other countries, says Alexandra ArkhangelskayaRussian President Dmitry Medvedev with his South <strong>Africa</strong>n counterpart Jacob Zuma (right), during a meeting in the Russian Black Sea resortof Sochi on July 4, 2011. Photo: RIA Novosti, Presidential Press ServiceThe rise of China and India as economicpowerhouses has transformedinternational relationships, andengineered a shift in the balance ofpower — from the West to the East.Following them is Russia, buoyed bythe commodities boom, and Brazil,reaping the rewards of economicreforms, with BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India and China andSouth <strong>Africa</strong>) becoming an investment and expansiondestination of almost all multinational companies fromthe West.South <strong>Africa</strong>, <strong>Africa</strong>’s economic powerhouse, has alsodeepened its engagement with China, India and Brazil, evenas it has expanded its engagement with the rest of thecontinent. The acquisition of 25 percent equity in StandardBank by the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China(ICDC) is a clear indication of South <strong>Africa</strong>’s role as a nodefor BRICS’ entry into <strong>Africa</strong>. The emergence of these newsouthern powers on the world stage and their increasingengagement with the <strong>Africa</strong>n continent shows thatthe North-South relationship is being superceded by theSouth-East relationship. <strong>Africa</strong>’s relationship with theglobal south will have implications for <strong>Africa</strong>’s development.The political and economic prominence of BRICS hascoincided with the political and economic gains throughmuch of Sub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong> as markets continue to open upto foreign competition and private capital flows pour intothe continent.Spurred largely by China’s foray into the continent,BRICS has turned its gaze towards <strong>Africa</strong> for future growthbecause of the continent’s untapped market and naturalresources. On account of this increased attention fromBRICS, <strong>Africa</strong>’s traditional Western trading partners have86August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Yrenewed their interest in the continent for fear of losingtheir strategic and economic interests to these risingsouthern powers.For example, at the conclusion of the first BRIC Summitheld in Yekaterinburg, Russia, on June 11, 2009, the leadersof Brazil, Russia, India and China called for greaterrepresentation of developing countries in global financialinstitutions, and for ending the dominance of the US dollaras the world’s standard reserve currency. Such triumphantstatements by the leaders of BRICS have raised hopes in<strong>Africa</strong> and the developing world as a whole that theemerging southern powers are likely to represent theinterests of developing countries in major internationalforums in order to democratise global economic governance,which is favourable to developing countries.However, there is apprehension among <strong>Africa</strong>ns aboutthe long-term effects of a BRICS-<strong>Africa</strong> engagement on thecontinent’s development, and whether these new partnerswill forge the same unequal relationship that exists between<strong>Africa</strong> and the West. After the collapse of the Soviet Unionin 1991, Russia, an ideological friend and ally of several<strong>Africa</strong>n nations during the Cold War, started to disengageitself from the continent and other developing countries. Butnow, with it showing a renewed interest in the continent, canwe talk of Russia’s return to <strong>Africa</strong>?hiStorical linkS<strong>Africa</strong> and Russia have a long history of friendship goingback to the days when the Soviet Union (USSR) assistedmany <strong>Africa</strong>n countries in gaining independence and helpedend apartheid in South <strong>Africa</strong>. The USSR supported the<strong>Africa</strong>n National Congress (ANC) and the South <strong>Africa</strong>nCommunist Party (SACP) in South <strong>Africa</strong>, MovimentoPopular de Libertação de Angola (MPLA) in Angola, Frentede Libertação de Moçambique (FRELIMO) in Mozambiqueand Zimbabwe <strong>Africa</strong>n Peoples Union (ZAPU) inZimbabwe.The USSR’s initiative in 1960 pushed the UN GeneralAssembly to adopt the ‘Declaration on Granting ofIndependence to ColonialCountries and Peoples’ even assome Western states refused to votefor it. During the time of theerstwhile USSR, more than 50,000<strong>Africa</strong>n nationals had been trainedin the country’s institutes anduniversities. Many <strong>Africa</strong>n leadersreceived training and support fromthe USSR.During the 1990s, Russia’srelationship with <strong>Africa</strong> weakened.The USSR’s collapse ended most ofRussia’s ties with <strong>Africa</strong>n countries.The Soviet ideological mission offostering socialism also ended.After the collapse of theSoviet Union in 1991,Russia, an ally of several<strong>Africa</strong>n nations during theCold War, started todisengage itself from thecontinent. But now, withit showing a renewedinterest in the continent,can we talk of Russia’sreturn to <strong>Africa</strong>?Share of world production (2009)AFRICARUSSIAOIL 12.4 16.7GAS 6.5 24.8COAL 16.6 6.3HYDRO 3.0 7.3NUCLEAR 0.0 9.7Source: International Energy Agency StatisticsRussia was unable to continue giving subsidies to its “client”regimes. The relationship with <strong>Africa</strong> dipped in priority, andin 1992, Russia closed nine embassies and four consulates inthe continent. Most cultural centres ceased to exist. From 20centres, only seven are left today. Diplomatic relationshipswith several <strong>Africa</strong>n states worsened in 1991 when the thenRussian President, Boris Yeltsin, ordered an end to all foreignaid and demanded immediate repayment of outstandingdebts. But gradually, things began to change, not only becauseof Russia’s economic recovery, but also due to a morebroadminded and rational perception of the modern worldby a new Russian leadership.The goal set in the Russian Foreign Policy Doctrine,approved by Russian President Dmitry Medvedev in July2008, is to expand cooperation with <strong>Africa</strong>n nations onbilateral and multilateral bases within the G-8 and G-20framework 1 . The Russian president visited Angola, Namibiaand Nigeria in June 2009 and gave an impetus to thesecrucial bilateral relationships. He was accompanied by adelegation of 400 businessmen and they signed severaleconomic agreements in areas such as mineral resources andnuclear energy.Medvedev has stressed that Russia’s position in <strong>Africa</strong>needs urgent strengthening amid deepening competitionfrom other countries. “At one time, we might have lostinterest in the development of relations with the <strong>Africa</strong>ncontinent. And now our task is to catch up all that was lost.We have a lot of good, interestingand important plans and ideas ofhow to develop our cooperation.Russia without jealousy looks for thepresence of other countries in <strong>Africa</strong>,but she intends to defend its interestson the continent,” he has said.peacemakingPeace is important to <strong>Africa</strong>.And though Russia is not playing aleading role in peacemaking, itspresence in this field is growing.Today, 230 Russian citizens are partof UN peace missions andoperations on the continent.August 2011-January 2012 87

A W A K E N I N Gtrade and economic relationS of ruSSia and african StateSRussian aviation groups in Sierra-Leone, Sudan and Chadare making <strong>special</strong> contributions. Up to 400 <strong>Africa</strong>npeacemakers are annually trained in Russia. At the heightof the civil war in Sierra Leone, a Russian contingent of115 men was deployed there, along with four Russianmilitary transport planes with crews. The UN Commandappreciated the performance of the airmen and awardedpeace medals to some of them. Nine groupsof Russian observers were incorporated into UNpeacekeeping forces. Twenty-five military observerswere dispatched to Western Sahara, 29 to DemocraticRepublic of Congo, four to the UN mission inCôte d’Ivoire and 40 military experts to the UN operationin Burundi.In 2006, there were 34 Russian military and policeofficers in the UN mission in Sudan, and 133 men in anaviation unit. Although the figures are optimistic, they alsoindicate that Russia lags behind many countries in providingpeacekeepers. For example, China sent 1,271 representativesto take part in the UN peacekeeping operations.aid for developmentRussia has written off $20 billion of debt from severalheavily indebted <strong>Africa</strong>n countries. Allocations for88August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Ydevelopment aid from the RussianFederal budget grew from$50 million in 2003 to $215 millionin 2006. From 2009 to 2012, Russiaallocated an additional $100 millionas aid to the poorest countries.Based on Russia’s Participationin International DevelopmentAssistance 2007, the annualallocation to all developingcountries was expected to grow to$500 million. However, the globalfinancial crisis of 2008 compelled theRussian government to change theseprojections. The objective now is toassure a stable trend, leading to theappropriation of approximately 0.7 percent of the grossnational product (GNP) for aid, as recommended by theUnited Nations.Before 1990, as many as 25,000 <strong>Africa</strong>ns received theirhigher education in the erstwhile Soviet Union. Today, 4,050<strong>Africa</strong>ns are pursuing higher education in Russia. TheRussian government grants 750 scholarships annually to<strong>Africa</strong>n students. Unfortunately, many remain unused.The Russian government in 2008 started the ‘EducationIn 2006, there were34 Russian military andpolice officers in the UNmission in Sudan, and133 men in an aviationunit. Although the figuresare optimistic, they alsoindicate that Russialags behind manycountries in providingpeacekeepersto help World Health Organisation(WHO) to help end polio.Since 2005, Russia has beenmaking regular payments to theUnited Nations World FoodProgramme (WFP). In 2007, themoney was spent on emergencyfood aid to Kenya ($2 million),Somalia ($1 million), Guinea, theDemocratic Republic of Congo andMali. In 2008, Russia rendered aidto Ethiopia ($4 million) and Kenya($2 million). In April 2008, at thefirst joint meeting of the <strong>Africa</strong>nUnion and United NationsEconomic Commission for <strong>Africa</strong>,Russia’s ambassador to Ethiopia announced a $500 milliondevelopment assistance package and a $20 million aid to theWorld Bank’s anti-malaria programme for <strong>Africa</strong>.economic intereStSRussia’s interests in <strong>Africa</strong> are not focused on naturalresources — the country’s own reserves are significant. (Still,the profitability of production and quality of raw materialsdoes put <strong>Africa</strong> on the front row). For Russian companies,8.07.0ruSSia - africa trade (value uS$ bn)6.05.04.03.02.0ExportImportTotalTrades1.0020002005 2006 2007 2008 2009Source: UN COMTRADE, AfDBfor All’ programme and by 2012, aims to allocate$43 million to the World Bank for the implementationof the international programme of raising the quality ofbasic education. Russia’s contribution to the Global Fundto Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM) is$40 million. During 2007- 2009, Russia contributed$20 million to the World Bank’s anti-malaria programmefor <strong>Africa</strong>. From 2008 to 2009, Russia paid $18 million<strong>Africa</strong>, with a population of one billion, is a potentialconsumer of goods and services.Medvedev’s visit to <strong>Africa</strong> in 2009 was projected as aneconomic trip, stressing that its goals was to assist Russianbusiness and develop mutually beneficial relationships with<strong>Africa</strong>n countries. In Cairo, a 10-year strategic cooperationpact was signed. Under the deal, the supply of arms to Egyptwas to be renewed.August 2011-January 2012 89

A W A K E N I N Gmajor inveStmentS of ruSSian companieS in africaRussian Host Country/ Industry Type of Value YearInvestor Company InvestmentNorilsk Nickel South <strong>Africa</strong> Gold mining and M&A (acquired 30% US$1.16 billion 2004Gold Fields processing of gold fields)Norilsk Nickel Botswana Nickel mining M&A (acquisition of US$2.5 billion 2007Tati Nickel and processing Canada Lion OreMining gave it 85%state in Tati Nickel)Sintez South <strong>Africa</strong>, Oil, gas, diamonds Greenfield exploration US$ 10-50 million 2006Namibia and and copperAngolaexplorationLukoil Côte d'Ivoire Oil exploration M&A (acquired US$900 million 2010.interest in 10,500square km deepwater blocksRusal Nigeria Aluminum M&A (acquired US$250 millionALSCON refining majority stake inAluminum SmelterCompany- ALSCONof Nigeria)Severstal Liberia Iron ore M&A (acquired control US$40 million 2008.of iron ore deposit inPutu Range area ofLiberia- ALSCONof Nigeria)Gazprom Algeria Natural gas Joint exploration and US$4.7 billion 2006.Sonatrach exploration development projects and US$7.5 billionby debt write-offagreement andrams dealAlrosa Angola, Namibia Diamond mining Greenfield investment US$300- 1992.and DRC and hydroelectricity 400 millionRosatom Egypt Nuclear power Ongoing negotiations US$1.8 billion 2010.to build Egypt's firstnuclear power plant(Sources: Media and Russian company websites)(Russia's Economic Engagement with <strong>Africa</strong>. <strong>Africa</strong> Economic Brief, Volume 2, Issue 7, May 11, 2011.)90August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YRussia’s Gazprom Group drilling for the first prospecting well, Rhourde Sayah-2, within the El Assel licence area in Algeria.The project began in March 2101. Photo: www.gazporm.comThe Russian government-owned RosAtom is aiming fora $1.8-billion contract to help build the first nuclear powerplant in Egypt, almost half of the going rate of $3.5 billion perreactor. RosAtom’s presence would threaten the chances ofFrance’s Areva, General-Electric-Hitachi and Toshibabreaking into the civilian nuclear market in the Middle East.Next, Medvedev went to Nigeria, <strong>Africa</strong>’s largest exporterof oil. A $2.5-billion joint project between the Russiangovernment-owned Gazprom and Nigerian NationalPetroleum Corporation (NNPC) to develop large oil andgas fields and lay a gas pipeline fromNigeria to Europe was discussed.But Gazprom failed to make thedeal a reality.In Angola, Medvedev finalised anagreement on economic cooperationand arranged a $300-million loan tosupport the launch of Angolansatellite ‘Angosat’. Also, Russianresources company Zarubezhneft isseeking greater access to Angolanoil fields and wants to broadencooperation with Angolan state oilcompany, Sonangol.Meanwhile, many Russiancompanies are seeking access toRussia’s trade with <strong>Africa</strong>is far behind China andIndia, let alone the U.S.Russia’s energy resourcesare located in areas thatare inaccessible and havean unfriendly climate. Sodeveloping these areaswould be costlier thandeveloping the sameresources in <strong>Africa</strong>Namibian uranium reserves. Leading Russian companiessuch as Alrosa, Rusal, Renova, Rosneft and Gazprom areeither involved in <strong>Africa</strong> or are seeking deals there.Yet, Russia’s trade with <strong>Africa</strong> is far behind that of Chinaand India, let alone the United States. Russia’s enormousenergy resources are located in areas that are inaccessible,sparsely populated and have an unfriendly climate.So developing these areas would be costlier than developingthe same resources in <strong>Africa</strong>.Some <strong>Africa</strong>n leaders are still grateful to Russia forits assistance in their liberationstruggles, but they need delivery, notdeals. Russia’s record is notcommendable on this count. Thecompetition for <strong>Africa</strong> is under way.In recent years, the traditional pool ofplayers: Europe, U.S. and Japan —followed by BRICS and then SouthKorea, Vietnam, Indonesia, Turkeyand the Gulf countries, have becomeactive on the continent.The business community seemsunaffected by the changinginvestment climate in <strong>Africa</strong>: if inBotswana, all seems well politicallyand economically, there was a civilAugust 2011-January 2012 91

A W A K E N I N GThe Rössing Uranium Mine in Namibia, one of the largest open-pit mines in the world, located in the Namib Desert.war-like situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.But all the risks pale before the abundance of cheap labourand favourable weather conditions, providing one of thehighest rates of return for economic projects and trade. As foreconomic cooperation, there is common ground. <strong>Africa</strong> andRussia own over 60 percent of the world’s natural resourcesand their interaction in this field is natural and will benefitboth sides.However, Russia is short of several minerals, which iscovered by imports: manganese (100 percent), chrome(80 percent) and bauxite (60 percent). The main bauxitesupplier is Guinea — one of the world leaders in bauxiteproduction. The deposits of 35percent of minerals in Russia,including manganese, chrome,bauxite, zinc and tin — are losingprofitability. The bulk of undevelopeddeposits are buried in theremote areas to the east of the UralMountains. It is less expensive toextract and transport minerals from<strong>Africa</strong> than to mine these depositsin Siberia and the Far East. <strong>Africa</strong>has 30 percent of the planet’snatural resources and partnershipswith its countries in raw materialscan be beneficial.Russia’s trade with <strong>Africa</strong>is low compared to othersin BRICS. China’s share inBRICS volume of tradewith <strong>Africa</strong> is 2/3, India’s20%, Brazil’s 11% andRussia’s 4%. From 2003 to2009, China invested$28 billion in 86 projects in<strong>Africa</strong> and India $25 billionin 130 projectsRussia will have to compete for <strong>Africa</strong>n resources withEurope, the United States, China, India and other emergingpowers. Russia and China have irreconcilable geopoliticalinterests in <strong>Africa</strong>. Russia is resource-rich while China isresource-poor. Both countries have, however, cash reservesto invest in the <strong>Africa</strong>n economy, but China has better accessto financial resources, because the Chinese government helpsChinese investors in <strong>Africa</strong> and they receive moneyfrom Exim-Bank, China Development Bank and its FundChina-<strong>Africa</strong>.Russia’s trade with <strong>Africa</strong> is low compared to others inBRICS. China’s share in BRICS volume of trade with <strong>Africa</strong>is 2/3, India’s 20 percent, Brazil’s11 percent and Russia’s 4 percent.From 2003 to 2009, China invested$28 billion in 86 projects in <strong>Africa</strong>,India $25 billion in 130 projects; Brazil$10 billion in 25 projects and Russia$9.3 billion in 47 projects 2 . Russia’strade turnover with <strong>Africa</strong> in 2010 was$8.66 billion, and half of it came fromEgypt. But China’s trade with <strong>Africa</strong> in2008 exceeded $100 billion and in2010, it stood at $114.6 billion 3 .There is a lot of room forexpansion in Russia-<strong>Africa</strong> trade.According to the Federal Customs92August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YAn artist’s perception of Angosat, the $327-million satellite Angola is preparing tolaunch with the help of Russian space technology.Service, the share of southern <strong>Africa</strong>, including South <strong>Africa</strong>,in trade with Russia is 0.1 percent. (The share of Brazil is1 percent, India 1.6 percent and China 7 percent). This lowshare does not correspond to the level of the politicalrelationship. Russian foreigndirect investment (FDI)in <strong>Africa</strong> is $5 billion, with a totalinvestment of to up $10 billion.The FDI is led by large multinationals.The largest companiesoperate in oil and gas, and thesmaller ones in the processing ofmetals. (“Russia’s EconomicEngagement with <strong>Africa</strong>”. <strong>Africa</strong>Economic Brief, Volume 2, Issue7; May 11, 2011.)There are 18 big Russiancompanies active in 13 countriesof <strong>Africa</strong>. The total amount ofexisting and planned projects is 40.Most active are Gazprom (eight projects), Lukoil (six), Alrosa,Rusal, Renova, Rosatom, Norilsk-Nickel, Sintez (three each).The leading host countries are South <strong>Africa</strong> (10 projects),Libya (seven), Angola (five), Algeria, Democratic Republic ofCongo and Namibia (four each), Nigeria (three), Egypt,Botswana, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana and Togo.Some important Russian projects in <strong>Africa</strong> include —There are a number ofobstacles to the developmentof Russian-<strong>Africa</strong>nrelationship. One is the lackof knowledge in Russiangovernment and businesscircles about the actualsituation in <strong>Africa</strong>,consequently, potentialareas of partnerships havebeen underexploreddiamond extraction in Angola (Alrosa),building Nigeria-Alger (Gazprom), extractingnickel in Botswana (Nornickel), developingoil deposits in the coastal zone of Côted’Ivoire and Ghana (Lukoil), developingmanganese and vanadium deposits in South<strong>Africa</strong> (Renova and Evraz) and extracting oilin Equatorial Guinea (Gaspromneftegas).Most projects are not complete with manyRussian companies registered abroad. Alongwith the exploitation of mineral resources,the major areas of Russian cooperation with<strong>Africa</strong>n countries include energy, infrastructure,telecommunications, fishing, education,health, tourism and the military (technicalassistance). The approximate cost ofRussian assets currently in <strong>Africa</strong> is $3-3.5billion.However, there are a number of obstaclesto the development of Russia-<strong>Africa</strong>relationship. One is the lack of knowledge inRussian government and business circlesabout the actual situation and specific counterparts in <strong>Africa</strong>,consequently, potential areas of partnerships have beenunderexplored.First of all, Russia needs to build a foreign policy to reflectthe interests of Russian business.There are some positive trends inthis direction, but everything isbeing done slowly. And, unfortunately,<strong>Africa</strong> is still not among thepriorities of the Russian foreignpolicy. The effectiveness ofRussia’s new engagement in <strong>Africa</strong>remains to be seen.Many potential <strong>Africa</strong>nexporters still have negativeperceptions about Russia and itsmarket, often comparing it toexport opportunities offered by theUnited States, Europe and China.Experts say Russia’s market is yet toopen up and <strong>Africa</strong>n exporters do not understand Russianbusiness approaches and strategies well.Thus, the demand for informational and financialsupport to Russian business entering <strong>Africa</strong>n markets ishigh. Apparently, Russia is rapidly becoming aware of itsinterests in <strong>Africa</strong> and is trying to catch up for lost decadesin the continent.nReferences1. Russia introduces its new Foreign Policy Concept. People’sDaily Online. July 17, 2008.2. El Pais (Spain). March 15, 2010.3. The Telegraph (London) February 24, 2011.August 2011-January 2012 93

A S I A N C H A L L E N G EEngaging TanzaniaWith India and China looking for expansion in <strong>Africa</strong>, their pattern ofengagement in the continent may have wider repercussions for countriessuch as Tanzania, say Darlene K. Mutalemwa and Deo P. MutalemwaPrime Minister Manmohan Singh and Tanzanian President Jakaya Mrisho Kikwete visiting the Tele-Medicine Unit, atthe India-Tanzanian Centre in Information and Communication Technology, in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania on May 27, 2011.India and China, the two emerging economicpowerhouses of Asia, have made no secretof their desire to engage <strong>Africa</strong> as they seeknew partnerships to fuel their boomingeconomies. Besides their decades-old tiesand major thrust provided by theSouth-South cooperation, the deepeningrelationship of the two countries with theregion is understood to have a significant impact on theeconomic transformation of <strong>Africa</strong>.It is in this context that an analysis of the currentinterests of China and India and their role asdrivers of growth in developing East <strong>Africa</strong>n economiessuch as Tanzania is of immense importance.Developmental aiDIn recent years, India and China have increased theiroverseas developmental aid to low-income countries,e<strong>special</strong>ly those in Sub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong>.ChinaThe existing data indicate that Chinese aid to <strong>Africa</strong>n countrieshas exceeded the aid provided by many traditionaldonors. But China prefers to keep the details of aid given to<strong>Africa</strong>n countries a closely guarded secret. There could bethree possible explanations to this. 2 First, the Chinese governmentfeels that their own people may object to such aidas the fund could instead be utilised for the welfare of thepoor in China. Secondly, China feels that information aboutaid is sensitive for recipient countries, as they argue that itis up to <strong>Africa</strong>n countries to decide if they wish to report thevolume of aid. Thirdly, China does not want <strong>Africa</strong>n countriesto compare with each other the amount of Chinese aidreceived by them.We, however, believe that the Chinese government is notvery open in this regard because of the traditional communistpenchant for secrecy that has been eventually extendedto its aid relations with <strong>Africa</strong>.China has had aid cooperation with <strong>Africa</strong> since the94August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Y1950s and 60s when China began establishing agriculturaland health projects and building factories in the new <strong>Africa</strong>nstates that were emerging out of colonial bondage.The Tanzania-Zambia Railway (TAZARA) is perhaps themost suitable example of early Chinese lending. Built in theearly 1970s, the $500 million-project that employed approximately50,000 Chinese was the largest foreign aid projectundertaken by China at the time. The project entailedthe building of a 2,000-km railway line between thecopper belt region in the landlocked Zambia and the portin Dar es Salaam. 3&4In Tanzania, China has been providing technicalassistance to other sectors as well, including, agriculture,industry, mining, and social services. Specific projects thatbenefited from China’s assistance also included theTanzania-China Friendship Textile Mill, which isTanzania’s largest textile factory, built in the 1960s, theMbarali Rice Farm (privatised in 2006) and China SisalFarm that offered Tanzania an insight into Asian methodsof planting, harvesting and cashing in on both grain and cashcrops.The Wami-Chalinze and Dodoma water projects havebeen financed jointly by Tanzania and the Chinese government,while another project was the 60,0000-seaternational stadium built at a total cost of $43.5 million — 53percent of the cost financed by the government ofTanzania and 47 percent ($20.5 million) financed throughTAZARA Railways, a 2,000-km-long railway line between Zambia and Dar-es-Salaam,was developed with Chinese aid.a soft loan from China. 5 The station opened in 2007.In the field of social services, since1968 China has beenregularly dispatching medical teams from ShandongProvince to Tanzania. In 2009, approximately 1,000 medicalworkers were sent to the country. The Chinese medicalworkers often share their knowledge by teaching localTanzanian health practitioners the Chinese system ofmedicine. 6Analysts say that China’s aid to Tanzania and other<strong>Africa</strong>n countries is unconditional as compared to foreignaid by Western countries, which typically demand compliancewith human rights, strong free-market economic management,environmentally responsible policies and politicalopenness on the part of recipient governments.Chinese aid is also directed towards infrastructureprojects in difficult terrains such as remote rural roads,bridges over deep escarpments and fast flowing rivers anddeep-sea ports, which traditional Western donors arereluctant to fund. 7 Thus, <strong>Africa</strong>n governments valueChinese aid for helping to dis-enclave economies, therebyspurring economic growth and making businesses morecompetitive.indiaAs for India, concrete statistics on her aid to Tanzania arealso difficult to get as India does not report its aid flows tothe Organization for Economic Cooperation andDevelopment (OECD) andthe Development AssistanceCommittee (DAC), thedonors’ club establishedwithin the OECD. However,Tanzania has been one of thelargest aid recipients ofIndia’s bilateral OverseasDevelopment Aid (ODA)outside South East Asia. 8India’s ODA to Tanzania is amix of project assistance, purchasesubsidies, lines of credit,travel costs, and technicaltraining costs incurred by theIndian government and evenextends to the defence sector.In addition, an outstandingtechnical assistanceproject 9 was established in1973. The National SmallIndustries Corporation(NSIC) of India continues tosupport the Small IndustryDevelopment Organisation(SIDO) in Tanzania that isnow an established organisationwith branches throughoutAugust 2011-January 2012 95

A S I A N C H A L L E N G Etable 1: indian trade with tanzania 2008-2010 132008 2009 2010India Export in US$ ( million) 859.73 772.87 895.01India Import in US$ ( million) 171.82 187.58 226.19Total 1031.55 960.45 1121.2Source: World Trade Atlas dataFigure 1: Sino-tanzanian trade 1995-2008 14US & million1000900800700600500400300China’simports fromTanzaniaChina’s exportto Tanzaniafor the nation that included$191 million in lines of credit,$180 million for water supplyprojects, $10 million for capacity-buildingprojects in socialand educational sectors and $1million for development. Indiaand Tanzania have also signeda double taxation avoidanceagreement to promote greaterinvestment and a pact to promotesmall-scale industries hasalso been signed.200traDe100India was the largest source0country for Tanzania’s importsfor three consecutive yearsfrom 2008 to 2010. Tanzania’sSource: World Trade Atlas data major imports from Indiainclude mineral fuels, oils, ironthe country. Tanzania has also been one of the largest beneficiariesof India’s ITEC/SCAAP 10 programme since 1966. machinery/appliances, plastic products, rubber items, cot-and steel, pharmaceuticals, motor vehicles, electricalBeginning with 24 trainees annually, the number of trainees ton fabrics and cereals, among other things. Its majorunder the programme was increased to 120 per annum in exports to India include vegetables, pulses, cashew nuts,2009 and now their number exceeds 1,200. Tanzania is also raw cotton, gemstones, cloves and other spices, wood, etc.a major beneficiary of Indian scholarships and other educationalassistance, which includes self-financing seats in precious metal ores but also smaller quantities of niobium,In comparison, China imports ores (not only copper andIndia’s higher learning institutions. About 5,000 Tanzanian tantalum, vanadium, zirconium and manganese), vegetablestudents are estimated to be currently in India under the and animal products from Tanzania. Since 2004, ores havescheme. Furthermore, two Indian funded projects are under dominated the Chinese imports.implementation, namely — the Centre of Excellence in Tanzania’s trade relations with the two emerging AsianICT by C-DAC and the Pan-<strong>Africa</strong>n e-Network project economies have both a direct and an indirect impact on itsbeing executed by TCIL. 11economy. The direct effects range from higher export volumesand prices of certain raw materials to the availabilityUnder an agreement signed on June 5, 2009, theGovernment of India has provided a line of credit $40 millionto Tanzania for improving its agriculture sector. 12 Tanzanian consumers. However, it still remains to be seenof Chinese and Indian products to a broad spectrum ofTanzanian Prime Minister Mizengo Pinda flagged off how this trade relation will impact poverty in Tanzania.the first consignment of 288 tractors in October 2010, out Nonetheless, the growth of exports can impact positivelyin terms of reducing poverty, if it translates into higherof the total of 1,860 tractors provided by India. It was tosupport the Tanzania government’s much-publicised investment, higher capacity utilisation, higher employment‘Kilimo Kwanza’, a clarion call to revamp the agricultural and expanded output. This will, in turn, result in an increasesector and achieve a green revolution in Tanzania — a in per capita income.concept borrowed from the Indian experience.On the other hand, Chinese and Indian imports presentDuring his three-day visit to Tanzania in May 2011, a big challenge to the small Tanzanian economy. TanzaniaPrime Minister Manmohan Singh unveiled an aid package has negative trade balances with the two countries 15 which199519971999200120032005200796August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YA Chinese shipping line off the Tanzanian coast. Counterfeit products are flooding the Tanzanian market.defies the whole purpose of the bilateral trade agreementsbetween Tanzania and the two countries. India and China,in turn, encouraged Tanzania to export more of its productsto them. Moreover, Tanzania has failed to control the floodof imported goods from the two countries that containsignificant quantities of counterfeits and items withquestionable pricing.The case in point is a 2008 report by Swain published inthe UK’s The Sunday Times according to which thecountry’s only flip-flop sandal factory was dying. A fewyears ago, it employed some 3,000 people and sold footwearacross the continent. Now it employs only 1,000 people.Its Lebanese manager complained that he could notcompete with cheap Chinese imports that were sold for lessthan their flip-flop’s cost price. In his report, Swain alsoadded that it had been reported that the Chinese were shippinggoods in diplomatic containers to their embassy inDar es Salaam, avoiding customs and import duty, whichcould, however, be merely a fictional story. 16On a related note, research carried out by Mashindanoet al in 2007 indicated that China topped the list of countrieswhich exported counterfeit products to Tanzania.China was followed by India, the U.A.E. and Kenya.Counterfeit goods are affecting the Tanzanian economy inseveral ways, including the loss of government revenue,employment opportunities, health hazards(diseases and deaths), spreading poverty and promotingunfair competition that tends to harm domestic manufacturingindustry. 17The government and various stakeholders have taken anumber of measures to address the problem. Regulatoryauthorities such as Tanzania Foods and Drugs Authority(TFDA), Tanzania Revenue Authority (TRA), TanzaniaBureau of Standards (TBS) and the manufacturers’ association(CTI) have intensified efforts and scaled up their campaignsagainst the entry of sub-standard products into thelocal market. These efforts are being complemented by theinitiatives to review laws and regulations that wouldempower the regulatory organs to curb the problem moreeffectively. 18inveStmentIndia was the second amongst the top ten investors inTanzania from 1990 to 2009, with a total investment of $1.31 billion. Major areas of investments were exportprocessing zones (EPZ), tourism, natural resources, energy,manufacturing, telecom, banking and insurance,transportation, and infrastructure. Among examples ofmany Indian investments in Tanzania, the latest is the firsteverprivate EPZ owned by an Indian group, the KamalGroup of Industries, set up near Dar es Salaam. It is designedto accommodate 80 industrial units spread over 300 acres.Tanzanian President Jakaya Mrisho Kikwete inauguratedthe EPZ on July 25, 2010. 19Tanzania has also benefited from Chinese foreign directinvestments (FDIs). According to Tanzanian governmentstatistics, the aggregate Chinese share of FDI in Tanzaniastood at 2.4 percent of the total FDI flow to Tanzaniabetween 1990-2006. The manufacturing sector received thelion’s share of the total Chinese FDI during the period,followed by agriculture and natural resource. 20Tanzania’s domestic and foreign investments are affectedby its poor business climate. Tanzania dropped in theannual worldwide ranking of ‘Doing Business’ report from126 in 2009 to 131 in 2010. 21 Further assessment shows thatTanzania’s ranking in ‘Doing Business’ hasn’t been consistentvis à vis ongoing reforms in the country. In spite of this,the country often ranks lower compared to other countriesin the region and it, therefore, discourages potentialinvestors in the sector. Reasons for such lower ranking havebeen linked with bureaucratic inefficiencies in starting business,dealing with licences, environment for competingfairly, employment of workers, registering property, gettingcredit, protecting investors, paying taxes, trading acrossAugust 2011-January 2012 97

