13.07.2015 Views

A Review of the Evidence - Search CIMMYT repository

A Review of the Evidence - Search CIMMYT repository

A Review of the Evidence - Search CIMMYT repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

observed in <strong>the</strong> double cross unexpectedly exceeded <strong>the</strong> yield decline observed in some <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> single crosses. Also once again, <strong>the</strong> yield <strong>of</strong> an OPV planted as a check was alwayssuperior to advanced generations <strong>of</strong> hybrids. But a noteworthy new result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> secondtrial was <strong>the</strong> finding that yields do not necessarily continue to decline after <strong>the</strong> secondgeneration; in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> single cross H-34, yield actually increased in <strong>the</strong> F3 and F4generations (Figure 3).In ano<strong>the</strong>r on-station trial conducted in a tropical lowland region <strong>of</strong> Mexico, RamírezVallejo et al. (1986) evaluated <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> seed recycling on <strong>the</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> threedouble-cross hybrids (H-503, H-507, H-510). With all three hybrids, F1 plants yielded betterthan advanced-generation progeny and better than a check OPV, V-522 (Table 17). After fivecycles <strong>of</strong> inbreeding, <strong>the</strong> yield decline averaged 16%. Virtually <strong>the</strong> entire yield declineoccurred between <strong>the</strong> F1 and F2 generations; an equilibrium was reached in subsequentgenerations, as no statistically significant changes in yield were observed between <strong>the</strong> F2and F5/F6 generations. Ramírez Vallejo et al. (1986) emphasize, however, that no selectionpressure was applied during <strong>the</strong> trial, and <strong>the</strong>y speculate that had selection pressure beenapplied (e.g., to simulate farmers’ selection practices), <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> advanced-generationprogeny might well have outyielded <strong>the</strong> F2 plants.Yield (kg/ha)10,0009,0008,0007,0006,0005,0004,0003,0002,0001,0000, y, y, y, y, y, y,,,,,,-25%-5%,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,y ,, , y yCommercial seed (F1)Second-generation seed (F2)Third-generation seed (F3), y, y, y, y, y,,,,,,,,,,, y, y, y, y, yH-34 H-30 V-23(single cross) (double cross) (improved OPV)Figure 2. Effects <strong>of</strong> seed recycling on yields <strong>of</strong>two commercial maize hybrids, Mexico.Source: Espinosa Calderón et al. (1990)-42%Yield (kg/ha)12,000,, yy10,0008,0006,0004,000,,Second-generation seed (F2),,, yy,, yy,, yy,, yy,, yy,,,,,,, yy,,y,y,,y,,,,,,-51%Commercial seed (F1)+20%+10%-27%,,,,,,,,,,,,Third-generation seed (F3)Fourth-generation seed (F4),, yy,, yy ,,,, yy ,,, yy ,,,, yy, y, y, y, y2,000,, ,,,, ,,yy 0,,yH-34 , H-36 ,, ,, yyH-68 , , yH-33 V-23(single cross) (single cross) (single cross) (double cross) (improved OPV)Figure 3. Effects <strong>of</strong> seed recycling on yields <strong>of</strong> selectedmaize hybrids, Mexico.Source: Espinosa Calderón et al. (1993)-6%-29%Table 17. Yield decline in advanced generations <strong>of</strong> hybrids, Mexico41Generation <strong>of</strong> inbreedingF1 F1’ F2’ F3’ F4’ F5’H-503 4,194 3,577 3,213 2,586 3,097 3,160H-507 3,964 3,393 3,014 2,937 3,122 3,092H-510 4,239 3,473 2,781 3,302 2,710 3,216Mean 4,132 3,481 3,002 2,942 2,976 3,156Inbreeding depression (%) n.a. 16 27 29 28 24Source: Ramírez Vallejo et al. (1986).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!