download the report - International Campaign for Tibet

Rukhag 3: The Nuns of Drapchi Prison126considered provocative, upon which Pema Butri knocked her to the floor and struck her with a belt. Another, Phuntsog127Choekyi (lay name Dekyi), of Garu Nunnery, suffered from a broken arm but was given no medical treatment. Two othernuns who were reportedly singled out for particular abuse by Pema Butri were “Goekyi” (ordained Ngawang Kaldrol), a Garunun detained in 1993 along with Phuntsog Choekyi; and Phuntsog Palyang, a Garu nun detained in 1994. 128By early afternoon on 4 May, the PAP, police, and Pema Butri withdrew from “old rukhag 3”, locking the women into theircells and leaving them to cope as best they could with their injuries. Reports concur that Ngawang Sangdrol was in the mostserious condition. Choeying Gyaltsen, who assisted in first aid, reports, “She was hit on the head with a belt [so] a lot of bloodflowed from her head. When we washed her head, during the third time the water [...] still became red in the bowl.” 129Norzin Wangmo adds:“She was to be put in solitary confinement, but all the solitary confinement cells were full, from the first of May.[...] For three days Ani Sangdrol didn't lift up her head. When she had to go to urinate, she wasn't able to pull upher shirt without help. She didn't [move her bowels] for 15 days. She got an illness inside. Then [the authorities]gave her medicine, but the medicine was useless. Then she was given powdered milk in cold water, and she stayedon a cold cement floor, and then she got diarrhoea.” 130Neither the protest of 1 May, which involved only the nuns of “new rukhag 3”, nor that of 4 May, which embroiled the womenof “old rukhag 3”, would be quickly resolved. Repercussions would continue to occur in the form of a punitive regimen formore than a year.38