A S I A N C H A L L E N G EAn Export Processing Zone set up by the Kamal Group of Industries in Tanzania.table-2: SeleCteD tanzania inveStment Centre’S regiStereD agriCulture projeCtSwith “inDian intereStS”, inCluDing agro proCeSSing aCtivitieS, For 1990-2007Project name Farming Activities No. of Employees Investment Worth(US$ million)Arusha Farms Ltd. Sisal Estate 407 0.54Tan Farms Ltd. Sisal Estate 385 0.37Tanagri Ltd. Paw paw Farming 15 0.74The Bombay Burmah Trad. Corp. Tea Farming 147 0.39Mayambe and Digoma Farms Ltd. Mixed Farming 85 0.02Tanzania Plantations Ltd. Agricultural crops & Diary 197 0.38Euro Vistaa (T) Ltd Commercial farming 450 27.77Mega Cashewnuts & Allied Plant. Cashew nuts plantations 205 1.80Agro processing activitiesCoastal Millers Ltd Grain Millers 30 2.57Sun Cape Edible Oil 70 2.44NSK (T) Ltd. Edible Oil 73 1.51Nipha Pamba Engineering Co. Ltd. Ginnery 86 5.07Nipha Pamba Ltd. Ginnery 59 2.13M. A. Kharafi (T) Ltd. Cashew nut Processing 100 1.75Mega Cashewnuts & Allied Plant. Cashew nut Processing 223 8.47Bidco Tanzania Ltd Oil Refinery Plant 500 3.33Olam Tanzania Ltd Cashew nut Processing 3730 10.15Bake Food International Ltd Biscuits Manufacturing 200 1.16Indo-<strong>Africa</strong>n Essential Oils Essential Oil Extraction 120 2.59Mount Meru Seeds Ltd Seed Processing Plant 52 1.41Source: Tanzanian Investment Centre 201098August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Ythe border, enforcing contracts coping with food securityand addressing the issue of increasing carbon footprint.These economy-wide factors also bear heavily on investmentsin the agriculture sector of the country.Notwithstanding these challenges, India is an importantpartner in Tanzanian agriculture for the following reasons:First, Tanzania needs support to start its own ‘GreenRevolution’ that has been the cornerstone of India’sagricultural achievement.Secondly, Indian private sector investments have traditionallyfocused on countries where the Indian diaspora hasa significant presence. 22 This approach is rapidly shifting,as they are now increasingly seekinginvestments in non-Anglo-<strong>Africa</strong>ncountries. A case in point is ExportTrading Group, whose headquartersare in Dar-es-Salaam,Tanzania. 23 The group’s activitiesrevolve around agriculturealthough group investments 24 alsocover information technology,mining, leisure, forestry, transportand port infrastructure.Thirdly, enterprise surveys in Sub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong> revealthat Indian entrepreneurial networks are woven togetherwith strands of information, shared contacts, sometimesfinance (credit or investment), and a degree of trust (frequentlybacked up by group-based sanctions). 25 Wordeddifferently, they have played an invaluable role in the growthof the <strong>Africa</strong>n private sector by bringing into the countrybetter skills, financial resources, and networking channels.Lastly, as evident in the Table-2 26 , Indian firms havepreferred to invest in the agriculture sector of Tanzania,which had been shunned by other foreign investmentproviders. Indian firms use a significant amount of rawIndian entrepreneurs haveplayed an invaluable rolein the growth of the <strong>Africa</strong>nprivate sector by bringinginto the country betterskills, financial resources,and networking channelsmaterials directly from the agriculture produce.With Tanzania’s proclaimed ‘Kilimo Kwanza’, a renewedcall for higher and robust efforts to revamp agriculture, anumber of additional areas for investments by Indian orjoint ventures are being planned. One area is the cashew nutprocessing industry in Tanzania, which witnessed activeoperations in the 1970s when over 25 factories were establishedas public enterprises with machinery imported fromIndia. However, collapse of the parastatal regime inTanzania in the mid 1980s and early 1990s left most of thesefactories in a poor state. Since the launch of privatisation inthe last decade, efforts are being made to start or even rehabilitatethe processing factories,where the use of Indian technologyhas been sought. Now, over 40 percentof Tanzania’s production ofcashew nut is shipped raw to theIndian market. In India, the rawmaterial is processed under labourintensive technology to kernels andre-exported to large brand processorsand distributors in industrialisedcountries, 27 thus generatingsubstantial value addition and employment outsideTanzania.migrationIn the 19th century, most immigrants flocking to <strong>Africa</strong>— businessmen, explorers, missionaries and soldiers —came from Western Europe. In East <strong>Africa</strong>, and Tanzania inparticular, Indian immigrants were possibly the largestgroup. But they were mainly indentured labourers or midand low-ranking colonial civil servants.On the other hand, the Chinese, whether legal or illegalmigrants, work in trade and construction sectors. They areWith Tanzania’s proclaimed ‘Kilimo Kwanza’, a renewed call for higher and robust efforts to revamp agriculture, a number of additional areasfor investments by Indian companies or joint ventures are being planned.August 2011-January 2012 99

A S I A N C H A L L E N G ESpecific projects that have benefited from China’s assistance include the Tanzania-China Friendship Textile Mill,which is Tanzania’s largest textile factory, built in the 1960s.doing everything from developing giant state-financedinfrastructure projects, building roads and railways to smallerenterprises selling consumer goods, and they competedirectly with Tanzanian entrepreneurs and labourers.Regarding Indian migrants, the commercial and businessrelationship between India and Tanzania is driven by thepresence of a large community of Tanzanians of Indian origin.28 It is estimated that there are about 40,000 people ofIndian origin who are mainly concentrated in urban centressuch as Dar es Salaam, Arusha, Dodoma, Morogoro,Zanzibar, Mwanza and Mbeya. 29 Many of the top and successfulbusiness establishments such as MohammedEnterprises Tanzania Ltd (METL) and the KarimjeeJivanjee enterprises are essentially family-based establishmentsand owned by Tanzanians of Indian origin. In addition,about 10,000 Indian nationals (expatriates) live andwork in Tanzania, mainly in industry and services; theyrepresent a broad mix from all over India. 30Several possible reasons explain the motives for theChinese to emigrate to Tanzania and other <strong>Africa</strong>n countriesto start businesses 31 , and to some extent they are truefor the Indian migrants as well. First, the Chinese are moreentrepreneurial and are, therefore, able to identify and takeadvantage of even small opportunities that the locals areunable to realise.Secondly, there has been a boom in Chinese investmentsin <strong>Africa</strong>n minerals and other natural resources. This isattracting other types of Chinese economic activities into theregion.Thirdly, those individuals who decide to leave China inquest of economic opportunities in <strong>Africa</strong> are likely to be farmore entrepreneurial and risk-taking than the•averageChinese (and also the average <strong>Africa</strong>n). Lastly, Chineseentrepreneurs have considerable experience running businessesin murky and often corrupt/less legal environments.They are able to capitalise on this skill in the <strong>Africa</strong>n context.Chinese workers have been accused of taking away localjobs while stealing local natural resources, violating labourstandards and labour law, and deepening corruption. Many<strong>Africa</strong>n countries — Tanzania is no exception — have a highunemployment rate and want the Chinese-run firms to hiremore local workers. On big construction projects, whereverpossible, the Chinese insist on importing their own workforcefrom China, including unskilled labour. However, someTanzanians feel that the Chinese have made little or no effortto adopt local customs, learn the language, and much lessmarry locals. Nonetheless, the Chinese are not associated withthe lavish lifestyles of their counterparts from Western aidagencies. Chinese workers live in sprawling accommodation,a picture of frugality, hard work and adaptability.ConCluSionThe expanding and deepening ties of India and China withTanzania present the country with a significant opportunityfor growth and economic transformation. Ultimately, itwill depend on wise visionary leadership and the strengthof Tanzanian institutions to shape China and India’s engagementfor the benefit of Tanzanian people. The two emergingpowers are unlikely to apply western-style political conditionalityto their aid, investment or trade cooperation withTanzania. They will seek opportunities for their respectivenational interests, which is a significant lesson forTanzanians. This does not exclude straightforward altruisticassistance to Tanzania from time to time; but it is betterseen as realistic mutual benefit in bilateral cooperation.China and India will not transform Tanzania:Tanzanians will transform Tanzania!n100August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YReferences1. Davies ( 2007), cited in Huse, Martine Dahle and StephenL Muyakwa ( 2008), China in <strong>Africa</strong>: lending, policy spaceand governance, Norwegian campaign for DebtCancellation and Norwegian Council for <strong>Africa</strong>,http://www.eldis.ids.ac.uk/go/topics/resource-guides/norwegian-research/aid&id=35901&type=Document,accessed 25th May 20082. Brautigam, Deborah (2008), China’s <strong>Africa</strong>n Aid:Transatlantic Challenges, GMF paper series,http://www.gmfus.org/doc/Brautigam0410aFINAL.pdf,accessed 25th May 20083. Swain, Jon (2008), <strong>Africa</strong>, China’s New Frontier, TheSunday Times, February 10, 2008, http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/africa/article3319909.ece,accessed 25th May 20084. Moshi and Mtui ( 2008), Scoping studies on <strong>Africa</strong>-ChinaEconomic Relations: The Case of Tanzania, A Revisedreport submitted to AERC, Nairobi5. Johanna Janson, Christopher Burke and Tracy Hon(2009), Patterns of Chinese Investment, Aid and Trade inTanzania. A briefing paper for the Centre for ChineseStudies. Prepared for World Wide Fund for Nature ( WWF).October.6. Lancaster, Carol ( 2007), The Chinese Aid System,Center for Global Development Essay ,http://www.cgdev.org/content/publications/detail/13953,accessed 25th May 20087. Bijoy C.R.(n.d), India: Transiting to a Global DonorSpecial Report on South-South Cooperation 2010, Availableat http://www.realityofaid.org/userfiles/roareports/roareport_3ce2522270.pdf,accessed 20th December 20118. www.mea.gov.in/meaxpsite/foreignrelation/tanzania.pdf,accessed 12th December 20119. mea.gov.in/mystart.php: ITEC/SCAAP denote IndiaTechnical Economic Cooperation (ITEC) and SpecialCommonwealth <strong>Africa</strong>n Assistance Programme10. Ibid11. MEA publications12. www.mea.gov.in/meaxpsite/foreignrelation/tanzania.pdf,accessed 12th December 201113. Johanna Janson, Christopher Burke and Tracy Hon(2009), Patterns of Chinese Investment, Aid and Trade inTanzania. A briefing paper for the Centre for Chinese Studies.Prepared for World Wide Fund for Nature ( WWF). October14. Moshi and Mtui (2008), Scoping studies on <strong>Africa</strong>-China Economic Relations: The Case of Tanzania, ARevised report submitted to AERC, Nairobi15. Swain, Jon (2008), <strong>Africa</strong>, China’s New Frontier, TheSunday Times, February 10, 2008, http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/africa/article3319909.ece,accessed 25th May 200816. Moshi and Mtui (2008), Scoping studies on <strong>Africa</strong>-China Economic Relations: The Case of Tanzania, ARevised report submitted to AERC, Nairobi17. Ibid18. www.mea.gov.in/meaxpsite/foreignrelation/tanzania.pdf,accessed 12th December 201119. Moshi and Mtui (2008)20. World Bank (2010), Available at t www.doingbusiness.org,accessed 12th December 201121. Indian investments or investment with Indian interestsare used and referred liberally here and onwards as investmentsfrom (i) non-resident Indians who are Indiancitizens holding Indian passports and residing in Tanzania(ii) Tanzanians of Indian origin who were once citizens ofIndia or whose spouses, parents, grandparents or greatgrandparents were once citizens of India.22. Interview held with ETG officials, December 2010.23. Eight countries in Western <strong>Africa</strong>, countries in Eastern,Southern, the horn of <strong>Africa</strong>, India, UAE24. Brautigham D (2003), Local Entrepreneurship in SouthEast Asia and Sub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong>: Networks and Linkagesto Global Economy in Asia and <strong>Africa</strong> in the Global economy( Eds, Aryeetey E, E Court, J., Nissanke, M and Weder,B) United Nations University Press, New York, pp 106-127; Ramachandran V and Shah M.K. ( 1998) MinorityEntrepreneurs and Firm performance in Sub-Saharan<strong>Africa</strong>, World Bank, RPED Paper no. 8625. Only those processed through the TanzaniaInvestment Centre are benefitting from <strong>special</strong> investmentincentives26. <strong>Africa</strong>n Agribusiness and Agro-Industry DevelopmentInitiative27. The Indian origin can be a bit misleading connotation:in local parlance sometimes it includes people of bothIndian and Pakistan origin.28. www.mea.gov.in/meaxpsite/foreignrelation/tanzania.pdf,accessed 12th December 201129. Ibid.30. Rodrick, Dani (2007), Chinese Entrepreneurs in <strong>Africa</strong>,http://rodrik.typepad.com/dani_rodriks_weblog/2007/08/chinese-entrepr.html, accessed 12th December 2011August 2011-January 2012 101

N E W E Q U A T I O N SMIDDLE powers zero inon <strong>Africa</strong> opportunityTurkey, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and the Gulf states join emerging powersto leverage new opportunities emerging in the continent,says Sandeep ChakravortyTurkey aims to deepen its security sector involvement in <strong>Africa</strong> and is also contributing financially to six of the existing eight UN missions.With Egypt, it co-chaired the International Donors Conference for the Reconstruction and Development of Darfur, in Cairo in 2010.<strong>Africa</strong>’s economy is expected to grow ata rate of between 5.5 and 6 percent in2012, according to internationalfinancial institutions like the WorldBank, International Monetary Fundand <strong>Africa</strong> Development Bank(AfDB). However, in spite of theprojected positive growth, <strong>Africa</strong> maycontinue to face significant development challenges in thecoming years.<strong>Africa</strong> represents more than 10 percent of the globaleconomy but accounts for only 2 percent of globaleconomic output and less than 1 percent of global trade.Its economic growth relies significantly on the export ofunprocessed or little processed raw materials and minerals.It is seen as a magnet attracting many countries. The AfDBestimates that <strong>Africa</strong>’s export to BRIC countries (Brazil,Russia, India and China) in 2009 accounted for 32.4 percentof all exports, up from 21.7 percent in 2000. China’sinvestment in <strong>Africa</strong> has touched $150 billion, up from justover $700 million in 1992. In 2010, India invested over$40 billion in <strong>Africa</strong>. Brazil invested at least $10 billion in2010. Its natural resources are attracting not only the majoremerging powers such as China, India and Brazil but alsomiddle-range powers such as Saudi Arabia, United ArabEmirates (UAE) and Turkey. It is interesting to note thegrowing interest of such countries in <strong>Africa</strong>.Turkey is the latest serious entrant with a definitivestrategy that makes it different from other players. China’spresence is strongly driven by the state while India’sengagement is driven by the private sector. Turkey’s <strong>Africa</strong>policy is an arena in which, for the first time, the interests102August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Yof civil society organisations, business sectors and the statehave converged.Turkey is also increasing its security sector involvementin <strong>Africa</strong>. It is currently providing personnel and contributingfinancially to six of the existing eight UN missions in<strong>Africa</strong>. Turkey co-chaired with Egypt the InternationalDonors Conference for the Reconstruction andDevelopment in Darfur in Cairo in March 2010. Turkeyalso hosted the Istanbul Somalia Conference organisedwithin the UN framework in May 2010. The conferenceprovided support for the Djibouti Peace Process and theTransitional Federal Government. The Istanbul Declarationadopted during the conference constitutes a road map forthe settlement of the Somali issue.The Turkey-<strong>Africa</strong> Cooperation Summit (TACS) heldwith the participation of 49 <strong>Africa</strong>n countries from August18-21, 2008, in Istanbul, marked the beginning of a steadyand sustainable cooperation processbetween Turkey and <strong>Africa</strong>. Viewedin the context of the Japan’sTICAD (launched in 1993),China’s FOCAC (2006), theIndia-<strong>Africa</strong> Forum Summit(2008, 2011), Turkish efforts toreach out to <strong>Africa</strong>n countries aresignificant. Since the TACS,Turkey’s <strong>Africa</strong>n script isunfolding according to a plan and adense network of institutionalmechanisms have emerged.The increasing political engagementbetween Turkey and <strong>Africa</strong>n countries also has ledto heightened diplomatic, economic, developmental, andsecurity cooperation. Today, Turkey, along with China andIndia, is among the only three countries with which the<strong>Africa</strong>n Union has strategic partnerships. The second TACSis scheduled to take place in an <strong>Africa</strong>n country in 2013.What is impressive about Turkey is the synergy betweengovernment policies, business strategies and humanitarianactivities. At the government level, they had startedconsidering the idea of entering <strong>Africa</strong> by the end of the1990s under the late Foreign Minister Ismail Cem Ipekçi.But it was only after 2005 that the Justice and DevelopmentParty (AKP) government took a new approach to <strong>Africa</strong> asan integral part of its foreign policy. The number ofembassies was raised from 12 in 2005 to 22 in 2011. Thisyear, Ankara is planning 10 new embassies. The Turkishleadership is making well-focused visits to <strong>Africa</strong> andwithin G-20, Turkey is emerging as the voice of <strong>Africa</strong>.In the meantime, many small and medium-sized Turkishcompanies are establishing themselves in <strong>Africa</strong>, resulting insubstantial economic engagement.Saudi Arabia has also markedly deepened its engagementwith <strong>Africa</strong>. A forum, called the Saudi East <strong>Africa</strong>n Forum,is one of the initiatives which helps foster trade andThe Turkey-<strong>Africa</strong>Cooperation Summit, in2008, in which 49 <strong>Africa</strong>ncountries participated inIstanbul, marked thebeginning of a steady andsustainable cooperationprocess betweenTurkey and <strong>Africa</strong>investment relations amongst the Middle East’s mostinfluential country and seven East <strong>Africa</strong>n countries,namely Ethiopia, Djibouti, Tanzania, Kenya, Somalia,Uganda and Rwanda. The first meeting of the forum tookplace in the Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa from November14-17, 2009. The Saudi delegation consisted of fourministers and representatives from 50 big companies.The objective of the forum is to promote partnership andcooperation between the business communities of SaudiArabia and East <strong>Africa</strong>n countries in the areas ofdevelopment of agriculture and agro-industry, which arecapable of exporting produces to Saudi Arabia andsatisfying the needs of the local markets.Saudi Arabia is one of the world’s biggest food importers.<strong>Africa</strong> has approximately 60 percent of the globe’s yet-to-becultivated arable land, as noted by the McKinsey GlobalInstitute. Saudi Arabia finds the East <strong>Africa</strong>n regionattractive not only because it iseasily accessible but also because theregion offers rich and fertileagricultural land, competitivelabour and favourable climate foragriculture as compared to the aridcountry. Commerce and IndustryMinister of Saudi Arabia Abdullahbin Ahmed Zainal Alireza told theSaudi East <strong>Africa</strong>n Forum that hiscountry was keen to boost economicpartnership with countries of theregion. “Saudi Arabia is committedto combating hunger, to providesupport for the host country but also to generate exports.We are not to impose our needs above the needs oflocal population,” he said. “We will engage in variousdevelopmental activities in the continent in general and inthe East <strong>Africa</strong>n region in particular for the reason ofgeographical ties to Saudi,” he added.Speaking at the Gulf <strong>Africa</strong> Investment Forum organisedin Riyadh from December 4-5, 2010, MozambiquePresident Armando Guebuza invited businessmen from thecountries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) to investin Mozambique, particularly in agriculture, in light ofdiverse micro-climatic regions that Mozambique was hometo. Agriculture is of particular interest to the GCC countriesas they import almost 60 percent of their food needs and thepopulation is expected to rise from 30 million in 2000 to 60million in 2030.Like Saudi Arabia, the UAE is also strengthening itspresence in <strong>Africa</strong>. According to data from the UAE’sMinistry of Foreign Trade, its overall trade with sixnon-Arab <strong>Africa</strong>n countries alone (Angola, Kenya, Nigeria,Ethiopia, South <strong>Africa</strong> and Tanzania) reached $6.2 billionin 2010. In fact, trade patterns have been acquiring newdimensions in recent times. For example, a few years ago,the UAE’s most important trading partner in <strong>Africa</strong> used toAugust 2011-January 2012 103

N E W E Q U A T I O N S<strong>Africa</strong> has approximately 60 percent of global yet-to-be cultivated arable land. Saudi Arabia finds the East <strong>Africa</strong>n region attractive not onlybecause it is easily accessible but also because the region offers rich and fertile agricultural land, competitive labour and favourable climate.be South <strong>Africa</strong>. In recent years, however, trade betweenSouth <strong>Africa</strong> and the UAE has been declining — droppingto $870 million in 2009 compared to $380 million in 2008— a substantial fall of almost 77 percent. Other countrieson the <strong>Africa</strong>n continent, on the other hand, have beenemerging as the new trade partners for UAE. Nigeria, forexample, has become an importantdestination for UAE’s exports andre-exports. Notably, UAE’s tradewith Nigeria recorded the biggestincrease — among the six <strong>Africa</strong>ncountries mentioned above — doublingto $863 million in 2009 from$430 million the previous year.Tanzania too has emerged as animportant trade partner for UAE inrecent times. Trade betweenTanzania and UAE rose sharply in2010 to $870 million from$510 million the previous year.Interestingly, not only is theUAE one of the leading exporters of goods to several <strong>Africa</strong>ncountries, it is also among the top 10 importer of goods andcommodities for as many as 10 <strong>Africa</strong>n countries — includingKenya. It is estimated that UAE’s total non-oil trade with<strong>Africa</strong> was worth $19.1 billion in 2010 — and this figure isexpected to rise further in coming years as the UAE makesUAE’s overall trade withsix non-Arab <strong>Africa</strong>ncountries — Angola,Kenya, Nigeria, Ethiopia,South <strong>Africa</strong> and Tanzania— reached $6.2 billionin 2010. The tradepatterns have beenacquiring new dimensionsin recent timesconcerted efforts to further diversify their trade and businessinterests on the <strong>Africa</strong>n continent.Investments from the UAE are also rising. Dubai Worldhas some 30 investment projects spread across <strong>Africa</strong>, whichincludes marine terminals in Djibouti, Algeria, Dakar(Senegal) and Maputo (Mozambique), wildlife reserves inRwanda and South <strong>Africa</strong> as well asa hotel project on the ComorosIslands. Etisalat, UAE’s telecomoperator, also has stakes in several<strong>Africa</strong>n telecom companies incountries like Sudan, Tanzania,Benin, Burkina Faso, Togo, Niger,the Central <strong>Africa</strong>n Republic,Gabon and Ivory Coast. Forinstance, Dubai Ports has investedin the Doraleh container terminalbuilt in Djibouti. Djibouti awardedDP World of Dubai a 20-year concessionto run its port. Dubai alsoagreed to build a $400-million oilterminal and a container terminal. Djibouti would own atwo-thirds stake in each, with Dubai holding the rest.Throughout the Horn of <strong>Africa</strong>, the Djibouti port has triggeredspin-off investments from businesses interested inentering Ethiopia. Djibouti’s turnaround has prompted theinvestors to look elsewhere in Sub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong>.104August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YFor investment centres in the Gulf such as Abu Dhabi,Dubai and Qatar, Sub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong> is a vast, untappedmarket full of competitive assets. The Gulf companies alsoview their assets in <strong>Africa</strong> as a hedge against losses sufferedin the U.S. and European banking and real-estate deals.Private Saudi investors have opened banks in Sudan andsigned agricultural deals. Ras Al Khaimah, one of theemirates, is building residential communities in theDemocratic Republic of Congo.In an effort to scale up trade and investments betweenthe GCC countries and <strong>Africa</strong>, theUAE-based Gulf Research Centreand the Council of Saudi Chambersjointly organised the <strong>Africa</strong>Investment Forum 2010 in Riyadh.The presidents of Mozambique,Angola, Benin, Zambia, Kenya,Senegal and Ghana and severalministers and senior officials fromother countries, including South<strong>Africa</strong>, attended the two-day event. The main purpose of theforum was to create opportunities to network and establishworking opportunities as the institutional relations betweenthe GCC states and <strong>Africa</strong> are still in their infancy. TheGCC-<strong>Africa</strong> trade relations are also strengthened by othersimilar high-level exchanges like the <strong>Africa</strong>-Arab BusinessInvestment Forum that brings together business leaders andgovernment institutions from <strong>Africa</strong>, the GCC countriesFor investment centres inthe Gulf such as AbuDhabi, Dubai and Qatar,Sub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong> is avast, untapped market fullof competitive assets.and international institutions to discuss and exploreinvestment opportunities.The organisation held a conference on November 17,2010 in Dubai. Importantly, the Gulf Research Centreorganised the first Gulf-<strong>Africa</strong> Strategy Forum in CapeTown, South <strong>Africa</strong>, in 2010. The unique conferenceprovided an unprecedented opportunity for governments,academics and the private sector to discuss the state ofcooperation between the GCC countries and <strong>Africa</strong> andoffer recommendations on how to further strengthenthis partnership in the comingyears. The conference is expectedto be organised every year fromnow on.<strong>Africa</strong> is increasingly beingrecognised by many emerging andmiddle powers as a continent ofopportunity. The Gulf countriesseem to have focused on trade andinvestment, particularly inagriculture and infrastructure, whereas Turkey seems to bemore interested in strengthening its political anddiplomatic ties with <strong>Africa</strong>n countries. The efforts of countriessuch as China, India and Brazil in enhancing theirties with <strong>Africa</strong> is known to the world, but the middlepowers’ growing involvent with the continent is alsobecoming increasingly prominent, a trend that deserves acloser analysis.nReferences1. Chinua Akukwe, “Development Challenges for <strong>Africa</strong> in 2012”,World Press.org, 8 January, 2012; http://www.worldpress.org/<strong>Africa</strong>/3865.cfm2. Margaret Coker, “Persian Gulf States Bet on <strong>Africa</strong> DespiteDownturn”, Wall Street Journal — The Outlook, 24 February, 2009;http://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=gulf%20states%20africa&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CDYQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB123535584342445343.html&ei=0AUVT7u7FZDKrAeSg_iMAg&usg=AFQjCNFttsq9ySsZTk1aajimq_Up4a-AQ3. Mehmet Özkan, “Turkey discovers <strong>Africa</strong>: implications andprospects”, Today’s Zaman, September 2008; http://www.todayszaman.com/newsDetail_getNewsById.action?load=detay&link=4.Joost Lagendijk, “Turkey in <strong>Africa</strong>”, Today’s Zaman; http://www.todayszaman.com/columnist-241234-turkey-in-africa.html5. Alain Vicky, “Turkey Moves into <strong>Africa</strong>”, Le MondeDiplomatique, May 2011; http://mondediplo.com/2011/05/08turkey6. Tesfa-alem Tekle, “UAE-<strong>Africa</strong> Trade on the Rise”, <strong>Africa</strong>Business Pages, November 2009; http://www.africa-business.com/features/uae-africa-trade.html7. Gulf Research Centre, “The Gulf-<strong>Africa</strong> InvestmentConference 2010: Fostering Economic Relations”, 4-5 December,2010; http://www.grc.ae/index.php?PK_ID=291&frm_action=show_event&frm_module=events&sec=events&sec_type=d8. All <strong>Africa</strong>.com, “Guebuza at Gulf-<strong>Africa</strong> Investment Forum”,5 December, 2010; http://allafrica.com/stories/201012061198.htmlAugust 2011-January 2012 105

