13.07.2015 Views

A Review of the Evidence - Search CIMMYT repository

A Review of the Evidence - Search CIMMYT repository

A Review of the Evidence - Search CIMMYT repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In <strong>the</strong> same trial, no statistically significant difference was detected between <strong>the</strong>performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> advanced-generation hybrids and <strong>the</strong> three OPVs. Based on this finding,Pérez Rodas (1997) concludes that in cases in which F1 hybrid seed is unavailable orunaffordable, recycling <strong>of</strong> hybrids would be rational.Zambezi et al. (1997) and Kumwenda et al. (1996, 1997) describe a series <strong>of</strong> on-farm trialscarried out in Malawi with <strong>the</strong> objective <strong>of</strong> evaluating <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> seed recycling on twosingle-cross hybrids (MH12 and MH16), one three-way-cross hybrid (NSCM41), and twotop-cross hybrids (MH17 and MH18). One landrace (LFM) and one improved OPV(Chitedze Composite C, or CCC) were also included for comparative purposes. Between <strong>the</strong>F1 and F2 generations, recycled hybrids suffered marked declines in yield (Table 19).Averaged across three levels <strong>of</strong> fertilization, inbreeding depression was greater in <strong>the</strong>single-cross hybrids (24-33%) than in <strong>the</strong> three-way crosses (22%) or in <strong>the</strong> top crosses (16-21%). A much greater degree <strong>of</strong> inbreeding depression was observed in <strong>the</strong> unfertilizedtreatments. An additional generation <strong>of</strong> recycling (from F2 to F3) produced less inbreedingdepression in both <strong>the</strong> single-cross and <strong>the</strong> top-cross hybrids; in several cases, F3 plantsoutyielded F2 plants, especially in unfertilized treatments.In this trial, many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> advanced-generation hybrids maintained <strong>the</strong>ir yield advantageover <strong>the</strong> improved OPV and <strong>the</strong> landrace. In general <strong>the</strong> top-cross hybrids toleratedrecycling better than <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r types <strong>of</strong> hybrids, although one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> recycled single crossesalso yielded well, particularly in <strong>the</strong> F3 generation (Figure 5). After one year <strong>of</strong> recycling,<strong>the</strong> recycled top crosses significantly outperformed <strong>the</strong> landrace, and after two years <strong>of</strong>recycling, <strong>the</strong>y outperformed both <strong>the</strong> OPV and <strong>the</strong> landrace. In addition to showing thatYield (kg/ha)9,0008,0007,0006,0005,0004,0003,0002,0001,000Third-generation seed (F3), y,y,y,y, y,y,y,yy,y,y,y,y,,yy,,y,y,y,yy,y,y,, , y,y,,yy,,y,y,y,yy,y,y,, , y,y,,yy,,y,y,y,yy,y,y,,y,y,,yy,,,,,,,,,,y,y,y,yy,y,y,, , y,y,,yy,,y,y,y,yy,y,y,, , y,y,,yy,,y,y,y,yy,y,y,, , y,y,,yy,,y,y,y,yy,y,y,, , y,y,,yy,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0,,,y,,HE-9103 HE-9101 HE-9122 HB-85 HB-9126 HE-9124 HA-46 HA-28 ICTA LM-7442 LM-7442 LM-7843DC DC DC (DC) DC DC TWC (TWC) B1(OPV) (OPV) (OPV) (OPV)Figure 4. Effects <strong>of</strong> seed recycling on yields <strong>of</strong> selected maize cultivars, Guatemala.Source: Pérez Rodas (1997).Note: DC = double-cross hybrid, TWC = three-way-cross hybrid, and OPV = open-pollinated variety43Commercial seed (F1)Second-generation seed (F2)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!