E N E R G Y S E C U R I T Y<strong>Africa</strong>n OIL, Asian growthEmerging economies of Asia are investing in <strong>Africa</strong>noil-producing countries only for their energy security. The West’scriticism of the Asian foray is unjustified, says Manendra SahuEmerging economies have registeredunprecedented growth. It has been sostrong that these have even weatheredthe 2008 global financial meltdown.While Western economies facedtremendous stress during themeltdown and are still struggling tocope with it, these new economies havestayed on the growth path. Their growth has had repercussionson the global energy market too, as energy demand in thefuture is likely to come from countries such as Chinaand India.The World Oil Outlook says: “China and India are theemerging giants of the world economy and internationalenergy markets. Energy developments in China and Indiaare transforming the global energy system by dint oftheir sheer size and their growing weight in internationalfossil-fuel trade... The momentum of economic developmentlooks set to keep their energy demand growing strongly.As they become richer, the citizens of China and Indiaare using more energy to run their offices and factories,and buying more electrical appliances and cars.These developments are contributing to a bigimprovement in their quality of life, a legitimate aspirationthat needs to be accommodated and supported by the restof the world.” 1This article looks at the foray of these economies into the<strong>Africa</strong>n oil sector to meet their growing energy needs.The analysis, however, restricts itself to major Asian countriessuch as India, China, Malaysia and South Korea. These Asiandrivers have sizeable investments in the <strong>Africa</strong>n oil sector.And all these countries, barring Malaysia, face energyscarcity.On one hand, these countries have limited domestic oilreserves and on the other hand, their growing economies needmore and more energy. They are forced to look for oil in<strong>Africa</strong> and other locations across the world.These countries have successfully entered the <strong>Africa</strong>n oiland gas sector, which, for decades, was dominated by Westernmultinationals. They are also competing to acquire oil and gasassets in the continent.The Western companies, which now face stiff competition,have started a campaign to malign Asian oil companies. Theallegations of human rights violations and corruption are someof the key weapons in their campaign. Are these allegationstrue? Are these above these allegations?A deep water oil field in the Mediterranean Sea off the coast ofAlexandria in Egypt. Photo: neftegaz.ruIndIa’s energy footprIntsIndia best illustrates how energy scarcity is forcing its oilcompany to look for new sources in <strong>Africa</strong>. India is a fastgrowing economy and is likely to maintain a high growth rate.The country, however, can grow only if energy supply iscontinuous, reliable and affordable.A few years ago, India was the world’s fifth-largest energyconsumer. Today, it has overtaken Japan and reached thefourth position. The country is expected to become thethird-largest consumer, overtaking Russia, by 2030.Its demand for oil is likely to increase at an average rate of2.9 percent annually over the next few decades. 2106August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YIndia produces nearly 880,000 barrels of oil a day against therequirement of 3 million barrels a day. The domestic resourcesare barely enough. India has 3,600 operating oil wells, butmost of these are old and the output is falling. 3The discovery of Bombay High is a good case study. Theoffshore oil well was discovered in 1974 and commercialproduction started in May 1976. 4 The well has beensteadily supplying oil for three decades and has now reachedits peak. So, the supply from Bombay High is falling and Indianeeds many such large discoveries to fulfill its oil needs.In the last 10 years, India has pursued an aggressive policyfor the discovery of oil by launching a New ExplorationLicensing Policy (NELP).However, even after nine roundsof NELP, no major oil discovery hasbeen made. There was, however,some success such as the discovery ofoil and gas in the Krishna Godavari(KG) basin in 2002.Mangala oil field in Rajasthan,with oil reserves of one billionbarrels, is another importantdiscovery made in 2004. These newsources have, however, providedonly temporary relief and thecountry is far from achievingself-sufficiency. As a result, to meetthe demand-supply gap, the country has no option but toimport oil. Today, India imports more than two-thirds of itsoil requirement.The Government of India, realising the limited potentialof domestic oil production, has set its eyes on the internationaloil sector. In its policy document, India Hydrocarbon Vision-2025, it stated the desire to become globally competitive.It mentions one of its objectives as: “To develop hydrocarbonsector as a globally competitive industry, which couldbe benchmarked against the best in the world throughONGC Videsh Limited(OVL), a subsidiary of thestate-owned Oil andNatural Gas Corporation,invested first in Sudan andlater in other <strong>Africa</strong>ncountries. At present,OVL has sizeableinvestments in <strong>Africa</strong>technological upgrade and capacity building in all facets of theindustry.” It stated that to meet the demand, the countryshould “acquire acreages abroad for exploration as well asproduction”.The document also makes following recommendations:i) Put in place a comprehensive policy to include totalderegulation of overseas Exploration and Production(E&P) business and empowering them to compete withinternational oil companies with the provision of fiscal andtax benefits.ii) Evolve a mechanism to leverage India’s “Buyer Power” toobtain quality E&P projects abroad.iii) Have a focused approach forE&P projects and build strongrelationships in focus countries withhigh attractiveness like Russia, Iraq,Iran and North <strong>Africa</strong>. 5The India Hydrocarbon Vision-2025brought about a sea change in India’senergy outlook. Indian oil companiesstarted looking for investmentopportunities abroad, which was nota strategy in energy sector after thecountry’s Independence in 1947.Indian oil companies now havea global footprint, <strong>Africa</strong> included.ONGC Videsh Limited (OVL), a subsidiary of the stateownedOil and Natural Gas Corporation, invested first inSudan and later in other <strong>Africa</strong>n countries. At present, OVLhas sizeable investments in <strong>Africa</strong>. It has invested in Sudan’sGreater Nile Oil Project, where it holds 25 percent stakethrough its subsidiary, ONGC Nile Ganga BV. It has alsoinvested in two more blocks in Sudan. In Egypt, it hasinvested in the North Ramadan Block located in the Gulf ofSuez. It also holds 33 percent stake in Egypt’s North EastMediterranean Deepwater Concession (NEMED). In Libya,An offshore oil extraction platform of India’s Oil and Natural Gas Corporation.August 2011-January 2012 107

E N E R G Y S E C U R I T YMajor oIl producIng countrIes of afrIcaN.B.: This map predates theemergence of South Sudan as anindependent country following thebifurcation of Sudan on July 9, 2011.it has a 49 percent stake in two onshore blocks. 6Two more public sector oil companies have invested in<strong>Africa</strong>. Oil India Limited (OIL), along with Indian OilCorporation (IOC), has jointly invested in two blocks inLibya. Private sector oil companies too are not far behind increating oil assets in <strong>Africa</strong>.Videocon Industries has launched a joint venture withBharat Petroleum Corporation (BPCL) in Mozambique anddiscovered gas of up to 15-30 trillion cubic feet.Mittal Steel Limited, in a joint venture with ONGC, hasformed the ONGC Mittal Energy Limited (OMEL) and hasacquired 45 percent stake in offshore oil and gas fields inNigeria. Essar Oil has three exploration blocks in Madagascar.The relationship between India and <strong>Africa</strong> does not stopat oil imports. India also sends back refined petroleum to<strong>Africa</strong>. India has a vibrant downstream oil sector and it is saidthat India may become the “refinery of the world”.India has 17 public sector refineries and two private ones.Their combined refining capacity is estimated to reach 235mmt by 2012, which will provide a surplus capacity of86 mmt for exports. 7The refineries of Reliance Industries (RIL) in Jamanagar,Gujarat, are one of the largest in the world with a cumulativecapacity of 62 mmt. Essar Oil-run refinery has a capacity of32 mmt.India has a vibrant and competent downstream oil sectorwith excess refinery capacity. <strong>Africa</strong> is woefully short of refinedoil products. The refineries in <strong>Africa</strong> are not able to meet the108August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Ylocal demand. 8 <strong>Africa</strong> thus provides an opportunity to Indiancompanies to bridge the gap between demand and supply.India has, therefore, emerged as a major supplier of refined oilproducts to <strong>Africa</strong>, mainly to the Indian Ocean littorals. Therefined oil products are today India’s top export commoditiesto <strong>Africa</strong>.The case of Angola is illustrative. India regularly importscrude oil from Angola and at the same time exports refinedproducts regularly back to Angola. So, several Indiancompanies, seeing an opportunity in the downstream sector,have made investments in <strong>Africa</strong>. Reliance Industries Limited(RIL) has acquired East <strong>Africa</strong>’s oil retail company Gulf <strong>Africa</strong>Petroleum Corporation (GAPCO) while Essar Oil hasinvested in a refinery in Kenya.afrIca resources, asIan InvestMent<strong>Africa</strong> is rich in oil and gas. The continent contains9.5 percent of the world’s oil reserves and has a 12.2 percentshare in global oil production.Similarly, it contains 7.9 percent of the world’s natural gasreserves and has a 6.5 percent share in global gas production.However, <strong>Africa</strong>n nations consume a mere 3.9 percent ofthe global oil production and sell the rest.Libya has the largest reserves ofoil in <strong>Africa</strong>. But sanctions imposedby the United Nations have kept oilexplorers away and the reservesremain largely unexploited. Nigeriahas the second largest reserves of oilon the continent, followed by Angolaand Algeria. 9 Over the years, oilhas been found in several placesin <strong>Africa</strong>.In 1990, its oil reserves stood at58.7 thousand million barrels thatincreased to 93.4 thousand millionbarrels after the year 2000. Thereserves today stand at 132.1 thousand million barrels.Thus, in 20 years, the reserves have doubled.Two big developments in oil explorations have beenthe Gulf of Guinea and discovery of oil and gas innon-traditional resources.The discoveries in Gulf of Guinea (adjacent to Nigeria),Equatorial Guinea, Sao Tome and Principe, has drawn theattention of all major oil companies.The rise of non-traditional oil producers is also important.The latest findings in East <strong>Africa</strong> have changed the outlook.Earlier, few thought Uganda, Tanzania and Mozambiquehad oil and gas, but today it is a reality. <strong>Africa</strong>’s contributionto global oil production is no less significant. The productionin the year 2000 stood at 7,804 thousand barrels daily.This has increased to 10,098 thousand barrels in 2010. Sixmajor oil produces in <strong>Africa</strong> — Nigeria, Angola, Algeria,Libya, Egypt and Sudan — contribute over two-thirdsof the total oil production in <strong>Africa</strong>. Production fromThe rise of non-traditionaloil producers is alsoimportant. The latestfindings in East <strong>Africa</strong>have changed the outlook.Earlier, few thoughtUganda, Tanzania andMozambique had oil andgas, but today it is a realityAngola and Sudan has also risen significantly in thelast 10 years.In 2000, Angola produced 746 thousand barrels daily.This increased to 1,851 thousand barrels in 2010. Sudan’s oilproduction has more than doubled in the last 10 years.In 2000, it stood at 174 thousand barrels a day and rose to 486thousand barrels a day in 2010.While these six countries are pulling in investments, smalloil producers have seen mixed growth in 10 years. On onehand, production has multiplied in Equatorial Guinea andChad, on the other hand, production in Cameroon, Republicof Congo and Gabon has actually fallen. 10As mentioned earlier, Asian countries have successfullyforayed into the <strong>Africa</strong>n oil sector. China is the big playerhere. It has made large investments in <strong>Africa</strong> over the last 10years and today. <strong>Africa</strong> is a major oil supplier to the Asian giant.Chinese companies — Petrochina (CNPC), ChinaPetrochemical Corporation (Sinopec) and China NationalOffshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) — have a presence in<strong>Africa</strong>, and of China’s oil import of 4.8 million barrels a dayin 2010, the <strong>Africa</strong>n share was 1.5 million barrels a day, thatis, nearly 30 percent of the total import. Chinese investmentshave also made Angola its largest oil supplier, along with SaudiArabia — the two countries togetheraccounting for a third of the import.In fact, oil import from Angola is solarge that for a few months it evensurpassed that from Saudi Arabia! 11China buys 45 percent of Angola’soil export. Chinese companies havemade large investments there.Sinopec has bought 40 percent stakein an oil block after declaring a$ 1.1-billion signature bonus. Angolahas received a $2-billion loanfrom China in exchange for oildeals. Another $ 1 billion wasadded to it in 2006. 12Now, there are other countries as well on the Chineseradar. Petrochina signed a deal with Nigerian NationalPetroleum Corporation in 2005 for the supply of 30,000barrels a day of crude. In 2006, China bought a stake in an oiland gas field for $2.3 billion in Nigeria. The country’sgovernment gave the power of “the first right of refusal” toPetrochina on four oil blocks after China committed to invest$4 billion in infrastructure. The deal involved China buyingcontrolling stake in a Nigerian oil refinery and building railwaysand power stations. In Algeria, Sinopec signed$525-million deal in 2002 to develop an oilfield. Petrochina,too, bought refineries for $ 350 million and signed a deal toexplore oil in two blocks in Algeria in 2003. 13Sudan is another investment destination for the Chinese.Petrochina holds 40 percent stake in Greater Nile PetroleumCompany. Petrochina and Sinopec have 40 percent and3 percent stake, respectively, in Petrodar, a companyAugust 2011-January 2012 109

E N E R G Y S E C U R I T Yundue crItIcIsMAsia’s bid for <strong>Africa</strong>n oil and gashas attracted criticism from theWest. The charges levelled againstAsian national oil companies arethat of human rights violations andcorruption.Many <strong>Africa</strong>n oil-producingcountries in <strong>Africa</strong> have also beenaccused of human rights violations.NGOs have accused theSudanese government of genocidein Darfur. In Nigeria, residents ofthe Niger Delta often raise theirvoices against government brutalities.Similar allegations have beenraised in North <strong>Africa</strong>. NGOsallege that Asian companies overlookhuman rights situations whileA class in progress at the India-Tanzania Centre For Excellence in ICT.investing in oil fields. Their collaborationwith taintedoperating out of Sudan. As such, 60 percent of Sudanese oilexports go to China.In other oil-producing countries such as Ivory Coast,Gabon and Democratic Republic of Congo, Chinesecompanies have signed exploration and production deals.China is also set to look for oil in Kenya, an emerging oilproducer. In Namibia, the Chinese are establishing an oilrefinery and are looking for oil exploration in the north of thecountry. They are also present in Ethiopia and Madagascar.In Uganda, CNOOC bought two-third stake in Tullow Oil’sthree blocks in October 2010. 14Malaysia and South Korea are the other Asian countriesinvesting in <strong>Africa</strong>. The Malaysians are present in Sudan.Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Petronas), a public sectorcompany, holds 30 percent stake in Greater Nile PetroleumCompany.In Melut Basin, the company holds 40 percent share inPetrodar. In White Nile Petroleum Operating Company,which operates Block 5A, Petronas has a 69-percent holding.Malaysia buys 11 percent of Sudan’s oil exports.In Egypt, Petronas has investment in the northeastMediterranean deep-water block. Apart from oil assets,Petronas has invested in the downstream sector in South <strong>Africa</strong>through its subsidiary, Engen Petroleum Limited, whichoperates a refinery in Durban and sells petroleum productsthrough outlets in Sub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong>. 15South Korea has investments in Nigeria and Libya.In Nigeria, the Korean National Oil Corporation (KNOC)signed an agreement in March 2006 to invest in a deep-waterexploration block, which it is prospecting at present. In Libya,KNOC, along with four other companies, Daesung Group,governments worsen human rights conditions in thecompanies, the NGOs say. 17The West’s criticism of Asian companies, however, isunjustified. In fact, the track record of Western MultinationalOil Companies (MOCs) is far more serious.The killing of rights activist Kennule ‘Ken’ Besson Wiwain Nigeria allegedly at the behest of Shell, an American MOC,is an apt example. He led a campaign demanding better livingconditions for the workers in Niger Delta. Shell was accusedof forcing the Nigerian military government to arrest Wiwa.The court gave him a death sentence, amid protests fromacross world. Human rights group in the United States movedcourt against Shell for its alleged involvement in Wiwa’s death.After a prolonged battle, Shell accepted an out-of-court settlementand agreed to pay compensation to Wiwa’s family. 18There have been many such charges against WesternMOCs. Thus, instead of criticising Asian companies, the Westshould set its house in order. The second criticism againstAsian companies is that they encourage corruption ingovernments. Incidentally, this charge comes from a groupwhich itself has been corrupting the oil sector for a long time.The MOCs have let corruption grow so much thatcitizens of many oil producing countries are today reelingunder poverty while their rulers are accumulating wealth.It was thus that the ‘Publish What You Pay’ movement waslaunched to put an end to the nexus between the MOCs andgovernments of oil-producing nations. 19 It called for goodcorporate governance and bringing in transparencyand accountability, while asking MOCs to declare all themoney paid to <strong>Africa</strong>n rulers. Once there is transparency,embezzlement of funds from governments to private overseasDaewoo International Corporation and Hyundai accounts can be stopped and money thus saved utilised forCorporation, invested in the Elephant oil field incentral-west Libya. 16development.In its anxiety to criticise Asian companies, the West110August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Ycreated a new category, Asian National Oil Companies(ANOC). This category suited them since most oilcompanies from the West are privately owned unlike thosefrom Asia. The West further questioned the functioning ofANOC.ANOC has the support of Asian governments for their<strong>Africa</strong> operations, unlike the West. The West said ANOC wassupported through diplomatic channels. It also said thatANOC’s operations were financially buttressed by the nationalexchequer and thus they cared little for the financialviability of investments.It is also alleged that ANOC has not been transparent intheir dealings, as they did not have to publish accounts tostockholders in stock markets. Also, the <strong>Africa</strong>n oil-producingstates give undue preference to ANOC, it said. 20 In suchan environment, MOCs found it hard to compete.These allegations are uncalled for and do not square upwith reality. Governments support ANOC in their nationalinterest for energy security. In fact, the Indian government hasbeen extending diplomatic support as part of a strategy toachieve energy security. The government’s policy document,Integrated Energy Policy, says: “Since 80 percent of globalhydrocarbon reserves are controlled by national oil companiescontrolled by respective governments, oil diplomacyestablishing bilateral economic, social and cultural ties canreduce supply risk.” 21Thus, there is no harm in using diplomatic channels topromote national interest. But the claim that Westerngovernments do not support MOCs is dubious. Many times,Western diplomats have promoted MOCs.The creation of the ANOC category is an effort to distortreality, at least in the case of India. The involvement of oilcompanies in <strong>Africa</strong> is not at all restricted to the public sector;Indian private sector companies too have made largeinvestments in <strong>Africa</strong>. Reliance, Essar and Videocon areconstantly looking for opportunities to expand operations in<strong>Africa</strong>. Private sector companies from South Korea too arepresent in <strong>Africa</strong>. This article argues that the creation ofANOC is faulty and should be done away with.conclusIonEmerging economies, Asian in particular, have impactedthe global oil market. These economies face challenges: on onehand, they have limited domestic oil resources and on theother hand, they need more energy. In such a situation, theseeconomies are forced to look for oil across the globe. <strong>Africa</strong>,with its vast oil reserves, is an apt destination to secure oilsupply. As such, many of these countries have invested in oilassets there.However, these investments have made competition toughfor MOCs in <strong>Africa</strong> and as a result, Asian investments havedrawn criticism. These criticisms originate from the fearthat the supply of oil to the West would be affected due toincreasing demand from the emerging economies.There is a need to bring in a fundamental change in theWest’s usage of energy. In terms of per capita energyconsumption, the West consumes more than Asia. GrowingAsian economies need more energy and are justified inlooking for oil in <strong>Africa</strong>. The consumption of oil is likely togrow more. So, the West, instead of blaming Asian countriesfor the increase in the demand for oil, should try to limit itsown energy usage.nReferences1. Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries, World OilOutlook, 2007. (Vienna: OPEC Secretariat, 2007).2. Tanvi Madan, Energy Security Series: India, The Brookings ForeignPolicy Studies, Brooking Institution, Washington D.C., November2006.3. US Energy Information Administration. www.eia.gov.4. Li Guoyo, World Atlas of Oil and Gas Basins, John Wiley and Sons,2011.5. Naik, S.R., Sinha, ST., Singh, SJ., Pant, S.K.C., Singh, S.N.K.,Report of the Group on India — Hydrocarbon Vision 2025, Governmentof India, February, 2000.6. ONGC Videsh Limited, www.ongcvidesh.com.7. Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, petroleum.nic.in/ refinery.pdf.8. ‘<strong>Africa</strong>n Union: Fuelling <strong>Africa</strong>’s Sustainable Development:The Oil and Gas Perspectives, AU/EXP/OG/5 (I), Report of First<strong>Africa</strong>n Union Conference of Ministers responsible forHydrocarbon, Cairo, December 11-15, 2006.9. British Petroleum, BP Statistical Review of World Energy, June2011, London: British Petroleum p.l.c., 2011.10. ibid.11. US Energy Information Administration, www.eia.org.12. Taylor Ian, China’s Oil Diplomacy in <strong>Africa</strong>, International Affairs(London), Volume 82, Number 5, September 2006, pp. 937-959.13. ibid.14. List of Chinese investments abroad is provided in thereport by Julie Jiang, Jonathan Sinton. Overseas Investment byChinese National Oil Companies: Assessing the Drivers and Impacts,International Energy Agency, February, 2011.15. Petronas, www.petronas.com.my.16. www.knoc.co.kr17. Matthew E. Chen, Chinese National Oil Companies, and HumanRights, Orbis,Volume 51, Number 1, Winter, 2007.18. Ingrid Wuerth, Wiwa V. , Shell: The $15.5-Million Settlement,ASIL Insight, Volume 13, Issue 14, September 9, 2009.19. Publish What You Pay, www.publishwhatyoupay.org20. John Mitchell, Glada Lahn, Oil for Asia: Brief Paper, ChathamHouse, March 2007.21. Government of India, Integrated Energy Policy: Report of the ExpertCommittee, Planning Commission, New Delhi, August, 2006.August 2011-January 2012 111

M A R I T I M E S E C U R I T YIsland Nations: Highstakes on high SEASIf India wants to exercise predominant influence in the Indian Ocean area,it must have a proactive and multifarious policy of engagement with thestrategically located island nations of <strong>Africa</strong>, says Ranjit KumarPresident Pratibha Devisingh Patil with Mauritius’ Prime Minister Navinchandra Ramgoolamat Clarisse House, Mauritius, on April 25, 2011.With <strong>Africa</strong> fast emerging asa major market andinvestment destination,besides being blessed withabundant agricultural andmineral resources, the bigpowers are eyeing thecontinent, e<strong>special</strong>ly itsisland nations, with a long-term strategic vision. The islandnations of <strong>Africa</strong> can provide a foothold to littoral andnon-littoral naval powers in the Indian Ocean. Therefore,not surprisingly, the island nations of <strong>Africa</strong> have come tooccupy greater importance in the strategic plans of the bigpowers. The island nations situated on the eastern <strong>Africa</strong>ncoast have greater relevancetoo, because of its geographicallocation. While India is anIndian Ocean Rim nation andhas island territories toprovide sustenance to itsmaritime assets and interests,the other big and powerfulnations like the United Statesand China are lacking in thisrespect and, therefore, feel agreater need to develop strategicpartnerships with theseisland nations. In fact, some ofthe smaller islands, which areuninhabited, can be used fornaval and air bases and asplaces for rest and recreation.Their importance can beunderstood from the kind offacilities the Diego Garcia basenear Mauritius provides to theU.S. forces. This islandbelongs to Mauritius but theBritish retained control overDiego Garcia and handed itover to the American militaryon a long-term lease. TheDiego Garcia base is a major outpost for American forces inthe Indian Ocean, giving the U.S. sole and unchallengednon-littoral military power and capability to exercisecontrol over the Indian Ocean.China, which is also a non-littoral power and has increasingeconomic and strategic interests in deepening relationswith <strong>Africa</strong>, aspires to have similar facilities for its naval armin the Indian Ocean. If China succeeds in getting such afacility, the U.S. and China will be sitting face to face witheach other on the Indian Ocean. Such a development,however, would reduce India’s comfort level in the IndianOcean. The announcement by the Chinese DefenceMinistry on December 13, 2011 that Seychelles hadinvited the Chinese navy to establish facilities for resupply112August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Yand recuperation of international ships during escortmissions, has attracted much media attention worldwideand there is wide speculation that this could be in fact thefirst step in finally helping the Chinese set up a naval baseon the Indian Ocean. As Seychelles is only 600 km awayfrom the U.S. naval base at Diego Garcia, the Americanstrategists would also be concerned.The Chinese Foreign Ministry, however, later clarifiedthat its naval fleet would only seek supplies or recuperate inSeychelles during anti-piracy operations. Earlier, theForeign Affairs Minister of Seychelles, Jean Paul Adam, saidthat his government had invited China to set up a militarypresence on the archipelago to helpfend off pirates. The United Statesalready has a drone base on one ofthe islands of Seychelles.India has only since the lastdecade started focusing ondeveloping capabilities to safeguardits interests more vigorously in itsmaritime neighbourhood. Manyinternational strategic observersoften say that India regards theIndian Ocean as its backyard andthe island nations, therefore, as itsnatural outposts. If India wants toexercise predominant influence inthe Indian Ocean area it must have a very aggressive policyof engagement with the island nations of <strong>Africa</strong>. Indiaalready has a very good working relationship with otherAs the biggest economyamong the Indian OceanRim nations and with astake in maintaining peaceand stability in themaritime area, India has anatural claim to deeperfriendship with the islandnations of the <strong>Africa</strong> in theIndian Oceanmajor non-<strong>Africa</strong>n islands like the Maldives and Sri Lanka.China too has made deep inroads into India’s close maritimeneighbourhood and is trying to woo Maldives. The 19thcentury American naval strategist, Alfred Thayer Mahan, isoften quoted by Indian strategic analysts as having said,“Whoever controls the Indian Ocean dominates Asia and inthe 21st century the destiny of the world will be decided onits waters.”Though the Chinese often critically say that the IndianOcean is not India’s ocean, Indian strategic observerscounter this assertion by saying that as the most populouscountry and a major economic and military power in theIndian Ocean region, India has anatural claim to assert its presencefor safeguarding its economic andstrategic interests. With two majorchains of islands, the Andaman andNicobar and the Lakshadweep,India’s Exclusive Economic Zone(EEZ) and territorial waters extendup to a major portion of the IndianOcean. Indian security planners,therefore, view with suspicion anyundue claim from outside powersover the Indian Ocean.Strategically, the island nationsof <strong>Africa</strong> on its eastern coast aregaining geopolitical importance because of the covert andovert rivalry among the big powers on the Indian Ocean. Asthe biggest economy among the Indian Ocean Rim nationsThe Diego Garcia base is a major outpost for the U.S. forces in the Indian OceanAugust 2011-January 2012 113

M A R I T I M E S E C U R I T YPrime Minister Manmohan Singh with Seychelles’ President James Alix Michel in New Delhi onJune 2, 2010. India signed the Bilateral Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement withSeychelles during the visit.and with a stake in maintaining peace and stability in themaritime area, India has a natural claim to deeper friendshipwith the island nations of the <strong>Africa</strong>n continent in the IndianOcean, namely, Comoros, Seychelles, Mauritius andMadagascar. India and China seemto be competing in providingmaximum civilian and militarysupport, though as an Indian Oceanpower, India seems to have anatural inclination for <strong>special</strong>relations with these island nations.But it must be noted that China hasalso been successful in establishinga <strong>special</strong> rapport with the rulers ofthese island nations, e<strong>special</strong>ly indefence cooperation. These islandnations can provide a foothold toany country in the Indian Ocean,e<strong>special</strong>ly to China, which is amajor emerging power seeking to assert its presence on theIndian Ocean. The Chinese government, of late, has beenmaking <strong>special</strong> overtures to some of these island nations.With China trying to gain mining rights in the central IndianOcean, which will provide an excuse for its naval assets tobe positioned in the area, India will have to brace up for anew era of rivalry in the Indian Ocean, in which the islandnations of <strong>Africa</strong> on its eastern coast will play a major roleas a platform for the navies of the big powers.With China trying togain mining rights in thecentral Indian Ocean,which will provide anexcuse for its navalassets to be positionedin the area, India willhave to brace up fora new era of rivalry inthe Indian OceanInstItutIonal MechanIsMIndia has given an institutionalshape to its relations with thelittoral navies through the grandinitiative of the Indian OceanNaval Symposium, of which theisland nations of <strong>Africa</strong> areimportant invitees. At a timewhen China has positioned itselfon the Indian Ocean with its‘string of pearls’ strategy throughits ports development projects inGwadar (Pakistan), Hambantota(Sri Lanka), Myanmar andBangladesh, the Indian navyregards it as a lost opportunityperhaps because of India’s slightlystrained relations with theseimmediate neighbours.However, now with Indiaseeking to position itself on thehigh seas through the via mediaof deeper strategic relations withthe island nations of <strong>Africa</strong>, theIndian navy may be able to markits presence in the coastal watersof <strong>Africa</strong>, mainly theMozambique channel in the Indian Ocean, which is also amajor trade and energy supply route.The increasing strategic importance of <strong>Africa</strong> can only begauged from the fact that the U.S. had set up a <strong>special</strong> andseparate command for <strong>Africa</strong> in2006, called Africom. The DefenceDepartment’s newest geographicunified command, headquarteredin Germany, works to assist themilitaries of the <strong>Africa</strong>n nations.When Pentagon made thisannouncement, Chinese PresidentHu Jintao was travelling to <strong>Africa</strong>.The Chinese reacted strongly tothis move, saying, “the Americaninitiative stood for the Cold Warbalancing and this move was rejectedby the <strong>Africa</strong>n countries”.According to reports, the U.S.Department of Defence is seriously looking for a suitableplace in <strong>Africa</strong> for its headquarters, but has not yet beensuccessful. There are reports that it is looking for one of theislands on the Eastern Coast of <strong>Africa</strong> for its headquarters.coMoRosComoros, a former French colony, consists of fourislands, though it has control over only three, which includesthe largest island of Grand Comore with its capital city of114August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Yand information technology. Comoros is alsopart of the Pan <strong>Africa</strong>n E-Network that seeks tobring tele-medicine and tele-education to<strong>Africa</strong>n people. Comoros was linked to the networkin September 2010.This e-network can assist the people ofComoros mainly with medical advice andhigher education. Almost 50 countries ofmainland <strong>Africa</strong> are already taking advantage ofthe network. In 2008, the Indian governmentalso announced the lifting of a ban on the exportof non-Basmati rice to help relieve the foodcrisis in Comoros. However, there have been nobilateral high-level visits between the two countries.The president of the island state hasvisited India only once for a multilateral meet.The visit of the Comoros Minister for ExternalAffairs and Cooperation to India was also underthe aegis of the Least Developed CountriesConference from February 18-19, 2011.Though Comoros supports India’s case forpermanent membership in the Security Councilof the United Nations and regards India as a rolemodel for development, India has not been veryaggressive in supporting developmentprogrammes in Comoros.Moroni. With a population of 800,000, the country has 250people of Indian origin. On December 23, 1974, the GrandComore, Moheli and Anjouan voted for independence whileanother island Mayotte preferred to stay with France. ThusFrance has retained its strategic foothold in the island nationand may discourage Comorian leaders from extendingstrategic support to the Chinese military. Though Comorosis a poor nation and depends entirely on international help,its Sunni population and its membership of the Organisationof Islamic Cooperation and the Arab League makes it apotential candidate for a pro-Islamic orientation and open toChinese appeasement.Being a former colony of France, the impoverishedisland nation gets a third of its budgetary requirements fromthe French government. But China seems to have found aniche for itself in Comoros by helping to build developmentalprojects of a sensitive nature in recent years. Theseinclude setting up a radio and TV station in Moroni andbuilding a number of government buildings like thePresidential Palace, the National Assembly, MoroniInternational Airport, and a donation of 5 million euro tosupport basic education by building schools. China has alsocommitted 4.65-million euro assistance for building a100-bed hospital in Anjouan.India hosted the then president of Comoros, AhmadAbdullah Mohamed Sambi, in November 2007 and set upa vocational training centre in Moroni to support skilldevelopment in plumbing, welding, electricity, civil works,seychellesIndia has been trying to strengthen its relationship withSeychelles by offering military assistance. The February2012 visit of President James Alix Michel to India indicatesa deepening of political relations between the two nations.In recent years, India has been making some efforts to establishan intimate security grid with the island nations ofSeychelles, Maldives, Madagascar and Mauritius. Chinaseems to have joined India, besides the United States, in therace by offering these island nations security cooperation,which will allow her to extend its influence in the IndianOcean.The visit of the Seychelles’ president to Beijing in May2010 was significant. The Chinese offered Seychelles a newwarship, a step the Indian navy had taken way back in 2005when it gifted INS Taramugli to Seychelles for patrolling thewaters around the island. Of late, Somalian pirates, whohave extended their tentacles up to the Seychelles Sea, cameunder severe pressure in the Gulf of Aden after thedeployment of international warships, including those fromIndia. Somalian pirates have seriously jeopardised theSeychelles tourist business. Later, the Indian navy deployedone of its warships mainly to protect the traffic aroundSeychelles.In fact, in the name of fighting the Somalian sea piratesin the Gulf of Aden, many big powers have been offeringunsolicited aid to the island nation. As the Indian navy isreported to have set up radar facilities for monitoring otherAugust 2011-January 2012 115

M A R I T I M E S E C U R I T Yand defence partnerships withthe island nations of <strong>Africa</strong> on theIndian Ocean.naval movements in the region, the Americans have steppedin with attractive offers of infrastructure development in lieuof which the Pentagon has successfully bargained to stationits P-3-C Orion maritime surveillance aircraft on one of theislands of Seychelles. The chief of the U.S. CentralCommand is reported to have visited Mahe, the capital ofSeychelles, and personally negotiated with the president ofSeychelles in mid-2010.In the name of fightingthe sea pirates, the Americanshave found an opportunity todeploy its maritimereconnaissance aircraft inSeychelles, extending itsfootprint in the Indian Oceanfrom the controversial DiegoGarcia military base. Thenew naval air base near DiegoGarcia will help the U.S. inkeeping a better watch onsurface and subsurface navalmovements of other naviesover the southern IndianOcean.Situated only 600 milesEast of Diego Garcia, thestrategic importance ofSeychelles is obvious. BesidesSeychelles, other islandnations of <strong>Africa</strong> can also beregarded as India’s strategicoutposts in the Indian Ocean.Therefore, of late, India hastaken some initiatives formaintaining its securityprofile in the Indian Oceanby developing close strategicMaDaGascaRFrance is already present inthe Indian Ocean with itsextended maritime territory onthe Reunion Island nearMadagascar.However, China has beencourting Madagascar with anaggressive engagement policy,though the island was underFrench rule and becameindependent only in 1960. Theworld’s fourth-largest island afterGreenland, New Guinea andBorneo, Madagascar is situated in the southwestern IndianOcean and is a member of the <strong>Africa</strong>n Union and South<strong>Africa</strong>n Development Community (SADC).With a population of 21.3 million, the country is arounda sixth of India’s size. Out of this population, roughly 20,000People of Indian Origin live in the island country, whereasmore than a 40,000-strong Chinese community inhabits116August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Ythe island nation, besidessome 10,000 newexpatriates from China.These expatriates aremostly small traders,against whom localresentment is brewing.Yet the Chinese havebeen successful in developingstrong militarybonds. The defenceminister of Madagascarwas invited to Beijing in2005 and a defencecooperation programme,e<strong>special</strong>ly in training,was chalked out.Considering the geographicaldistance, themanner in which theChinese government’sengagement policy withthe island has helpedsettle a considerable number of Chinese citizens is indicativeof China’s aggressive policy of engagement with thecountry. Frequent high-level bilateral visits, according to asenior Chinese official, has strengthened relations betweenthe armed forces of the two countries.The island country is rich in mineral resources, includinghydrocarbons, limonite, nickel and graphite and is alsoan important source for gems. Though Madagascar was thefounding member of the <strong>Africa</strong>n Union, for long itremained on the margins of <strong>Africa</strong>’s mainstream affairs.In 2007, India set up a listening post in northernMadagascar with a view to enabling the Indian navy tomonitor ship movements. This listening post has beenequipped with radars and surveillance gear, which canintercept maritime communications. This is said to beIndia’s first naval monitoring facility in the Southern IndianOcean. The increasing petroleum traffic across the Cape ofGood Hope and the Mozambique Channel offers the Indiannaval facility in Madagascar a close view.The year 2003 was the high time for Indian navaldiplomacy when it bagged a contract from Mozambique toprovide maritime security for the <strong>Africa</strong>n Union summit.MauRItIusNearly 900 km east of Madagascar, Mauritius is anotherof India’s bulwarks in its maritime strategy. India hasestablished an extensive and perhaps the deepest everdefence relationship among all the littoral states of IndianOcean with Mauritius.According to an official background paper, India’sdefence relations with Mauritius have been multifarious.For example, roughly 45-50 personnel from the MauritianPolice Force are trained annually in Indian defence trainingestablishments. India has been deputing a Diving and aMarine Commando (MARCOS) training team toMauritius for two-three weeks since 2008. At the request ofthe government of Mauritius, Indian naval ships regularlyundertake surveillance and joint patrolling of the vast EEZof Mauritius with a view to providing deterrence to piracyand illegal fishing activities in the region.In November 2009, Dhruv, an advanced light helicopter,was delivered to the government of Mauritius with a grantof $10.42 million from India. A Coastal Radar SurveillanceSystem (CSRS), which was commissioned in April 2011,was financed by a grant of 2.46 million euros. A bilateralagreement for the supply of an offshore patrol vessel (OPV)to the Government of Mauritius is currently beingimplemented with the OPV being designed and constructedby GRSE Ltd. at a cost of $58.5 million. The OPV isfunded partly by an EXIM Bank line of credit ($48.5million) and partly by a grant ($10 million).Considering the depth of bilateral defence relations,Mauritius can be called India’s closest ally in the IndianOcean, which has fully relied on India for enhancing itsdefence capabilities. In fact, for the last few decades, Indiahas been providing the island nation with military expertiseand weapons systems. Besides, a number of naval and airforce personnel are also deployed in the Mauritius coastguard.The Mauritian government has also signed anagreement with the Indian navy for hydrographic work nearthe Mauritian coast. This will enable safer navigation andbetter management of the Mauritian EEZ for which anIndian Navy ship has been deployed.nAugust 2011-January 2012 117

K I N S H I PA bridge called DIASPORAIndia, China and Brazil have had longstanding links with <strong>Africa</strong> which havebeen sustained and deepened by their diaspora, says Shubha SinghAasif Karim, a former captain of Kenya’s national cricket team, and his family at their home in Nairobi, Kenya. People of Indian origin havegone on to occupy key positions in their adoptive countries and have made seminal contributions. Photo: Preston Merchant<strong>Africa</strong> has now joined the list ofemerging economies as the steadygrowth rate in several <strong>Africa</strong>ncountries has made the continent anattractive investment and tradedestination. <strong>Africa</strong> is the newfrontier, with its vast reserves ofuntapped natural resources. As a newemerging economic region, the continent is of <strong>special</strong>interest for other emerging economies such as India, Chinaand Brazil, each looking for new regions for economicengagement.Increasingly, private enterprises from high-growtheconomies are coming to <strong>Africa</strong>, drawn by the availability ofabundant raw materials, a young workforce, and growingdemand. While growth levels in the United States and Europelanguish, several sub-Saharan economies have grown at anaverage of 6.6 percent in the past few years.India, China and Brazil have had long links with <strong>Africa</strong> andthese links have been in part nurtured by their diasporas. Eachof these countries is now using those links to further trade andcommercial ties. Despite the global economic slowdown,<strong>Africa</strong>’s economic transformation has continued. India, Chinaand Brazil had marginal roles in <strong>Africa</strong>’s trade volume a decadeago. Today, China accounts for 13 percent of <strong>Africa</strong>’s trade,while India has increased its share from 2.3 percent in 2000 toover 5 percent in 10 years. Brazil’s trade has also doubledduring this period.Indians have had historical ties with <strong>Africa</strong>. The IndianOcean has been host to a regular trading network betweenIndia and the eastern coast of <strong>Africa</strong> since ancient times. Indianand <strong>Africa</strong>n traders were familiar with the coastal regions ofeither side of the Indian Ocean. There are now more thanthree million People of Indian Origin (PIO) in <strong>Africa</strong>, spreadacross the Anglophone, Francophone and Lusophone regions.They had either travelled or migrated to <strong>Africa</strong> at differenttimes and in different capacities, such as indentured workers,artisans, traders, professionals, and, more recently, asentrepreneurs and economic migrants.The largest population of PIOs is in South <strong>Africa</strong>, East<strong>Africa</strong> and other Anglophone countries. But recent migrantshave moved to newer places in <strong>Africa</strong>. Small Indian commu-118August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Ynities, numbering a few thousands to amere handful, dot the <strong>Africa</strong>n continentfrom Lesotho to the Ivory Coast. Thereare now about 25,000 Indians in Nigeria,about 8,000 of whom are Nigeriancitizens; some 6,000 Indians live inBotswana while Eritrea has a populationof just about 500 Indians.Just as the Indian diaspora in the U.S.helped in fostering better ties betweenIndia and that country, it has also playeda significant role in improving tiesbetween their country of residence andthe former homeland. Indianentrepreneurs in countries such as Liberiaand Togo have facilitated contacts andprovided easier access to these countries.Upjit Singh Sachdeva went to Liberia20 years ago to work in a relative’s timberbusiness. Starting his own businessventure a few years later, Sachdeva went on to foster fruitfulcontacts between India and Liberia.In recognition of his efforts, the Indian governmentappointed him its Honorary Consul-General in Liberia.Indian investments in Liberia have increased from $450million in 2005 to more than $2 billion in 2009. Today, Indiais the main supplier of pharmaceutical products and eggs toLiberia. There are a number of individuals in different <strong>Africa</strong>ncountries who have played a similar role in helping todeepen India’s ties with their host countries.There is a historical similarity in the nature of Indian andChinese contacts in <strong>Africa</strong>. Both regions had ancient tradingcontacts; a regular migration of indentured workers took placeduring the colonial times; and, in the wake of <strong>Africa</strong>nindependence, both India and China befriended the newlyindependent nations.India sent teachers to <strong>Africa</strong>n countries, while Beijingoffered the services of its doctors. However, China’sdomestic preoccupations reduced its contacts with <strong>Africa</strong> inthe later decades till Beijing began opening up its economy andushering in reforms. On the other hand, India’s politicalengagement with <strong>Africa</strong> had deepened through theNon-Aligned Movement.China’s links with <strong>Africa</strong> go back several centuries. Tracesof those are visible in Chinese coinsand porcelain discovered at several<strong>Africa</strong>n sites. There is evidence oftrade between China and the East<strong>Africa</strong>n coastal region from the 12thcentury. There are early Chinesewritten records of travellers’impressions of <strong>Africa</strong>. In early 15thcentury, Chinese Admiral Zheng Hewas known to have travelled as far asEast <strong>Africa</strong> with a large fleet of ships,Overseas Chinese workers at a factory in South <strong>Africa</strong>. Chinese companies are today majorplayers in <strong>Africa</strong>’s infrastructure sector.Indians have had historicalties with <strong>Africa</strong>. The IndianOcean has been hostto a regular tradingnetwork between Indiaand the eastern coast of<strong>Africa</strong> since ancient timesreturning with cargo-loads of fine product and exotic animalsand plants never before seen in China. However, a more activeinteraction between China and <strong>Africa</strong> began in the colonialdays. As the European powers established new colonies indifferent regions of <strong>Africa</strong> and slavery was abolished in theWest, the latter needed workers to tend plantations in the newcolonies. The two main sources of labour in that period wereChina and India. Descendents of those indentured workersand other migrants of that time today form the core of theIndian and Chinese diaspora in <strong>Africa</strong>.Brazil and africaAs one of the emerging nations with a booming economy,Brazil is keen to seek out new markets and <strong>Africa</strong> was a naturaldestination given its geographic proximity. Brazil began itsnew thrust towards <strong>Africa</strong> in 2005, when its then President,Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, visited 12 <strong>Africa</strong>n countries andopened 16 embassies on the continent.Lula elevated <strong>Africa</strong> to a priority area in Brazil’s foreignpolicy, referring to “moral and historical obligations” andstressed that Brazilian society was built on the sweat andblood of <strong>Africa</strong>ns. Again, it was the historic ties between<strong>Africa</strong> and Brazil that President Lula invoked to open doorsin <strong>Africa</strong>, stressing on the transportation of thousands of<strong>Africa</strong>ns, taken as slaves to thecountries of the New World.It is said that Brazil has the largestpopulation of people of <strong>Africa</strong>norigin outside <strong>Africa</strong>. Most of themare descendants of slaves who werebrought from West <strong>Africa</strong> in the 16thcentury. The slave trade continuedfor 300 years. Slavery was abolishedin Brazil only in 1888. In fact, almost49 percent of Brazilians have <strong>Africa</strong>nAugust 2011-January 2012 119

K I N S H I Pancestry. Afro-Brazilians have a major influence on Brazil’sculture and society, e<strong>special</strong>ly on music, dance, food and art.Large multinational and Brazilian companies have found iteasier to route their investments through Afro-Brazilians.Agri-business has become an important segment in theBrazil-<strong>Africa</strong> commercial engagement with the production ofethanol from sugarcane.Though Brazil is a relative newcomer to <strong>Africa</strong> comparedto India and China, the cultural similarities between Brazil andcountries of West <strong>Africa</strong> and its geographic proximity to the<strong>Africa</strong>n continent give Brazilian enterprises an edge in West<strong>Africa</strong>. Brazilian businessmen, e<strong>special</strong>ly those of <strong>Africa</strong>norigin, have the advantage of a shared culture and languagewhen dealing with the former Portuguese colonies in <strong>Africa</strong>.It makes it easier for them to do business in <strong>Africa</strong>n countries.<strong>Africa</strong> has also opened up to embrace its diaspora. It hasmade moves towards engaging with the larger <strong>Africa</strong>ndiaspora around the world. The constitution of the <strong>Africa</strong>nUnion states that it will “invite and encourage the fullparticipation of the <strong>Africa</strong>n diaspora as an important part of ourcontinent, in the building of the <strong>Africa</strong>n Union”.The <strong>Africa</strong>n diaspora has been defined as “consisting ofpeople of <strong>Africa</strong>n origin living outside the continent,irrespective of their citizenship and nationality and who arewilling to contribute to the development of the continent andthe building of the <strong>Africa</strong>n Union”.Several countries such as Ghana and Nigeria havegovernmental programmes focusing on the diaspora. <strong>Africa</strong>’sengagement with its diaspora has encouraged its immigrantcommunities to strengthen contacts with their ancestralhomelands.A major part of Brazil’s trade with <strong>Africa</strong> is through its oilimports from Nigeria, but it is in Angola, another formerPortuguese colony, where Brazilian private enterprises haveestablished a big presence. Brazil’s trade, investment andtechnology transfer to <strong>Africa</strong>n countries was initially part ofthe larger paradigm of South-South cooperation but the roleof the diaspora has given it a further momentum.china and africaFor China, <strong>Africa</strong> has become a major source of rawmaterials. The Chinese presence in the continent began fromthe mid-1800s when thousands of Chinese workers werebrought to <strong>Africa</strong> to work in the mines, to build railroads andto toil in the sugarcane plantations. Poverty and rural distressled to large-scale migration out of the Chinese coastalprovinces to South East Asia and further west to <strong>Africa</strong>. Smallto large Chinese settlements grew up in the territories whereChinese workers had been brought in as unskilled labour.There was another smaller wave of Chinese migrants to<strong>Africa</strong>n countries when hundreds of Chinese fled themainland after the Communist takeover.There were substantial Chinese communities in South<strong>Africa</strong>, Madagascar and Mauritius in the 1950s; some of theChinese residents were second- and even third-generationoverseas Chinese. Most of them had little contact withmainland China and most of them were involved infarming, market gardening or owned small provision storescalled ‘baihou’. Besides some amount of trade in Chinesegoods, there was little interaction between China andoverseas Chinese in <strong>Africa</strong>.Chinese businessmen left Shanghai in large numbersafter the Communist takeover in China and some of themreached <strong>Africa</strong> where they sought to set up similarbusinesses they had at home. As <strong>Africa</strong> began decolonising,Beijing began to take interest in the newly-independent<strong>Africa</strong>n states; the 1955 Afro-Asian Conference in Bandunghelped give greater depth to Beijing’s ties of friendship withAn elderly woman of Indian origin shops at the City Park Traders Market, a development project of the Aga Khan Foundationin Nairobi, Kenya. Photo: Preston Merchant120August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YPeople of <strong>Africa</strong>n origin playing drums in the city of Salvador in the Bahia state of Brazil.Afro-Brazilians have a major influence on Brazil’s culture and society, e<strong>special</strong>ly on music,dance, food and art. Photo: Lalo de Almeida for The New York Times<strong>Africa</strong>n countries. China took up infrastructural projectssuch as the construction of railways in <strong>Africa</strong> and sent alarge number of doctors to <strong>Africa</strong>n countries. Later, as Chinainitiated economic reforms and opened its economy, it saw<strong>Africa</strong> as a good source of naturalresources and as a market forconsumer goods.As Beijing laid emphasis onexports, it found the Chinesediaspora settled around the worldas a good conduit to introduceChinese goods to the countries theywere living in. As China gained inimportance, the diaspora alsolooked towards China for businessopportunities. There was growingdemand in <strong>Africa</strong>n countries forcheap consumer goods, a demandthat China could meet through thehelp of the overseas Chinese. Together with increasing trade,China also entered the infrastructure sector in <strong>Africa</strong>.Chinese companies took the help of local Chineseresidents to find their way through <strong>Africa</strong>n economies,bidding for large infrastructure contracts. Many of <strong>Africa</strong>’sChinese residents got in touch with relatives back homeinviting them to explore growing business opportunities in<strong>Africa</strong>n states. As the Chinese bagged industrial projects,they brought in semi-skilled and skilled workmen to buildthem. The enterprising Chinese workmen later moved onto set up their own business ventures.Overseas Chinese have taken enormous pride in China’srise as an economic powerhouse. The Chinese living in<strong>Africa</strong> also began trading in Chinese goods. While traditionally,Chinese businessmen brought in skilled workers tohelp build their businesses, latter-day Chinese migrantsIndian communities, whichare well-entrenched in<strong>Africa</strong>n countries, havebeen a source ofcompetitive advantagefor incoming Indiancompanies as consumersof Indian goods as well asfacilitators and partners forattracting investmentcame in themselves as traders, setting upshops and bringing in members of theextended family to help run those shops.Shortly, Chinese textiles swamped the<strong>Africa</strong>n market with their low-cost waresthat were better presented and priced thanlocal fabrics and garments.The Chinese in <strong>Africa</strong> also built up localnetworks for retail and brought in Chinesemadegoods that were far cheaper thanwestern products and affordable to the<strong>Africa</strong>n consumer. In fact, Chinese communitiesprovided small loans and assistanceto its members to help set up businesses. AChinese trader would travel to China everyfew months and stock up on goods thatcould be sold through the local Chinese retailnetwork. Today, the presence of the Chinesediaspora has helped Chinese transnationalcorporations locate in <strong>Africa</strong>n countries.Over the years, <strong>Africa</strong> has become an importantmarket for Chinese goods. There are few accurate estimatesof the size of the Chinese diaspora in <strong>Africa</strong>. Estimates rangefrom half a million to one million. But the numbers ofChinese businessmen, traders, workersand farmers are growing distinctlyin several <strong>Africa</strong>n countries.Lesotho has a brand newChinese-built Parliament buildingand its main industry, textiles, ispartly Chinese-owned. There arealso a string of Chinese shops andrestaurants in several remote townsin Lesotho.india and africaThe Indian diaspora in <strong>Africa</strong> isestimated to number about three million— they include descendants ofthe indentured workers who were taken to Natal in the late 19thcentury and descendants of workers brought to build railroadsin East <strong>Africa</strong>. From the “dukawallas” (small shop-keepers) ofearlier days, Indians have entered almost all aspects of social lifein the countries where they are settled.Initially, the main Indian foray into the <strong>Africa</strong>n economywas through its public sector companies, but as the Indianeconomy opened up, Indian-<strong>Africa</strong>n economic interactionwas increasingly began driven by India’s private sector.Indian communities, which are well-entrenched in<strong>Africa</strong>n countries, have been a source of competitiveadvantage for incoming Indian companies as consumers ofIndian goods as well as facilitators and partners forattracting investment. Diasporic communities have becomean asset for India, China and Brazil in their engagement with<strong>Africa</strong>.nAugust 2011-January 2012 121

D O I N G B U S I N E S S W I T H A F R I C AIndia to import more <strong>Africa</strong>n oilIndia plans to set up joint ventureswith <strong>Africa</strong>n countries to step up itsoil and gas imports from theresource-rich continent thereby reducingits dependence on any particularregion. The country’s energy needs aregrowing to fuel a $1.8 trillion economyand <strong>Africa</strong> is emerging as an alternativehydrocarbons hub.“We have been trying to diversifyour sources of oil and gas imports so asto reduce our dependence on any particularregion of the world,” UnionFinance Minister Pranab Mukherjeesaid at the third India-<strong>Africa</strong>Hydrocarbons Conference in NewDelhi on December 9. “In the comingyears, <strong>Africa</strong> will play a major role inmeeting the growing demand for crudeoil and gas in India,” he said while inauguratingthe two-day conference.Currently, the Middle East accountsfor 70 percent of India’s oil and gasimports. Saudi Arabia is the largest supplierof oil to India, followed by Iran.<strong>Africa</strong> accounts for one-fifth of India’soil imports. He said the import of crudeoil from <strong>Africa</strong> had increased from nearly22 million tonnes per annum in2004-05 to more than 35 million tonnesin 2010-11.“Today, more than one-fifth ofIndia’s crude oil imports are from<strong>Africa</strong>, with the major suppliers beingNigeria, Angola, Algeria, Egypt,Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea andSudan,” he said.He said India’s refining capacitywould increase from 194 million to 238million tonnes per annum by 2013.“This means we need about 40 milliontonnes of additional crude per annum.”“Similarly, our government’semphasis on increasing the share of naturalgas in the country’s energy basketfrom 10 percent to about 20 percentmakes it necessary to look for increasingour LNG (liquid and natural gas)imports,” he said.<strong>Africa</strong>n countries have proven oilreserves of 132 billion barrels, while theFinance Minister Pranab Mukherjee adressing the 3rd India-<strong>Africa</strong> Hydrocarbons Conferencein New Delhi on December 9.annual oil production in the region is478 million tonnes, which is about 12percent of the world’s total oil production.He said Indian companies wereinterested in buying equity stakes in oiland gas assets in <strong>Africa</strong> and other partsof the world in a bid to enhance thecountry’s energy security.“It is my firm belief that in thehydrocarbon sector India and <strong>Africa</strong> arepoised for a long-term partnershipbased on mutuality of interests. In thedays to come, we will witness growinginvestments by Indian companies in<strong>Africa</strong> and vice-versa,” he said.Petroleum Minister S. Jaipal Reddysaid that Indian companies were keenon entering into partnerships and formingjoint ventures for enhancing oil andgas exploration activities in <strong>Africa</strong>ncountries. “Our preferred approach willbe to go in for joint ventures with<strong>Africa</strong>’s national oil companies. There isno limit. We are interested in buying asmuch oil and gas from <strong>Africa</strong> as we can.”He said Indian firms such as GAIL(India) Ltd and Indian Oil Corporationwere interested in sourcing oil andLNG on long-term basis from <strong>Africa</strong>.He said Indian companies were alsointerested in exploring “possibilities ofequity participation in existing or proposedLNG liquefaction projects, businessopportunities in gas processing andgas-based petrochemical projects in<strong>Africa</strong> and farm-in opportunities in producinggas blocks for conversion toLNG and dispatch to India”.He also said that India’s premierpublic sector oil companies — ONGC,IOCL and GAIL — would train 450personnel from <strong>Africa</strong>’s oil and gas sectorover the next three years.At present, India’s oil companieshave a presence in 24 countries, includingEgypt, Kenya, Uganda, Tanzaniaand Mauritius.With <strong>Africa</strong> emerging as an alternativeto the volatile Middle East, theworld’s leading powers as well asemerging powers like China, India andBrazil have intensified their energydiplomacy in the continent. Chinasources over 30 percent of its oil importsfrom <strong>Africa</strong>, with Angola contributingthe bulk of it.As China has entrenched its presencein leading oil-producing <strong>Africa</strong>ncountries, India, too, has raised its stakesby building on historical goodwill it hasenjoyed in the continent to secure energyassets there through targeted investments,infrastructure deals and linesof credit.n122August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YBenin invites Indian oil firmsThe West <strong>Africa</strong>n country ofBenin has invited Indiancompanies to help developits oil and gas sector.“There are a lot of unexploredmineral reserves in Benin, e<strong>special</strong>lyin the oil and gas segment.We want India’s expertise inexploration to find these resourcesand use them,” Chirstophe Kaki,Director of Cabinet in the BeninoisMinistry of Petroleum and MineralResources, said in New Delhi onDecember 10.“I want to invite Indian companiesto come and work with us in amutually beneficial partnership,”he said, on the sidelines of the 3rd India-<strong>Africa</strong> Hydrocarbon Summit 2011 inNew Delhi on December 10.Unlike neighbouring Nigeria andGhana, Benin’s resources remainunderexplored. Kaki felt that these couldbe explored in collaboration with Indiancompanies. Benin has also soughtIndia’s support in the fields of educationand infrastructure development.“We need geologists and otherrelated professionals in the explorationfield. India can also help in terms ofproviding education in this segment,”he said. “In terms of infrastructure, thereis also an opportunity to collaborate.”His views were corroborated byIndia seeks extra oil from NigeriaIndia has asked Nigeria to allocatemore oil and gas to India and helpit in its energy security efforts.“India has expressed an interest toprocure extra crude oil and liquefiednatural gas from Nigeria,” Minister ofState for Petroleum and Natural GasR.P.N. Singh told the Parliament onAugust 11, 2011. As India’s refiningcapacities increase, it would requiremore crude oil and gas, which Nigeriahad the ability to sell, he said. India’srefining capacity is projected toincrease from 185 million metrictonnes per annum to 240 million by2012-13. nAn offshore oil platform in Benin.Gurjit Singh, Additional Secretary, Eastand South <strong>Africa</strong>, in the Ministry ofExternal Affairs. Singh said that Indiawas looking at developing long-termpartnerships with <strong>Africa</strong>n nations.“We look at <strong>Africa</strong> not as a source ofnatural resources only. We believe<strong>Africa</strong>’s biggest resource is itsinhabitants. Our policy is focused ondeveloping human resource andcapacity in <strong>Africa</strong>, so that <strong>Africa</strong>ns canuse this for their own benefit,” he said.He also said that though India’sfootprint in <strong>Africa</strong>’s oil and gas sectorwas smaller than that of China, it was amatter of time before the country caughtup. “Our footprint in the oil sector issmall, whereas some other countrieshave a larger footprint. But in manyother sectors, we have a bigger footprintand it is only a matter of time andopportunity that our footprint becomesbigger.”nC-DAC automating Ethiopian customs systemAn Indian IT major is assisting theEthiopian Revenues andCustoms Authority (ERCA)transform its valuation methodology toa transaction cost system from aminimum price setting system to preventunder-invoicing.The 3.5-million birr (about $203,000)project is being undertaken by theIndian government-run Centre forDevelopment of Advanced Computing(C-DAC) to enable the ERCA complywith the World Trade OrganisationAgreement on Customs Valuation.The contract was signed in September2011. India’s Central Board of Exciseand Customs is the consultant for theproject at no cost to ERCA, according toFekadu Bekele, ECRA’s director ofcustoms valuation.The new system will depend oninvoices provided by importers asopposed to the existing database ofminimum prices of an estimated 7.5million goods. The automated system isexpected to eliminate under-invoicing.The new system is expected to beready for trial in six months, enablingERCA to obtain up-to-date priceinformation for every sector andeliminate problems associated withoutdated prices.ERCA hopes that the new systemwill help the authority achieve its targetof collecting revenue of 70 billionbirr (about $4 billion).nAugust 2011-January 2012 123

D O I N G B U S I N E S S W I T H A F R I C AIIFT to open overseas centre in UgandaThe government-run IndianInstitute of Foreign Trade(IIFT) is all set to open its firstoverseas campus in Uganda. The centrewill assist students understandthe nuances of globalisation andcapacity-building in <strong>Africa</strong>.“We are setting up an institute inKampala, which will be our firstfull-fledged overseas campus. TheUgandan government will provide usthe necessary infrastructure for theproject,” said IIFT director K.T.Chacko. “We have already signed anagreement in this regard with theUganda government. The process hasbeen set in motion and we plan to startwith some executive programmes,soon,” he said.The new institute, named India-<strong>Africa</strong> Institute of Foreign Trade(IAIFT), is being set up as a part of theIndian government’s initiative to helpdevelop a higher education system in<strong>Africa</strong>n countries in <strong>special</strong>ised fields.“Initially, the institute will be run bythe IIFT. Later, we will hand it overto Uganda,” said Chacko. He addedIndia and South <strong>Africa</strong>have agreed to giveimpetus to trade andinvestment between the twocountries and strengthenbilateral cooperation inmicro, small and mediumenterprises sector.Minister of State forCommerce and IndustryJyotiraditya M. Scindia held talks withSouth <strong>Africa</strong>n Trade and IndustryMinister Elizabeth Thabethe to discussthe areas of business cooperation.Thabethe was in New Delhi onNovember 15.Scindia reiterated India’s offer ofcooperation in the development of micro,small and medium enterprises (MSME)sector in South <strong>Africa</strong>, according to aThe India-<strong>Africa</strong>Institute of ForeignTrade in Kampalawill be IIFT’s firstoverseas centrethat the Indian government, throughIIFT, would bear the cost of all softinfrastructure, such as, faculty, libraryand expenses on information andcommunication technologies requiredfor running the institute.“It will be a pan-<strong>Africa</strong> institute —part of India’s commitment for capacity-buildingin <strong>Africa</strong>,” Chacko said.Established in 1963 by the governmentof India, IIFT runs somestatement released after the meeting. Heoffered India’s cooperation with respect<strong>special</strong>ised programmes in collaborationwith foreign institutions, but it has nofull-fledged overseas campus in anycountry. The institute offers a two-yearmaster’s degree in international businessand a one-and-a-half-year executivemaster’s degree in the same stream incollaboration with the Institute ofFinancial Management in Dar esSalaam, Tanzania.Headquartered in New Delhi, IIFTalso has a campus in Kolkata. Apart fromthe full-time master’s in businessmanagement courses, the institute alsooffers part-time management coursesand short-term diploma programmesfor executives. The courses to be offeredon the Kampala campus will be on thesame lines as offered in India, said theIIFT director.During the India-<strong>Africa</strong> ForumSummit in 2008, Prime MinisterManmohan Singh had announcedthat India would help establish 19educational institutions in <strong>Africa</strong>. IIFTis one of them. The <strong>Africa</strong>n Union hadzeroed in on Kampala as the site for theinstitute.nIndia, South <strong>Africa</strong> to cooperate in MSMEIndia has offered tohelp South <strong>Africa</strong>in terms of ITintegration andvocational trainingto the structural issues andthe dovetailing of informationtechnology (IT) into thehandicrafts and handloomsector. He also offeredcollaboration in the fieldof vocational training and ITskills.Thabethe appreciated thedevelopment of micro, smalland medium enterprises in India, e<strong>special</strong>lyof rural artisans, as well as the ‘clustermodel’ adopted in many sectors.Thabethe was in New Delhi toparticipate in the 31st edition of theannual India International Trade Fair.South <strong>Africa</strong> had put up a ‘NationalPavilion’ at the fair showcasingartisanal craft products selected fromacross South <strong>Africa</strong>.n124August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YBharti Airtel touches50-millon mark in <strong>Africa</strong>Airtel <strong>Africa</strong>, a division of Indiantelecom operator Bharti Airtel,has built a 50-million strongcustomers base in <strong>Africa</strong>, where itacquired telecom operations in a$9 billion debt-funded deal in 2010.“Bharti Airtel Limited todaycelebrated a significant milestone whenit acquired its 50-millionth mobilecustomer in <strong>Africa</strong>,” said a companystatement on November 30. “It hasachieved this milestone within just 17months of acquiring Zain’s mobileoperations in 16 <strong>Africa</strong>n countries andhas added 14-million new mobilecustomers during this period.”Airtel <strong>Africa</strong> had invested $1 billionin the network infrastructure in <strong>Africa</strong>.The company is now launching thesame technology being rolled outin Europe and the United States.The company has already beenawarded 12 3G licences across itsoperations and launched the first 3Gnetwork in Congo.Earlier this year, the companyexpanded its footprint by securing alicence to operate a GSM network inRwanda. In addition to building thenecessary infrastructure, Airtel hassigned agreements with leadingcompanies like Nokia, Samsung andBlackBerry. “I shall like to thank thegovernments and regulators for theirsupport and would like to reiterate thatwe share their vision of bridging thedigital divide with affordable telecomservices,” said Manoj Kohli, ChiefExecutive Officer (International) andJoint Managing Director, Bharti Airtel.Meanwhile, Airtel Nigeria was inthe midst of a project to put in place 250solar energy base stations across thecountry in the first phase as part of itsefforts to reduce carbon dioxideemissions by eliminating the use ofdiesel and petrol to generate power atthe base stations, an official said.The first phase of the project startedin November 2010 and would endin February 2012. The second phasewould follow soon after that, ChiefOperating Officer Deepak Srivastavasaid in Lagos on December 7.Srivastava said the company hadinvested 93 billion nairas (about $600million) in the past year to fund itsnetwork expansion to improve itsservices. The new solar energy basestation is expected to handle about1,200 subscribers receiving and makingcalls at the same time.Bharti Airtel on January 17 this yearlaunched its 3.75G platform in Zambia,enabling customers to experiencehigh-speed mobile broadband accessand make video calls and watchtelevision live. “The 3.75G technologywill give our customers the opportunityto interact with data in a differentway,” said Fayaz King, ManagingDirector, Airtel Zambia.nLava to invest $5 mn in NigeriaMobile phone manufacturerLava will invest $5 millionin the coming fiscal todevelop service centres and brandbuilding in Nigeria, where it sellsnearly 50,000 units per month.“We will go ahead and invest $5 millionto develop the service centre andbrand building in Nigeria.“This investment will also benefitour operations in Ghana, as it sourcesa lot of content from Nigeria,” SunilRaina, Chief Marketing Officer of LavaInternational, said in New Delhi onDecember 22.He said the company’s phones hadbeen well received in the <strong>Africa</strong>ncountry.“Consumer wants in India andthese markets are similar and we arefocusing on providing products whichhave long battery life with standard features,”he said.The company said that it wouldtweak a few features like languageoptions from English-to-French to luremore customers.He said Lava was targeting 10 percentof handset market share in Nigeriawhere it started offering phones fourmonths ago.“It is a 2 million to 2.5 million permonth market. We are targetingnearly 10 percent of the total marketshare in the coming quarter,” the ChiefMarketing Officer said.nAugust 2011-January 2012 125

D O I N G B U S I N E S S W I T H A F R I C AIndia to help Ethiopia boostagricultural outputApremier Indian agriculturalresearch institutehas tied up with anEthiopian institute to helpit increase the country’sagricultural output.The Ethiopian Institute ofAgricultural Research (EIAR)and the Indian AgriculturalResearch Institutes (IARI) signeda memorandum of understanding(MoU) in Addis Ababa inDecember 2011 to carry outagricultural research that would helpboost agricultural production inEthiopia.IARI is India’s premiernational institute for agriculturalresearch and education. It wasresponsible for research leading toIndia’s Green Revolution in the 1970s.Ethiopia’s Agriculture State MinisterWondyerad Mandefro said the MoUAgroup of Indian expertsis helping revive teacultivation in Malawi insouthern <strong>Africa</strong> and has so farsucceeded in bringing 8,500 acresof land under tea cultivation.The move follows a slackeningof interest in tobacco farming dueto low global prices for the crop,Sujeet Katoch, general manager ofthe Kawalazi Estate Company inMzuzu, said.Speaking on the sidelines of theFairtrade <strong>Africa</strong> Convention in Accrain November 2011, Katoch said:“Malawian farmers have for a long timedepended on tobacco farming but thedrop in global prices for tobacco hasrenewed interest in tea cultivation andsome of us have been recruited to helpin the building of tea estates.”The Ethiopian Institute ofAgricultural Research andthe Indian AgriculturalResearch Institutes (IARI)signed an MoU to carryout agricultural researchwould help enhance the bilateralrelations between the two countries.He added that the two institutesMalawi’s tea estates on revival pathA tea estate in Malawi.Agriculture is the mainstay ofMalawi, a country of 13 million people.Katoch said although Indian interestin Malawian tea cultivation dated backto the 1960s it had not been sustained.“For the past three years, we have beentrying to introduce the concept ofsmallholding farms in tea growing areaswould get a chance to undertakejoint agricultural research thatwould help in increasingproduction.Indian Ambassador toEthiopia Bhagwant Bishnoi saidthe MoU would furtherconsolidate the relations betweenthe two countries. He said Indiawas interested in sharing itsagricultural experience withEthiopia.The agreement would also enableIndia to undertake research on meatand dairy development in Ethiopia.In addition to conductingresearch, the EIAR is charged withthe responsibility of coordinatingagricultural research across thecountry, and will also advise thegovernment on agricultural researchpolicy formulation. Currently, theEIAR has 55 research centres. nand have so far been able toget 10,000 farmers interested ingrowing tea.”He said the Kawalazi Estate wasopened by the Smallholder TeaAuthority in the early 1960s, butfollowing the inability of thesmallholders to manage it, GlobalTea and Commodities (GTC), thecurrent owners, took over in 2001.Katoch, who is from Assam, a statein the northeast of India, said sincethe takeover of the Estate, “thecompany has done all-time high croptwice already”. “The company employsa total workforce of nearly 2,400 menand women in its tea and macadamiaoperations, making it one of the largestemployers in the private sector in thenorth of the country,” hesaid. — Francis Kokutsen126August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YIndian fertiliser companieswant to buy mines in <strong>Africa</strong>The Indian fertiliser industry,facing a rise in the demand andcost of importing raw material,is eyeing mineral assets in <strong>Africa</strong>. “Thereis a possibility of buying stakes in mines,which are in initial stages of operations,”A. Vellayan, Chairman of the FertiliserAssociation of India (FAI), said in NewDelhi in December. He is also GroupChairman of Murugappa Group, basedin Chennai. Some of the key miningareas the industry wants to enter are inEritrea, Ethiopia, Congo and Ghana.Vellayan said the prices of fertilisersand the subsidies given by thegovernment would also be reduced iffertiliser companies entered into jointventures with mining companies.“This will have a significant impacton the prices. Currently, there are someIndian companies in South <strong>Africa</strong>,Tunisia and Morocco, and many ofthem are considering expanding theiroperations to other <strong>Africa</strong>n countries.But the government’s support isrequired from that,” Vellayan said.Fertiliser manufacturers have asked thegovernment to create a $20 billionsovereign fund to buy overseas mineralassets.“Although there were discussionsabout allocating $1 billion for asovereign wealth fund for public sectorcompanies, we have discussed with thegovernment for a sovereign fund ofabout $20 billion for potash andphosphates,” he said. “Either we can goand buy, or else the government paysthe same amount ($20 billion) insubsidies.”India, which consumed 58 milliontonnes of fertilisers in 2010-11, lacks keymineral ingredients for the manufactureof fertilisers such as potash andphosphatic rock and has to depend onimports. The country imports 100percent of potash and 90 percent ofdiammonium phosphate (DAP).In 2010-11, the country imported7.41 million tonnes of DAP and4.5 million tonnes of potash.The rising input costs have led to arise in the prices of DAP — these havedoubled from `9,350 a tonne in April2010 to `18,500 a tonne.The government has given a `900billion fertiliser subsidy to farmers toprotect them from the fluctuatinginternational prices, including abudgetary provision of `335 billion forphosphatic and potash-based fertilisersfor 2011-12.Industry watchers say the ownershipof mineral reserves can bring long-termrelief and security to the sector which isreeling under high import costs due tothe depreciation of the rupee. Also,foreign producers such as Russiancompany Uralkali, which is part of alarger international cartel, have denieddiscounts on potash to Indiancompanies.“In the long term, we need assuredsupplies, as we cannot depend anylonger on one or two suppliers. We area big country and have a hugepopulation to feed,” said SatishChander, FAI’s Director General.“It will be more economical thanbuying the minerals from a few suppliers,”he said.Big names such as BHP-Billton,Rio Tinto and Vale are eyeing <strong>Africa</strong>nassets to mine potash.nKaruturi to set up sugar factory in EthiopiaKaruturi Agro Products, a subsidiaryof KaruturiInternational, is set to establisha sugarcane factory in Ethiopia.The factory, with a capacity of crushing7,000 tonnes of cane a day, is to bebuilt in Gambella regional state. Some15,000 hectares of Karuturi land inGambella will start producing sugarcanein three years, said Assefa Arega,manager of Karuturi’s plantation, inDecember 2011. The company expectsthe plant to be ready in time for theharvest. Karuturi is currently doing afeasibility study on the project. Workon the sugarcane crushing factory,including site identification, supplyingand installation, is expected to commenceearly in 2012. The plantationand the factory will be set up adjacentto each other. — Groum Abate nAugust 2011-January 2012 127

F E A T U R E SIndian-origin woman givesback to GhanaSonya Sadhwani who is using corporate socialresponsibility to help Ghanaian societyAn Indian-origin woman — oneof the many second-generationIndians living in West <strong>Africa</strong>— strives to give back to Ghana, acountry where her grandfather arrivedas a 14-year-old seeking greener pasturesand eventually became a successfulbusinessman.Sonya Sadhwani’s grandfatherRamchand Khubchandani laid thefoundation of the family’s retail chainbusiness in Ghana in 1929. He startedoff as a store boy and went on to builda retail chain business, the GlamourStores, which his son, Bhagwan,turned into the Melcom Group.However, her idea of working inGhana is far different from that of hergrandfather’s. Decades later, Sonya ischanging the company’s goals toinclude corporate social responsibilityand is getting into charity work in a bigway through Melcom Care, the charityarm of the Melcom Group ofCompanies. “Ghana is my home andam very attached to the people of thiscountry,” says Sonya.There are over 4,000 Indians in atotal population of more than 24 millionin Ghana.Like her grandfather and her father,Sonya finds Ghana so welcoming thatshe calls it a paradise.“The people of Ghana are very sincereand very accommodating and donot make you feel like an outsider,”says Sonya.Like others of her generation,Sonya and her friends have little connectionwith their grandparents’ countryof origin. However, they havemaintained a close bond of friendshipwith one another.“We meet regularly to dine out and(meet at) other social charity activities,”says Sonya.Born in Accra in October in 1965,Sonya attended the elite GhanaInternational School (GIS) for a whilebefore joining her father in HongKong. “I didn’t like the cosmopolitannature of Hong Kong but had toremain there until I left for the UnitedStates for higher education.”She moved to New YorkUniversity where she earned a degreein business education.“After earning my degree, I wentback to Hong Kong and started teachingat the Sears Rogers InternationalSchool,” she added.Soon after this, Sonya says, “I gotengaged and had to leave Hong Kongto join my husband in Nigeria wherewe lived for eight years until wemoved to Ghana where my husbandwas running the Crown StarElectronic Industry.” She became amother during this time and so spentlittle time working at the Melcom headoffice.“Seven years ago, I was given myfirst project to run for the companyand slowly graduated to the Director ofBrand Management.”Sonya’s dream is to give back tosociety through charity work. Shespent time teaching in the AmericanInternational School in Lagos, Nigeria,and at GIS, but her big dream is to takeher charity work to the next level andthis she wants to do full time. n— Francis KokutseHinduism spreads in Ghana, reaches TogoFrom just two dozen people in themid 1970s to nearly 3,000 familiesnow, Hinduism is spreadingin Ghana and has made its way intoneighbouring Togo too.Hinduism began to grow in Ghanaafter <strong>Africa</strong>n spiritual leader Essel ji wasinitiated by Swami Krishnanda jiSaraswati into the Holy Order ofRenunciation in 1976, said KwesiAnamoah, the national president of the<strong>Africa</strong>n Hindu Temple here.“Today, there are 2,000 to 3,000Hindu families all over the countrywhich is a big increase from the 24 peoplewho participated in the first-everspiritual camp in 1976 to become disciples,”Anamoah said.“We have achieved this through thesimple lives we lead,” he said.“We invite people to the monastery todevelop a better understanding ofHinduism. We have been able to changetheir perception that it was a form of culturalenslavement,” said Anamoah.Christians form nearly 70 percent ofthe 24-million population of Ghana,while the population of six million inTogo includes nearly 30 percentChristians and 20 percent Muslims. n128August 2011-January 2012

The majority of tweets in <strong>Africa</strong>are made by young peoplefrom their mobile devices,thus driving the growth of Twitter<strong>Africa</strong>, a new research has revealed.The study ‘How <strong>Africa</strong> Tweets’says <strong>Africa</strong>n users of Twitter agedbetween 20 and 29 are also activeacross a range of social media, includingFacebook, YouTube, Google+and LinkedIn.The research by PortlandCommunications and Tweetminstersays Twitter is helping form new linkswithin the continent.“It is clear that <strong>Africa</strong>’s Twitterrevolution is really just beginning,”Beatrice Karanja, associate director andhead of Portland Nairobi, was quotedas saying.“Twitter is helping <strong>Africa</strong> and<strong>Africa</strong>ns to connect in new ways andswap information and views. And for<strong>Africa</strong> — as for the rest of the world —that can only be good,” says Karanja.The report says Twitter is becomingan important source of informationin the continent, with 68 percentof those polled saying they use Twitterto monitor news while over 22 percentuse it to look for employmentopportunities.Analysts say Twitter will play a crucialrole as Kenya gears up forgeneral elections either in Decemberor in early 2013.All of Kenya’s presidentialcandidates, including Prime MinisterRaila Odinga, Vice President KalonzoMusyoka and Finance MinisterUhuru Kenyatta are active Twitterusers.The survey analysed over 11.5million tweets originating from thecontinent during the last three monthsof 2011.“Twitter in <strong>Africa</strong> is widely used forsocial conversation, with 81 percent ofthose polled saying that they mainlyuse it for communicating withfriends,” the report says.Latest figures from theCommunications Commission ofKenya (CCK) also say mobile telecommunicationsare driving the country’srapid internet growth.The CCK’s latest telecommunicationsand internet report says Kenyanow has 14.3 million internet users,and most of them — 75 percent —A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YYoung people drive Twitter’sgrowth story in <strong>Africa</strong>access the internet using mobiledevices.The study finds that South <strong>Africa</strong> isthe continent’s most active country byvolume of tweets, with about fivemillion tweets during the fourth quarterof 2011.It was followed by Kenya with 2.5million tweets, Nigeria 1.65 million,Egypt 1.21 million and Morocco745,620, to make up the top five mosttweet-active countries in <strong>Africa</strong>. nAugust 2011-January 2012 129

F E A T U R E S<strong>Africa</strong>ns take home Indian ideasParticipants of the ‘Jagriti Yatra’.On a socio-economic train voyageof India, Isaac AbeikuOtoo, a youth leader fromGhana, realised what one could do withjust $20. Inspired by Infosys founderN.R. Narayana Murthy’s success story,the 34-year-old wants to motivate peoplein his country.Otoo was one of the 35 foreignnationals, several of them from <strong>Africa</strong>,who took part in ‘Jagriti Yatra’ (journeyof awakening) from December 24, 2011to January 8, 2012. They joined over 400Indian youngsters on the 15-day trainjourney, spanning 7,000 km and stoppagesat 13 institutions that have developedunique solutions to India’s challenges,in an effort to awaken the spiritof entrepreneurship among them.Bangalore, India’s Silicon Valley, wasone such halt. Participants visited theInfosys campus where NarayanaMurthy went down memory lane andtold them how he started his businesswith merely $20 in his pocket.Out of the 35 foreign nationals invitedto Jagriti Yatra, the Public DiplomacyDivision of the Ministry of ExternalAffairs sponsored eight <strong>Africa</strong>ns.“Every day was a new learning experienceon a train. There’s diversity atevery level, so many cultures, languages,challenges,” Brian Abel from South<strong>Africa</strong> said. On the train, the participantsshared ideas about their own countriesand social commerce.“Meeting people who don’t havehuge resources but can start from apoint, just one day at a time, one personat a time, and decide to make a change— think it has really struck me,” NanaAma Tima Boakye, another participantfrom Ghana, said.Participants learned about developmentin communities throughentrepreneurship, something many saidthey could relate to. “I have the samechallenges in my country and I understandthat if we are going to be able tocreate some change, you have to start tounderstand the roots of the problem,”Boakye from Accra said.Boakye works in the shippingindustry in the West <strong>Africa</strong>n nation. Alocal Member of Parliament who visitedIndia told her about the programme.She describes the relationshipbetween India and Ghana as one of“sister countries”.Other participants from <strong>Africa</strong> camefrom the Democratic Republic ofCongo, Kenya, South <strong>Africa</strong> andZambia. Their interests and educationin social economics range from engineeringto politics to environment.These participants visited a village inBihar completely transformed throughsocial entrepreneurship and businessmentoring — one in Karnataka lit up bysolar energy and another in Tamil Naduwith a world-class eye care centre,among other places.“I have learned that even with $20,you can start from somewhere and endup wherever you want to if your managementand skills are in the right place,”said Frank Arnold Okyerie, a communitypolitician who works as secretary tothe Member of Parliament of Ghana’sCentral Region. He wants to impart theknowledge he has acquired to youth inhis country “who are running their ownbusinesses in local villages”.“I will look at the kind of businessesthey are doing and show them how togrow them,” says Okyerie.Some participants were also thinkingabout bringing experiments like thisto their own country.“I have acquired some knowledgethat at the end of the day I am not goingto keep to myself, but parley it to youthin <strong>Africa</strong>,” says Okyerie.n130August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YIndians, <strong>Africa</strong>ns connectthrough traditional craftsThe flavours of <strong>Africa</strong> live in itscolourful arts, crafts, peopleand magnificent landscapes.Eighteen <strong>Africa</strong>n craftspeople fromfive countries — Kenya, Ethiopia,South <strong>Africa</strong>, Uganda and Rwanda —were in India’s capital New Delhi,showcasing their crafts at the 25thannual ‘Dastkari Haat Crafts Bazar’.The spread of <strong>Africa</strong>n craft at thefair, which was inaugurated by DelhiChief Minister Sheila Dikshit, includedbead work, leather craft, embroidery,woven ware, jewellery and metalware in a riot of colours and traditionaldesigns. The <strong>Africa</strong>n showcase,‘Handcrafting Promises’ for the CraftsSkill Development and Natural DyeWorkshop generated interest withcrowds thronging the vends and anopen-air exhibition that displayed thewares.The crafts exchange between Indiaand <strong>Africa</strong> at Dilli Haat was supportedby the Ministry of External Affairs.The Dastkari Haat Samiti, a non-profitcrafts forum founded by cultureactivist and promoter Jaya Jaitly, implementedit as a follow-up action to thepromise made by India to help the<strong>Africa</strong>n crafts sector at the ‘India-<strong>Africa</strong>Forum Summit’ in Ethiopia in 2011.Jaitly said the exchange activityincluded skill training workshops for<strong>Africa</strong>n craftspeople in basketry,leather beadwork, embroidery, weavingand natural dyeing. The 18-member<strong>Africa</strong>n crafts delegation was led bysix resource persons — Eugenie Drakefrom South <strong>Africa</strong>, Rahab Naisotuaefrom Kenya, Jennifer Mulli fromKenya and Kinene Nusulah fromUganda. “‘Handcrafting Promises’came about as a follow-on event of the‘India-<strong>Africa</strong> Summit’. We took 20Indian craftspeople to Ethiopia andthey presented 30 of their craftspersons,”Jaitly said.“The group of 50 interacted forthree days to address issues like genderempowerment, organisation building,natural dye workshop and skill training— sectors in which the <strong>Africa</strong>n sidewanted India to help the continentdevelop its arts and crafts,” she said.The crafts activist said the mostimportant component of the programmewas natural dyeing becausechemical dyeing was still common in<strong>Africa</strong>. “Four Indian dyeing expertsfrom different corners of the countrywill teach the <strong>Africa</strong>n craftspeople howto extract colours from natural substancesand ways to apply them,” Jaitlysaid.An Indian craftswoman with Kenyancraftswomen at a training workshop in NewDelhi on January 2 . (Left) An Ethiopiancraftsman at the workshop.Rights and environment activistsVandana Shiva, Sandeep Dikshit andPurnima Rai (Crafts Council)addressed the <strong>Africa</strong>n delegation onempowerment of gender in crafts asthe bulk of <strong>Africa</strong>’s traditional craftstrade is controlled by women.“The programme is spread overfour years between 2011-2014. It ismeant to foster people-to-people contactbetween India and <strong>Africa</strong> and allowa wider display for their crafts,” RaviBangar, Joint Secretary, West <strong>Africa</strong>,Ministry of External Affairs, said.Designer Ritu Kumar, who attendedthe event, said: “The material andmediums used by the <strong>Africa</strong>n craftspeoplelike beads, shells, embroidery,weaving and bright dyes are commonto India. All traditional cultures havesimilarities in their crafts.”As many as 190 craftspeople fromacross India participated in the fair. n— Madhushree ChatterjeeAugust 2011-January 2012 131

F E A T U R E SA progressive madrassa in theheart of Uttar PradeshThe entrance to the Jamaitul Falahmadrassa in Bilariyaganj town of Azamgarhdistrict in Uttar Pradesh.“Falah is a junction ofboth curricula —the divine and themodern. I have learnta lot from here and itis enough to open upmy mind...”Breaking the stereotypes associatedwith madrassas, a 50-year-oldIslamic seminary in UttarPradesh teaches subjects like personalitydevelopment and home science; runsan elaborate teacher training programme;has a higher girl enrolmentratio; and has students who are no lessactive on social networking websitesthan their counterparts in metro cities.Welcome to Jamiatul Falah, amadrassa in Bilariyaganj town ofAzamgarh district that has kept pacewith modern education. The studentswho come here from across the countryare taught subjects which are rarelytaught in Islamic institutions.Jamiatul Falah, which means‘University of Eternal Success’, alsostarted a mini Industrial TrainingInstitute (ITI) and a public hospital in2011. The institution now aims to introduceparamedical courses for students.“Madrassas across the country nowunderstand the need to train teachersbecause they play a key role in any educationalsystem,” said Falah managerMohammad Tahir Madani.“The modern subjects help studentsunderstand religious commandmentsand also give them self-confidence,” hesaid.“If our students don’t know otherlanguages, then they won’t know othercultures as well. Nowadays, English hasbecome an important language, learningwhich can boost their confidence,”Madani explained.More than 50 percent of the studentsin the institution in higher classes areconversant with the internet and mosthave a Facebook account.Shahid Habib, a student, has 425Facebook friends. “I access the internetto send e-mails and browse for information,”he said.Of the 4,300 students, 2,600 are girlsand the majority of the outstation studentsare from Bihar, West Bengal,Uttarakhand, Maharashtra and Nepal.The enrolment ratio for girls inhigher classes is also high. “Educatingthe girl child is necessary to empowerthem. The ratio of educated girls hasincreased in our society. Girls fromeconomically poor families also geteducation here,” Falah headmistressSalma Jaleel said.“Poor students do not pay fees. Weeducate them because we believe it isour responsibility,” Madani said.Falah, which has a monthly fee ofless than `100, provides free education,accommodation and meals to at least 30percent of its students.The institution’s alumni are pursuingresearch in various universities inIndia and abroad. The Al-Falah Hospitaloffers allopathic, ayurvedic, homeopathicand Unani treatment to patientsfrom across the country.It serves at least 100 patients daily andprovides free service to the poor, irrespectiveof caste, creed or faith.Azam Beg, an alumni of Falah whohails from Rajasthan, went on to studyUnani medicine from Aligarh MuslimUniversity and was twice elected students’union president.“Falah is a junction of both curricula— the divine and the modern. I havelearnt a lot from here and it is enough toopen up my mind,” said Beg, who nowruns 12 schools and colleges and fourmadrassas in different parts of Rajasthan.Laying emphasis on bringing aboutchanges in the educational system of themadrassas, Madani said: “Madrassas followan old style of teaching system andit requires certain changes in the syllabus.”“The teaching pattern in madrassasdepends on books and not subjects; weneed to change it now,” he pointed out.Falah has a panel in place to check thequality of education. It also conducts aparent-teacher meeting every threemonths, which is a rare practice inmadrassas.Students are also encouraged to makewall magazines in different languagessuch as Arabic, Urdu and English atJamiatul Falah.Mohammad Arif, a doctor at Al-Falah Hospital, believes that madrassasshould be at the forefront of change inevery field.According to Madani, there is a misconceptionthat only Muslim studentsare allowed to study in madrassas. “Ourdoors are open for students of any faith,caste or place. Hindu students too havebeen part of Falah in the past,” he said. n— Abu Zafar132August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YIndian touch to Kenyan craftThe chill still hung heavy in theair — misting the brick andmortar facade of Dilli Haat inNew Delhi on January 8. It was almostnoon. Comrades-in-arms Jennifer Mulliand Millicent Seela, both from Kenya,were almost inured to the mist or thefreezing bite in the air.Their nimble fingers fly on swathes ofIndian hand-woven silks as they learnttheir first needle strokes of the traditionalkantha — a stitch from the lush plainsof Bengal.The Kenyan craftswomen were inan open-air classroom experiencing thecenturies-old heritage of Indianembroidery and textiles at a craftsexchange programme, ‘HandcraftingPromises’, between <strong>Africa</strong> and India.Jennifer Mulli, director of KatchyKollections (under a Kenyan craftslabel called ‘Jiamini’), bead weavers bytradition, said she was looking at differenttypes of beading from India.“India has a wide variety of beading traditionsand we want to find out howbead crafts from the two countries cancomplement each other,” Mulli said.Mulli was also taking part in thedyeing workshops at the crafts fair.“I am learning the use of natural dyebecause we still use chemical dye inour country. Most of our weavers andcraftspeople do not know the processof extracting natural dyes but we haveall the spices and natural spices andflowers that are used for colours inKenya,” she said.“In India, horns arecarved differently.This is a craft we wantto look at... how it isdone in India. We alsowant to learn Indianweaving...”Mulli and her mate Millicent werekeen to tie up with Indian artisans todevelop their range of brassware. “Wealso craft in brass, but India has richerbrassware. We want trade partners inbrass as well as silver,” she said.Horn carving is common to bothIndia and Kenya. Indian craftsmen havebeen sculpting in ivory, buffalo, deer andrhino horns for centuries like <strong>Africa</strong>ncraftspeople, who craft a bigger portfolioof horn artefacts and jewellery culledfrom many more animal species, thecrafts resource person from Kenya said.“But in India, horns are carved differently.This is a craft we want to look at...how it is done in India. We also want tolearn Indian weaving,” Mulli said.Mulli had adapted many traditionaljewellery into contemporary accessoriesto make for comfortable wear.“We have culturally changed ourindigenous beaded chokers craftedwith wires to leather and bead designerwear which does not hurt the skin.Our traditional wire and bead necklacesare stiff and uncomfortable.“We loom our beads on leather sothat they resemble fabrics. The coloursof our beadware are more subtle andWestern unlike the earthy <strong>Africa</strong>nshades so that the market can identifywith the jewellery,” she said.Necklaces in <strong>Africa</strong> had no pendants.But we have introduced pendantsin our necklaces,” she added. n— Madhushree ChatterjeeIndia a sensory overload: <strong>Africa</strong>n designerShe looks in awe at the shimmeringpiles of Gujarati shawls,embroidered with colouredthread and mirrors. “India is a sensoryoverload. We don’t have so many textiles,not to this extent, in <strong>Africa</strong> as onefinds in India. The tonalities of coloursare wider and the textures are so different,”said Eugenie Drake, a leadingSouth <strong>Africa</strong>n handicrafts promoter anddesigner, who was in India with a craftsshowcase from her country.Drake is exhibiting her wares — aquaint medley of bead necklaces, Zululove girdles, ethnic love-letter pendants,leg-ring bangles, embroidered fabricsand ethnic silverware — at the 25thDastkari Haat Samiti in Dilli Haat.Drake manages ‘Piece’, a 10-year-oldniche crafts boutique in Johannesburgthat blends traditional crafts from theethnic Zulu, Ndebele and Venda communitiesof South <strong>Africa</strong> with contemporarywestern motifs to create wearableaccessories.“The big thing about our creations isto make as many young people wearwhat we make because they are contemporary...and yet at the same timethe grandmother of a girl who wears ourproducts feels proud because she seesher culture reflected in the child,” Drakesaid. “I make woven grass-fabric andbead bangles inspired by the traditionalleg-rings (chunky anklets) which noone wears now. I have designed necklacesby improvising on the traditionalZulu betrothal necklace and colouredlove-letter pendants.”The colours of her beads convey differentmessages, Drake said. “Zulu couplesearlier conducted their courtshipswith love-letter bead pendants — smallsquare multi-coloured charms that danglefrom neck-pieces.”The size of the <strong>Africa</strong>n beads varyfrom tribe to tribe, she said. Her list ofbuyers include the likes of MichelleObama, Bill Clinton, Elton John andOprah Winfrey.n—Madhushree ChatterjeeAugust 2011-January 2012 133

B O O K S & I D E A SMaking <strong>Africa</strong> sMileand busting stereotypesThere is a need to rediscover <strong>Africa</strong> while discarding the clichés that havedistorted the image of the continent, insists Ben OkriIs it always famine in the heart of<strong>Africa</strong>? Pause and think again.It’s time to rediscover <strong>Africa</strong>through the eyes of love, the true <strong>Africa</strong>of laughter, joy, creativity andplayfulness, says celebrated Nigeriannovelist Ben Okri in a lyrical meditationon the continent that has been trappedin clichés.“There is <strong>Africa</strong> in all of us. <strong>Africa</strong> isour dreamland and our spiritualmotherland. We have to rediscover thetrue <strong>Africa</strong> of laughter, joy, creativity andplayfulness,” said Okri at the JaipurLiterary Festival held in the colourfulnorth-western desert state of Rajasthanfrom January 20-24. He was reading outBen Okrifrom his new book, A Time for NewDreams, a string of poetic essays andepigrams on <strong>Africa</strong>.“We have to discover the <strong>Africa</strong> ofmysticism, divination, myths andmysticism,” intoned the novelist in hisrich baritone, casting a spell over theaudience in the Durbar Hall of DiggiPlace that hosted the literary carnivalattended by thousands of book-lovers.Okri, who won a Booker for hismuch-acclaimed novel, The FamishedRoad in 1991, eloquently argued fordismantling negative stereotypes thatportray <strong>Africa</strong> as the place of famine,disease, bloodshed and mindlesscruelty, and spoke about the need tocreate a new narrative for this vibrantcontinent and its people.“<strong>Africa</strong> was seen for many decadesthrough greed. This justified all kinds ofviolence. The world should begin to seelight in <strong>Africa</strong>, its beauty and genius,”said the novelist. “<strong>Africa</strong> has beenwaiting for centuries to be discoveredthrough the eyes of love and lover.We need to rediscover <strong>Africa</strong> in us forregeneration of society.”“It is <strong>Africa</strong>’s turn to smile. That’sthe loveliest gift the world can give tokeep <strong>Africa</strong> smiling,” he said.“It is easy to dismiss <strong>Africa</strong>. It is easyto patronise <strong>Africa</strong>. It is easy to professto like <strong>Africa</strong>. It is easy to exploit <strong>Africa</strong>.And it is easy to insult <strong>Africa</strong>,” read theopening lines to “O, Ye Who Invest inFutures”, a series of poetic statementsabout <strong>Africa</strong> in A Time for New Dreams.“I am not asking for a romantic view,just clear-seeing, to discover the fullrichness of people for who they are.To see afresh without romance,exaggeration and distortion,” said thepoet-novelist. “I am talking abouttransforming the perception of a people.It’s always famine in the heart of <strong>Africa</strong>.We must explode the stereotypes,” saidthe author. “You must fight fire withfire,” said Okri.Okri underlined the need for great<strong>Africa</strong>n writers to counter the bleakbut powerful vision of Joseph Conradin The Heart of Darkness. The writerargued that Conrad’s Heart of Darknesscontinues to shape the perception of<strong>Africa</strong> to the outside world, as it is sucha powerful, rich and persuasive text.“There is only one way to counter it,and that is with good writing, towrite back.”n134August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YHomeless Afropolitansrevel in Hybrid identityThe term ‘Afropolitans’ has been used to describe those multilingual<strong>Africa</strong>ns who are simultaneously at home and not at home in Westernmetropolises, but who tie their sense of self to <strong>Africa</strong>Shubnum Khan, Teju Cole, Taiye Selasi, Philip Gourevitch participating in a discussion moderated by ICCR’s Director General Suresh Goyal(extreme right) at the Jaipur Literary Festival.London meets Lagos meetsDurban meets Dakar meetsNew York. And now Jaipur.‘American accent, European affect,<strong>Africa</strong>n ethos.’ A new breed of hybridinklings called Afropolitans gathered tochant and enchant the word-besotted atthe world’s biggest literary jamboree inJaipur in January.Taiye Selasi, a London-born writerand photographer of Nigerian andGhanaian origin enthralled bibilophilesby reading out extracts from the essaythat launched the expression,Afropolitans. Selasi, better known forher Granta debut story The Sex Lives of<strong>Africa</strong>n Girls, talked eloquently aboutthe <strong>Africa</strong>n literary landscape and theAfropolitan sensibility. Teju Cole,New York-based Nigerian-Americanwhose debut novel Open City has putthe literary world in a fever of excitement,was one of the star attractions atthe literary show that cuts acrossgeographies, cultures and nationalboundaries.Cole’s much-acclaimed novelrevolves around the solitary walks ofthe half-Nigerian, half-German narratorin multi-racial New York, where hemeets an eclectic set of migrants wholaunch him into erudite soliloquies,interspersed with learned quotes fromRoland Barthes and Yoruba mythology.Much like his narrator, Cole, whogrew up in Lagos and came to Americain 1992, juggles multiple cultural identities,making him a quintessentialAfropolitan, a “chutnified” solitary, inSalman Rushdie’s words, who hasmultiple homes but belongs to none.“A writer has a gift to convert experienceinto language... and to bear testimony tothe truths of the world,” says Cole.Selasi coined ‘Afropolitans’ in anessay entitled Bye-Bye Babar in LIPmagazine in 2005 to describe what shecalled “<strong>Africa</strong>ns of the world”. Sincethen, it has become a chic buzzword inthe literary and cultural world todescribe those multilingual <strong>Africa</strong>nswho are simultaneously at home andnot at home in Western metropolises,but who tie their sense of self to <strong>Africa</strong>.Who exactly are Afropolitans?“You’ll know us by our funny blend ofLondon fashion, New York jargon,<strong>Africa</strong>n ethics, and academic successes.Some of us are ethnic mixes,e.g. Ghanaian and Canadian, Nigerianand Swiss; others merely culturalmutts: American accent, Europeanaffect, <strong>Africa</strong>n ethos,” she writes.“There is at least one place on the<strong>Africa</strong>n continent to which we tie oursense of self: be it a nation-state, a city, oran auntie’s kitchen. Then there’s the G8city or two (or three) that we know likethe backs of our hands, and the variousinstitutions that know us for our famedfocus. We are Afropolitans: not citizens,but <strong>Africa</strong>ns of the world.” nAugust 2011-January 2012 135

B O O K S & I D E A SA carnival ofliterAry delights<strong>Africa</strong>n literary giants like Ben Okri and debutant writer Teju Cole broughtin a whiff of the continent, brimming with creativity and literary giftsThe absent Salman Rusdhie mayhave stolen the headlines, butthe five-day Jaipur LiteraryFestival (January 20-24, 2012) will beremembered for its many incandescentmoments when poetry intersectedwith polemics, science duelled withspirituality, rationalists cohabited withmystics and the truths of art competedwith the lies of politics and bigots.Billed as the “mahakumbh of theword”, a metaphor for redemption andtranscendence through words bred inthe solitude of writers, the festival soaredbeyond bigots who have no hunger forfreedom, but subsist on a sparse diet ofcertitudes.The fifth edition of the festival,which exposed an eclectic crowd of over100,000 people to literary giants, stellarintellectuals and celebrity playwrights,such as Top Stoppard, MichaelOndaatje, Richard Dawkins and StevenPinker, was by far the biggest since thefestival started on a tentative note in2007. <strong>Africa</strong>n literary giants like BenOkri and Ghana-American writerTeju Cole brought in a whiff of thecontinent brimming with creativity andliterary gifts.Going by the count of footfall,122,000 people, more than twice thenumber last year, came to savour thisfeast of stories at the Diggi Palaceheritage hotel that has become a landmarkin this ‘Pink City’ of Jaipur.The sheer logistics of the festival werestaggering: There were over 250 invitedauthors, more than 1,000 journalists andaround 2,500 invitees who participatedas delegates.On all five days of the festival, therewere five parallel sessions, with two tothree authors and speakers, from dawnto dusk. And 24 corporate giants,including Tata Steel, Google and Bankof America, stepped in generously tobankroll creativity. In five days, the twobookstores at Diggi Palace sold booksworth over $100,000.“I feel so happy here. The Indiansare so open to the beauty of words andfeelings,” says Argentinian writer PolaOxoriac, the author of The WildTheories. ”It’s an absolutely unique,spectacular show. It’s amazing howliterature can connect to people,” saysKamin Mohammadi, the London-basedIranian writer and journalist.The themes chosen for discussioncriss-crossed genres and geographies,displaying an eclectic range. “Debutantwriters and unheard voices share the skywith international stars and popularbestsellers here,” says Namita Gokhaleand William Dalrymple, well-knownwriters themselves and the organisers ofthe festival.From <strong>Africa</strong> to the Middle East, thestate of the world, e<strong>special</strong>ly its conflictzones like Kashmir and Palestinefigured in discussions. Literature’sperennial romance with revolution andits genius for subverting the status quocame in for critical gaze and werereflected in the discussions on the ArabSpring, writing and resistance, thedemocratic renaissance in Myanmar,and the new breed of cultural hybridscalled ‘Afropolitans’.Rushdie or no Rushdie, the shadowof god loomed large over a secular feteof letters with the presence of celebrityatheists and sceptics like RichardDawkins, Steven Pinker andA.C. Grayling. And it wasn’t just thefundamentalists who were hustling Godinto this carnival of creativity.Fittingly, the festival started withsessions on soul-stirring Bhakti poetryand the vision of Sikh gurus and endedwith a stirring debate on ‘This Housebelieves that Man has replaced God’.Bigots tried to spoil the party byforcing the author of The Satanic Versesto stay away and made sure that hisscheduled video-link address was alsoscrapped, eliciting howls of outrage, butthey couldn’t quite kill the creativeexuberance of the festival.The five-day fest was interspersedwith soulful devotional singing byShabnam Virmani, the famous singer ofKabir songs, and Parvathy Baul.It was also a festival whererevolutionaries rubbed shoulders withsocialites, the swish set togged out intrendy clothes partied with panache,literary-minded Bollywood stars floatedaround and foreign women writers fellin love with the sari.The festival had many lightermoments, fusing discourse and discos,as it were. The performances by theJaipur Kawa Brass Band and fire-eatingdancers of Rajasthan Josh were simplymesmerising, getting many inspiredsouls to shake a leg or two.The crowds were overwhelming,but in the end, it is the commingling ofcrowds with creative geniuses that havemade the JLF such a powerful brand, aplace to be seen and heard, justifying themoniker by celebrity editor Tina Brownas “the greatest literary show on earth”.“It’s an egalitarian festival, anybodywho loves can come in. If this festivalinspires people to buy at least two booksof the writers they heard speak, I wouldcall it a success,” says a Delhi-basedwriter and blogger who has been comingto the JLF for the last few years. n136August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Y■ LiteratureA selection of new books on <strong>Africa</strong> and by <strong>Africa</strong>n writersfrom www.africabookcentre.comLIFE TIMES: Stories 1952-2007By Nadine Gordimer; 560pp; UK; Bloomsbury; Hardback; £30.00THROUGHOUT HER career, noted South <strong>Africa</strong>n writer Nadine Gordimerhas built a literary reputation with her incisive short storiesas much as with her acclaimed novels. Together withher essays, this highly imaginative body of work won herthe Nobel Prize for Literature in 1991. In the opinion ofthe Academy: “Through her magnificent epic writing shehas — in the words of Alfred Nobel — been of very greatbenefit to humanity.” About short story writing,Gordimer had said that while novelists took the reader bythe hand developing “a consistency of relationship thatdoes not and cannot convey the quality of human life,where contact is more like the flash of fireflies, in and out,now here, now there, in darkness. Short-story writers see by the light of the flash;theirs is the only thing one can be sure of the present moment.” Spanning sixdecades, the 35 stories in this book are drawn from her 10 published collections.THE NAGUIB MAHFOUZ CENTENNIAL LIBRARY: 20 VolumesBy Naguib Mahfouz; 9000pp; Egypt; American University in Cairo;Hardback; £395.00This exclusive limited edition is a definitive 8000-pagecollection presented in 20 hardbound volumes bringingtogether for the first time all the translated works ofNaguib Mahfouz, Egypt’s most celebrated writer. Soldas a set, the Centennial Library comprises Mahfouz’s 35novels, including his first, Khufus Wisdom, published in1939, and his last, The Coffeehouse, which appeared in1988, as well as a new translation of his masterpieceMidaq Alley by award-winning translator HumphreyDavies. The volumes also contain 38 short stories, aselection from Mahfouz’s very short fictions TheDreams, and his Echoes of an Autobiography, personal and reflective commentaryon situations and events that shaped his life.ENVIRONMENT ATTHE MARGINS:Literary and Environmental Studies in<strong>Africa</strong>By Byron Caminero-Santangelo & Garth AndrewMyers (Eds.); 304pp; USA;Ohio UP; Paperback; £30.99THE ESSAYS bring togetherscholarship in geography,anthropology, and environmentalhistory with the study of <strong>Africa</strong>nand colonial literatures andwith literary modes of analysis.Contributors analyse writings bycolonial administrators and literaryauthors, as well as by such prominent<strong>Africa</strong>n activists and writers asNgugi wa Thiongo, Mia Couto,Nadine Gordimer, WangariMaathai, J. M. Coetzee, ZakesMda, and Ben Okri. These postcolonialeco-critical readings focuson dialogue not only among disciplinesbut also among differentvisions of <strong>Africa</strong>n environments.POSTCOLONIAL FRANCOPHONE AUTOBIOGRAPHIES:From <strong>Africa</strong> to the AntillesBy Edgard Sankara; 232pp; USA; University of Virginia Press; Paperback; £21.99BRINGING A COMPARATIVE perspective to the study of autobiography, Edgard Sankaraconsiders a cross-section of postcolonial francophone writing from <strong>Africa</strong> and the Caribbean in orderto compare for the first time their transnational reception. Sankara not only compares the ways inwhich a wide selection of autobiographies were received locally (as well as in France) but also juxtaposesreception by the colonised and the coloniser to show how different meanings were assignedto the works after publication. Sankara’s geographical and cultural coverage of <strong>Africa</strong> and its diasporais rich, with separate chapters devoted to the autobiographies of Hampâté Bâ, ValentinMudimbé, Kesso Barry, Patrick Chamoiseau, Raphaël Confiant and Maryse Condé.August 2011-January 2012 137

B O O K S & I D E A S■ Economy and PoliticsAFRICAN AWAKENING:The Emerging RevolutionsBy Sokari Ekine & Firoze Manji (Eds.);324pp; UK; Pambazuka; Paperback; £17.95THE TUMULTUOUS uprisings of citizens inTunisia, Egypt and Libya have been characterisedas ‘Arab revolutions’ by media analysts. However,what have been given less attention are the concurrentuprisings in Benin, Gabon, Senegal,Swaziland, Ethiopia, Djibouti, Uganda and in otherparts of the <strong>Africa</strong>n continent. The uprisings across<strong>Africa</strong> and in the Middle East, the book argues, arethe result of common experiences of decades ofdeclining living standards, mass unemployment, land dispossessions andimpoverishment of the majority, while a few have engorged themselveswith riches.DEFEATING DICTATORS:Fighting Tyranny in <strong>Africa</strong> andAround the WorldBy George B.N. Ayittey; 288pp;UK; Palgrave; Hardback;£18.99DESPITE BILLIONS of dollarsof aid and the best efforts of theinternational community toimprove economies and bolsterdemocracy across <strong>Africa</strong>, violentdictatorships persist. As a result,millions have died; economies arein shambles; and states are on thebrink of collapse. PoliticalAS LONG AS THEY DON’T BURY ME HERE:Social Relations of Poverty in a Namibian ShantytownBy Inge Tvedten; 216pp; Switzerland; Basler Afrika Bibliographien;Paperback; £27.00AN INCREASING number of Southern <strong>Africa</strong>ns live inurban slums. Focusing on four shantytowns in the northernNamibian town of Oshakati, this book analyses thecoping strategies of the poorest sections of such populations.The study is based on fieldwork conducted intermittentlyduring a period of 10 years. It combines theories of political,economic and cultural structuration, and of the materialand cultural basis for social relations of inclusion andexclusion. As the poorest shanty dwellers are excluded fromvital urban and rural relationships and forced into socialrelations of poverty amongst themselves, they tend to giveup improving their lives and act in ways that further undermine their position.AFRICA AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS IN THE 21ST CENTURYBy Scarlett Cornelissen, Fantu Cheru & M. Timothy Shaw (Eds.);272pp; UK; Palgrave; Hardback; £57.50AT THE start of the second decade of the 21st century,<strong>Africa</strong> is viewed in a much more positive light by analysts,investors, observers and policy makers. China’srecent involvement with the continent has set the tonefor new forms of engagement between <strong>Africa</strong> and therest of the world. The contributors discuss the implicationsfor <strong>Africa</strong>’s future trajectories and how to understandthe continent’s position in the international system.They also demonstrate how the study of shifts in<strong>Africa</strong>’s international relations can help explain broaderdynamics and the changing foundations of the worldorder.observers and policymakers arestarting to believe that economicaid is not the key to saving <strong>Africa</strong>.So what does the continent need todo to throw off the shackles of militantrule? <strong>Africa</strong>n policy expertGeorge Ayittey argues that before<strong>Africa</strong> can prosper, she must befree. Taking a hard look at the fightagainst dictatorships around theworld, from Ukraine’s orange revolutionin 2004 to Iran’s GreenRevolution last year, he examineswhat strategies worked in thestruggle to establish democracythrough revolution. Ayittey alsooffers strategies for the West tohelp <strong>Africa</strong> in her quest for freedom,including smarter sanctionsand establishing fellowships for<strong>Africa</strong>n students.138August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YSUDAN LOOKS EAST:China, India and the Politics of Asian AlternativesBy D. Large & Luke A. Patey (Eds.); 192pp; UK; James CurreyPublishers; Paperback; £16.99BY SUCCESSFULLY turning to China, Malaysiaand India from the mid-1990s, amidst civil war andpolitical isolation, Khartoum’s ‘Look East’ policytransformed Sudan’s economy and foreign relations.Sudan, in turn, has been a theatre of Chinese, Indianand Malaysian overseas energy investment. Whatbegan as economic engagements born of pragmaticnecessity later became politicised within Sudan andwithout, resulting in global attention. This book providesa ground breaking analysis of Sudan’s ‘LookEast’ policy. It offers the first substantive treatmentof a subject of fundamental significance within Sudanthat, additionally, has become a globally prominent dimension of its changinginternational politics.EATING FROM ONE POT:The Dynamics of Survival in PoorSouth <strong>Africa</strong>n HouseholdsBy Sarah Mosoetsa; 220pp;South <strong>Africa</strong>; WitwatersrandUniversity Press; Paperback;£19.99The book draws on AmartyaSen’s notion of cooperative conflictto argue that in times of crisisthere is more conflict thancooperation in the poorest households.Poverty seriously underminesthe collective character ofhouseholds and creates divisions■ ArtsPOSTCOLONIAL ARTISTS AND GLOBAL AESTHETICSBy Akin Adesokan; 248pp; USA; IndianaUniversity Press; Paperback; £16.99What happens when social and political processessuch as globalisation shape cultural production?Drawing on a range of writers and filmmakers from<strong>Africa</strong> and elsewhere, Akin Adesokan explores theforces at work in the production and circulation ofculture in a globalised world. He tackles problemssuch as artistic representation in the era of decolonisation,the uneven development of aesthetics acrossthe world, and the impact of location andcommodity culture on genres, with a distinctiveapproach that exposes the global processes transforming cultural forms.THE SCENT OF INVISIBLE FOOTPRINTS:The Sculpture of Pitika NtuliBy Antoinette Ntuli; 200pp; South <strong>Africa</strong>;Unisa Press; Hardback; £60.00A fusion of poetry, prose and sculpture and givesthe reader a glimpse into the complex and restlessmind of Pitika Ntuli who spent 32 years of his lifein exile. Pitika carries us into the world of wood,stone, bone and metal turning the familiar intonovelty; demystifying daily objects; powerfullyconveying human feeling and sensibilities ideas,philosophies and dreams ooze out of solid, apparentlyinanimate, objects. His works are full of humour, wit and magic, andare imbued with profound indigenous insights, whilst at the same time conversingwith Western artists like Modigliani, Giacometti and Picasso.along generational and genderlines. The book documents thehumiliation many men feel at theloss of their role as providers, andthe resulting escalation of domesticviolence and alcohol abuse.Sarah Mosoetsa conducted morethan 100 intensive interviews. Inthe first three chapters she providesa vivid account of individuallives, perceptions and experiences.The case studies are thendiscussed in relation to therestructuring of the country’swelfare and social policies, andthe extension of social grants.Mosoetsa argues that these policiesshape the livelihoods thatpeople pursue in order to surviveunder desperate conditions, butfail to address the root causes ofpoverty and inequality.August 2011-January 2012 139

B O O K S & I D E A S■ Development discourseAFRICA TOWARD 2030:Challenges for Development PolicyBy Erik Lundsgaarde; 320pp; UK;Palgrave0; Hardback; £60.00WITH THE deadline of the MillenniumDevelopment Goals approaching, governmentsare considering the main elements for a globaldevelopment policy reference system after 2015.Adapting insights from the scenario analysistradition, the contributors identify six majorunderlying causes of change and key uncertaintiesaffecting <strong>Africa</strong>’s development prospects.These drivers of change which are consideredvital in shaping <strong>Africa</strong>’s future include demography,climate change, technology and innovation, domestic political development,new actors in international development, and global governance. Moreover, theauthors outline several generalised scenarios for the continent’s future and discussthe implications of the changing <strong>Africa</strong>n development context for the prioritiesand organisation of European development cooperation.MENDING THE BROKENPIECES:Indigenous Religion and SustainableRural Development in NorthernGhanaBy Amenga-Etego, RoseMary; 348pp; USA; <strong>Africa</strong>World Press; Paperback;£24.99HIS STORY IS HISTORY:Rural Village Future through the Eyes of a Rural Village BoyBy Tlou Setumu; 206pp; South <strong>Africa</strong>; Unisa Press; Paperback; £20.99HOW MANY doors have been slammed in one’s face in this world? How manydoors does one find closed? Yet, while wasting timein front of a closed door, other doors are waiting tobe opened. Told in fascinating detail, this memoir isa chronicle of the fight against poverty towards a lifeof achievement. Having endured a lifetime of struggle,from childhood on into his adult life, TlouSetumu shares with readers a personal account of hisrural and urban experiences in South <strong>Africa</strong>. Not oneto shy away from asking deep-seated questions,Setumu explores the myth that poverty and rural lifeare synonymous. He looks for answers to this humanquandary in a broader context of human existence, notaccepting the condition as a given.ADDRESSING THE existingpolarised debate on the subject,this book debunks the popularnotion that <strong>Africa</strong>’s religio-culturaltraditions are stalling development.Using the Nankani ofNorthern Ghana as an example,Rose Mary Amanga-Etego illustrateshow the religio-culturaltraditions of <strong>Africa</strong>ns constitutea frame of thought that can bevery beneficial to sustainabledevelopment given the rightcontext.INTRODUCTION TO PARTICIPATORY COMMUNITY PRACTICEBy Rinie Schenck, Hanna Nel & Huma Louw; 376pp; South <strong>Africa</strong>;Unisa Press; Paperback; £35.99AN EXPERIENCED team of authors unpacks the definition that people-centredcommunity practice is a management process. This process is facilitated with a communityof people to take action to increasingly actualise their fundamental human needs toenhance the quality of their lives and those of the wider community which they are part of.The book’s approach to community practice is consistent with fundamental social workvalues. This approach ensures that even beginners would work with communities in arespectful way so that communities would not be imposed upon or disempowered in theprocess.140August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YBestsellers in IndiaIndian journalist M.J. Akbar’s “Tinderbox: The Past and Future of Pakistan” leads the non-fiction section of the bestseller listwhile “Home Boy” by H.M. Naqvi leads the fiction chartTOP 10: NON-FICTION1. Steve Jobs:The ExclusiveBiographyAuthor: WalterIsaacsonPublisher:HachettePrice: `7992. Thinking, Fast and SlowAuthor: Daniel KahnemanPublisher: Allen LanePrice: `4993. RahulAuthor: JatinGandhi andVeenu SandhuPublisher:PenguinPrice: `4994. QuestAuthor: DanielYerginPublisher: Allan lanePrice: `1,1995. Boomerang: The MeltdownTourAuthor: MichaelLewisPublisher: AllanlanePrice: `5996. Non-StopIndiaAuthor: Mark TullyPublisher: PenguinPrice: `4997. Lucknow BoyAuthor: Vinod MehtaPublisher: PenguinPrice: `4998. Where China Meets IndiaAuthor: Thant Myint-UPublisher: Faber & FaberPrice: `6999. Whatever The Odds: TheIncredible Story Behind DLFAuthor: K.P. Singh, Ramesh Menonand Raman SwamyPublisher: Harper CollinsPrice: `69910. No HigherHonourAuthor:Condoleezza RicePublisher: Simon &SchusterPrice: `799TOP 10: FICTION1. The Secret ofthe NagasAuthor: AmishTripathiPublisher:WestlandPrice: `2952. TheImmortals of MeluhaAuthor: Amish TripathiPublisher: WestlandPrice: `1953. Zero DayAuthor: David BaldacciPublisher: PanBooksPrice: `3504. Revolution2020Author: ChetanBhagatPublisher: RupaPrice: `1405. NarcopolisAuthor: JeetThayilPublisher: Faber& FaberPrice: `4996. TheLitigatorsAuthor: John GrishamPublisher: HodderPrice: `3507. The Timeof My lifeAuthor:CeceliaAhernPublisher:HarperCollinsPrice: `2508. The Sense of an EndingAuthor: Julian BarnesPublisher: Random HousePrice: `5999. Our Ladyof AliceBhattiAuthor:MohammedHanifPublisher:RandomHousePrice: `49910. NoonAuthor: Aatish TaseerPublisher: 4th EstatePrice: `499(Source: Bahri Sons, New Delhi, www.booksatbahri.com. All the books listed above are available online)August 2011-January 2012 141

D O C U M E N T S / S P E E C H E S‘Adopt a cooperative approach’Address by Prime MinisterManmohan Singh at the 66th Session ofthe United Nations General Assembly inNew York24/09/2011Allow me at the outset to congratulateyou on assuming thePresidency of the GeneralAssembly. I wish to assure you of India’sfull cooperation in the conduct of thesixty-sixth session of the Assembly.It is also my great pleasure towelcome in our midst the new State ofSouth Sudan. We meet at this session ofthe United Nations General Assembly ata time of great uncertainty and profoundchange. Till a few years ago the worldhad taken for granted thebenefits of globalization and globalinterdependence. Today we are beingcalled upon to cope with the negativedimensions of those very phenomena.Economic, social and political events indifferent parts of the world havecoalesced together and their adverseimpact is now being felt across countriesand continents. The world economy is introuble. The shoots of recovery whichwere visible after the economic andfinancial crisis of 2008 have yet toblossom. In many respects the crisis hasdeepened even further.The traditional engines of the globaleconomy such as the United States,Europe and Japan, which are also thesources of global economic andfinancial stability, are faced with continuedeconomic slowdown. Recessionarytrends in these countries are affectingconfidence in world financial andcapital markets. These developments arebound to have a negative impact ondeveloping countries which also have tobear the additional burden of inflationarypressures. Declining global demandand availability of capital, increasingbarriers to free trade and mounting debtpose a threat to the internationalmonetary and financial system.Prime Minister Manmohan Singh addressing the 66th Session of the United NationsGeneral Assembly in New York on September 24.Questions are being asked about the efficacyof the Bretton Woods institutions.There has been unprecedented socialand political upheaval in West Asia, theGulf and North <strong>Africa</strong>. People of theseregions are demanding the right to shapetheir own future. Energy and food pricesare once again spiraling and introducingfresh instability, e<strong>special</strong>ly for developingcountries. The Palestinian question stillremains unresolved and a source of greatinstability and violence. India is steadfastin its support for the Palestinian people’sstruggle for a sovereign, independent,viable and united state of Palestine withEast Jerusalem as its capital, living withinsecure and recognizable borders sideby side and at peace with Israel. We lookforward to welcoming Palestine as anequal member of the United Nations.Terrorism continues to rear its uglyhead and take a grievous toll of innocentlives. New threats to internationalsecurity have emerged. At a time whenthe world needs more internationalcommerce, the sea lanes of communicationacross the Indian Ocean are undersiege. Acts of piracy are being carried outwith impunity from lands that arebeyond the writ of any functioning stateor international accountability.Iniquitous growth, inadequate job andeducation opportunities and denial ofbasic human freedoms are leading togrowing radicalisation of the youth,intolerance and extremism. We have nochoice but to meet these challenges.We will succeed if we adopt acooperative rather than a confrontationistapproach. We will succeed if weembrace once again the principles onwhich the United Nations was founded— internationalism and multilateralism.More importantly, we will succeed ifour efforts have legitimacy and arepursued not just within the frameworkof law but also the spirit of the law.The observance of the rule of law is asimportant in international affairs as it iswithin countries. Societies cannot bereordered from outside through militaryforce. People in all countries have theright to choose their own destiny anddecide their own future. The internationalcommunity has a role to play inassisting in the processes of transitionand institution building, but the idea thatprescriptions have to be imposed fromoutside is fraught with danger. Actionstaken under the authority of the UnitedNations must respect the unity, territorialintegrity, sovereignty and independenceof individual states.Correspondingly, governments are dutybound to their citizens to createconditions that enable them to freelydetermine their pathways to development.This is the essence of democracyand fundamental human freedoms.There are many other things that wecan do. We must address the issue of thedeficit in global governance. We need astronger and more effective UnitedNations. We need a United Nations that142August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Yis sensitive to the aspirations of everyone— rich or poor, big or small. For this theUnited Nations and its principal organs,the General Assembly and the SecurityCouncil, must be revitalised.The reform and expansion of theSecurity Council will enhance itscredibility and effectiveness in dealingwith global issues. Early reform of theSecurity Council must be pursued withrenewed vigour and urgently enacted.We should not allow the globaleconomic slowdown to become a triggerfor building walls around ourselvesthrough protectionism or erectingbarriers to movement of people, servicesand capital. Effective ways and meansmust be deployed to promote coordinationof macro economic policies of majoreconomies. The reform of governancesystems of international financialinstitutions ought to be pursued withspeed and efficiency. The developmentagenda must be brought firmly back tothe centre stage of the United Nations’priorities. We need a much more determinedeffort to ensure balanced, inclusiveand sustainable development for thebenefit of vast sections of humanity.In the last few decades India haslifted tens of millions of its people out ofabject poverty. We are in a position tofeed our population better, to educatethem better and to widen their economicchoices. But we still have a very longway to go. We wish to quicken the paceof India’s transformation in partnershipwith the international community. A fastgrowing India can expand the boundariesfor the global economy.A democratic, plural and secular Indiacan contribute to tolerance and peacefulco-existence among nations. Developingcountries need investment, technologyand market access for their products.They need assistance in the areas ofeducation, health, women’s empowermentand agriculture. During the recentlyheld 4th United Nations’ LeastDeveloped Countries Conference, Indiahas strengthened its partnership with theLeast Developed Countries throughsignificantly enhanced lines of credit andassistance in capacity building. We haveto pay particular attention to <strong>Africa</strong>.<strong>Africa</strong>’s richest resources are not itsminerals but its people. We have toempower them and open the doors forthem to human advances in technology,education and skill development. At thesecond India-<strong>Africa</strong> Forum Summit inAddis Ababa earlier this year Indiaoffered lines of credit worth $5 billionand an additional $700 million grant forhuman resource development, transferof technology and building newinstitutions.The United Nations should leadefforts in the area of food security.We need more cooperation in agriculturaltechnologies, water conservation,land usage and productivity and stabilityin commodity prices. Developingcountries need a peaceful externalenvironment to grow. The fight againstterrorism must be unrelenting. Therecannot be selective approaches in dealingwith terrorist groups or the infrastructureof terrorism. Terrorism has to befought across all fronts. In South Asiathere are encouraging signs of cooperationin the area of security, as exemplifiedin India’s cooperation with Bangladesh.We should not allowthe global economicslowdown to becomea trigger for buildingwalls aroundourselvesSuch cooperation is adding to thesecurity of both our countries. Therecent assassination of ProfessorBurhanuddin Rabbani in Kabul is a chillingreminder of the designs of theenemies of peace in Afghanistan. It isessential that the process of nation-buildingand reconciliation in that countrysucceeds. This is vital for ensuring peaceand security in the region. India will playits part in helping the people ofAfghanistan to build a better future forthemselves, just as we are doing in othercountries in South Asia. We will do sobecause prosperity and stability in ourregion are indivisible.We wish to see an open, inclusive andtransparent architecture of regionalcooperation in the Asia Pacific region andpeaceful settlement of disputes. I callupon the United Nations to evolve acomprehensive and effective response tothe problem of piracy in the Red Sea andoff the coast of Somalia. As a littoral stateof the Indian Ocean, India is ready towork with other countries in this regard.Simultaneously, the internationalcommunity should continue with effortsto restore stability in Somalia.We have joined international effortsto provide humanitarian assistance to thecountries afflicted with severe famineand drought in the Horn of <strong>Africa</strong>,specifically Somalia, Kenya and Djibouti.Nuclear proliferation continues toremain a threat to international security.The Action Plan put forward by the lateRajiv Gandhi for a nuclear weapon freeand non-violent world provides a concreteroad map for achieving nuclear disarmamentin a time-bound, universal,non-discriminatory, phased and verifiablemanner. I commend the UnitedNations for its efforts in focusing worldattention on nuclear safety. Our plansfor utilising nuclear power to meet ourenergy needs hinge upon full satisfactionabout the safety of nuclear energy.We have undertaken a thorough reviewof the safety of our nuclear plants. Wesupport international efforts under theaegis of the International Atomic EnergyAgency to enhance levels of safety.The perspectives that I have outlinedto this august assembly are the ones thathave guided our actions in the SecurityCouncil since India became a non-permanentmember of the Council inJanuary this year. There are still millionsliving in poverty across the world. Theirplight has worsened, for no fault oftheirs, due to the global economic andfinancial crisis of the recent years. Theactions of governments around theworld are therefore under close scrutiny.It is vitally important that through ouractions and deeds we renew people’sfaith in the charter and objectives ofthe United Nations. I am confidentwe can do this through statesmanship,foresight and collective efforts.India stands ready to play its part in thisnoble endeavour.nAugust 2011-January 2012 143

D O C U M E N T S / S P E E C H E SIndia and Mali welcomefriendship and cooperationThe Joint Statement by India and Malion the occasion of the visit of the Presidentof Mali on January 11, 20121. His Excellency Mr. President of theRepublic of Mali Amadou ToumaniTOURE paid a State visit to India onJanuary 11-12, 2012. The Presidentwas accompanied by First LadyMadame Toure Lobbo Traore and ahigh-level Ministerial and Businessdelegation. The Ministerialdelegation included TheirExcellencies, Bocary Tereta,Minister of Livestock and Fisheries;Soumeylou Boubeye Maiga,Minister of Foreign Affairs andInternational Cooperation;Aghatham AG Alhassane, Ministerof Agriculture; Habib Ouane,Minister of Power and Water;Modibo Ibrahim Toure; Minister ofPost and New Technologies;Sambou Wague, Minister in Chargeof Budget.2. The President was accorded anofficial ceremonial reception atRashtrapati Bhawan in the capitalNew Delhi on January 11, 2012.The President laid a wreath at thememorial to Mahatma Gandhi atRajghat. During the visit, PresidentToure met the President of IndiaPratibha Devisingh Patil whohosted a banquet in his honour.He held talks with Prime MinisterManmohan Singh. E. Ahamed,Minister of State for External Affairscalled on the President.3. President Toure met leaders ofIndian business and industry in NewDelhi.4. President Toure appreciated theachievements made by the State, theGovernment and people of India inall fields in the course of nationaldevelopment which has increasinglyenhanced the role and standing ofIndia in the region and the world.5. The leaders of the two countriesexchanged views in an atmosphere ofwarmth, cordiality and mutual truston all aspects of bilateral cooperationas well as on the regional andinternational issues of mutualinterest. They welcomed thedevelopment of the friendship andcooperation between India and Mali.6. The leaders expressed satisfaction atthe intensification of diplomaticcontacts between the two countriesfollowing the opening of residentEmbassies in New Delhi andBamako in 2009 and 2010respectively.7. Both sides agreed to further enhancehigh-level visits and meetingsbetween the two countries.The leaders noted that there stillremained considerable potential forcooperation and agreed to stronglyenhance the partnership between thetwo countries in all areas of mutualinterest.8. Both sides called for an earlyconvening of the first meeting of theJoint Ministerial Commissionfollowing the signing of theAgreement on Political, Economic,Scientific, Technical and CulturalCooperation between India and Maliin October 2009.9. The leaders agreed to further deepenthe partnership, by adding moreconcrete programmes and projectsand broadening it to new areas forcooperation. Both sides agreed tocontinue strengthening cooperationin the areas of economy, trade andinvestment, finance, humanresource development, culture, agriculture,fisheries, etc., while strivingto expand cooperation into otherpotential areas such as mining,hydrocarbons, agriculture, food processing,ICT, science and technology,public health. Both sides agreedto find ways and means of enhancingand further expanding the bilateraltrade and promoting mutuallybeneficial cooperation. India notedwith appreciation Mali's offer forIndian participation in their miningindustry, agriculture, food processing,dairy and poultry farming,cotton cultivation, pharmaceuticalindustry, leather industry, automobileand two-wheeler segment andother commercial activities andexpressed its willingness tocollaborate with Mali in these areas.10. Both sides noted with satisfactionthat the two-way trade had increasedsteadily in the recent years. PresidentToure affirmed that Mali wouldcreate favourable conditions forIndian enterprises to invest in thecountry. Both sides agreed to step uptrade and investment linkages, interaliaby encouraging cooperation.11. The Malian side welcomed theenhanced training slots provided byIndia under ITEC for training andcapacity building of Malian defenceforces.12. During the visit, the followingAgreements were concluded: anAgreement for grant of aGovernment of India Line of Creditof $100 million for a PowerTransmission Project connectingBamako and Sikasso via Bougouniin Mali and MoU on Co-operationin the Field of Geology and MineralResources.13. President Toure highly appreciatedthe support and assistance of theGovernment and people of Indiarendered to Mali's developmentprocess over the past years andwarmly welcomed the announcementby the Prime Minister of Indiato continue to assist Mali in its socioeconomicdevelopment.14. The leaders affirmed their desire anddetermination to work together forpeace and stability in the region and144August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Ythe world, and agreed to furtherstrengthen cooperation at regionaland international fora, e<strong>special</strong>ly theECOWAS-India as well as in AU,WTO, WIPO, UN and theNon-aligned Movement.15. The Malian side underlined the pioneeringrole played by India in consistentlyextending support andcooperation to <strong>Africa</strong>n countrieswithin the framework of South-South Cooperation. This hasacquired an enhanced and significantrole following the successfulorganisation of India-<strong>Africa</strong> ForumSummit in 2008 and the <strong>Africa</strong>-IndiaForum Summit in 2011 leading tothe strengthening of <strong>Africa</strong>-Indiarelationship.16. Both sides also agreed to closelycooperate to promote dialogue andcooperation in <strong>Africa</strong> with theaim of promoting peace, stability,development and prosperity in thecontinent.17. The two sides agreed to strengthencooperation to effectively address thechallenges posed by non-traditionalsecurity threats such as climatechange, environmental degradation,natural disasters, energy security etc.18. The Indian side thanked Mali for itssupport to India's candidature forpermanent membership in anexpanded United Nations SecurityCouncil.19. On the situation in the Middle East,the two sides condemned anyforms of violence and urged theprotagonists to resume dialogue andreiterated their support for the “RoadMap” of the “Quartet”.20. The two sides strongly condemnedterrorism in all its forms and manifestationsand resolved to increasecooperation in the common effortsof the international community inpreventing this scourge in a comprehensivemanner. Both sidesagreed to closely cooperate for anearly finalisation of aComprehensive Convention onInternational Terrorism, for whichIndia had presented a draft at theUnited Nations in 1996.21. The Indian side appreciated theregional peace-keeping efforts ofMali in <strong>Africa</strong> and reiterated its offerfor providing training facilities toMali to augment its peace-keepingcapabilities. India appreciated theConference on Peace, Security andDevelopment in the Sahelo Saharianregion organised by the Governmentof Mali in 2010, in order to addressissues on cross-border crimes andterrorism affecting the region.22. President Amadou Toumani Toureexpressed his gratitude to the State,Government and friendly people ofIndia for the warm reception andhospitality accorded to the Presidentand the Malian delegation duringtheir State Visit to the Republic ofIndia. He invited the President andthe Prime Minister of India to payState Visits to Mali. The invitationswere accepted.n‘World needs to bridgepromise and delivery gap’Address by Minister of State for ExternalAffairs Preneet Kaur at the UnitedNations General Assembly on NewPartnership for <strong>Africa</strong>’s Development, inNew York11/10/2011It gives me great pleasure to addresstoday’s Joint Debate on the NewPartnership for <strong>Africa</strong>’sDevelopment and the promotion ofpeace and development in <strong>Africa</strong>,including in its efforts to fight malaria.In the immortal words of India’s firstPrime Minister, Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru,<strong>Africa</strong> is our “sister continent”. India’slinks with <strong>Africa</strong> are civilisational. Theyare anchored in centuries of trade acrossthe Indian Ocean; in the shared struggleagainst the yoke of colonialism; in ourendeavour of post-colonial nationbuilding,and in our common quest tounshackle our people from the bondageof poverty, disease, hunger, illiteracy,and apartheid.We also owe a debt of gratitude tothis great continent for being the politicalbirthplace of the Father of ourNation, Mahatma Gandhi, who firsttested his central precepts of non-violenceand peaceful resistance in South<strong>Africa</strong>.Ten years after the adoption of NewPartnership for <strong>Africa</strong>’s Development(NEPAD), it is befitting to recognise thenoteworthy progress made so far inpursuing sectoral priorities in agriculture,infrastructure, health, education,science, information technology, andenvironment. Nevertheless, this decadalmilestone also offers an opportunity forsober reflection on the unfinished tasksahead in fulfilling the vision ofsocio-economic growth and sustainabledevelopment that was envisaged whenthis framework was first conceived.Particularly relevant to this discussionis the pivotal contribution ofinternational cooperation in <strong>Africa</strong>’sdevelopment, e<strong>special</strong>ly in its efforts tomake progress towards the MillenniumDevelopment Goals and in surmountingthe difficult challenges confrontingpost-conflict and transitional societies in<strong>Africa</strong>. As rightly emphasised by theSecretary-General in his report, theinternational community needs to stepup its efforts and bridge the gap betweenpromise and delivery. The shortfall ofUS$ 18 billion in meeting ODA commitmentsto <strong>Africa</strong> is a cause of concern.In these times of political uncertaintyAugust 2011-January 2012 145

D O C U M E N T S / S P E E C H E SMinister of State for External Affairs Preneet Kauraddressing the United Nations General Assemblyon October 11, 2011.and fragile transitions in many<strong>Africa</strong>n countries, it is more incumbentthan ever for the continent’sdevelopment partners to stay thecourse and help <strong>Africa</strong>n countriesachieve their developmental goals.On India’s part, we have togetherwith our <strong>Africa</strong>n partnerstransformed our age old and <strong>special</strong>engagement into an enduring andmulti-dimensional relationship.After careful nurturing over successiveyears, today our partnershipwith <strong>Africa</strong> is aligned with thepriorities integral to the developmentalgoals of <strong>Africa</strong> and is built on thefoundations of mutual equality andcommon benefit. Sectoral areas of cooperationthat have been accorded highpriority include infrastructure development,capacity-building, agriculture,health, food security and technologycooperation. Earlier this year, we reaffirmedour abiding commitment toworking with our <strong>Africa</strong>n partners at thesecond India-<strong>Africa</strong> Forum Summit inAddis Ababa in May 2011. At theSummit, India announced fresh lines ofcredit worth US$ five billion over thenext three years for <strong>Africa</strong> and anadditional US$ 700 million grantassistance for human resource development,transfer of technology, and buildingnew institutions and trainingprogrammes, in consultation with the<strong>Africa</strong>n Union, the Regional EconomicCommunities and our <strong>Africa</strong>n partners.In keeping with NEPAD’s emphasis oninfrastructure development, we havealso decided to support the developmentof a new Ethio-Djibouti Railway line atUS$ 300 million. We are also discussingwith the <strong>Africa</strong>n Union the augmentationof capacities for the developmentof regional structure in railways.Building on the success of the Pan<strong>Africa</strong>n E-network project that shareswith all <strong>Africa</strong>n countries our expertisein the fields of healthcare and educationthrough satellite, fiber optics andwireless links, we are looking at settingup an India-<strong>Africa</strong> Virtual University.The proposed University will set aside10,000 new scholarships for <strong>Africa</strong>nstudents. We are further going to significantlyraise the number of <strong>Africa</strong>nbeneficiaries of our scholarships andtraining slots, including under ourflagship technical and economic assistanceinitiative- the Indian Technicaland Economic Cooperation Programme(ITEC). We have committed ourselvesto offering more than 22,000 scholarshipsto <strong>Africa</strong>n students over the nextthree years. With a view to encouragingtrade and investment flows, there is alsoa proposal to establish an India-<strong>Africa</strong>Business Council. India is alreadyunilaterally making available duty freeand quota free market access for goodsfrom 34 Least Developed Countries in<strong>Africa</strong>. This covers 94 percent of India’stotal tariff lines and provides preferentialmarket access on tariff lines thatcomprise 92.5 percent of global exportsof all Least Developed Countries.India’s private sector has played anincreasingly important part in recentyears in supporting trade and investmentflows. Indian companies have madelarge investments in <strong>Africa</strong> in industry,agriculture, services, human resourcedevelopment and infrastructure.The Indian conglomerate Tata hasemerged as the second largest investor inSub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong>. New initiatives toestablish an India-<strong>Africa</strong> FoodProcessing Cluster, an India-<strong>Africa</strong>Integrated Textiles Cluster, anIndia-<strong>Africa</strong> Civil Aviation Academy, anIndia-<strong>Africa</strong> Centre for Medium RangeWeather Forecasting, and anIndia-<strong>Africa</strong> Institute of Agriculture andRural Development are on the anvil.India has also contributed actively inefforts to maintain peace and security onthe <strong>Africa</strong>n continent through oursix decade long involvement in UNpeacekeeping efforts. Our most substantialpresence remains in <strong>Africa</strong>,including in the latest peacekeepingmission in South Sudan.Further, India will contributeUS$ 2 million for the <strong>Africa</strong>n UnionMission in Somalia in line with ourconsistent support to the developmentof <strong>Africa</strong>n capacities in themaintenance of peace and security.We have consistently held theposition that the internationalcommunity must further encourageregional and sub-regional organizationsin <strong>Africa</strong> to play a more important roleboth in peacekeeping and peacebuildingissues within <strong>Africa</strong>.Before concluding, I would like tospeak to the global anti-malariacampaign, particularly in <strong>Africa</strong>, dealtwith in the WHO Report transmittedby the Secretary-General. The Reportemphasises the need to intensify effortsto reach the recently revised and moreambitious targets by 2015.The analysis presented in the Reportdraws on empirical evidence to suggesta strong link between injection ofsignificant funding and rise in the numberof lives saved as a result ofanti-malarial efforts. The fact that fundinghas stagnated in the past two years istherefore particularly worrisome. Wewould urge all donors to step up effortsat this critical juncture. India’s owncooperation agenda with <strong>Africa</strong> includescapacity building programmes for medicaland health <strong>special</strong>ists to tackle pandemicslike malaria, filarial polio, HIVand TB. India’s private sector has beeninvesting in establishing pharmaceuticalmanufacturing facilities in <strong>Africa</strong>n countries.We are willing to do more.In conclusion, India’s vision of the21st century sees a great and dynamicrole for <strong>Africa</strong> as an emerging growthpole of the world. We will offer ourfullest cooperation to translate thisvision into reality. We will take our partnershipfrom pillar to pillar founded onmutual solidarity and kinship to harnessthe great potential of the more than 2.1billion Indians and <strong>Africa</strong>ns. n146August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YIBSA framework is unique: PMPrime Minister Manmohan Singh addressing the Plenary Session of IBSA Summit atPretoria in South <strong>Africa</strong> on October 18, 2011.Address by Prime MinisterDr. Manmohan Singh’s at the IBSASummit in Pretoria, South <strong>Africa</strong>18/10/2011At the outset I would like toexpress my profoundgratitude to President JacobZuma, the Government andthe people of South <strong>Africa</strong> for makingexcellent arrangements for the 5th India,Brazil and South <strong>Africa</strong> (IBSA) Summit.I would also like to thank and convey myappreciation to our Ministers, officials,Focal Points and others who havepainstakingly worked to ensure thesuccess of our meeting. I would also liketo welcome President Dilma Rousseff toher first IBSA Summit. I am sure that wewill benefit from her vision and leadershipin the strengthening and consolidationof the IBSA Dialogue Forum.Our grouping derives its strength andglobal influence from the fact that itconsists of three major developingdemocracies located in three continents.We share the principles of pluralism,democracy, tolerance and multiculturalism.We have similar views on manyglobal issues such as the primacy of thedevelopment agenda, a just and equitableinternational order, a multipolar world,a rule based international trading system,climate change and reform of the UnitedNations. Our cooperation is underpinnedby three pillars — politicalconsultation and coordination; multisectoraltrilateral cooperation; andexecution of development projects inthird countries through the Trust Fund.The IBSA framework is unique becauseit goes beyond just government-togovernmentinteraction. It touches thelives of our people by facilitating dialogueamong civil society and other importantsections of society. The IBSA Forum hasalso helped us in strengthening our ownbilateral relations with each other.Through its 16 Working Groups and 6people-to-people fora IBSA has broughttogether our officials, technical experts,business representatives, intellectualsand academicians. Despite thegeographic distance between us, ourcooperation has grown in all areas. Yetthere is a lot more that IBSA can do tobring tangible benefits to our peoples.The year 2011 has <strong>special</strong> salience onaccount of the fact that we are allMembers of the United NationsSecurity Council. We have demonstratedour cohesion and coordination onvarious issues under discussion in theUnited Nations, particularly in thecontext of developments in West Asiaand North <strong>Africa</strong>. The visit of an IBSAdelegation to Damascus in August thisyear and their interaction with the Syrianleadership demonstrated the politicalrole which IBSA can usefully play. Weshould build upon this experience. Westand united in our efforts to address thedeficit in global governance. The UnitedNations Security Council must beenlarged in order to reflect present dayreality and to make it representative andeffective in responding to globalchallenges. The IBSA Trust Fund is anovel initiative. Through this we havebeen able to share our developmentalexperience with other developingcountries in the true spirit of South-South cooperation. We should strengthenIBSA’s ownership of the projectsexecuted under the Trust Fund andbring their focus back to what wasoriginally envisaged, i.e., hunger andpoverty alleviation. We could considernew projects in areas such as agricultureand agro-processing, environment andenergy, including new energy resources.These will help our partner countries inaddressing the challenges of food andenergy security. The IBSA Trust Fundprojects could also useful focus oneducation and skill development, whichis a key requirement of almost alldeveloping countries. Despite theglobal economic slowdown our threeeconomies have registered a steadygrowth rate. Our intra-IBSA trade isalmost touching the 20 billion dollarmark. This augurs well for realizing ourtarget of $25 billion by 2015, and forbeing even more ambitious. The earlyconclusion of India-SACU-MercosurTrilateral Trade Arrangement wouldgive a boost to South-South trade. Withthe conclusion of this trilateral arrangement,<strong>Africa</strong> could emerge as a bridgelinking South Asia and Latin America.The sovereign debt crisis in Europe andrecessionary trends in the traditionalengines of the global economy — theUnited States, Europe and Japan aresending negative signals to world finan-August 2011-January 2012 147

D O C U M E N T S / S P E E C H E Scial and capital markets which areshowing signs of distress. Developingcountries cannot remain untouched bythe negative impacts of these developments.Their ability to address theirdevelopmental challenges has beenadversely affected. We hope that effectiveand early steps will be taken by Europeand other advanced economies to calmthe capital and financial markets andprevent the global economy fromslipping into a double dip recession.The G-20, of which all of us aremembers, has played an important rolein pursuing the agenda of reform ofinternational monetary and financialinstitutions. We should coordinate ourpositions in the run up to the G-20Summit in Cannes to ensure that thepriorities of the developing economiesare adequately reflected. Our cooperationon environment and climatechange issues is important. The BASICGroup has proved to be an effectiveforum for projecting the viewpoint ofthe developing world. We shouldmaintain the momentum of coordinationand consultation in the run up toDurban.I wish South <strong>Africa</strong> under PresidentZuma’s leadership all success for theDurban Conference. I also wishPresident Dilma Rousseff all success forthe Rio+20 meet in Rio de Janeiro inJune next year. The issue of IBSA’soutreach is one of the important itemson our agenda. IBSA has deservedlyreceived considerable attention since itsestablishment in 2003. It is important tofurther consolidate our achievementsand maintain the unique identity ofIBSA. We should preserve the commonprinciples and values we stand for.India remains committed andwilling to work closely with its IBSApartners in our collective endeavour tofurther deepen our cooperation. I havepleasure in extending a most cordialinvitation to you all for the next Summitmeeting of IBSA in India in 2013. Iwould like to heartily congratulate thepeople of South <strong>Africa</strong> as they prepare tomark the 100th anniversary of the<strong>Africa</strong>n National Congress next year. n‘IBSA dialogue forum has matured’Statement by Prime MinisterManmohan Singh prior to his departureto South <strong>Africa</strong> for the 5th IBSA Summit17/10/2011Iwill leave tomorrow on a visit toSouth <strong>Africa</strong> to attend the 5th IBSASummit being hosted by PresidentJacob Zuma in Pretoria on 18 October2011. The Summit is expected to focus,among other things, on coordinationamong IBSA countries in UnitedNations Security Council, sustainabledevelopment, the forthcoming meetingsof the Conference of Parties under theUNFCCC and the Conference ofParties to the Kyoto Protocol beinghosted by South <strong>Africa</strong> later this year, theRio+20 Conference being hosted byBrazil in 2012 and other matters relatedto deepening of cooperation under IBSA.The IBSA Dialogue Forum hasmatured considerably over the years.There is greater cooperation across awider canvas. Above all, the idea of threelarge developing democracies, Brazil,India and South <strong>Africa</strong> working togetherin a highly complex global environmenthas taken root, and has receiveduniversal welcome by our peoples.It is a happy coincidence that duringPrime Minister Manmohan Singh being received by the South <strong>Africa</strong>n Minister forSocial Justice Bathabile Dlamini, on his arrival at Waterkloof Air Force Base, Pretoria,for the 5th IBSA Summit in South <strong>Africa</strong> on October 17, 2011.2011 India, Brazil and South <strong>Africa</strong> aremembers of the United NationsSecurity Council.We have shown significant cohesivenessand coordination in our approachto issues under discussion in theSecurity Council.I also look forward to an exchange ofviews with our IBSA partners on thecurrent global economic and financialsituation e<strong>special</strong>ly in the context of theforthcoming G 20 Summit in France.We expect to issue an IBSA JointDeclaration at the Summit.During my stay in Pretoria, I lookforward to holding bilateral meetingswith President Jacob Zuma andPresident Dilma Rousseff to exchangeviews on global, regional and bilateralissues of mutual interest.n148August 2011-January 2012

Statement by Prime MinisterManmohan Singh’s after conclusion ofthe 5th IBSA Summit18/10/2011A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YIBSA meet fruitful, says PMAt the outset I would like toconvey my profoundgratitude to President JacobZuma, the Government andthe people of South <strong>Africa</strong> for the warmthand cordiality with which we have beenreceived here in Pretoria.It is always a pleasure and privilege tovisit this beautiful country. This is acountry with which India and the peopleof India have very deep rooted links —links that have changed the course ofIndia’s history. The people of India owea deep debt of gratitude to South <strong>Africa</strong>for giving us the Mahatma. India joinsthe people of South <strong>Africa</strong> as they prepareto mark the centenary celebrations of the<strong>Africa</strong>n National Congress (ANC) nextyear. We cherish our historical and deepemotional links with the ANC. Theelimination of apartheid was one of themost seminal events of the 20th century.We have just concluded a very fruitfulexchange of views on a wide range ofissues of interest to all the three countries.We have heard the results of the meetingsof the Working Groups and Forums whomet before our Summit. We havediscussed ways and means to furtherconsolidate our cooperation andcollaboration under the India BrazilSouth <strong>Africa</strong> (IBSA) Dialogue Forum. Ihave had the privilege of attending all theIBSA summits. I am, therefore, witnessto the flowering of this uniqueorganisation and this is a matter of greatsatisfaction for me. We have defied theskeptics and shown how three like mindedcountries can pool their resources andgenius to help each other and others.IBSA countries are already membersof groupings such as Brazil, Russia, Indiaand China (BRICs), Brazil, South <strong>Africa</strong>,India and China (BASIC) and the G-20.We have a tradition of collaborating onPrime Minister Manmohan Singh, President Jacob Zuma of South <strong>Africa</strong> and President DilmaRousseff of Brazil at the 5th IBSA Summit in Pretoria in South <strong>Africa</strong> on October 18, 2011.global economic issues and challengessuch as international economic and financialcrisis, climate change, energy securityand food security.This Summit is <strong>special</strong> because it hastaken place in a year when all three of usare members of the United NationsSecurity Council. We have acted in concerton the global stage, dealing with complexregional and international politicalIntra-IBSA tradeis now close to$20 billion. I am,therefore, confidentthat we will be ableto cross the target of$25 billion by 2015and security issues, including recently inWest Asia. This suggests that IBSA canplay a role in promoting the cause ofinternational peace and security.The IBSA framework is uniquebecause the interaction under IBSAtranscends the realm of government-togovernmentactivity to encompass dialogueamong civil society and people-topeopleexchanges.Its cooperative framework in the formof 16 Working Groups and 6 people-topeoplefora brings together our officials,technical experts, business representatives,intellectuals and academicians.These have helped to expand ourcooperation considerably. The IBSATrust Fund is another unique feature ofour outreach activities, which we haveagreed to promote further.There is, however, vast potential toincrease and expand our cooperation.Intra-IBSA trade is now close to US$ 20billion. I am therefore confident that wewill be able to cross the target of US$ 25billion by 2015. We need to do muchmore to address the present deficit ofintra-IBSA linkages in terms of people’stravel, transport facilities and otherrelated infrastructure.As three developing democracies, weshare very similar aspirations. We seekthe empowerment of our people andbetterment of their lives throughinclusive socio-economic development.Our cooperation so far indicates that weare on the right path.India looks forward to workingclosely with its IBSA partners in ourcollective endeavours to further deepenour cooperation. I have offered that wewill be happy to host the next IBSASummit in India in 2013. I thank you. nAugust 2011-January 2012 149

D O C U M E N T S / S P E E C H E SIndia ready for challenges: EAMThe participating council of ministers at the 11th IOR-ARC meeting in Bengaluru on November 15, 2011.Statement by External Affairs MinisterS.M. Krishna upon the conclusion of theCouncil of Ministers’ Meeting ofIOR-ARC in Bengaluru15/11/2011We have just concluded avery successful interactionof Indian OceanRim Council ofMinisters.This is the first time that theIOR-ARC meeting was held in India atthe apex level. India would be chairingthe Association for the next two years.Thereafter Australia would assumechairmanship for a further period of twoyears in 2013. I am delighted that mygood friend and colleague, ForeignMinister Kevin Rudd, joined me as ViceChair in the deliberations.I am also pleased to welcomeSeychelles back into the Association’sfold, taking our number to 19. Wewholeheartedly facilitated the re-entryof Seychelles ensuring that they couldrejoin us at Bengaluru itself. All 19 of usare sea faring nations, enjoying thebounty of the mighty Indian Ocean. Wealso have the responsibility at the sametime, to further strengthen maritimesecurity and do everything possible toenhance, all round cooperation amongIOR nations. The Indian Ocean is ofstrategic importance to all our membernations. India is committed to takeinitiates to address the contemporarychallenges and developmentalaspirations of all nations on its rim. Wehave taken a decision in the meeting tofully harness the potential of all IORrelated institutions that have been establishedover the years.I am very encouraged by theoverwhelming support for India’sChairmanship and enthusiasm formaking Indian Ocean Association avibrant grouping for promotingeconomic and trade relations, cooperationin education, tourism, fisheries,strengthening maritime security,combating piracy, disaster management,share best practices and experiences —to cite a few examples. We welcome theelection of the new Secretary General ofthe Association, High Commissioner K.V. Bhagirath. He will take up his post on1 January 2012. You would have seenthe communiqué which spells out ourvision. I would refrain from going intofurther details at this stage. I also took theopportunity, over yesterday and today,to have a series of meetings with visitingheads of delegations, including FinanceMinister Rudd of Australia, FinanceMinister Dr. Dipu Moni of Bangladesh,Finance Minister Arvin Boolell ofMauritius, Sr. Minister of InternationalMonetary Cooperation of Sri Lanka,Minister of East <strong>Africa</strong>n Cooperation ofTanzania, FM Al — Qirbi of Yemen andthe Finance Minister of Seychelles.I reviewed the state of play of ourbilateral relations with my interlocutors,consulted them on infusing new synergiesin the Indian Ocean Association ofnations, as well as, exchanged views onregional and international issues ofinterest. All my interlocutors weredelighted that this important event hadbeen held in Bengaluru and are goingback with very positive impressions ofthe city and State.Last but not the least, I will like totake this opportunity to sincerely thankChief Minister of Karnataka, the stategovernment and the people ofBengaluru, for their unqualified supportand spontaneous warmth. n150August 2011-January 2012

Opening statement by External AffairsMinister S.M. Krishna at the Councilof Ministers’ Meeting of 11th IndianOcean Rim Association for RegionalCooperation in Bengaluru15/11/2011A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Y‘Coordination is key’Over six decades ago, ourfirst Prime MinisterPandit Jawaharlal Nehruenvisioned a grouping ofcountries bordering the Indian Oceanthat could help one another in tackingcommon challenges. This extraordinarilyperceptive idea was realised in1997 with the formation of ourAssociation. We reaffirmed then thatthe Indian Ocean is an integral part ofour collective destiny, and that we needa holistic vision for a cooperativeresponse to current challenges for thisregion.The key east-west arteries ofinternational trade — e<strong>special</strong>ly incommodities and energy sources —run through our ocean. Maritimesecurity issues impact on our strategicsecurity and the conventional securityof our boundaries. Technologicalevolution and the rising cost of naturalresources have made it economicallyviable to harvest new resources fromour seabeds. The sustainability of oureconomic development in today’secologically challenged world requiresefficient management of our sharedseas. Conservation and sustainableharvesting are vital for the security ofour marine food resources.These are both opportunities andchallenges for collaboration, whichreinforce the cultural and civilisationalfactors that have historically unitedour region. Our association is based onan open regionalism, permittingmultiple channels of interaction inareas of regional and sub-regionalinterest. Piracy is a priority challenge.It increases the direct cost of trade. Itadds indirect costs through increasedExternal Affairs Minister S. M. Krishna at the 11th Meeting of the Council of Ministersof IOR-ARC in Bengaluru on November 15, 2011.insurance premia and a human cost tomany of our nationals involved in theshipping industry. We need to buildupon existing national, regional andmultilateral measures to enhancecoordination to combat piracy.We can build functional relationshipsbetween our Navies and CoastGuards to enhance the security of ourwaters. Our port and customsauthorities, as well as our shippingfirms, need to address issues oftransport infrastructure andconnectivity that hinder trade.The growth of intra-regional tradehas been limited by poor connectivity,market complexities and inadequatetrade facilitation. Our intra-regionalinvestment flows are modest, thoughmany of our economies are importantdestinations for foreign directinvestment from outside our region.We need to promote initiatives torectify this situation.We should strengthen connectionsbetween our disaster managementagencies. India is willing to share itsexperiences with the TsunamiWarning System for the Indian Ocean.Our hydrology, marine biology andweather systems research institutionscan develop mutually beneficialcollaborative projects, share best practicesand enhance national capacities.We can invite the Indian Ocean NavalSymposium, of which all our countriesare members, to make a presentationon its work at our future meetings.Our international technicalcooperation programme, ITEC, offerscapacity-building courses in a numberof areas of priority interest to ourAssociation. Our Foreign ServiceInstitute has developed trainingmodules that could be of interest todiplomats in our member-countries.More regular educational, cultural andtourism exchanges can play a key rolein promoting people-to-peopleunderstanding. Our officials have beendiscussing ways of simplifyingprocedures for utilization of ourSpecial Fund. It should become aneffective instrument for financingprojects and studies of commoninterest. With this objective, India hasdecided to provide additional fundingof $1 million to the Fund.From our meetings over the lastfew days, we get the sense ofwidespread impatience for ourAssociation to move from discussion toaction. India shares this sentiment andwould like our meeting today to impartthe required momentum in thisdirection. We have asked all our Headsof Mission in your countries to attendour deliberations here, so that they cantake forward our agenda in prioritysectors of interest.nAugust 2011-January 2012 151

D O C U M E N T S / S P E E C H E S‘We complement each other’Address by External Affairs MinisterS. M. Krishna at the conference on‘Indian Lines of Credit: An Instrumentto Enhance India-<strong>Africa</strong> Partnership’ inNew Delhi22/11/2011It gives me pleasure to be here thismorning with you to address thisConference attended by representativesfrom over 40 <strong>Africa</strong>ncountries. It is indeed heartening to notethe overwhelming response to ourinvitation. We are here today on acommon platform to discuss how Indiaand <strong>Africa</strong>n countries can worktogether to achieve the goals of ensuringinclusive growth and sustainabledevelopment. We face similar challengesin transforming our economies for thewell-being and prosperity of ourpeople.There are striking complementaritiesthat exist between <strong>Africa</strong>’srequirements and India’s capabilities inmany areas. I am confident that ourpartnership will continue to grow as wemove forward on this path. PrimeMinister Dr. Manmohan Singh, whileaddressing the Second India-<strong>Africa</strong>Forum Summit earlier this year,observed “India will work with <strong>Africa</strong> torealise its vast potential. We believe thata new vision is required for <strong>Africa</strong>’sdevelopment and participation inglobal affairs”. In this spirit, India is readyto share its experience with our <strong>Africa</strong>nbrothers and sisters. <strong>Africa</strong>n economyexpanded by 4.5 percent in 2010. Indianeconomy expanded by around 8 percentin the same period. India and <strong>Africa</strong>together comprise a market of 2.2 billionpeople with a combined Gross DomesticProduct (GDP) of US$3 trillion. Tradebetween India and <strong>Africa</strong>, which stood at$11.9 billion in 2005-06, increased to$53.3 billion last year. There has been anincrease in investments in bothdirections as well.All this, of course, is impressive butExternal Affairs Minister S.M. Krishna and Deputy Minister for Humanitarian Affairsand Disaster Management of South Sudan, Sabina Dario Lokolong, in New Delhion November 23, 2011.there is still vast potential for furthergrowth. India is engaging with <strong>Africa</strong> atbilateral, regional as well as continentallevels. The India-<strong>Africa</strong> ForumSummits have lent a contemporarydimension to our relations.Our economic engagement isdirected at meeting the socio-economicdevelopment aspirations of developingcountries in the spirit of South-Southcooperation. This takes several forms,including Indian Technical andEconomic Cooperation (ITEC) programmesthat are tailor-made to respondto the capacity-building needs of ourpartner countries. Several initiativesunder our Focus <strong>Africa</strong> Programmesunderline our political commitment tobuild mutually beneficial partnerships.Lines of Credit (LoC) are animportant instrument in this contextand are the focus of this conference. Atthe India-<strong>Africa</strong> Forum Summit in Maythis year, the Indian Prime Minister hadannounced $5 billion over the next 3years under lines of credit to help <strong>Africa</strong>achieve its development goals. TheseLoCs provide support at highlyconcessional terms to least developedcountries and developing countries inthe <strong>Africa</strong>n continent. We note a greatdeal of interest from our partners tocooperate in this framework. As we takeour cooperation forward, it is ofparamount importance that we followtransparent and fair selection proceduresbased on competitive bidding for awardof contracts and their execution. Suchtransparency will ensure best value formoney and quality of delivery under thescheme. I believe that you will behaving detailed discussions on our policies,procedures and methodology onhow to access and make best use ofIndian Lines of Credit. We value yourinputs and hope that you will find thediscussion useful and enriching. I amsure that the experiences to be sharedduring the Conference by the seniorofficials of the Ministry of ExternalAffairs, Ministry of Finance, ExportImport Bank and Confederation ofIndian Industry (CII) would addimmense value to the deliberations duringthe Conference. The perspectives ofthe visiting representatives from the<strong>Africa</strong>n countries, who are the primeactors for taking advantage of the IndianLoCs, would also be of enormous usefor the Indian side.n152August 2011-January 2012

Address by National Security AdviserShiv Shankar Mennon at the GulfForum-2011 on ‘Global Power Shiftsand the Role of Rising Powers’ atRiyadh, Saudi Arabia05/12/2011Iwish to thank the Institute ofDiplomatic Studies and theMinistry of Foreign Affairs of theKingdom of Saudi Arabia for thehonour of speaking at this prestigiousforum on the Gulf and the Globe.Allow me to make a few points tostart off a discussion on the topic thatwas suggested to me, namely, GlobalPower Shifts and the Role of RisingPowers.We live in a time of unprecedentedchange. No one knows this better thanthe sub-region where we are today. Itis hard to think of another area whichhas been as transformed in the last 50years as the Gulf. Often the scope andpace of change is beyond explanationor comprehension and our thinkingstill has to catch up with reality. Thisis true of the economic shift that hasaccelerated after the financial crisis of2008. It is also true of the rapid shiftsin regional and global balances ofpower. Some of the change is positive.For the first time in history 60 percentof mankind has been exposed tosustained growth rates of over6 percent for an extended period.Balance of power shifts and technologicalchange are creating a worldwhere power is more widely held. Weseem to be moving to a situation ofmultiple major powers in theinternational system with the ability toproduce or influence outcomes.Unprecedented change also bringswith it unprecedented uncertainty andinsecurity. This is evident around us.Globalisation has created interdependence,knitting the world together. IfA F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YWe are moving towards amulti-polar world: NSAShiv Shankar MenonWe seem to bemoving to a situationof multiple majorpowers in the internationalsystem with theability to produce orinfluence outcomesthe centre of gravity of world politics,and soon the economy, has shifted toAsia, including the Gulf, Asia is nowalso the cockpit of rivalries and thestage on which internationalcompetition is played out. Uncertaintyand insecurity lead powers to followhedging strategies, each acting on theirown worst fears, and thereby riskingmaking them come true.But the same change that creates newchallenges also opens up space forcreative diplomacy. There is spaceopening up in the international systemfor medium powers and others to play amore active role in this world ofmultiple powers, economically interlinkedand embedded in a new balanceof power.What are the drivers of this change?They range from technology (such asnuclear fission, ICT and uses of outerspace), to economics, to politics, and tonew issues like climate change and theuses of soft power in an interdependentworld. Technologies likeinformation and communicationstechnology (ICT) have empoweredsmall groups and individuals and thestate itself, opening up new domainswith new rules and practices, and newforms of contention.We see the effects of these powershifts all around us. Developments inNorth <strong>Africa</strong>, West Asia and Gulf areevidence. The epicentre of globalgrowth shifting to Asia is another. Ifthis transformation is to be continued,for the benefit of the global economy,energy will be the key, and the Gulfwill be critical to the rest of Asia’sgrowth and therefore to global economichealth.The flip side of commonprosperity is common security. Asia’ssecurity is also interlinked across thisgreat continent. India has thereforeargued for an open, inclusive Asiansecurity architecture to be evolved bythe powers of the region itself. We facecommon challenges of proliferation,terrorism, and maritime security andneed to find a way to ensure the peaceand stability that is essential to ourfutures.What is the role of emerging powersin this situation? First, a problem ofdefinition. Many of these so calledemerging countries are really reemergingpowers, better described asrapidly developing countries ratherthan as rising powers. Today, the worldis fortunate to have several growthpoles simultaneously in East Asia,South Asia, South East Asia, the Gulfand in <strong>Africa</strong>.The larger countries in thiscategory, (irrespective of whether youAugust 2011-January 2012 153

D O C U M E N T S / S P E E C H E S(Left to right) President Dmitry Medvedev of of Russia, President Lula da Silva of Brazil, President Hu Jintao of the People’s Republic of Chinaand Prime Minister Manmohan Singh of India at the BRICS Summit in Brasilia in Brazil on April 16, 2010.call them rising or emerging powers),are likely to continue to have severalpoor people even as they accumulatepower in the international system,unlike the situation in the 19th or 20thcenturies when Europe and NorthAmerica developed. They are thereforeunlikely to behave as the older ortraditional powers did, and theirdomestic imperatives will take priorityin policy formulation. I can only speakfor India, and give you one Indian’sview on the role of so-called emergingpowers. We in India still have a longway to go in realising our domestic goalof transforming India to the pointwhere each Indian has the opportunityto fully realise his potential. The scale ofour domestic task is enormous, and fora long time to come our primaryresponsibility will be to sustain the paceof inclusive growth at home. I remembera Chinese friend saying once thatthe best contribution that India andChina can make to global foodsecurity is to feed themselves. There isconsiderable truth in that.Over the last two decades years Indiahas averaged over 6 percent growth,which has accelerated to between 8-9percent in the last five years. With adomestic savings rate of 35 percent andinvestment rate slightly higher than thatthe economy can sustain high growthrates. India’s economic prospects aregood and the fundamentals are strong.We also recognise that we live in anincreasingly interdependent world andthat India’s own success is increasinglybound to the fate of the rest of the world.When we began economic reformstwenty years ago only about 14 percentWe recognise that welive in an increasinglyinterdependent worldand that India’s ownsuccess is increasinglybound to the fate ofthe rest of the worldof our GDP was related to the externaleconomy. Today, that proportion iscloser to 40 percent. (That figure isalmost twice that for China.) We will,therefore, work with our internationalpartners, contributing within ourcapacity to creating an enabling externalenvironment for the domestic transformationof India. That is what India andSaudi Arabia have attempted to dotogether in the G-20.This requires an external environmentof peace. It is important that ourstrategic partnership also extend tocreating that climate of peace workingtogether on issues of regional security.For India Saudi Arabia and the Gulfare vital partners. Almost 6 millionIndians live and work here, and ourtrade is now over 100 billion dollars ayear. India has a stake in issues relatingto peace and stability in the wider Gulfregion including Iran and Iraq.India and Saudi Arabia enjoy cordialand friendly relations reflectingcenturies of economic and social ties.The landmark visit of His Majesty KingAbdullah bin Abdulaziz to India inJanuary 2006 opened a new chapter inIndia-Saudi Arabia relations, which wascarried forward by the visit of PrimeMinister Manmohan Singh in 2010,giving new impetus to our strategicpartnership.One thing I can assure you. Indiawill not be like the traditional big powers.Mrs Indira Gandhi used to say Indiawill be a different power, a power thatworks for development, peace andinternational understanding, in its owninterest and in that of its friends andpartners abroad, Asia is not Europe andour indigenous strategic cultures arestrong and lasting. I am confident that,working together, India and the Gulfwill be able to face the challenges thatthe new geopolitics are throwing up andtake advantage of the opportunities thatthese changes are opening up. n154August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Y‘Energy the most fundamentalelement in development’Minister of State for Petroleum and Natural Gas and Corporate Affairs R.P.N. Singh at the valedictory session of the3rd India-<strong>Africa</strong> Hydrocarbons Conference in New Delhi on December 10, 2011. To his left is India’s Foreign Secretary Ranjan Mathai.Address by Foreign Secretary RanjanMathai at the India <strong>Africa</strong> HydrocarbonConference in New Delhi10/12/2011Iam honoured to have theopportunity to address theparticipants of the India-<strong>Africa</strong>Hydrocarbon Conference. Thehigh participation in the third edition ofthe Conference demonstrates thesuccess of the Conference and the factthat India and <strong>Africa</strong> can do a lot together.India and <strong>Africa</strong> have deep historicallinks from the time the valleys of Nileand Indus were cradles to the earliestcivilisations of the world. We had linksthrough trade and commerce across theIndian Ocean throughout history. (Thewest coast of India in particular.) Someof these linkages were weakened duringthe colonial era. Now, India and <strong>Africa</strong>have a renewed partnership in politicaland economic endeavours. The growthcentres of the world are shifting fromWest and North to East and South andwe see <strong>Africa</strong> as an emerging growthpole of the world. We are clear that inreforming the UN Security Councilthere has to be appropriate representationfor <strong>Africa</strong> as well as India asPermanent Members. As emergingeconomies both India and the nations of<strong>Africa</strong> have a lot of complementarities,which need to be exploited to their fullpotential in order to fulfill the developmentalaspirations of our citizens.Earlier this year, we reaffirmed ourabiding commitment to working withour <strong>Africa</strong>n partners at the Second India-<strong>Africa</strong> Forum Summit in Addis Ababa inMay 2011. Addressing the Summit ourPrime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singhsaid; I quote: ‘We (therefore) need a newspirit of solidarity among developingcountries. We must recognise that in thisglobalised age we all live inter-connectedlives in a small and fragile planet. Wemust work together to uplift the lives ofour people in a manner that preservesthe sustainability of our common air,land and water.’And let me add — that energy is themost fundamental element indevelopment, i.e., the process by whichthe lives of people are uplifted — asmentioned by our Prime Minister.Working together in the field of energyis therefore critical to our partnership.Let me assure you that while we mayspeak of <strong>Africa</strong> as a continent, we havethe highest respect for the uniqueidentity and individuality of each country.At the Summit, India announcedfresh Lines of Credit worth US$5 billionover the next three years and anadditional $700 million grant assistancefor human resource development,transfer of technology, and buildingnew institutions and trainingprogrammes. Areas of cooperation thatAugust 2011-January 2012 155

D O C U M E N T S / S P E E C H E Shave accorded high priority includeenergy and infrastructure development,capacity-building, agriculture, health,food security and technologycooperation. In the Ministry of ExternalAffairs we are working to develop theseprogrammes country to countrykeeping in mind that each country hasspecific requirements; but manysuccessful programmes in health andeducation span a number of countries.Turning to Energy in the India <strong>Africa</strong>relationship: Let me say that I am happyto hear about the Conference outcomewith ideas for new paradigms in ourenergy relationship with <strong>Africa</strong>. We cansee three particular complementarities:From the perspective of energycooperation between India and <strong>Africa</strong>,the first, and the most obvious, is thecomplementarity of resource endowmentsand supply-demand dynamics.<strong>Africa</strong> is estimated to have 9.5 percent ofglobal proven oil reserves, 7.9 percent ofthe proven global gas reserves and about3.8 percent of the global coal reserves.These estimates are likely to grow in thefuture and <strong>Africa</strong> is already one of themost lucrative energy destinations forinvestment. Outside the traditional areaof North <strong>Africa</strong>, the main focus has beenon West <strong>Africa</strong> and countries along theGulf of Guinea which have been seen asthe major locus of hydrocarbon reserves.But we have recently been informedabout substantial discoveries onshoreand offshore — in the East <strong>Africa</strong>nregion also (most recently in Uganda,Tanzania, and now off the coast ofMozambique). This should make us reevaluatethe geological potential of theentire Indian Ocean basin. On the otherhand, the Indian economy has been oneof growth stories of the world economy,but heavily dependant on imported energy.As a result, there has been a steadyincrease in India’s imports of crude oil,liqified natural gas (LNG) and otherpetroleum products from <strong>Africa</strong>. Toquote an example, even on a year-onyearbasis, our crude oil imports from<strong>Africa</strong> have steadily increased from 15.68percent in 2009 to 20.62 percent in thefirst ten months of 2010. Therefore, wewould naturally be seeking commercialpartners in <strong>Africa</strong> to meet large portionsof India’s energy needs through importsof crude oil, LNG and other petroleumand energy products. This makes for atruly win-win proposition as ourpartners seek assured markets.The second is that of structuralcomplementarities in the hydrocarbonsector. <strong>Africa</strong> is not only a geographywell endowed with hydrocarbonresources; it also represents a number ofdynamic countries whose own demandfor fuel, petroleum products, technologies,jobs, skills and investments is onthe rise. This opens avenues to explorefor more opportunities for equityinvestment in the <strong>Africa</strong>n markets andtwo way tie-ups. With our provenexpertise in refining, consultancy,training and infrastructural developments,we perceive potential formutually beneficial business tie-ups. It isin this spirit that at the second <strong>Africa</strong>India Forum Summit in Addis Ababa,India has offered large numbers ofTraining positions to <strong>Africa</strong>n nationalsWe have noalternative but to buildon our success inharnessing renewableenergy, e<strong>special</strong>lysolar, wind andbiomassin Oil & Natural Gas sector (nearly 450positions), and Hydro, thermal, PowerGrid sector (nearly 370 positions).The third complementarity is that ofenergy poverty and energy access. Weare all familiar with the fact themillions in our countries have no accessto commercial energy. India has beenan ardent advocate of renewableenergy in the international arena,particularly in popularising the conceptof ‘Energy Access for All.’ We do thisboth because of the requirement ofenergy and to tackle the need for a lesscarbon intensive energy future. It isclear from the International ClimateChange Conferences (including theone underway now at Durban) that theadvanced industrial countries see thetransition to an era of new energysources and environmental technologies,as a means to retain theirtechnological and industrial edge overthe rest of us. We have no alternativebut to build on our success so far inharnessing renewable energy, e<strong>special</strong>lysolar, wind and biomass. We have toexpand cooperation between <strong>Africa</strong> andIndia in this sector in terms of trainingand capacity building, as we in thetropical regions have some advantagesin these sectors. But we need a bridgeto the bright new era of renewables,and for this we would have to rely onincreased production and distributionof natural gas that is relatively lesscarbon intensive than coal, whichbrings us back to cooperation andcollaboration in hydrocarbons.I understand that there have beensome very fruitful deliberations in the3rd India-<strong>Africa</strong> HydrocarbonConference, making it a very successfuland mutually beneficial undertaking.The range of activities and discussionheld in these two days are evidence of theresolve with which India and the <strong>Africa</strong>ncountries wish to develop their relationshipin the hydrocarbon sector. I am surethat with the passage of time, thisenergy relationship between India andthe nations of <strong>Africa</strong> would develop intoa very symbiotic relationship, extendingbeyond the hydrocarbon cooperationagreements and joint working groups, toa situation where we are jointly able toprovide affordable energy to ourrespective people and fulfill theirdevelopment aspirations. In a sense thismakes us geo-economic and strategicpartners and I hope by the time of the 4thConference, some of what you havediscussed today, will start becoming areality.I also take this opportunity to congratulateMinistry of Petroleum andNatural Gas and the Federation of IndianChambers of Commerce and Industry(FICCI) for successful organisation ofthe 3rd India-<strong>Africa</strong> HydrocarbonConference, which deals with the vitalsubject of energy security, one of thepriorities of Indian foreign policy. n156August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YEmerging poles of powerExtract from the speech by ForeignSecretary Ranjan Mathai at theConference on ‘Economic Policies forEmerging Economies’ in New Delhi14/12/2011During the deliberationstoday you may have dealtwith definitional issues inthe context of the emergenceof “emerging economies”, andjust how many economies fit thedescription. It is, therefore, not myintention to go back to the GoldmanSachs Global Economics PaperNumber 66, which brought Brazil,Russia, India and China (BRICs), intothe jargon of international discourse.But the last ten years have propelledBRICs further forward in popular imagination,as well as much as in the realityof their contribution to the globaleconomy. Obviously Indonesia, Mexicoand Turkey and some other countriesmay need to be added to the acronym.Or just as we have IBSA we could havefurther sets of emerging economies whoacquire prominence when groupedtogether. Such groupings are arbitraryas the emerging economies are notnecessarily cohesive. But whethercollectively or severally the emergingeconomies are set to become poles ofeconomic and political power in a multipolarworld. Such predictions are bynature dangerous. In the 1960s HermanKahn had more or less convinced somethat by the end of the century we wouldall need to speak Japanese to survive.There are other examples to show that— in the long run not only are we alldead but all our predictions are dead!Now, the Financial Times ofDecember 7 carried the headline ‘Brazilgrowth shudders to halt’. The articlesuggests a somewhat eager anticipationof a hard landing or slowdown for allfour BRICs countries. Some slowingmay be inevitable over time but to drawa conclusion that the long-term trendsare negative is probably a case of prematureschadenfreude. However, policieshave clearly to be set in place if the trendlines are to stay steady. Evidence fromthe growth path of China and India showthat there are key features of theeconomic environment that are necessaryto sustain growth, hence good pointersto the economic policies necessary:(i) The liberal open economic orderbuilt over the last sixty years with,stable trading rules, a reliableinternational reserve currency,protected commons through whichmerchandise and invisibles can beexchanged globally, has been identifiedby Ashley Tellis as a key enabler.(ii) India’s case is not one of trade-drivengrowth. But the unleashing ofanimal spirits which has enabled us toleverage a 34 percent savings rate, isnot purely a domestically drivenmechanism. The success stories ofIndian software professionals weremade possible through integration inglobal communication networks andthe relatively open system of tradingin services. Global success of theservices sector imparted newimagination and confidence to ourcountry, apart from financing a boomin domestic consumption, andcreating a wider domestic consensuson the benefits of participation in theglobal economy.Emerging countries would,therefore, do well to play their part inpreserving the viability of global regimesand systems of trade and transport,tweaking them to remove distortionswhich deliberately work against them.But individually or as a group, emergingeconomies must encourage greateremphasis on trade and connectivity.A second critical area is the policiesthat affect our energy choices. There isno getting away from the fact that eventoday sustained growth will require whatLenin called ‘electrifizia’. With 40percent of the population still withoutaccess to commercial energy in India oneof the greatest challenges of economicpolicy is to stimulate energy investments,efficiencies and innovations.As the recent Durban discussionsshowed, there will be continuedpressure to slow down the emergence ofemerging countries, through mechanismsof legally binding agreementswhich would curtail critical energy andinfrastructure development. In our owninterest, as much as in our responsibilityfor the planet, emerging economies haveno alternative but to become Greenfocussed economies within onegeneration. This will call for a technologicalrevolution, which points to anotherset of economic policies necessary.Emerging economies will have to takeaccount of the fact that their spectaculargrowth in the last 2-3 decades began atlow levels of development. Most hadresources that remained underemployedbecause of lack of opportunities or lack ofwhat Tellis calls ‘catalysing mechanisms’.Economic reform helped with factoraccumulation, and at the same time theemerging economies benefited from the‘late industrialisation’ syndrome of usingproduction techniques, technologies andprocesses already tried and testedelsewhere. In telecom, for example, wewere able to leapfrog an entire stage ofdevelopment and did not have to dig upthe whole country with copper wire fora nation-wide landline network, beforemoving as we have to a stage where over800 million people have telecomconnectivity. The future will depend to amuch greater extent on productivity. Ofcourse, availability of capital, technology,higher education and efficient infrastructurewill be necessary. But as an ADBstudy looking at the year 2030 notes“what will differentiate countries is theirability to adopt technologies — the skilllevel of workforce, appropriate capital andinfrastructure, openness to trade andFDI, and more generally the investmentclimate”. The so called demographicdividend can be one only if productivitygains become the norm.nAugust 2011-January 2012 157

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L Y■ Contributors■ K. MATHEWS is Professor of International Relations at the Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia. Earlier, he was Professor of<strong>Africa</strong>n Studies and the Head of the Department at the University of Delhi. He has lectured in several leadinguniversities in <strong>Africa</strong> for 20 years with over 90 publications to his credit, including his widely referred book, <strong>Africa</strong>, India andSouth-South Cooperation (edited in collaboration with N.N. Vohra).■ SANJUKTA BANERJI BHATTACHARYA is Professor of International Relations at the Department of InternationalRelations, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India. She taught History at Delhi University and Gargi College before joiningJadavpur University. She has written three books and has published over 50 articles in national and international journals andedited volumes to her credit. She has also received the prestigious Fulbright Fellowship twice, in 1987 and 2004.Her academic interests include foreign relations, Third World studies, conflict resolution and American Studies.■ RAJIV BHATIA is a retired career diplomat. He has served as India’s High Commissioner to South <strong>Africa</strong>, Lesotho,and Kenya. He is a Visiting Senior Research Fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore.■ PROF PAUL MUSILI WAMBUA is Associate Professor of Maritime and Commercial Law at the University of NairobiSchool of Law.■ MUMO NZAU is Lecturer of Political Science at Catholic University of Eastern <strong>Africa</strong>.■ SIMON FREEMANTLE is Senior Analyst, <strong>Africa</strong>n Political Economy Unit, at Standard Bank Research.■ MANISH CHAND is Editor of <strong>Africa</strong> Quarterly, a journal focused on India-<strong>Africa</strong> relations and <strong>Africa</strong>n issues. He is SeniorEditor with IANS, a leading Indian media company. He has written widely on international issues and presented papers on the<strong>Africa</strong>n resurgence and the rise of emerging powers in the <strong>Africa</strong>n continent.■ DANILO MARCONDES DE SOUZA NETO is a Professor at the Institute of International Relations at PontificalCatholic University in Rio de Janeiro.■ ESTEFANÍA MARCHÁN is a Researcher at Latin American Studies Programme, at Gateway House: Indian Council onGlobal Relations, a think tank based in Mumbai.■ DARLENE K. MUTALEMWA is a Lecturer and Researcher at Mzumbe University, Dar es Salaam Campus College,Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania.■ DEO P. MUTALEMWA is a development economist consultant and a former international civil servant living in Tanzania.■ ALEXANDRA ARKHANGELSKAYA teaches at the Institute for <strong>Africa</strong>n Studies in the Russian Academy ofSciences, Moscow.■ SANDEEP CHAKRAVORTY is a senior diplomat in India’s Ministry of External Affairs. He has travelled to many <strong>Africa</strong>ncountries and written on <strong>Africa</strong>n issues. He is currently Director (China and East Asia) in the Ministry of External Affairs,New Delhi.■ RANJIT KUMAR is Diplomatic Editor with Navbharat Times, a leading Hindi Daily. He is the author of the bookSouth Asian Union.■ MANENDRA SAHU is Senior Lecturer at the Centre for <strong>Africa</strong>n Studies, University of Mumbai. He <strong>special</strong>ises onenergy issues in <strong>Africa</strong>.■ SHUBHA SINGH is a senior journalist and has been writing on foreign affairs for over two decades. She is the author oftwo books on Indian diaspora, Fiji: A Precarious Coalition and Overseas Indians: The Global Family.■ MAURICE N. AMUTABI (Ph.D) is Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences,The Catholic University of Eastern <strong>Africa</strong>.158August 2011-January 2012

A F R I C A Q U A R T E R L YNote to Contributors<strong>Africa</strong> Quarterly, published since 1961, is devoted to the study and objective analyses of <strong>Africa</strong>n affairs andissues related to India-<strong>Africa</strong> relations. Contributions are invited from outstanding writers, experts and <strong>special</strong>istsin India, <strong>Africa</strong> and other countries on various political, economic, social-cultural, literary, philosophicaland other themes pertaining to <strong>Africa</strong>n affairs and India-<strong>Africa</strong> relations. Preference will be givento those articles which deal succinctly with issues that are both important and clearly defined. Articles whichare purely narrative and descriptive and lacking in analytical content are not likely to be accepted.Contributions should be in a clear, concise, readable style and written in English.Articles submitted to <strong>Africa</strong> Quarterly should be original contributions and should not be under considerationby any other publication at the same time. The Editor is responsible for the selection and acceptanceof articles, but responsibility for errors of facts and opinions expressed in them rests with authors. Manuscriptssubmitted should be accompanied with a statement that the same has not been submitted/accepted for publicationelsewhere. Copyright of articles published in the <strong>Africa</strong> Quarterly will be retained by the IndianCouncil for Cultural Relations (ICCR).Manuscripts submitted to <strong>Africa</strong> Quarterly should be typed double space on one side of the paper and twocopies should be sent. A diskette (3 ½” ) MS-Dos compatible, and e-mail as an attachment should be sentalong with the two hard copies. Authors should clearly indicate their full name, address, e-mail, academicstatus and current institutional affiliation. A brief biographical note (one paragraph) about the writer mayalso be sent.The length of the article should not normally exceed 7,000 to 8,000 words, or 20 to 25 ( A-4 size) typedpages in manuscript. Titles should be kept as brief as possible.Footnote numbering should be clearly marked and consecutively numbered in the text and notes placedat the end of the article and not at the bottom of the relevant page. Tables (including graphs, maps, figures)must be submitted in a form suitable for reproduction on a separate sheet of paper and not within the text.Each table should have a clear descriptive title and mention where it is to be placed in the article. Place allfootnotes in a table at the end of the article. Reference numbers within the text should be placed after thepunctuation mark.Footnote style: In the case of books, the author, title of the book, place of publication, publisher, dateof publication and page numbers should be given in that order, e.g. Basil Davidson, ‘The Blackman’sBurden: <strong>Africa</strong> and the Curse of the Nation State’, London, James Curry, 1992, pp. 15-22.In the case of articles, the author, title of article, name of the journal, volume and issue number in brackets,the year and the page numbers should be given in that order.In addition to major articles and research papers, <strong>Africa</strong> Quarterly also publishes short articles in the sectiontitled News & Events. They may not exceed 2,000 words in length. Contributions of short stories andpoems are also welcome.Contributors to <strong>Africa</strong> Quarterly are entitled to two copies of the issue in which their article appears inaddition to a modest honorarium. Contributors of major articles accepted for publication will receive up toa maximum of `4,000.Contributions may be sent by post to:The Editor<strong>Africa</strong> QuarterlyIndian Council for Cultural RelationsAzad BhavanIndraprastha EstateNew Delhi-110 002Contributions may be e-mailed to:africa.<strong>quarterly</strong>@gmail.comAugust 2011-January 2012 159

Indian Council for Cultural RelationsAzad BhavanIndraprastha EstateNew Delhi — 110 002E-mail: africa.<strong>quarterly</strong>@gmail.comRegistered with the Registrar of Newspapers of IndiaRegd No. 14380/61